On Mon, 22 May 2000, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
> The problem had to do with large numbers of objects in the cache.
...
> Right now, things are in a holding pattern because I'm finding a limit
> on the number of objects I can put in the cache (less than 100, so it
> is an issue). Hopefully Sam will
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 03:46:41PM -0700, Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
> I know what beta testing is, so I hope you didn't think I was trying to yank
> your chain! I knew that if it got ugly I could easily take that server
> offline and easily back out the code.
Ack! I'm sorry for what I think is a m
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 2:36 PM
To: Karyn Ulriksen
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: mod_perl and IPC
That's why I wanted more beta testers on real servers. :)
You may want to roll back to 0.02 on that server. I'll run some more
bench
That's why I wanted more beta testers on real servers. :)
You may want to roll back to 0.02 on that server. I'll run some more
benchmarks and profile the code to see where the issue is. IPC::Cache
actually got a lot lighter, since I'm relying on IPC::SharedCache to
do most of the work.
I'l
erver with the old .02 code before I take off today.
-Karyn
-Original Message-
From: DeWitt Clinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 1:06 PM
To: Karyn Ulriksen
Subject: Re: mod_perl and IPC
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 02:01:42PM -0700, Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
>
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 04:35:54PM -0400, Drew Taylor wrote:
> Could I ask what the problems you were having? I can't use
> IPC::SharedCache currently because I get the error "Couldn't find free
> segment" or something like that when trying to initialize the cache. The
> system engineers are supp
> I could use a few beta testers of the new IPC::Cache module. If
> anyone wants to help, please let me know.
Count me in.
Drew Taylor wrote:
>
> Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
> >
> > Great News! But it is true. It works great. I monitor the servers closely
> > because I have quite a lot packed into them and the PHP module likes to get
> > ugly once in a while. I use the IPC::Cache module to simply stash
> > information
DeWitt Clinton wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm the author of IPC::Cache and frankly, I'm a little surprised
> it's worked so well for you. :) I've noticed some performance issues
> with it. The good news, however, is that Sam Tregar, author of
> IPC::SharedCache, and I have been working on a major upgrade.
Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
>
> Great News! But it is true. It works great. I monitor the servers closely
> because I have quite a lot packed into them and the PHP module likes to get
> ugly once in a while. I use the IPC::Cache module to simply stash
> information I retrieve from a database about
Karyn Ulriksen
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: mod_perl and IPC
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 12:06:20PM -0700, Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
> IPC::Cache has worked like a champ for me on a heavily loaded webserver.
> It's simple and (I'm lead to believe) it's a compiled mo
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 12:06:20PM -0700, Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
> IPC::Cache has worked like a champ for me on a heavily loaded webserver.
> It's simple and (I'm lead to believe) it's a compiled module. You interact
> with it like a hash file, but if you're clever you can work it out for your
>
ry nicely (no memory
leaks that I have run into).
Good luck!
-Original Message-
From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_perl and IPC
Hi there,
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Reilly, Thomas wrote:
> I have to
Hi there,
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Reilly, Thomas wrote:
> I have to find out what the best method is for having mod_perl have
> bi-directional communication with a unix daemon process which will
> receive a string (for simplicity!) from mod_perl, (extracted from
> the client request), talk to exist
Hi there!
i'm new to mod_perl/Apache! I have to find out what the best method
is for having mod_perl have bi-directional communication with a unix daemon
process which will receive a string (for simplicity!) from mod_perl,
(extracted from the client request), talk to existing c-code which
15 matches
Mail list logo
