Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-30 Thread struan
* at 30/06 10:18 +0800 Gunther Birznieks said: > > At 09:06 AM 6/30/00 +0700, Edwin Pratomo wrote: > > > >this doesn't seem to be aware of either WAP browsers or the emulators. > >A typical usage of this is to return WML pages if the request comes from > >a WAP browser, otherwise return html page

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-30 Thread Drew Taylor
Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > Would you mind please submitting this as a standard NON-Apache CPAN module? > > There are too many modules (even 1 is too many... ;)) under the Apache::* > moniker that actually can be used in generic CGI programs. > > The fixuphandler sounds interesting, but I woul

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-30 Thread Drew Taylor
Leon Brocard wrote: > > Drew wrote: > > > I am about to embark on a journey to find/create a brower sniffing > > module. > > You may want to have a look at: > > http://search.cpan.org/search?dist=HTTP-BrowserDetect > http://www.jamespo.ukshells.co.uk/perl/ Ahhh, guess I should have searched CP

RE: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Edwin Pratomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 10:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Browser Sniffing > > > Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Drew Taylor wrote:

RE: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-30 Thread Leon Brocard
Drew wrote: > I am about to embark on a journey to find/create a brower sniffing > module. You may want to have a look at: http://search.cpan.org/search?dist=HTTP-BrowserDetect http://www.jamespo.ukshells.co.uk/perl/ Leon "mustn'treinventwheel" -- Leon Brocard | perl "programmer"

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Edwin Pratomo wrote: > Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Drew Taylor wrote: > > > > > I'm hoping it's been done already, because the user-agent strings are > > > terribly inconsistent... > > > > I needed something like that once and ended up with this: > >

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 09:06 AM 6/30/00 +0700, Edwin Pratomo wrote: >Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Drew Taylor wrote: > > > > > I'm hoping it's been done already, because the user-agent strings are > > > terribly inconsistent... > > > > I needed something like that once and ended up with this

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread Edwin Pratomo
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Drew Taylor wrote: > > > I'm hoping it's been done already, because the user-agent strings are > > terribly inconsistent... > > I needed something like that once and ended up with this: > > sub UA { > my $ua = shift; > my $n = ""; > my $v = "

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread brian moseley
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > So two CPAN submissions, one under Apache::* and another > under CGI::* or maybe under LWP (I prefer CGI::* > though)... i vote HTTP!

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread brian moseley
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > There are too many modules (even 1 is too many... ;)) > under the Apache::* moniker that actually can be used in > generic CGI programs. yeah, i'm thinking the same thing about Apache::Session!

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread Scott Alexander
Looking at this, I'm tempted to do a similar thing. My thought was to take the code and then twist it slightly to put the information into a database. ie when I create a new session, grab the information about browser etc. Would save me a bit if it were already a completed apache:: module

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread Gunther Birznieks
Would you mind please submitting this as a standard NON-Apache CPAN module? There are too many modules (even 1 is too many... ;)) under the Apache::* moniker that actually can be used in generic CGI programs. The fixuphandler sounds interesting, but I would prefer if that were a wrapper around

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread Drew Taylor
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Drew Taylor wrote: > > > I'm hoping it's been done already, because the user-agent strings are > > terribly inconsistent... > > I needed something like that once and ended up with this: Cool! I ripped off the browser & version code. It seemed m

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Drew Taylor wrote: > I'm hoping it's been done already, because the user-agent strings are > terribly inconsistent... I needed something like that once and ended up with this: sub UA { my $ua = shift; my $n = ""; my $v = ""; # $n is the name of the browser # $v

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread Drew Taylor
Casey Bristow wrote: > > I've also played with the idea of creating a similiar class, but have not > had time to really get on with it.. The best client sniffer that I have > found thus far is a javascript (ewww) one.. but it would rock to have this > functionality as an apache mod > > http:

Re: Browser Sniffing

2000-06-29 Thread Casey Bristow
I've also played with the idea of creating a similiar class, but have not had time to really get on with it.. The best client sniffer that I have found thus far is a javascript (ewww) one.. but it would rock to have this functionality as an apache mod! http://developer.netscape.com:80/docs