Not sure how far this will go, but the Ninth Circuit has specified
that source code is protected free speech in support of Professor
Bernstein's original victory.
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,0-36217,00.html
__
Apache Inte
7;ve grabbed the snapshot "modssl-SNAP-19990506.tar.gz", and now get
past the problem where the SSL headers couldn't be found. However, a number
of alarming-style messages were displayed during the configure run :
===
Configur
Hello again,
I was wondering if anybody had been able to look at this. I'm still
experiencing the same difficulties, and nothing shows up in the error logs,
nada. The code only partially parses, and it's really baffling me. I have
confirmed the code works ok under plain mod_perl. If yo
Just a note from one of the teeming millions.
The current situation is rather confusing. Like many I had originally
thought ApacheSSL & mod_ssl were the same thing. I'm also one of those who
had initial difficulties installing ApacheSSL, so I tried out mod_ssl.
Ralf's extensive website and the p
Thanks guys this is great stuff. Very entertaining.
Cheers, g-
"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 05, 1999, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> > > > [...]
> > > > d) Apache-SSL supports DSOs.
> > >
> > > Are you sure, Ben? At least I still cannot image how you support DSO while
> > > Apache-SSL
On Thu, May 06, 1999, Harry Zink wrote:
> > Fine. Although from a performance point of view you'll not see much
> > differences, of course. It's more the functionality you've to compare IMHO.
> > For this an overview chart is useful...
>
> Understood, and I will compare functionality, as well as
> Fred Read writes:
Fred> We can access non secure web pages as "http://server/" and
Fred> "http://server/~user" but "https://server/" fails with the
Fred> following error message:
Fred> Netscape's network connection was refused by the server:
Fred>
Fred> The server may not be ac
> We can access non secure web pages as "http://server/" and
> "http://server/~user" but "https://server/" fails with the
> following error message:
>
> Netscape's network connection was refused by the server:
>
> The server may not be accepting connections or
> may be busy.
>
> Tr
> Fine. Although from a performance point of view you'll not see much
> differences, of course. It's more the functionality you've to compare IMHO.
> For this an overview chart is useful...
Understood, and I will compare functionality, as well as ease of use, and
ease of install.
After all, some
Having written an authentication module for Apache which has
passed our testing and appears to be working fine we rebuilt
Apache with mod_ssl.
We can access non secure web pages as "http://server/" and
"http://server/~user" but "https://server/" fails with the
following error message:
Nets
On Thu, May 06, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> HOWEVER, I'm sorry but having just had a look round the CVS part of
> www.modssl.org, I really don't think I'm capable of trying to assemble a
> working distribution - at least not without first learning all about CVS
> (I've never used it
>> But, when I try building mod_ssl-2.2.8_1.3.6, I get :-
>> + SSL interface vendor extensions: disabled
>> Unknown flag
>> + SSL interface plugin: Configured DBM (-ldbm)
>> Error: Cannot find SSL header files under
>> /data/arc/apache/openssl-SNAP-19990426
>> + SSL library path:
On Thu, May 06, 1999, Boyce, Nick wrote:
> On 5th.May.1999 Mads Toftum wrote
>
> > You should have SSL_BASE=../openssl-SNAP-19990426 on the same line as the
> > ./configure
>
> Sorry, but that failed in just the same way :
> [...]
As I said: You've to use the latest mod_ssl CVS version when
On 5th.May.1999 Mads Toftum wrote
> You should have SSL_BASE=../openssl-SNAP-19990426 on the same line as the
> ./configure
Sorry, but that failed in just the same way :
> =< cut >==
>
In directory /data/arc/apache/mod_ssl-2.2.8-1.3.6 :-
SSL_B
On Wed, May 05, 1999, Boyce, Nick wrote:
> I've raised this with Ralf E via the Mod_SSL Jitterbug system, but either
> I'm posting followup mail to the wrong address, or he's away right now, as
> it's all gone quiet.
The address for replies is [EMAIL PROTECTED] But you're right, it
should be wr
On Wed, May 05, 1999, Harry Zink wrote:
> While it is certainly entertaining to observe the bickerings of your two, on
> here, allow me a suggestion that will actually benefit those who need to use
> these tools, and are more interested in performance than politics:
>
> I am going to set up two
On Wed, May 05, 1999, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > d) Apache-SSL supports DSOs.
> >
> > Are you sure, Ben? At least I still cannot image how you support DSO while
> > Apache-SSL still uses direct symbol references between the Apache core and the
> > apache_ssl module (the big "no-no" for
Full_Name: Jeroen Gremmen
Version: 2.2.8
OS: Linux
Submission from: gw-nl2.origin-it.com (193.79.128.38)
I have the following problem:
When accessing my secured pages from IE5 (same with IE4) it says 'This
certificate cannot be verified due to a lack of information'. I've read through
the mod_ss
I have the following problem:
When accessing my secured pages from IE5 (same with IE4) it says 'This
certificate cannot be verified due to a lack of information'. I've read
through the mod_ssl and openssl documentation and frankly I really don't
understand this certificate creation.
What I want t
19 matches
Mail list logo
