mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-16 Thread Jan Vejvalka
Hi *, I read the FAQ ( http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#vhosts ) and I read Owen's reply to this list from March 28 ( http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modssl&m=98576871506980&w=2 ) I still have a question to ask. Before I found that FAQ and that reply, I was trying (for some

mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

1999-09-09 Thread Mike
Hi everyone Please forgive a beginners' possibly ignorant question... My first attempt at this... I have a server with several name based virtual hosts on it. As I discovered, mod_ssl won't work with name based virtual hosts, for reasons discussed earlier on this list. My question is, will it

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-16 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Jan Vejvalka wrote: > NameVirtualHost 1.2.3.4:443 > > > ServerName host1.mydomain.dom > DocumentRoot "/data/host1" > ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ServerName host2.mydomain.dom > DocumentRoot "/data/host2" > ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > (...) > > The rest of

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-17 Thread Jan Vejvalka
Thanks for the reply. > If you're using the same SSL configuration and the same certificate for > both hosts (generally not an option in the real world because of the > security alert boxes it brings up in the browser), then you won't _notice_ > a problem with namevirtualhost. That's because you

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-17 Thread Jeff
TED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:33 PM Subject: Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts > Thanks for the reply. > > > If you're using the same SSL configuration and the same certificate for > > both hosts (generally not an option in the r

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-17 Thread Jan Vejvalka
Jeff, Thanks for the sequence, it's clear now. Just why doesn't it work with the wildcarded VirtualHost ? I didn't come to the idea of the wildcard certificate, and I didn't mind the popup messages. It's better without them, thanks ! Jan > If so, then it is quite simple > 1/. browser looks

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-17 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 06:52:42PM +1000, Jeff wrote: > Jan, > > What is the host name (common name) in the certificates ??? > I suspect you have used *.mydomain.dom - correct ??? > > If so, then it is quite simple > 1/. browser looks up DNS and gets IP, > 2/. browser connects to IP port 443, >

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-18 Thread Michael Grant
Jeff wrote: > What is the host name (common name) in the certificates ??? > I suspect you have used *.mydomain.dom - correct ??? Hmm, I'm also using name based virtual hosting with ssl as well, but my cert isn't *.domain.dom, it's just cn=domain.dom. The virtual hosts are of the form sub1.domain

RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-22 Thread robert
18, 2001 3:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts Jeff wrote: > What is the host name (common name) in the certificates ??? > I suspect you have used *.mydomain.dom - correct ??? Hmm, I'm also using name based virtual hosting with ssl as well,

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-23 Thread Magnus Stenman
inal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Grant > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 3:52 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts > > Jeff wrote: > > What is the host name (common name)

RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread robert
bject: Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > can some one send me the proper syntax for setting up name-based virtual > host with ssl? > I have tried several things and only nonvitrual host seem to

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread Owen Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Can I assign privet ip's to a virtual host and still server it on the web? > Or will I have to buy public ips? I assume you are trying to get round the problem of only-one-SSL-host per IP address (otherwise there is no point in doing this for ordinary HTTP). Think i

RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread John . Airey
, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 26 July 2001 14:31 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: mod_ssl and name-based virtua

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Owen Boyle wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Can I assign privet ip's to a virtual host and still server it on the web? > > Or will I have to buy public ips? > > I assume you are trying to get round the problem of only-one-SSL-host > per IP address (otherwise there

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-26 Thread Eric Rescorla
Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, this is a problem with how *HTTPS* works - SSL (and TLS) are just > channel-level encryption and/or authentication protocols, what you tunnel > through them (and what semantic juggling you do with the peer-certificates, such > as URL <--> CN com

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

1999-09-09 Thread Henrik Olsen
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Mike wrote: > Hi everyone > > Please forgive a beginners' possibly ignorant question... My first attempt > at this... > > I have a server with several name based virtual hosts on it. As I > discovered, mod_ssl won't work with name based virtual hosts, for > reasons discusse

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts (oops)

2001-07-17 Thread Jan Vejvalka
> This, however, does not work if I use > (the same IP address for all hosts) instead of . > > Still a bit confused. Definitely confused: I turned that just the other way. Now correctly: when I specify the IP address (the same IP for all the SSL v-hosts), it works. When I use the asterisk,