I've got 4 new machines coming in around the 22nd. I'll have physical
access to them for two weeks before we colo them. Probably the easiest
way to determine mod_perl's scalability by going to multiproc on linux
would be for me to test them. They are dual proc machines, but I can pull
a proc ou
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Horrocks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "mod_perl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withscripts
that contain un-share
I see it also. However, I only see it after I get an entry of
200 -
in the access log, i.e. the page returned status code 200, but
the content-length is not recorded.
I'm still in the process of investigating. BTW the above log
entry occurs 90% of the time with a script that does a fi
Hi guys,
Sorry for the brain fart email, i now have it all working peachy now.
Thanks for the help though.
dave
Tom,
TK>This puts the footer nicely to all files .htm or .html
TK>However, I have a few .shtml pages as part of my site, which have worked
TK>with no errors. After making this change:
TK>
TK>
TK>SetHandler perl-script
TK>PerlHandler Apache::Footer
TK>
TK>
TK>..I imagined that .sht
I'll say just a little now since i'm moving semi slowly on this project.
I'm working on writing a suite that at some point will have a calender
program in it. The whole thing is perl based and the entire web enterface
is going to be done in mod perl. Whole setup will be databased
backed and re
A few things:
- In your results, could you add the speedycgi version number (2.02),
and the fact that this is using the mod_speedycgi frontend.
The fork/exec frontend will be much slower on hello-world so I don't
want people to get the wrong idea. You may want to benchmark
Hi,
I am running Apache 1.3.14 w/ mod_perl 1.24 on a Linux RedHat 6.2 machine.
I have recently began to implement mod_perl to some of my content.
As per "Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C" book, I wrote a footer for
each page, with the following directive in httpd.conf:
SetHandle
Hi there,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, andrewl wrote:
> "Cannot load /usr/local/apache/modules/libperl.so into server: undefined symbol:
> ap_ctx_get"
> Any clues?
Have you read .../mod_perl/SUPPORT
?
73,
Ged.
Hello,
AL>This is definitely related to libperl.so ... When I comment out
AL>LoadModule perl_module modules/libperl.so
AL>in httpd.conf, then apache will start. Unfortunately, I'd like to get
AL>mod_perl working.
AL>
AL>Does anyone know about this ap_ctx_get? I understand that there could
AL>b
Blue Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote:
>> > Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one
>>
>> I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be nice to start
>> with one that at least had
> > Right, but this also points out how difficult it is to get mod_perl
> > tuning just right. My opinion is that the MRU design adapts more
> > dynamically to the load.
>
> How would this compare to apache's process management when
> using the front/back end approach?
Same thing appl
This is definitely related to libperl.so ... When I comment out
LoadModule perl_module modules/libperl.so
in httpd.conf, then apache will start. Unfortunately, I'd like to get
mod_perl working.
Does anyone know about this ap_ctx_get? I understand that there could
be a bug in another module tha
Sam Horrocks wrote:
>
> Don't agree. You're equating the model with the implemntation.
> Unix processes model concurrency, but when it comes down to it, if you
> don't have more CPU's than processes, you can only simulate concurrency.
>
Hey Sam, nice module. I just installed your SpeedyCGI
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Horrocks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "mod_perl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withscripts
that contain un-share
Buddy Lee Haystack wrote:
>
> Does this mean that mod_perl's memory hunger will curbed in the future using some of
>the neat tricks in Speedycgi?
Yes. The upcoming mod_perl 2 (running on Apache 2) will use MRU to
select threads. Doug demoed this at ApacheCon a few months back.
- Perrin
Does this mean that mod_perl's memory hunger will curbed in the future using some of
the neat tricks in Speedycgi?
Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> Sam Horrocks wrote:
> > Don't agree. You're equating the model with the implemntation.
> > Unix processes model concurrency, but when it comes down to
/usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl configtest
produces
"Cannot load /usr/local/apache/modules/libperl.so into server: undefined symbol:
ap_ctx_get"
I'm done some searches for clues at RedHat and other sites, but all I see is
something about and IBM issue.
Any clues?
Andrew L.
Sam Horrocks wrote:
> Don't agree. You're equating the model with the implemntation.
> Unix processes model concurrency, but when it comes down to it, if you
> don't have more CPU's than processes, you can only simulate concurrency.
[...]
> This url:
>
> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/li
Joshua Chamas wrote:
> The Hello World 2000 benchmark is complete, and my results are below
Kind of harsh results for Template Toolkit, but it makes sense given the
nature of the test. Variable interpolation in TT provides extra
functionality to give transparent access to method calls, coderefs,
> zhang-sh wrote:
> Re: where can I get MIME/Head.pm modules
www.cpan.org
begin:vcard
n:Kortemeyer;Gerd
tel;fax:(517) 432-2175
tel;work:(517) 432-5468
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.lite.msu.edu/kortemeyer/
org:Michigan State University;LITE Lab
adr:;;123 North Kedzie Labs;East Lansing;
> $r->content_type("text/plain";
You are missing a ")" here. Check the error_log of Apache for errors like that.
- Gerd.
begin:vcard
n:Kortemeyer;Gerd
tel;fax:(517) 432-2175
tel;work:(517) 432-5468
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.lite.msu.edu/kortemeyer/
org:Michigan State University;LITE
Hi everyone.
I have just built apache mod perl, things seem to be fine since /server-status reports
Apache Server Status for home.itchy.and.scratchy
Server Version: Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) mod_perl/1.24_01
Server Built: Jan 5 2001 17:49:02
I have also edited my httpd.conf file to include the f
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote:
> > Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one
>
> I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be nice to start
> with one that at least had some decent sheduling features so I could us
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote:
> Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one
> so tightly integrated to your other products, it's almost
> always better to custom write it yourself. Or hack up a freeware
> version.
I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be n
> Let me just try to explain my reasoning. I'll define a couple of my
> base assumptions, in case you disagree with them.
>
> - Slices of CPU time doled out by the kernel are very small - so small
> that processes can be considered concurrent, even though technically
> they are handled ser
Hey,
The Hello World 2000 benchmark is complete, and my results are below
along with the Hello World benchmark. Please feel free to contribute
h2000 benchmarks for any environment, or suggest changes for those
in the test suite, download at http://www.chamas.com/bench/hello.tar.gz
The h2000 ben
28 matches
Mail list logo
