On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:12:48 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> about 4 different sources in order to learn enough to start experimenting..
pf.conf
calomel.org
building firewalls with openbsd
Do you have the other sources you used, to hand at all?
I have a pretty good idea but it never stays
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:53:57 -0500
Neal Hogan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> > On 09/15/10 13:41, Neal Hogan wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Bambero wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to know, is OpenBSD 4.8 ready now ?
> >>> Release date is 01
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:53:58 +0200
Bambero wrote:
> Yes, it seems to be the best way.
>
> Does anyone know that may I use 4.7 instalation CD to install 4.8 sets ?
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Dunceor wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Bambero wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd lik
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:08:57 +0200
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Kevin Chadwick [2010-09-15 18:14]:
> > > Does anyone know that may I use 4.7 instalation CD to install 4.8 sets ?
> > Yep, but the shasums will fail, however it will continue and tell you
> > them, so
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:59:07 -0600 (MDT)
li...@telus.net wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2010, J Sisson wrote:
> > Is something stopping you from using install48.iso to install?
>
> Installing via FTP is simply a habit I developed a long time ago (before
> an install ISO was made available). I just downloa
I noticed the -w option to spamd but couldn't find any info for an
appropriate setting via google or the mailing lists.
I imagine spamd needs a very small recv buffer and so this option is
there for good reason. I hope I will never need this setting but having
it set for more efficiency can't hurt
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:45:00 +0200
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) wrote:
> My boxes have been running with -w 1 for a few years, doesn't seem to
> scare them off, unfortunately:
I'll try -w 666 and see if that works.
I'll report back soon
p.s. Thanks
There is a much higher potential of variation of implementations of xens
and it is next to impossible to find out any particular hosts, xen
details.
If anyone has these details, maybe they could share, but you may have a
more reliable experience with a Linux KVM host.
arpnetworks.com (linux KVM)
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:51:48 -0700
patrick keshishian wrote:
>
> > Does openBSD has a boot manager like Grub or Boot0 for FreeBSD ?
>
> I don't think so.
>
Gag (written in assembly) is quite handy and allows you to select new
partitions on the fly.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:47:02 -0400
Brad Tilley wrote:
> Rikky Taylor wrote:
> > I was after some general advice. I need to setup a routing firewall with 3
> > interfaces, moderate traffic and a fair amount of NAT'ing in the rules.
> >
> >
> >
> > Given identical modern server hardware would I
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:32:27 +0200
Ross Cameron wrote:
>
> Thats just my 5c worth and I've always been of the opinion that at least two
> different skins of firewalls should be deployed, build ontop of different
> technologies.
> Makes life a lot harder for whomever you want to keep out.
>
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:53:57 +0100
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:32:27 +0200
> Ross Cameron wrote:
>
> >
> > Thats just my 5c worth and I've always been of the opinion that at least two
> > different skins of firewalls should be de
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:24:14 +0100
- Tethys wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Brad Tilley wrote:
>
> > I don't mean this as bashing Linux, just pointing out facts. I think
> > history shows that OpenBSD has a better track record here (if that means
> > anything to anyone).
>
> Does it
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:02:16 -0600
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > And isn't srandom sometimes (very rarely!) appropriate? E.g. for
> > generating encryption keys?
>
> hell no!
>
> srandom is definately worse than the arc4random generator.
>
> oh, but linux people told you it was the best. I get it
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:41:12 +0200
Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:42:04AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> > I have to build a new mail relay host, and would like to use spamd and
> > smtpd on OpenBSD. I'm required to provide antivirus scanning of mail
> > contents, however.
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:02:41 -0400
Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
> >> > And isn't srandom sometimes (very rarely!) appropriate? E.g. for
> >> > generating encryption keys?
>
> If arandom is somehow not appr
Just added a system to the network with a rage agp card and onboard
intel.
I've never liked the idea of a video card using system memory but am
under the impression that the intel driver support is better at the
moment in OpenBSD.
Which would you choose?
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:37:59 -0400
Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> > Is there noway to solve this with existing software, such as a compatible
> > but
> > limited driver ?
>
> Have you called up nvidia? You have a support contract, right?
>
I belie
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:33:00 +0200
Janne Johansson wrote:
> 2010/10/4 Kevin Chadwick
>
> > > I do love all this considerations. Just wondering by on earth entropy
> > > doesn't get much attention in a world where people seems so worried
> > > about securit
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:37:14 +0200
Daniel Gracia wrote:
> I do love all this considerations. Just wondering by on earth entropy
> doesn't get much attention in a world where people seems so worried
> about security and privacy.
Do you mean the world in general or the OpenBSD world.
I presume
>Then of course the tiiiny tiiiny problem of defining in code how to
>_prove_ that the input
>is random. Proving some input is skewed in one of 123 ways is easy and
>relatively fast,
>but proving that the input data will never fail a statistical test is..
>Hard.
If a situation is possible where a
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 05:54:18 +0900 (JST)
z6w...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> Thanks everybady for answering my stupid question.Seems like the cause
> wasn't
> DVD drive.I'm afraid of that I said stupid things.
>
> I haven't found
> informations of somebady who installs OpenBSD on this
> VAIO.However I fo
Alright, everyone
I came across "How to track port updates in stable" in the mailing list
archives.
http://openports.se looks cool but I can't find the stable branch and
the http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html seems to have stopped at 4.1.
Up untill now I've simply updated a current and stabl
hey might suggest to still use something
> > better.
> >
> > I know I am done with SATA drives experience have proven it just way
> > to clearly to me!
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> So I guess thats a vote for SATA? :)
>
> Actually, as I finished this post, I realized that once I bought some
> kind of adapter, I would be spending enough extra to just go ahead and
> get a bigger IDE without actually spending more total $.
>
> SCSI was nice, wasn't it!
>
--
Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:40:22 +0200
"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" wrote:
> "Bret S. Lambert" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 06:24:23AM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > > I've downloaded the bsd.rd and booted it with the same result - booting
> > > process stops at the same point. The system s
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:10:55 +0200
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:15:37AM -0400, Jeremy Chase wrote:
> > I found this article that claims 4.7's ftpd and sftp are vulnerable to DoS:
> >
> > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Flaw-in-libc-implementation-threatens-FTP-servers-1
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:03:05 -0400
William Yodlowsky wrote:
> On 7 October 2010 at 14:52, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> > I came across "How to track port updates in stable" in the mailing list
> > archives.
> >
> > http://openports.se looks cool but I
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 22:39:58 +0200
PPP2 wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 06:24:23AM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> >> > > I've downloaded the bsd.rd and booted it with the same result -
booting
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:27:45 +0400
Dmitry-T wrote:
> 11.10.10, 08:46, "Tomas Bodzar" :
>
> > 6) Did you test it on real OpenBSD, real HW and latest release or snapshot?
>http://bsdanywhere.org/faq
>" What is the primary focus of BSDanywhere?
>A mostly __unmodified__ OpenBSD kernel and userlan
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:34:22 +0400
Dmitry-T wrote:
> 11.10.10, 15:13, "Claudio Jeker" :
>
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:16:19PM +0200, Martin Pelikan wrote:
> > > 2010/10/11, Claudio Jeker :
> > > > CPU consumed by the kernel is not accounted by the scheduler. All the
> > > > work done by ur
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:17:37 +0400
Dmitry-T wrote:
> My test OpenBSD:
>
> load from livecd bsdanywhere46-amd64
>
> in different consoles:
>
> dd if=/dev/wd0c of=/dev/null bs=1m
> dd if=/dev/wd0c of=/dev/null bs=1m
> dd if=/dev/wd0c of=/dev/null bs=1m
> iostat
> top
>
> run:
> dd if=/dev/urand
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 01:12:03 +0200
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Much of the compliance efforts may look good on paper, but have
> > no impact on actual usage or may be trivially circumvented
>
> or even worse, will likely end up compromising security
> in case somebody aiming for "hardening" manipul
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 07:09:03 +0200
roberth wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:46:41 -0700
> patrick keshishian wrote:
>
> > as this, where -- the "mortal" is accused to be a whiner.
>
> (...)
>
> the key words were "every time this happens" ...
>
> if you find an error or something strange, mo
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:53:24 +0200
Jan Stary wrote:
> On Oct 16 19:20:32, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 05:46:24PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > (I have changed the subject,
> > > because the subject has changed.)
> > >
> > > On Oct 14 01:59:39, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > On T
This may already be known but I certainly didn't know about it, so
heres a heads up to all users.
There is a bug no. 6410 that may or may not be related to the one that
was apparently silently fixed in freebsd compilation whilst still
leaving user compilation with problems for a while.
"http://ww
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:10:44 +0200
"Benny LC6fgren" wrote:
> On 2010-10-17 12.57, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> > Summary
> > ---
> > My primary laptop ("nitrogen") died, so I moved its disk to a backup
> > laptop ("oxygen"). That laptop then died. :( I have now moved the
> > former-nitrogen-
At the last part of the install, just after timezone entry using
install48.iso.
"(Ramdisk_CD) #164 Oct 18 17:42:33"
An error message is given saying.
Uid0 on /: file system full
/: write failed , file system is full
sed: stdout: No space left on device
/bin/df gives
blocks us
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:45:44 +0200
Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Is there a way to force the speed of fans
IMHO this should be controlled by hardware but it isn't and nvidia have
started doing the same cheap rubbish with their gpus. I'm not sure about
what you can do with current and the x201 but if
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:45:18 +0200
Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> 1.5GHz VIA C7 CPU o an
> ATOM one?
No idea what the acceleration on this board brings to the party, but if
you do then bare in mind that;
1 atom mhz != 1 traditional i386 mhz
(see atom on wikipedia (varying types) for info)
Maybe th
On a streamlined kernel config I've been toying with
disabling /dev/ksyms but will probably leave it enabled. I've
read theo saying in the archive, something like netstat should be
updated to use the vmstat mechanisms but the nestat code is horrible
to work on.
Does netstat just use it for speed
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:56:26 +0200
Henning Brauer wrote:
> I hate all that widescreen
> shit. 14.1" 1400x1050 is awesome.
Hear, Hear. I'm not alone in the quest that gets harder every day.
I've seen a "revolutionary" panasonic tv advert recently that reckons
they're tv is "cinema proportion" at
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:48:51 +0200
Toni Mueller wrote:
> Also, Linux is better supported by hardware vendors, and/or much less
> picky about hardware than OpenBSD is.
>
Ironically, I've found a system, don't know whether it's bios setup or
what, I haven't put my finger on it yet but I can't bel
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 01:17:35 +0200
Henning Brauer wrote:
> > "Intel GM965 Video" rev 0x0c at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
> > What's "not configured" here?
>
> I have no idea :)
Does it have tv or vga out?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:30:25 +0200
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Claudio Jeker [2010-10-28 10:01]:
> > > > i have theorized in the past that the problem we face is
> > > > that an insufficient number of axe murderers are attending those kinds
> > > > of research meetings.
> > > Why not taking part o
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:38:11 +0300
Denis Doroshenko wrote:
> during the install I get kernel message that there is no space left on /
> the message pops up right after I enter the timezone
> is it so that the following command block fills up the ramdisk space?
>
> ( cd /mnt/usr/share/zoneinfo
>
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:26:14 -0500
Denny White wrote:
> Here ya go, bunkie, pump up those brave little fingers and scroll a
> couple of lines. And while you're at it, spray some of this all over
> your sorry ass:
Please don't abuse the trolls, it's not their fault they have fat
fingers.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
"James A. Peltier" wrote:
> No I cannot just put and get. Moving hundreds of gigabytes of medical
> imaging data around with FTP/SSH would be out of the question.
Why?
I imagine you know but FTP/SSH != sftp
Do you think ssh is too slow and unreliable?
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
"James A. Peltier" wrote:
> I was merely attempting to offer input as to why someone *might* require
> NFSv4.
Fair enough but you haven't convinced me, how about ipsec, nfsv3,
authpf etc, but I'd still investigate sftps applicability first.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
"James A. Peltier" wrote:
> That fact that I am choosing to use it is somewhat irrelevant to the thread
> but it exploded from the question of "why not to use NFSv4".
I thought the original thread was concluded quite quickly in that it
wasn't desired by
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:55:50 -0700
Sean Kamath wrote:
> It's a bitch
> to code in sftp support to every application that expects to operate on a
> file.
That's why I suggested the windows program that uses sftp as a windows
share that I happened to stumble across, but didn't log the name as it's
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:02:47 -0600 (MDT)
Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> SNIP
> > The US government mandates it and then when it gets to the people who
> > support it they use V4. It is a beautiful thing. Go committee design!
> >
> > Ask theo for his much
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:37:44 -0300
Marcos Laufer wrote:
> Yes , i know i should upgrade . Six months ago i upgraded this machine
> from 3.4 to 4.3 version by version,
> and it took a long offline time so i had to stay at 4.3 temporarily ,
> and i was planning to upgrade it again from 4.3 to 5.0
I have a machine that will primarily be used for web surfing but it has
a radeon 128 which causes some graphic defects under aperture=1. It
looks to me that aperture=2 would be quite a bit more 'evil' than
aperture=1 which most machines run fine under and so I'm going to switch
it for an nvidia car
> On Nov 08 20:43:21, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > which causes some graphic defects under aperture=1.
>
> What "graphic defects"? And what makes you think it's due to the radeon,
> and what makes you think it's du to the aperture=1?
>
It didn't dete
For future reference, does anyone know if modern ati and intel gpus
perform just as XwellX fast at aperture=1?
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:45:15 -0500
Joe McDonagh wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 09:09 AM, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > I just saw the v20z 4.8 dmesg on ajacoutot@ webpage and
> > noticed he was running i386 instead of 64-bit. Curious
> > if that is just a preference on his part or an issue
> > with running 6
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:39:35 +0100
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > Sorry, I should have specified that I have FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in
> > /etc/mk.conf.
I found when using fetch_packages I had to use make install rather than
make package. Hardly a big deal, but is that expected?
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:09:05 -0800 (PST)
James Hozier wrote:
> > From: Jacob Meuser
> > Subject: Re: Azalia "No
> Problem" but no Audio
> > To: misc@openbsd.org
> > Date: Thursday, November 11,
> 2010, 11:18 PM
> >
> > unless you're willing to send me your machine or one like
> > it for keeps,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:51:49 -0500
Jeremy Chase wrote:
> 2010/11/11 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera :
> > On 10/05/10 12:47, Toma9 Vavys wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I would like to become helpful OpenBSD developer (pentester) one day,
> >> so I have a few questions.
> >>
> >> I am CompSci student at the mo
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:06:45 -0600
"L. V. Lammert" wrote:
> At 04:01 AM 11/12/2010, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> >If you insist and I don't know about the latest version, then vmware is
> >likely much more reliable than virtualbox but still more problematic
> &
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:27:21 +0100
Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> Is it better to test everything in Windows 7 via Virtualbox.
I would have have thought from wherever your pentest tools are?
KVM is another option
For some things, epecially panics and load tesing/dos. OpenBSD would
need to be native
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:56:24 -0800
Bryan Irvine wrote:
> > I've heard of people not even getting past the install even with a
> > hardware virtualisation capable cpu.
>
> On VirtualBox this is probably more to do with the dynamic image size.
> You have to create the disk image as a fixed size i
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:29:53 -0500
Chris Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:06 PM, David Astua wrote:
> > Check this:
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~peterb/network/drop-vs-reject
>
> Good article. "Stealth" mode is highly overrated. I generally use
> return except in the case of b
> Possibly, yes. Here's why. You're not attacking an OpenBSD host.
>
> The hypervisor has a network stack that is engaged before any guest.
> How else can you setup virtual switches, "attach interfaces", etc.
> Assuming that stack is vulnerable in some fashion, you have the
> opportunity to atta
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:53:55 +0100
Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 14:09:48 -0500, daniel holtzman
wrote:
> > Perhaps one or more developers would be curious about the crashes? Why
not
> > donate the machines instead of throw them out?
>
> ok. I'm not the owner, only the jani
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:18:16 +0100
Alexander Hall wrote:
> On 11/26/10 16:43, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> >
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> Sorry for this hasty e-mail. I have a Thanksgiving emergency here.
> >> Namely, my wife has accidentally erased all
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 17:50:13 +0100
Joachim Schipper wrote:
> Let me add one more reason to the ones already offered: there are *many*
> side-channel attacks that can cross VM barriers. In other words, don't
> do any sort of crypto (SSH, IPsec...) on virtualized machines, unless
> you trust every
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:17:17 -0500
Brad Tilley wrote:
> Do they really fail that often?
My current understanding is that a mostly empty SSDS electronics will
fail before it forgets what it's written but a mostly full and busy SSD
may start forgeting fairly soon, unless it shuffles data which wou
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:52:38 -0800
Scott Stanley wrote:
> OR, is there a
> possibility that the disc is marginal and the drive is picky enough to
> complain?
This has happened to me twice, once a retry worked the other time I
plugged in a usb-to-ide cdrom and the installer picked it up straight
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:44:51 +0100
Jan Stary wrote:
> On Nov 30 12:32:16, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:17:17 -0500
> > Brad Tilley wrote:
> >
> > > Do they really fail that often?
> >
> > My current understanding is that a mostly e
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:09:14 +0100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> sandforce controller
Noted, nice one Claudio.
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:38:09 -0600 (CST)
"L. V. Lammert" wrote:
> Ever head of Don Quixote? THe moral of the storey - pick the battles you
> have a chance of winning and avoid the rest.
Operation Chariot - Where british commandos accomplished an impossible
mission, with the help of code breakers,
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:42:00 -0800
Mehma Sarja wrote:
> Meaning, if you kill a cow in this life, you come back
> as a cow and someone can kill you.
Time to start eating humans instead ;-)
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:19:00 -0500
Chris Dukes wrote:
> I deal with lawyers that still insist on POP3 in the clear for their
> crack berry to retrieve email.
OMG
I've never even looked closely at the crackberry's (my brother laughed
a long time at that) because the server was obviously designed
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:06:49 +0100
Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> The thing is that it is very hard to
> persuade someone to use PGP all the time.
it is very hard to persuade someone to use PGP in the first place, and
even harder to believe they have a secure machine. Sometimes you may
find encrypted pdf
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 01:23:36 +0100
roberth wrote:
> sata disk got really crappy since they hit 2TB. (or 1.5TB in Seagates
> case.)
Hitachi have said that some issues were hit when they moved to 2tbs but
a new generation of their drives will solve these problems starting
with a 3tb version. I've
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:55:21 +
Fred Crowson wrote:
> On 14/12/2010, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> > are rarely as bad. A graphical and simple (probably impossible) OpenBSD
> > browser, would really be something, but now I'm just dreaming.
>
>
> xxxterm shoul
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:56:50 -0500
"Jeremy O'Brien" wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:41:04AM +0400, Dmitry-T wrote:
> > > Try to recover ballance:
> > > renice 20 -p 30996
> > > renice -20 -p 21919 25914 754
> > ^^
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 06:28:51 -0500
Josh Smith wrote:
>
> I've got to say I'm suprised the dns server in the base system of the
> worlds most secure OS is not able to validate dnssec responses
>
Actually there is much debate about how much security dnssec adds,
atleast currently. OpenSSL even,
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:25:56 +1100
"Rod Whitworth" wrote:
> tcpdump on each end showed expected aro who-has requests without
> answer
I had the same ip assigned to two interfaces and got this behaviour even
if one was down? (4.8 stable)
Maybe something thinks your four port card has the same ip
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:43:30 -0500
Dustin Cannon wrote:
> Perhaps it's just a matter of
> someone being interested enough to take the plunge?
And decide whether they think it's worthwhile or more important than
other things to work on.
The FreeBSD jail is quite quite cool in some respects, and
>>> > /usr/local/libexec/symux: can't load library 'libfontconfig.so.6.0'
> OK, I figured this out: I must have accidentally gotten the wrong
> xbase47.tgz fileset. problem solved.
For the archives:
You also get a missing library error if symux is run as a non root user
and can't write it's pid
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:30:56 +0100
Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > You also get a missing library error if symux is run as a non root user
> > and can't write it's pid file in /var/run
>
> That seems unlikely, are you sure?
Tell a lie, sorry.
Symon does report errors about it's pid file
Symux te
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:13:04 -0800
travis+ml-openbsd-m...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> I have it on fairly good authority that this behavior is
> considered a bug in the Linux kernel
So what's wrong with user rights and what exactly is the use of this
(when this bug is fixed) apart from for confusio
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:39:51 +0400
OpenBSD Geek wrote:
> But when spamd is enabled, mails take a long time(sometimes a day or less)
> to arrive in our box. Sometimes, we don't receive mails.
That's a big part of how it works. You can tune the delay with
spamd_flags in /etc/rc.conf.local.
Some s
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:53:35 -0600
patric conant wrote:
> 2^24=16,777.216
> So they are close.
I read, the same ips are being used by ISPS in different parts of the
world with a kind of global nat.
Also, If you look at the GeoIP lookup data you'll see great swathes were
allocated early on and se
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:33:31 +0100
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) wrote:
> I could offer mine for public consumption, but I would need
> to sanity check it first for outdated data.
If it's no bother to get and post it, then I'd be interested in the
unsanitised data? Even the problematic d
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:35:34 +0100
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) wrote:
> We didn't see any noticeable increase in
> spam received or load on content filterning when going to two minutes
> IIRC. YMMV, may contain nuts etc.
Did you see an increase in legitimate mail getting through with
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:58:23 +0100
Bret Lambert wrote:
> Counting my toaster?
Dilemma
3G toaster - maybe wastes a valuable ipv4
wifi toaster and x other devices - maybe waste's me with radiation (if
it's microwave band wifi (water resonater))
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:56:28 +0100
Henning Brauer wrote:
> is there some other way to make people READ the fucking mnapages we
> put so much effort in?
laser etcher + contact lens and super glue
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:49:29 +0200
Mihai Popescu wrote:
> please tell me how to use this SHA256 file then?
There was a thread recently about this where theo threatened to remove
them, please don't.
It is only guaranteed for releases and not snapshots, where it will be
hit and miss.
You can comp
801 - 891 of 891 matches
Mail list logo
