On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:30:22PM -0500, Cameron B. Prince wrote:
I just realized, I meant to say IPC::Run below from my previous post.
I also read a post about IPC::Open... I looked at the synopsis and it
looks rather complicated.
Only if you're trying to do something complicated, like
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 01:18:12PM -0500, Cameron B. Prince wrote:
Hi Barrie,
I dug out an old note from you and started trying IPC::Run. Here's what I
have so far:
sub MP3Check {
my ($self,$params) = @_;
use IPC::Run qw( run timeout );
my @command = (
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:08:54PM -0500, James G Smith wrote:
My apologies.
np :). It's fun to prattle on about my babies ;).
The StateML:: stuff does sound neat though :) I'm wanting to
eventually put together a gui for creating web-based wizard-like
applications -- draw the circles
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 07:25:48PM -0500, James G Smith wrote:
XML::SAX::Machines
This is an XML SAX processing framework, nothing to do with state machines I'm
afraid. I do have another distribution (not on CPAN, let me know if you want a
copy) in the StateML:: namespace that takes an XML
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:10:03PM -0800, SubbaReddy M wrote:
/soft/Apache-ASP-2.27/make_httpd/mod_perl-1.26/core: No such file or directory.
You need a core file to do this... gdb is kindly pointing out that you
don't have one.
and i am really thankfull for your help.
I'm just
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:59:55AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
Hi,
verbose
I'm looking for a little discussion on selecting a data storage method, and
I'm posting here because Cache::Cache often is discussed here (along with
Apache::Session). And people here are smart, of course ;).
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:54:11AM -0800, Andrew Ho wrote:
Let me point out that if you are using MD5 hashes for directory spreading
(i.e. to spread a large number of files across a tree of directories so
that no one directory is filled with too many files for efficient
filesystem access),
I'm seeking a sanity check on statically linked binary extensions in
with httpd. I've built what I want, but the build is not easily
automatable, and I'm hoping I missed an easy alternative somewhere.
Background: we have a .png that we want to generate on the fly with up
to several thousand
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:27:58AM -0700, Alex Krohn wrote:
while (1) {
{
my $var = 'x' x 50;
my $sub = sub { my $sub2 = sub { $var; } };
}
# $var and $sub should be gone, but memory is never freed
sleep 1; # Don't crash things =)
}
Thank you, much better. I can't make out the difference between the two
command lines (again, I ask you to please clean up your script output,
or just copy and paste from your terminal to your mailer, those ^Hs and
^]s make things hard to decipher).
Can you do a type perl perl5.6.0 perl5.6.1,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:46:24PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
This is not going well with me as this forces to stay at perl 5.00503 until
BSD/OS comes up with the new perl distrubution.
Again, I don't follow. What leads you to that conclusion?
- Barrie
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:47:09PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
perl 5.6.1 calling itself perl 5.6.0
Come off of it!
I don't know where you got that idea.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:55:26PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
When I ran perl 5.6.1 it was identifying itself as perl 5.6.0 .
Identity crisis??
Dunno, but you can bet it's not right. Care to post the command and
results? Sounds like a symlink problem, you might want to use some
combination
Michael Peppler wrote:
Based on preliminary tests I was able to use a 1 in 10 ratio of
database handles per httpd child processes, which, on a large site
would cut down on the number of connections that the database server
needs to handle.
I'd be interested to see how this compares with
Michael Peppler wrote:
The back-end is Sybase. The actual connect time isn't the issue here
(for me.) It's the sheer number of connections, and the potential
issue with the number of sockets in CLOSE_WAIT or TIME_WAIT state on
the database server. We're looking at a farm of 40 front-end
Matt Sergeant wrote:
Yes, I believe the entry is simply *.domain.com!
Then use mod_rewrite to map the right folder.
Yup. Beware though, there are certain issues you may need to think of if
you're going to be sending/receiving mail from these domain names. One
problem is the reverse name
Passing this along from the mason list.
Original Message
Subject: [OT]Apache::Reload (was Re: [Mason]More "At The Forge" articles)
Date: 29 Aug 2000 10:59:35 +0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexei V. Barantsev)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Rolsky
Mikael Claesson wrote:
with mod_perl it looks even better.
Cool. Welcome.
I plan to keep all lowerlevel database stuff in C, and
embed it in a perl module. Will this make things run
slower than if I made it all in perl?
Usually faster, but whether that's significant in your application
Roger Espel Llima wrote:
@{"${class}::ISA"}
Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to do this that works under
strict? The above requires a "no strict 'refs'" to work.
Something like this we3nt by on p5p a while ago (IIRCC):
@{$main::{"$class\::"}-{ISA}}
but that's a lot more
aaron wrote:
for example, in discussion software you have a very clear moment when you
want to invalidate specific pages: when a message arrives. now i don't want
squid or any other cache to even check w/ every request. i know darn well
when the cache is no longer valid!
I've been
Jeremy Howard wrote:
* fork(): Memory hog, since it copies the entire Apache process (is this
right--does it share the memory for all the modules etc...?)
Assuming you're on a modern Unixish system, it shouldn't be bad at all if
you don't change too many variables and if the child doesn't
I said:
The most often wished-for approach is for a http cache to accept the whole
request before passing it through to the main httpd, but I'm not aware of
any that do that.
Jeremy Howard wrote:
How do proxy servers like Squid work?
Squid, Apache in cache mode, et al, was what I
Drew Taylor wrote:
Does anyone have good evidence either way?
I don't see how Csub { my $foo ; ... could ever fail to undef $foo, modulo
bugs in perl. A hell of a lot of code wouldn't work, then.
My practice is to never init lexicals to undef/(), and only to '' or 0 if
they might be used
A nit: the distinction between paging and swapping doesn't seem clear to me.
You describe the paging process, then talk about how you should never swap.
Or maybe that's too detailed for your intended audience.
- Barrie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a know bug? Is there a bug?
Not that I know of, did you check the archives?
Is it right in front of my face?
Something seems odd to me, see below, but it shouldn't be causing you
too much grief.
First, to educate me, what's encrypt do differently than
Eric Jain wrote:
I'm sure there is a better method, which
also is able to log more detailed than just in seconds...
Haven't used it under mod_perl, but Time::HiRes is available:
http://search.cpan.org/search?mode=modulequery=Time%3A%3AHiRes
- Barrie
"Reilly, Thomas" wrote:
If any one can give me a few lines of code I would appreciate it.
One way is:
use IPC::Run qw( run close_terminal ) ;
run(
sub {
# ... your code here ...
sleep 15 ;
},
init = sub {
close_terminal ;
exit if fork ;
Stephen Zander wrote:
As Matt has already commented, in the handler the method call
overheads swamps all the other activities.
Just to clarify: that's only important if you are doing very few other
activities, or if those other activities also include a high percentage
of method calls:
[Sorry for the delay: didn't notice this since it was sent only to the list]
Eric Cholet wrote, in part:
I never advocated optimizing at the expense of the above criteria, we
were discussing optimizations only. I certainly believe a program is a
compromise, and have often chosen some of
Matt Sergeant wrote:
You also forgot that print() goes to a tied STDOUT, which is even more of
an overhead...
Yeah, that'd probably swamp almost all other effects Stas is testing right
there, and it explains Stas's test results when varying $|.
- Barrie
Eric Cholet wrote:
These
things add up, so don't you think that whatever can be optimized, should ?
Wrong question, IMHO: it's what you optimize for that counts. Several things
come to mind that are often more important than performance and often mean not
optimizing for performance (these
31 matches
Mail list logo
