Re: CGI::Uploader & CGI::Upload (was: CGI::FileManager)

2004-05-01 Thread Mark Stosberg
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 11:12:48AM -0700, Austin Schutz wrote: > > Having multiple modules which appear to provide parallel benefit > can end up confusing the users as to which module is the best. It can. This is also an area where the cpan rating sytems can be very helpful: ( http://cpanrat

Re: CGI::Uploader (was: CGI::FileManager)

2004-05-01 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Austin Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be nice if there were some way to take over management of > the module from the current owner. If they aren't responsive, there ought > to be some mechanism for doing it without their input. if you need to take o

Re: CGI::Uploader (was: CGI::FileManager)

2004-05-01 Thread Austin Schutz
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 07:58:02AM -0500, Mark Stosberg wrote: > > I can see two minor bugs that require little more than a line or two of > > changes to fix them, and one feature request which includes code. Are > > there some other bugs I'm missing? > > This bug is not minor: > http://rt.cpan.o

Re: CGI::Uploader (was: CGI::FileManager)

2004-05-01 Thread Andy Wardley
Mark Stosberg wrote: > I think I want to make some slight tweaks to the API, but it's about > ready for 1.0. It's built around my own common usage: Uploading images > and storing meta data in a database. However, it works fine for non > images as well. I think this module should be called CGI::Im

Re: CGI::Uploader (was: CGI::FileManager)

2004-05-01 Thread Mark Stosberg
Thanks for the feedback Andy. > On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 09:00:36AM +0100, Andy Wardley wrote: > Mark Stosberg wrote: > > I think I want to make some slight tweaks to the API, but it's about > > ready for 1.0. It's built around my own common usage: Uploading images > > and storing meta data in a d

Re: CGI::Uploader (was: CGI::FileManager)

2004-04-30 Thread Mark Stosberg
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:47:49PM -0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > > I am looking for a module that can be used as part of a web based > application which requires management of a (partial) file system. > If there is no such module I wonder if it would be interesting to add > to CPAN ? > > So my ques

Re: CGI::FileManager

2004-04-30 Thread Ken Youens-Clark
t; application should not be. > > For uploading a file I could use CGI::Upload. > > > So my questions are: > - Is there such a module that someone could recommend ? > - If there is no such module would a generic FileManager module using > CGI be interesting on CPAN ?

CGI::FileManager

2004-04-30 Thread Gabor Szabo
such module would a generic FileManager module using CGI be interesting on CPAN ? - What name ? CGI::FileManager ? - What else should such a module include ? Gabor