Hi,
Oct 3 17:34:08 sky named[12837]: REFUSED unexpected RCODE resolving
'LibreSsl.cOM/A/IN': 2001:4b98:d:1::4b#53
Oct 3 17:34:08 sky named[12837]: REFUSED unexpected RCODE resolving
'wWw.LibResSL.ORg//IN': 2001:4b98:d:1::4b#53
Oct 3 17:34:08 sky named[12837]: REFUSED unexpected RCODE reso
On 2014-04-27, Michał Lesiak wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
>> That's not a good plan at all. Sometimes, new binaries work on
>> old versions and vice versa, but in general, that's not the case.
>> So if you ship packages for 5.2-stable (well, actu
Hi Theo,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Huh? You've understood incorrectly. Each release of OpenBSD is ABI
> incompatible
> with the previous, or next. We make no promises about ABI. Making such
> promises
> would be incompatible with making progress. If you want
>Ok, got it. My understanding was that binaries complied on older systems have a
>better chance of running correctly on newer systems than the other way around.
Huh? You've understood incorrectly. Each release of OpenBSD is ABI
incompatible
with the previous, or next. We make no promises about
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> That's not a good plan at all. Sometimes, new binaries work on
> old versions and vice versa, but in general, that's not the case.
> So if you ship packages for 5.2-stable (well, actually, 5.2-obsolete),
> you force your users to
Hi Michal,
Michal Lesiak wrote on Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:01:54PM +0200:
> I know, but I'll never know what ancient versions my users will use,
> so I'm using a (reasonably) old version to build the package and
> compile stuff to retain some backwards-compatibility.
That's not a good plan at all
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> > I'm working on 5.2 version.
>
> That's unsupported for nearly a year now.
> Consider upgrading to 5.5 after May 1.
I know, but I'll never know what ancient versions my users will use, so I'm
using a (reasonably) old version to
some previous
> versions.
> I'm working on 5.2 version.
That's unsupported for nearly a year now.
Consider upgrading to 5.5 after May 1.
> 1. I have a custom "rc_register()" sub defined in my .rc script, but
> I cannot make rc subsystem recognize that - trying to
some previous versions.
> I'm working on 5.2 version.
>
> 1. I have a custom "rc_register()" sub defined in my .rc script, but I
> cannot make rc subsystem recognize that - trying to run that ends with
> calling rc_usage(). I've checked up (briefly) rc.subr
Hello,
I'm converting a .rc script made by someone a coupe of years ago for the
same product I'm currently working on. It's important for this tale as
this may mean that this actually worked for some previous versions.
I'm working on 5.2 version.
1. I have a custom
02.08.2008 14:28, Pau wrote:
I am using an old FJS lifebook P7010 and everything works just fine...
wireless, sound, X, apm -C keeps it relatively silent and if you get
the second battery, you'll get a 1.8Kg sub-notebook running obsd for
about 6 hours
I believe the newer FJS lifebooks are
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:55:49PM -0600, Anathae Townsend wrote:
> Besides the ASUS EEEPCs, has anyone tried to get other sub-notebooks working
> under OpenBSD?
>
> Two computers I am thinking of are the MSI WIND (street price around $550
> canadian) and the Acer Aspire One A1
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Anathae Townsend wrote:
> Besides the ASUS EEEPCs, has anyone tried to get other sub-notebooks working
> under OpenBSD?
http://openbsd.org/zaurus.html
-d
I am using an old FJS lifebook P7010 and everything works just fine...
wireless, sound, X, apm -C keeps it relatively silent and if you get
the second battery, you'll get a 1.8Kg sub-notebook running obsd for
about 6 hours
I believe the newer FJS lifebooks are much more noisy and have a
re
Anathae Townsend wrote:
Besides the ASUS EEEPCs, has anyone tried to get other sub-notebooks working
under OpenBSD?
I tried a Fujutsu P1120 a while back. Everything worked except the
touchscreen, and I understand that was fixed since then, but I haven't
had a chance to try it. Pro
On 08/01/2008 14:55, Anathae Townsend wrote:
Besides the ASUS EEEPCs, has anyone tried to get other sub-notebooks working
under OpenBSD?
I used Sharp Zaurus SL-c3200 with OpenBSD/arm for a while. OpenBSD port
is great and its probably the smallest device to run OpenBSD.
If you need
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:55:49PM -0600, Anathae Townsend wrote:
> Besides the ASUS EEEPCs, has anyone tried to get other sub-notebooks working
> under OpenBSD?
>
>
>
> Two computers I am thinking of are the MSI WIND (street price around $550
> canadian) and the Acer
Besides the ASUS EEEPCs, has anyone tried to get other sub-notebooks working
under OpenBSD?
Two computers I am thinking of are the MSI WIND (street price around $550
canadian) and the Acer Aspire One A110-1955 (street price around $380
canadian)
Anathae
Thanks to all for your replies.
relayd seems to be what I'm looking for.
BR,
Markus
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-04-28, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to have PF redirecting traffic based on sub-domains? I.e. I
want traffic to a.mydomain.nu to be redirected to
On 2008-04-28, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to have PF redirecting traffic based on sub-domains? I.e. I
>> want traffic to a.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'a and traffic
>> to b.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'b&#x
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Markus Bergkvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to have PF redirecting traffic based on sub-domains? I.e. I
> want traffic to a.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'a and traffic to
> b.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Markus Bergkvist <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have PF redirecting traffic based on sub-domains? I.e. I
> want traffic to a.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'a and traffic
> to b.mydomain.nu to b
> -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Im Auftrag von Markus Bergkvist
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. April 2008 23:45
> An: OpenBSD Misc
> Betreff: Redirect traffic based on sub-domain?
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have P
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Markus Bergkvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have PF redirecting traffic based on sub-domains? I.e. I
> want traffic to a.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'a and traffic to
> b.mydomain.nu to be redi
Hi,
Is it possible to have PF redirecting traffic based on sub-domains? I.e.
I want traffic to a.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'a and
traffic to b.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'b'.'
/Markus
Hi,
I know we have the laptop web page, but it seems to be a bit old. I
know because I posted two entries some months ago and they never
showed up... or maybe the quality was miserable... don't know...
Anyway...
I am looking for a sub/notebook, of ~1.2 kg (2.something maximum),
with a
Is it possible that I could do something like a better sorting using
Tables and PF?
I mean overload is a great function but if I use it for serval Ports
I've (as far as I know) to use multiple Tables if I wanna know who e.g.
does SSH-Brute-Forces or who does HTTP-CGI-Scanning and such crap.
In fa
28 matches
Mail list logo
