Let me just try to explain my reasoning. I'll define a couple of my
base assumptions, in case you disagree with them.
- Slices of CPU time doled out by the kernel are very small - so small
that processes can be considered concurrent, even though technically
they are handled
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote:
Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one
I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be nice to start
with one that at least had some decent sheduling features so I could use
Hi everyone.
I have just built apache mod perl, things seem to be fine since /server-status reports
Apache Server Status for home.itchy.and.scratchy
Server Version: Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) mod_perl/1.24_01
Server Built: Jan 5 2001 17:49:02
I have also edited my httpd.conf file to include the
$r-content_type("text/plain";
You are missing a ")" here. Check the error_log of Apache for errors like that.
- Gerd.
begin:vcard
n:Kortemeyer;Gerd
tel;fax:(517) 432-2175
tel;work:(517) 432-5468
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.lite.msu.edu/kortemeyer/
org:Michigan State University;LITE
zhang-sh wrote:
Re: where can I get MIME/Head.pm modules
www.cpan.org
begin:vcard
n:Kortemeyer;Gerd
tel;fax:(517) 432-2175
tel;work:(517) 432-5468
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.lite.msu.edu/kortemeyer/
org:Michigan State University;LITE Lab
adr:;;123 North Kedzie Labs;East
Joshua Chamas wrote:
The Hello World 2000 benchmark is complete, and my results are below
Kind of harsh results for Template Toolkit, but it makes sense given the
nature of the test. Variable interpolation in TT provides extra
functionality to give transparent access to method calls, coderefs,
Sam Horrocks wrote:
Don't agree. You're equating the model with the implemntation.
Unix processes model concurrency, but when it comes down to it, if you
don't have more CPU's than processes, you can only simulate concurrency.
[...]
This url:
/usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl configtest
produces
"Cannot load /usr/local/apache/modules/libperl.so into server: undefined symbol:
ap_ctx_get"
I'm done some searches for clues at RedHat and other sites, but all I see is
something about and IBM issue.
Any clues?
Andrew L.
Does this mean that mod_perl's memory hunger will curbed in the future using some of
the neat tricks in Speedycgi?
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Sam Horrocks wrote:
Don't agree. You're equating the model with the implemntation.
Unix processes model concurrency, but when it comes down to it,
Buddy Lee Haystack wrote:
Does this mean that mod_perl's memory hunger will curbed in the future using some of
the neat tricks in Speedycgi?
Yes. The upcoming mod_perl 2 (running on Apache 2) will use MRU to
select threads. Doug demoed this at ApacheCon a few months back.
- Perrin
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Horrocks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "mod_perl list" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withscripts
that contain un-shared
Sam Horrocks wrote:
Don't agree. You're equating the model with the implemntation.
Unix processes model concurrency, but when it comes down to it, if you
don't have more CPU's than processes, you can only simulate concurrency.
Hey Sam, nice module. I just installed your SpeedyCGI for
This is definitely related to libperl.so ... When I comment out
LoadModule perl_module modules/libperl.so
in httpd.conf, then apache will start. Unfortunately, I'd like to get
mod_perl working.
Does anyone know about this ap_ctx_get? I understand that there could
be a bug in another module
Right, but this also points out how difficult it is to get mod_perl
tuning just right. My opinion is that the MRU design adapts more
dynamically to the load.
How would this compare to apache's process management when
using the front/back end approach?
Same thing applies.
Blue Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote:
Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one
I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be nice to start
with one that at least had some decent
Hello,
ALThis is definitely related to libperl.so ... When I comment out
ALLoadModule perl_module modules/libperl.so
ALin httpd.conf, then apache will start. Unfortunately, I'd like to get
ALmod_perl working.
AL
ALDoes anyone know about this ap_ctx_get? I understand that there could
ALbe a
Hi there,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, andrewl wrote:
"Cannot load /usr/local/apache/modules/libperl.so into server: undefined symbol:
ap_ctx_get"
Any clues?
Have you read .../mod_perl/SUPPORT
?
73,
Ged.
Hi,
I am running Apache 1.3.14 w/ mod_perl 1.24 on a Linux RedHat 6.2 machine.
I have recently began to implement mod_perl to some of my content.
As per "Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C" book, I wrote a footer for
each page, with the following directive in httpd.conf:
Files ~
A few things:
- In your results, could you add the speedycgi version number (2.02),
and the fact that this is using the mod_speedycgi frontend.
The fork/exec frontend will be much slower on hello-world so I don't
want people to get the wrong idea. You may want to benchmark
I'll say just a little now since i'm moving semi slowly on this project.
I'm working on writing a suite that at some point will have a calender
program in it. The whole thing is perl based and the entire web enterface
is going to be done in mod perl. Whole setup will be databased
backed and
Tom,
TKThis puts the footer nicely to all files .htm or .html
TKHowever, I have a few .shtml pages as part of my site, which have worked
TKwith no errors. After making this change:
TK
TK Files ~ "\.s?html?$"
TKSetHandler perl-script
TKPerlHandler Apache::Footer
TK /Files
TK
TK..I
Hi guys,
Sorry for the brain fart email, i now have it all working peachy now.
Thanks for the help though.
dave
I see it also. However, I only see it after I get an entry of
200 -
in the access log, i.e. the page returned status code 200, but
the content-length is not recorded.
I'm still in the process of investigating. BTW the above log
entry occurs 90% of the time with a script that does a
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Horrocks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "mod_perl list" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withscripts
that contain un-shared
I've got 4 new machines coming in around the 22nd. I'll have physical
access to them for two weeks before we colo them. Probably the easiest
way to determine mod_perl's scalability by going to multiproc on linux
would be for me to test them. They are dual proc machines, but I can pull
a proc
25 matches
Mail list logo