At 02:13 PM 12/24/01 +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
FWIW, we are having what seems to be a very productive discussion at
docs-dev mailing list. Unfortunately no mail archiver seem to pick this
list up, so only the mbox files are available:
http://perl.apache.org/mail/docs-dev/
Is anyone up to make
Bill Moseley wrote:
At 02:13 PM 12/24/01 +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
FWIW, we are having what seems to be a very productive discussion at
docs-dev mailing list. Unfortunately no mail archiver seem to pick this
list up, so only the mbox files are available:
Hi there,
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
I took a look at the winning design
You just spammed the Net with 100 Megabytes of junk.
Please don't send 60k messages to the mod_perl list.
73,
Ged.
Philip Mak wrote:
I took a look at the winning design at
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/ and I see a significant problem for
people in 800x600 resolution (which is pretty common still, and I use it):
Philip, can you please repost your comments to docs-dev at
perl.apache.org? We don't
I took a look at the winning design at
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/ and I see a significant problem for
people in 800x600 resolution (which is pretty common still, and I use it):
A horizontal scrollbar appears at the bottom of the screen.
Can't this be fixed? Also, the left sidebar
Ideally if Thomas, Carlos and Allan could take
the best of each other's work and produce the perfect design, that
That would be OK for me, Carlos, Allan??
Wow, all three winners have agreed to work together to make the killer
design! that's great guys!!! I guess the next step is to apply
I'm throwing in my two cents a bit late, so it's a bit depreciated now (one
cent?). But something to think about for the site.
I've worked with php a little lately -- not programming, but making minor
changes to a site. I've used the php site http://www.php.net/ a few times,
and I've found it
All that makes it really easy for someone new to feel comfortable.
And isn't that what the mod_perl site should do?
It would be nice to see license info, too, as someone new
might want to be
clear on that right away, too.
You can also quickly see a list of supported modules.
The mod_perl design contest's voting process took 12 days and is over now.
and the winner is
# Design by Votes
--
1. Thomas Klausner 86
2. Carlos Ramirez 50
3. Allan Juul 31
--
Total 167
Congratulation to the three
That's said I suggest that any further discussion on this topic is to be
made on the modperl-site list, so not to clutter the modperl users list
with unnecessary noise. I've originaly posted here, because I wanted to
reach as many caring users as possible. But now those interested in
the
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:28:04PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
# Design by Votes
--
1. Thomas Klausner 86
yeah!
Since Thomas' design has won the gold, I suggest that we incorporate the
constructive comments (attached) into his design, with David Harris'
hello all
a few comments from me regarding the competion.
first of all a big thank to stas for invoking it.
it was quite fun and challenging but also hard
work getting the job done (learning TT + doc-set).
secondly. thomas (and carlos), congratulations! i liked
both your solutions.
also
Thomas Klausner wrote:
# Design by Votes
--
1. Thomas Klausner 86
yeah!
Congrats Thomas! (and Allan).
Ideally if Thomas, Carlos and Allan could take
the best of each other's work and produce the perfect design, that
That would be OK for me, Carlos, Allan??
Hi ALL,
I did love the result and I too go by,..
Ideally if Thomas, Carlos and Allan could take
the best of each other's work and produce
the perfectdesign,
I am willing to help you guys,.
Congrats Thomas and other participents.
With best regards,
Anand R
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting
This is just a reminder that we need your votes. So far we have about
130 votes. Please help us to choose.
Stas Bekman wrote:
Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
Now it's a time for you to
Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
Now it's a time for you to chose the design that you like the most by
voting at http://www.tohubohu.net/cgi/mpchallenge
In order to let everybody enough time
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks to Eric Cholet for providing this voting script and hosting it.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 09:39:28 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.23-dev (Unix)
PHP/4.0.6 mod_perl/1.26_01-dev Connection: close Content-Type:
text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
:: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 09:39:28 GMT Server:
:: Apache/1.3.23-dev (Unix) PHP/4.0.6 mod_perl/1.26_01-dev
:: Connection: close Content-Type:
:: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Expires: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 09:39:28 GMT
::
:: Double header issue?
Worked fine for me.
Jonathan M.
El Mar 04 Dic 2001 05:39, Stas Bekman escribió:
Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
Now it's a time for you to chose the design that you like the most by
voting at
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 13:52, Hans Poo wrote:
Please, can you send the address of the three designs?
If you click the names on the poll, you go to the sites.
--
___
Robin Berjon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- CTO
k n o w s c a p e
Hans Poo wrote:
[snip]
voting at http://www.tohubohu.net/cgi/mpchallenge
[snip]
Please, can you send the address of the three designs?
did you try clicking the links with the names?
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
http://www.quantumfx.com/modperl_site/
You just click on the names ... Didn't you see the links?
Einar
At 09:52 04/12/2001 -0300, you wrote:
El Mar 04 Dic 2001 05:39, Stas Bekman escribió:
Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
Hi
( 01.12.04 16:39 +0800 ) Stas Bekman:
Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
I'd like to echo that thanks since all 3 designs are thoughtful and well
executed.
While a poll is cleaner in a way,
El Mar 04 Dic 2001 11:27, Einar Roheim escribió:
You just click on the names ... Didn't you see the links?
Einar
At 09:52 04/12/2001 -0300, you wrote:
El Mar 04 Dic 2001 05:39, Stas Bekman escribió:
Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
challenge and
John Saylor wrote:
Hi
( 01.12.04 16:39 +0800 ) Stas Bekman:
Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
I'd like to echo that thanks since all 3 designs are thoughtful and well
executed.
Sorry, someone (you?) has already voted from IP address my
ip listed here
So much for allowing my co-workers to vote even though we
have unique email addresses. :-(
Emad
Original Message
Subject: [modperl site design challenge] please vote
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 16:39:19
--On mardi 4 décembre 2001 08:17 -0800 Emad Fanous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, someone (you?) has already voted from IP address my
ip listed here
So much for allowing my co-workers to vote even though we
have unique email addresses. :-(
Emad
Sorry about that, this constraint has
Thanks, Eric. Seems to be working.
Emad
Eric Cholet wrote:
--On mardi 4 décembre 2001 08:17 -0800 Emad Fanous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, someone (you?) has already voted from IP address my
ip listed here
So much for allowing my co-workers to vote even though we
have unique
The deadline is over now, but if you didn't have enough time till now
and want to submit your design or improve the one that you've submitted,
please email me and we will wait for you. If you do that, please give me
a completion time estimate. The deadline was set in order to make things
on 26.11.01 17:14, John Saylor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
( 01.11.25 22:37 +0100 ) Thomas Klausner:
You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
Nice work!
Is it all right to talk details?
In my opinion something like:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:36:07AM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
* The first page (Home) successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
That's very good. Do the others validate as well (or at least, do you see any
reason why they wouldn't ?) ?
On some of the deeper pages, Pod::POM
Hi
( 01.11.25 22:37 +0100 ) Thomas Klausner:
You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
I like it. The main part of it is now just an elaboration of the
contents, I imagine this will be a changing teaser of some sort.
* While the
At 11:14 AM 11/26/01 -0500, John Saylor wrote:
* While the design might not be to cool from the designers point of view, I
like it because it is simple, doesn't use HTML-tables, is small and fast
(/very/ little HTML-overhead) and accessible to disabled people.
But that *is* cool. I think it's
On Monday 26 November 2001 10:07, Bill Moseley wrote:
---snip---
Does it need to render well in old browsers? (e.g. netscape 4.08)
There's a lot of old browsers out there, but maybe anyone looking at
mod_perl would be a bit more up to date...
Bill Moseley
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi:
Hi!
You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
You can get the whole distro to download at:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/modperl-site-domm.src.tgz
or just the output at:
On Sunday 25 November 2001 22:37, Thomas Klausner wrote:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
Simple, nice, and cool (imho), thanks for submitting !
* The first page (Home) successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
That's very good. Do the others validate as well (or at least, do you
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:36:07AM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
* The first page (Home) successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
That's very good. Do the others validate as well (or at least, do you see any
reason why they wouldn't ?) ?
On some of the deeper pages, Pod::POM
37 matches
Mail list logo
