Hi Bill,
on OS X Snow Leopard all tests passed successfully.
Bests regards,
Ricard de Benito.
2010/1/14 Bill Hart
> I have fixed the issue with t-invert being missing from the tarball,
> and so rc6 is now available on our site for testing.
>
> I also made a number of very minor corrections (p
make ; make check passes for me on linux 64 bit (debian 5.0)
cpu = Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (nehalem)
gcc 4.3.2
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> I have fixed the issue with t-invert being missing from the tarball,
> and so rc6 is now available on our site
Great! It's looking like it might be a genuine release candidate.
I missed a reference from the tex file and there's some paperwork.
There's also a minor issue reported to me off list with the yasm
configure, which doesn't recognise all the things we like to pass to
MPIR's configure, which I'll ne
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
> I have fixed the issue with t-invert being missing from the tarball,
> and so rc6 is now available on our site for testing.
>
> I also made a number of very minor corrections (paperwork, essentially).
>
> Fingers crossed!
>
> Bill.
>
Builds and t
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> You have to do make distclean before going from a 64 bit build to a 32
> bit build.
>
> Let me know if this doesn't fix it for you.
That was my problem, working fine now.
Jeff.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
You have to do make distclean before going from a 64 bit build to a 32
bit build.
Let me know if this doesn't fix it for you.
Bill.
2010/1/14 Jeff Gilchrist :
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>
>>> If we are on a 64bit OS and want to build a 32bit mpir library, how
>>> wou
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>> If we are on a 64bit OS and want to build a 32bit mpir library, how
>> would we do this use: ./configure ABI=32 ?
>
> Yes, I believe this is the correct method. This will force it to check
> only 32 bit compiler flags.
I just wanted to double
2010/1/14 Jeff Gilchrist :
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>> I have fixed the issue with t-invert being missing from the tarball,
>> and so rc6 is now available on our site for testing.
>
> The following systems have passed ./configure --enable-cxx; make; make check
>
> -
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
> I have fixed the issue with t-invert being missing from the tarball,
> and so rc6 is now available on our site for testing.
The following systems have passed ./configure --enable-cxx; make; make check
- Linux 64bit Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5440 @
Note that on x86 and x86_64, the linux build will complain of
unrecognised configure options (if you supply any of the more unusual
MPIR specific ones, even --enable-cxx, I believe). This is harmless,
it is just yasm letting you know it doesn't recognise the options
(which it safely ignores).
I wi
I have fixed the issue with t-invert being missing from the tarball,
and so rc6 is now available on our site for testing.
I also made a number of very minor corrections (paperwork, essentially).
Fingers crossed!
Bill.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I found the issue. The file t-invert was missing from the Makefile,
which caused autotools to skip over it.
I've corrected the issue, but cannot issue rc6 until the machine I was
working on (boxen.math) comes back up. It seems to have all but died.
Bill.
2010/1/14 Bill Hart :
> Well, the missing
Well, the missing file is indeed a problem. That has to be an
autotools issue. But I don't have an idea what exactly is going wrong
yet. I thought I had autotools working without complaint.
I'll look into it.
Bill.
2010/1/14 Case Vanhorsen :
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Bill Hart
> wrot
Oops. Wasn't sent to mpir-devel. I sent you a copy.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Case Vanhorsen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Cactus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 14, 4:52 am, Case Vanhorsen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Bill Hart
>>> wrote:
>>> > I believe I've mana
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Cactus wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 14, 4:52 am, Case Vanhorsen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Bill Hart
>> wrote:
>> > I believe I've managed to get a working release candidate (rc5)
>> > together, and it is up on the website now for testing.
>>
>> > This
On Jan 14, 4:52 am, Case Vanhorsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
> > I believe I've managed to get a working release candidate (rc5)
> > together, and it is up on the website now for testing.
>
> > This version is actually a candidate for release, as it fixes al
16 matches
Mail list logo
