On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Adi Fairbank wrote:
> Thanks Gunther,
>
> We actually have discussed releasing our entire application open source.
> I personally would love to release it, being the chief architect, but
> there are other people involved who have put in a lot of work
> (directional/advisem
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
[text cut]
>
> So for Adi -- I think the messaging server is great and I am sure it is
> cool and works well. And I am sure there are people on this list who will
> benefit. But unless your company makes the healthcare system itself open
> source
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> At 09:14 AM 4/28/01 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> >On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> >
> > > As I think I mentioned, it's great that the people like you on this list
> > > have a passion for delivering cool software.
> > >
> >[snipped]
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Bakki Kudva wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:14:10 +0100 (BST)
> Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Amen to that and there is Enhydra on the Java side. To get the
> functionality of these two frameworks I'd have to integrate many many CPAN
> modules, keep track of v
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> As I think I mentioned, it's great that the people like you on this list
> have a passion for delivering cool software.
>
> I may have missed the intent of these two posts (micropayment and messaging
> engines), but unfortunately, I don't really
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> > Well, you know how I feel. :) But the others don't so...
> >
> > I believe the most crucial and missing approach is to put resources into
> > making ready-made applications that work on mod_
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> Well, you know how I feel. :) But the others don't so...
>
> I believe the most crucial and missing approach is to put resources into
> making ready-made applications that work on mod_perl rather than core
> mod_perl itself. This is also a problem
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Oh, I didn't know that [Covalent sells mod_perl]. I guess that's because
> I'm not on the buyer side. Does it announce this fact? So why don't we
> have a link to Covalent from the perl.apache.org site? I think this is
> very essential for mod_perl to te
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > Hey, we have a product -- mod_perl. All we need is to nicely pack it,
> > start selling it, support it and put the money back into mod_perl R&D.
>
> Covalent does this already. all of the "bundle" product
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Hey, we have a product -- mod_perl. All we need is to nicely pack it,
> start selling it, support it and put the money back into mod_perl R&D.
Covalent does this already. all of the "bundle" products include
mod_perl, and anybody can buy support packag
> I think there are two paths... mod_perl needs more market-awareness... it
> needs a PR and marketing company.. then companies will start using it, then
> there will be more dreams jobs like you described.. simple fact is, I
> couldn't name more then 3 companies in my area who use it, and I never
11 matches
Mail list logo
