Thanks Per. But should the stoic silence for this poser of mine, be construed as there
are NO takers out there who have their Web Sites in Production, running out of Apache
1.XX and Mod-Perl 1.XX on Windows NT/2000?
Primarily we are a Microsoft shop, and I would like to answer this question to
I am not sure, if I should post it here:
OS: Windows 2000; Perl:ActivePerl 631; Apache:2.0.35; Mod_Perl:1.99_01 downloaded via
PPM under theorynx website.
In the httpd.conf, I am making the Apache::Registry pointer to be
Apache2::ModPerl::Registry.
However, when my CGI script is run, I get
Randy:
Thanks for your response. Here are my responses:
A few things to perhaps look at ...
- does the error message give some more specific hint of what
may be wrong?
Not at all. THE REQUESTED OPERATION HAS FAILED -- This is the message that I get
from Apache Monitor Services application.
Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Arul, Rex wrote:
I am not sure, if I should post it here:
OS: Windows 2000; Perl:ActivePerl 631; Apache:2.0.35;
Mod_Perl:1.99_01 downloaded via PPM under theorynx website.
In the httpd.conf, I am making the Apache::Registry pointer
Randy:
In order to keep my Apache 1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26 safe, I tried installing Apache
2.0.35/mod_perl-2 on a different NT 4.0 Server with ActivePerl 628.
LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so
PerlModule Apache2
WORKS!!!
However, when I write a simple Perl CGI page, it bombs at the
Stas:
The fix still does not work. Here is the error message (OS: Windows NT 4.0 SP 6a;
ActivePerl 628; PPM Install of Mod_Perl-1.99 from theoryx.uwinnipeg.ca and Apache
2.0.35):
Server error!
Error message:
Attempt to free unreferenced scalar at
Thanks a lot to Stas and Randy, I have got the MOD_PERL-1.99 and Apache 2.0.35 to get
started up and running to serve the first CGIs under MOD_PERL in Windows NT 4.0 SP 6a
environment. I am sure it should be the same for Windows 2000 too.
Points:
1) I am having problems in my Windows 2000
