- Original Message -
From: "Gunther Birznieks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tim Bunce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
r 16, 2000 4:04 AM
> > To: Les Mikesell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Tim Bunce; Aaron; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: database access
> >
> >
> > 3. As a plug, I had also suggested a couple years ago that I
> > would like the
> > feature to be able
> -Original Message-
> From: Gunther Birznieks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 4:04 AM
> To: Les Mikesell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Tim Bunce; Aaron; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: database access
>
>
> 3. As a plug, I had al
r.
Later,
Gunther
At 07:53 PM 11/15/2000 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: "Tim Bunce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tim Bunce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:21 AM
Subject: Re:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I wonder if Apache::DBI could figure out what connections are worth
> holding open by itself? It could have some hints in the config file
> like regexps to match plus a setting that would tell it not to
> make a connection persist unless it had seen x
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Bunce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > > Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the undocumented
> > > > somehow made it to the documented status.
> > >
> >
> > yeah... but Apache::DBI and DBI are in cahoots! it's a secret love that
> > no d
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:55:38PM -0500, Aaron wrote:
> >
> > > Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the undocumented
> > > somehow made it to the documented status.
> >
>
> yeah... but Apache::DBI and DBI are in cahoots! it's a secret love that
> no documentation can break ap
>
> > Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the undocumented
> > somehow made it to the documented status.
>
yeah... but Apache::DBI and DBI are in cahoots! it's a secret love that
no documentation can break apart!
no, really it would be nice if the DBI connection "hook" was
Hi there,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, George Sanderson wrote:
> Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the undocumented
> somehow made it to the documented status.
Well don't get me wrong either, but when I thought the Guide could do
with a re-write, I re-wrote it.
:)
73,
Ged.
At 08:04 AM 11/13/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I haven't followed this thread too closely, so forgive me if I'm not quite
>with it...
>
>you can already do this with Apache::DBI...
>
>change DBI->connect() to the (undocumented) 6 parameter call:
>
>
Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if th
I haven't followed this thread too closely, so forgive me if I'm not quite
with it...
>
> It would be very useful to be able to specify at connect time that
> you don't want a particular connection to be persistent. If you have
> a lot of small databases or some with different user/password
> p
Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Perrin Harkins wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
> > > > Would you be interested in adding support for resetting some of these to
> > > > Apache::DBI? It's pretty easy to do, using PerlCleanupHandler like the
> > > > auto-rollback does. It would be
Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
> > > Would you be interested in adding support for resetting some of these to
> > > Apache::DBI? It's pretty easy to do, using PerlCleanupHandler like the
> > > auto-rollback does. It would be database-specific though, so you'd
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
> > Would you be interested in adding support for resetting some of these to
> > Apache::DBI? It's pretty easy to do, using PerlCleanupHandler like the
> > auto-rollback does. It would be database-specific though, so you'd have
> > to find a way for peopl
Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
> > Apache::DBI is, as far as I know, dangerous, and people rarely seem to
> > warn of this.
>
> It's no more dangerous than any other scheme for persistent connections,
> like JDBC pooling, etc.
>
> > It's dangerous because:
> >
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
> Apache::DBI is, as far as I know, dangerous, and people rarely seem to
> warn of this.
It's no more dangerous than any other scheme for persistent connections,
like JDBC pooling, etc.
> It's dangerous because:
> (a) Although it rolls back any transaction
> I am trying to access access Microsoft SQL server on NT from Apache Server
> under Linux,
> Can some one give me a direction, how/where to looking into it?
>
> Appreciate for any help
Check out the FreeTDS libs at:
http://www.freetds.org/
I use it now to contact a MS SQL 6.5 server f
plete
instructions
At 08:16 AM 11/9/00 -0600, you wrote:
>I am trying to access access Microsoft SQL server on NT from Apache Server
>under Linux,
>Can some one give me a direction, how/where to looking into it?
>
>Appreciate for any help
>
>PC Wang
>
>-Original
clayton cottingham wrote:
>
> Greg Cope wrote:
> >
> > Jason Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > Is Apache::DBI absolutely necessary if you want to establish persistent
> > > database connection per child?
> >
> > No you can write your own (its open source remember ;-) but why bother -
> > standing on the sho
, 2000 4:11 PM
To: Greg Cope
Cc: Jason Liu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: database access
Greg Cope wrote:
>
> Jason Liu wrote:
> >
> > Is Apache::DBI absolutely necessary if you want to establish persistent
> > database connection per child?
>
> No you can write your
ders of giants etc
>
> Greg
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: David Hodgkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 5:10 AM
> > > To: Jason Liu
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Greg Cope
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 10:53 AM
> To: Jason Liu
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: database access
>
>
> Jason Liu wrote:
> >
> >
nks,
>
> Jason
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Hodgkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 5:10 AM
> > To: Jason Liu
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: database access
> >
> >
> > "Jason Liu&qu
Thank you for the help everyone.
Jason
HI Jason,
Have a look at the source of Apache::DBI.
An important part of the module is a ping method that ensures the
connection handle (e.g., $dbh) doesn't go stale.
You can write your own ping method by doing something like:
CTED]
> Subject: Re: database access
>
>
> "Jason Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In general, how should database connections be handled between
> parent and
> > child processes? Can you establish database connections from within a
> > h
"Jason Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In general, how should database connections be handled between parent and
> child processes? Can you establish database connections from within a
> handler?
Absolutely. And using Abache::DBI caches the connection handle.
--
Dave Hodgkinson,
Thanks for reply.
I need some information in the Oracle database for access control. We have
some methods in our proprietary library for Oracle access. I have a file
called GateKeeper.pm that contains the access handler, sub handler{ ... }.
I placed the same code inside and outside of the handl
Time 12:02
Copy to (bcc: Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea)
Bcc Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea
Fax to
Subject database access
Hi,
I can access oracle
"Jason Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I can access oracle database from the main Apache process, but not from any
> child processes. I am fairly new to this subject, can someone give me some
> advice?
What error are you getting? You looked in the error logs? What do you
mean by "ma
Hi,
I can access oracle database from the main Apache process, but not from any
child processes. I am fairly new to this subject, can someone give me some
advice?
Thanks in advance,
Jason
32 matches
Mail list logo
