You should copy Java plugin DLL files manually.
(I know Mozilla can detect Java VM and install plugin automacally, but
it doesn't always work.)
Copy all NP*.DLL (maybe 4 or 5 files) in the Java VM bin directory to
Mozilla plugin directory and restart Mozilla.
Philippe Benthien wrote:
I
Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
Hi,
when I installed 0.92 the collected addresses were lost and the
addresses stopped being collected. I finally fixed it by creating a new
profile.
Now I've installed 0.93, and besides skyPilot being slightly broken, the
collected addresses have gone haywire
IOW, if you design a browser to accomodate a 20% error rate,
designers will allow pages to pass with 25% bad code. If you
change to 25%, the designers will allow 30%. It's a negative
feedback loop.
I can't think of any reason why not closing 100 tags would be of
benefit to anyone (well,
Hi,
Of late, I've been installing the various Mozilla
stable releases (0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc.) and, needless to
say, have been VERY impressed with it - it's my default
browser for almost everything except for brain-dead
sites that require me to use IE. Congratulations and
sincere Thanks to all
On 6 Aug 2001 07:12:52 GMT,
richard snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
: when I installed 0.92 the collected addresses were lost and the
: addresses stopped being collected. I finally fixed it by creating a new
: profile.
: Now I've installed 0.93, and besides skyPilot
On 5 Aug 2001 20:50:08 GMT,
Dave Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
:Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:(XML is another story.) OTOH, increasing the stack limit to allow even
:more broken pages is most likely not worth the effort. Authors should
:just fix their
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
Hi,
Of late, I've been installing the various Mozilla
stable releases (0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc.) and, needless to
say, have been VERY impressed with it - it's my default
browser for almost everything except for brain-dead
sites that require me to use IE. Congratulations
Someone figured that allowing deeper nesting would make a stack overflow
somewhere. (It has happened. That's why the limit was put in.)
So it shows as much as it can without crashing. An excellent
explanation.
I can't recall now - wasn't there some discussion about showing a
tray icon
Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
Hi,
when I installed 0.92 the collected addresses were lost and the
addresses stopped being collected. I finally fixed it by creating a new
profile.
Now I've installed 0.93, and besides skyPilot being slightly broken, the
collected addresses have gone haywire
Jerry Park wrote:
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
Hi,
Of late, I've been installing the various Mozilla
stable releases (0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc.) and, needless to
say, have been VERY impressed with it - it's my default
browser for almost everything except for brain-dead
sites that require me to use
On 6 Aug 2001 06:10:09 -0700,
Jason Bassford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Someone figured that allowing deeper nesting would make a stack overflow
: somewhere. (It has happened. That's why the limit was put in.)
: So it shows as much as it can without crashing. An excellent
:explanation.
:
Steve wrote:
I was trying to do a regular expression search on some HTML based on
Mozilla's View Source, and it just wouldn't work.
I downloaded the file to my machine and opened it up with a text
editor. I saw that what showed up as foo in Mozilla's View Source was
actually FOO on the
To everyone:
I've been using Mozilla off and on since the beginning, and have been
excitedly tracking your progress, longing for the day that I could use
Mozilla full time.
With the web development that I do, I need a stable environment to work
with, and especially a solid browser that can
I was lead engineer!
Luke Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
To everyone:
I've been using Mozilla off and on since the beginning, and have been
excitedly tracking your progress, longing for the day that I could use
Mozilla full time.
Netscape 6.1 Final was released this morning. You can find it at
ftp5.netscape.com/pub/netscape6/english/6.1.
http://www.ctv.es/cctv/contactar_.html
Ross Systems S.L.
CCTV division
Poligono Asuarán nave 16
48950 Asua Vizcaya
944710500 - Fax 944711324
Hi Asa, thanks for the reply
Asa Dotzler wrote:
It is very underused making the wishes of a couple of people look much
more important than they probably should be. We have 15,000 active
Bugzilla accounts and the most voted for bug has like 150 votes!!!
Low voter turnout is a
I also wrote most on the in-line functionallity yesterday.
Chris Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Wow!
I'm absolutely blown away by how stable and fast Mozilla has gotten.
You folks have done an amazing job since the last time I used it (~4
months ago).
Jerry Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If you really wanna have fun listening to the kooks, I suggest tuning
into KHOW AM 630 down there in the Springs (if it comes in) around 11
o'clock. The Art Bell show features regular guests who speak
David Coppit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi Asa, thanks for the reply
Asa Dotzler wrote:
What if it is a request for a feature that
would take significant enginering resources away from existing buggy
features. I never see
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
Netscape 6.1 Final was released this morning. You can find it at
ftp5.netscape.com/pub/netscape6/english/6.1.
The folder exists, but there's no browser there yet.
But I think that means we'll have final release soon.
We'd be greatful if some knowledgeable user would tell us what (if any) file
likely to be named what likely located in what directory/folder if one opted
for the default installation one can modify to force the Mozilla (Build
2001060703) browser to display text in some chosen/arbitrary size.
I would say 0.8.1 was the first release which was stable enough to use
as my primary browser. I think it started kicking ass with 0.9.2 release
and 0.9.2+ nightlies. Recent nightlies 20010080508 and today's build are
the best so far IHMO.
Win98SE
Chris Snell wrote:
Wow!
I'm absolutely
richard snow wrote:
Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
btw: I still love this browser. Before I said: If I can't use my
browser with my bank I must change browser. Now it's more the other
way around :o)
Trying again with Reply ALL instead of Reply.
Wauv. That would be my second e-mail on that
Eric Vaandering wrote:
Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
Now I've installed 0.93, and besides skyPilot being slightly broken,
the collected addresses have gone haywire in the same way again. (I
never use nightlies for lack of time :-/). Do anyone know a less
timeconsuming and drastic solution
I have a limited knowledge of HTML. As I navigate to many web sites,
even I notice sloppy html coding. I know that Mozilla handles HTML 4.01
and through the quirks modes Netscape 4.0. Is this enough. Does Mozilla
need one more mode that allows for many cases of coding I will simply
call
I know browser sniffers have been debated to death. Please read what I
have written before you give up on further debate.
Is it possible to have a menu bar item where we could change the code in
Mozilla that browsers dectect? Sometimes Mozilla will work with a site
it has been shut out of
Asa Dotzler wrote:
snip
We try to tackle the most important bugs first. At
the top of the list are crashes, hangs and dataloss problems that affect
our users. Very few people vote for these types of bugs. Perhaps voting
would make more sense as a tool for Enhancement bugs only. It seems
Paul Bergsagel wrote:
snip
Is it possible to have a menu bar item where we could change the code in
Mozilla that browsers dectect?
big snip
See the mostfreq bug 46029
(http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46029)
Jacek
Could you send me a screen shot of the new Netscape 6.1. Would love to
look at it.
Wayne
Thomas wrote:
I was lucky :) but I don't like the new netscape icon...(rounded
edges) :)
but the mail icons are cool!
Gord McFee wrote:
Mustafa Hirji wrote:
In article [EMAIL
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Bergsagel wrote:
I have a limited knowledge of HTML. As I navigate to many web sites,
even I notice sloppy html coding. I know that Mozilla handles HTML 4.01
and through the quirks modes Netscape 4.0. Is this enough. Does Mozilla
need one more mode that
I was lucky :) but I don't like the new netscape icon...(rounded edges) :)
but the mail icons are cool!
Gord McFee wrote:
Mustafa Hirji wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
Netscape 6.1 Final was released this morning. You can find it at
Thomas wrote:
I was lucky :) but I don't like the new netscape icon...(rounded edges) :)
but the mail icons are cool!
Gord McFee wrote:
Mustafa Hirji wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
Netscape 6.1 Final was released this morning. You can find it
I am unable to add anything to my personal tool bar, the instructions
inside the latest Netscape notwithstanding. I posted this question
before but evidently I wasn't taken seriously.
Earlier versions allowed the creation of personal tool bar items by
simply dragging the URL from the window to
Edit Preferences Appearance Fonts
click on use my fonts, overriding page specific Fonts ... I think will
do what you want.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'd be greatful if some knowledgeable user would tell us what (if any) file
likely to be named what likely located in what directory/folder
I have a limited knowledge of HTML. As I navigate to many web sites,
even I notice sloppy html coding. I know that Mozilla handles HTML 4.01
and through the quirks modes Netscape 4.0. Is this enough. Does Mozilla
need one more mode that allows for many cases of coding I will simply
call
Nick Richards wrote:
Jerry Park wrote:
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
Hi,
Of late, I've been installing the various Mozilla
stable releases (0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc.) and, needless to
say, have been VERY impressed with it - it's my default
browser for almost everything except for brain-dead
sites
And it came to pass that Dave Huang wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Christopher Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And it came to pass that Dave Huang wrote:
They should, but like it or not, most people use IE as
their HTML validator--
Sloppy. They should use a validator, not a browser.
And it came to pass that Paul Bergsagel wrote:
I have a limited knowledge of HTML. As I navigate to many
web sites, even I notice sloppy html coding. I know that
Mozilla handles HTML 4.01 and through the quirks modes
Netscape 4.0. Is this enough. Does Mozilla need one more
mode that allows
And it came to pass that RV wrote:
Netscape 6.1 Final was released this morning. You can find
it at ftp5.netscape.com/pub/netscape6/english/6.1.
Nope, it's another Beta update, that was mislabeled. It's
officially N6.61b1b
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
And it came to pass that Peter Tatiner wrote:
I am unable to add anything to my personal tool bar, the
instructions inside the latest Netscape notwithstanding. I
posted this question before but evidently I wasn't taken
seriously.
Earlier versions allowed the creation of personal tool
Jay Garcia wrote:
Thomas wrote:
I was lucky :) but I don't like the new netscape icon...(rounded edges) :)
but the mail icons are cool!
Gord McFee wrote:
Mustafa Hirji wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
Netscape 6.1 Final was released this morning. You can
Gord McFee wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Thomas wrote:
I was lucky :) but I don't like the new netscape icon...(rounded edges) :)
but the mail icons are cool!
Gord McFee wrote:
Mustafa Hirji wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
Netscape 6.1 Final was released
Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
IOW, if you design a browser to accomodate a 20% error rate,
designers will allow pages to pass with 25% bad code. If you
change to 25%, the designers will allow 30%. It's a negative
feedback loop.
I can't think of any reason why not closing 100 tags would be
* * * * THIS IS NOT AN MLM PROGRAM! * * * *
The World's Leading Entrepreneurs Joined Forces 4 years ago
and created THE MOST POWERFUL AND PROFITABLE
VENTURE IN THE WORLD.
THIS IS AN ENTREPRENEURS DREAM THAT IS CREATING
THE MOST PHENOMENAL WORLDWIDE EXPLOSION NEVER
SEEN BEFORE.
You're
The subject pretty much covers it... I am behind so many firewalls that
a team of network security engineers has to sacrifice a virgin goat in
order to retrieve a simple webpage from the Outside World. Just how is
the talkback agent supposed to get through things like blocked outbound
ports,
++
Urlaubsnachricht / Autoreply
Automatisch generierte Email
Bitte nicht antworten!
OUT OF OFFICE
automatic generated Email
please don´t reply!
INCA - Manfred KREJCIK
Network Support
++
Sg. geehrter Absender!
That is not what it reports when clicking on Help About Netscape =
NETSCAPE 6.1
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
Beta versions reported as Netscape 6.1PR1 and I believe were based on Gecko
rv 0.91 build20010623
Christopher Jahn
RV wrote:
That is not what it reports when clicking on Help About Netscape =
NETSCAPE 6.1
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726
Netscape6/6.1
Beta versions reported as Netscape 6.1PR1 and I believe were based on
Gecko rv 0.91 build20010623
Christopher
In article 9klctj$[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
They should, but like it or not, most people use IE as their HTML validator.
This does not make such behavior right, nor should we try and solve
the problem by encouraging people to continue down the path of such
behavior.
In article 9kic92$[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
I'm guessing all the unclosed fonts are causing some stack to fill, and
Mozilla gives up rendering the rest of the page? Anyways, I think it'd be
nice if Mozilla could handle this, although I have no idea how hard it'd
be to do.
That is an interestingly broad statement. Do I understand that there are
no high level language compilers or interpreters that you can recommend?
Let me break down my broad statement into two groups. When the code's
intent is unambiguous I fully expect any software to cope. When the
code's
RV wrote:
Netscape 6.1 Final was released this morning. You can find it at
ftp5.netscape.com/pub/netscape6/english/6.1.
= permission denied
BArt
It's not too much to demand that people write proper code.
OK, what about these situations:
a) Webdesigner views their own site but doesn't know how to fix it.
b) Webdesigner views anothers' broken site and is unable to use it but
notifies the owner. Website owner doesn't respond.
c) Computer
54 matches
Mail list logo
