-Original Message-
From: Gunther Birznieks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 4:04 AM
To: Les Mikesell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tim Bunce; Aaron; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: database access
3. As a plug, I had also suggested a couple years ago
To: Les Mikesell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tim Bunce; Aaron; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: database access
3. As a plug, I had also suggested a couple years ago that I
would like the
feature to be able to specifically not having the ping() method by
Apache::DBI if the database had already
- Original Message -
From: "Gunther Birznieks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Les Mikesell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Tim Bunce" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Aaron" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:04 AM
Su
At 07:53 PM 11/15/2000 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Les Mikesell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Tim Bunce" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Aaron" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:21 A
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Les Mikesell wrote:
I wonder if Apache::DBI could figure out what connections are worth
holding open by itself? It could have some hints in the config file
like regexps to match plus a setting that would tell it not to
make a connection persist unless it had seen x
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Les Mikesell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Tim Bunce" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Aaron" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: database access
On Tue, 14 Nov
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Bunce" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the undocumented
somehow made it to the documented status.
yeah... but Apache::DBI and DBI are in cahoots! it's a secret love that
no documentation can
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:55:38PM -0500, Aaron wrote:
Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the undocumented
somehow made it to the documented status.
yeah... but Apache::DBI and DBI are in cahoots! it's a secret love that
no documentation can break apart!
I haven't followed this thread too closely, so forgive me if I'm not quite
with it...
It would be very useful to be able to specify at connect time that
you don't want a particular connection to be persistent. If you have
a lot of small databases or some with different user/password
At 08:04 AM 11/13/00 -0500, you wrote:
I haven't followed this thread too closely, so forgive me if I'm not quite
with it...
you can already do this with Apache::DBI...
change DBI-connect() to the (undocumented) 6 parameter call:
Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the
Hi there,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, George Sanderson wrote:
Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the undocumented
somehow made it to the documented status.
Well don't get me wrong either, but when I thought the Guide could do
with a re-write, I re-wrote it.
:)
73,
Ged.
Don't get me wrong here, "but", it would be nice if the undocumented
somehow made it to the documented status.
yeah... but Apache::DBI and DBI are in cahoots! it's a secret love that
no documentation can break apart!
no, really it would be nice if the DBI connection "hook" was
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Apache::DBI is, as far as I know, dangerous, and people rarely seem to
warn of this.
It's no more dangerous than any other scheme for persistent connections,
like JDBC pooling, etc.
It's dangerous because:
(a) Although
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Would you be interested in adding support for resetting some of these to
Apache::DBI? It's pretty easy to do, using PerlCleanupHandler like the
auto-rollback does. It would be database-specific though, so you'd have
to find a way for people to
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Would you be interested in adding support for resetting some of these to
Apache::DBI? It's pretty easy to do, using PerlCleanupHandler like the
auto-rollback does. It would be database-specific though, so you'd have
Les Mikesell wrote:
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Would you be interested in adding support for resetting some of these to
Apache::DBI? It's pretty easy to do, using PerlCleanupHandler like the
auto-rollback does. It would be database-specific
, 2000 4:11 PM
To: Greg Cope
Cc: Jason Liu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: database access
Greg Cope wrote:
Jason Liu wrote:
Is Apache::DBI absolutely necessary if you want to establish persistent
database connection per child?
No you can write your own (its open source remember
clayton cottingham wrote:
Greg Cope wrote:
Jason Liu wrote:
Is Apache::DBI absolutely necessary if you want to establish persistent
database connection per child?
No you can write your own (its open source remember ;-) but why bother -
standing on the shoulders of giants etc
oft SQL server on NT from Apache Server
under Linux,
Can some one give me a direction, how/where to looking into it?
Appreciate for any help
PC Wang
-Original Message-
From: clayton cottingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:11 PM
To: Greg Cope
Cc: Jason
I am trying to access access Microsoft SQL server on NT from Apache Server
under Linux,
Can some one give me a direction, how/where to looking into it?
Appreciate for any help
Check out the FreeTDS libs at:
http://www.freetds.org/
I use it now to contact a MS SQL 6.5 server from
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Apache::DBI is, as far as I know, dangerous, and people rarely seem to
warn of this.
It's no more dangerous than any other scheme for persistent connections,
like JDBC pooling, etc.
It's dangerous because:
(a) Although it rolls back any transactions
-
From: David Hodgkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 5:10 AM
To: Jason Liu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: database access
"Jason Liu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In general, how should database connections be handled betwee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Greg Cope
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 10:53 AM
To: Jason Liu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: database access
Jason Liu wrote:
Is Apache::DBI absolutely necessary if you want
,
Jason
-Original Message-
From: David Hodgkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 5:10 AM
To: Jason Liu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: database access
"Jason Liu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In general, how shoul
: database access
"Jason Liu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In general, how should database connections be handled between
parent and
child processes? Can you establish database connections from within a
handler?
Absolutely. And using Abache::DBI caches the connection handle.
HI Jason,
Have a look at the source of Apache::DBI.
An important part of the module is a ping method that ensures the
connection handle (e.g., $dbh) doesn't go stale.
You can write your own ping method by doing something like:
Thank you for the help everyone.
Jason
Hi,
I can access oracle database from the main Apache process, but not from any
child processes. I am fairly new to this subject, can someone give me some
advice?
Thanks in advance,
Jason
"Jason Liu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I can access oracle database from the main Apache process, but not from any
child processes. I am fairly new to this subject, can someone give me some
advice?
What error are you getting? You looked in the error logs? What do you
mean by "main"
ime 12:02
Copy to (bcc: Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea)
Bcc Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea
Fax to
Subject database access
Hi,
I can access oracle database from the m
Thanks for reply.
I need some information in the Oracle database for access control. We have
some methods in our proprietary library for Oracle access. I have a file
called GateKeeper.pm that contains the access handler, sub handler{ ... }.
I placed the same code inside and outside of the
"Jason Liu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In general, how should database connections be handled between parent and
child processes? Can you establish database connections from within a
handler?
Absolutely. And using Abache::DBI caches the connection handle.
--
Dave Hodgkinson,
32 matches
Mail list logo
