Brad Van Sickle bvs7...@gmail.com wrote:
What are you guys using to cluster the LVS servers? Is that
functionality native to LVS?
The keepalived daemon provides this. Can be triggered manually
(I'm doing this for a master-master mysql setup) or automatically,
for our backend LVS system.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Brad Van Sickle bvs7...@gmail.com wrote:
What are you guys using to cluster the LVS servers? Is that functionality
native to LVS?
There's a heartbeat system you can use for HA. If you look at the
docs for LVS you'll see info on it.
Also, I've come across
In data 15 aprile 2010 alle ore 05:11:15, Brad Van Sickle
bvs7...@gmail.com ha scritto:
LVS does sound interesting but in your infrastructure layout aren't your
single LVS load balancers single points of failure?
I simplified a bit too much :)
Every LVS machine has a hot-spare, and you
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Cosimo Streppone cos...@streppone.it wrote:
In data 15 aprile 2010 alle ore 05:11:15, Brad Van Sickle
bvs7...@gmail.com ha scritto:
LVS does sound interesting but in your infrastructure layout aren't your
single LVS load balancers single points of failure?
I
What are you guys using to cluster the LVS servers? Is that
functionality native to LVS?
Also, I've come across fastcgi a lot in researching this and I'm
having trouble understanding exactly what it is.
The fastcgi website makes it sound like it's almost a mod_perl
replacement and another
Hello
I have a lot of experience in large scale web applications using Java
and Websphere, but I now find myself needing to scale a web application
built on mod_perl, and I have some questions about best practices for
doing that since I don't have any sort of deployment manager or an
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Brad Van Sickle bvs7...@gmail.com wrote:
My first question relates to quality of service and load balancing:
I'm currently using mod_proxy on the web layer, and I know I can set that up
to load balance requests to multiple app layer nodes, but to the best of my
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Brad Van Sickle bvs7...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't find much info on perlbal after a quick glance, I'll certainly give
it a closer look, but my inital reaction is that I'm leary of replacing
Apache on my web layer. I'm doing a few things with a few other modules
So it sounds like Apache is simply not going to meet my needs. In the
event that I do need to replace Apache, hopefully you can save me some
research time and recommend me one of the listed options that fulfills
my needs (or confirm that perlbal does)
I need the following features:
1)
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Brad Van Sickle bvs7...@gmail.com wrote:
So it sounds like Apache is simply not going to meet my needs. In the event
that I do need to replace Apache, hopefully you can save me some research
time and recommend me one of the listed options that fulfills my needs
In data 14 aprile 2010 alle ore 22:57:06, Brad Van Sickle
bvs7...@gmail.com ha scritto:
My first question relates to quality of service and load balancing:
Hi Brad,
we're using LVS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Virtual_Server),
and I find it very useful and reliable.
Our
I concur with LVS. I have LVS running on a $10 piece of hardware (300
MHz CPU,
128MB memory) that acts as a load balancer for 15+ web servers. I use
keepalive
to monitor the systems.
Dzuy
Cosimo Streppone wrote:
In data 14 aprile 2010 alle ore 22:57:06, Brad Van Sickle
bvs7...@gmail.com
LVS does sound interesting but in your infrastructure layout aren't your
single LVS load balancers single points of failure? Especially if they
are running on older hardware? Maybe that isn't important in your
environment? However, it seems like that negates a lot of the high
availability
13 matches
Mail list logo
