[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-25 Thread Bill Hart
That's great. Thanks. Bill. 2008/12/26 : > > On Thursday 25 December 2008 11:57:40 Bill Hart wrote: >> These look ok to me. If you want to do autoxmas and commit to trunk, go >> ahead. >> > OK > >> The only thing missing is the license text. You have your copyright, >> but at present you are no

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-25 Thread jason
On Thursday 25 December 2008 11:57:40 Bill Hart wrote: > These look ok to me. If you want to do autoxmas and commit to trunk, go > ahead. > OK > The only thing missing is the license text. You have your copyright, > but at present you are not licensing anyone to redistribute your code. > Your lic

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-25 Thread Bill Hart
These look ok to me. If you want to do autoxmas and commit to trunk, go ahead. The only thing missing is the license text. You have your copyright, but at present you are not licensing anyone to redistribute your code. Your license only has to be compatible with "LGPL version 2 (or at the users o

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-24 Thread jason
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 01:04:13 Bill Hart wrote: > Great! Torbjorn's patch is clearly licensed v3+, so we cannot use it > as eMPIRe is LGPL v2+. > While waiting for Santa , I don't think he's coming , I did this This should correct the present errors , I can svn into trunk at some point

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread jason
On Dec 24, 2:47 am, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: > On Wednesday 24 December 2008 02:23:22 Jason Martin wrote: > > > Thanks Jason & Bill, > > > I'll try digging into those errors in two day (Christmas/Family > > obligations at the moment). I really really dislike > > auto{conf|make|tool}, bu

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread jason
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 02:23:22 Jason Martin wrote: > Thanks Jason & Bill, > > I'll try digging into those errors in two day (Christmas/Family > obligations at the moment). I really really dislike > auto{conf|make|tool}, but I guess I need to embrace it... seems to be > the only game in to

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Jason Martin
Thanks Jason & Bill, I'll try digging into those errors in two day (Christmas/Family obligations at the moment). I really really dislike auto{conf|make|tool}, but I guess I need to embrace it... seems to be the only game in town. --jason Jason Worth Martin Asst. Professor of Mathematics http:/

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread jason
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 01:50:38 Bill Hart wrote: > OK great. Can you commit to trunk after running that. > done result after running aclocal,autoconf,automake,autoheader and rm -r autom4te.cache > It should fix the --enable-cxx issue you reported. We've already > tested this fix previou

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Bill Hart
OK great. Can you commit to trunk after running that. It should fix the --enable-cxx issue you reported. We've already tested this fix previously and it should work. Just no one committed it. The automess I reported is probably due to a different version of autohell on sage.math (the machine we

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread jason
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 01:22:01 Bill Hart wrote: > I've got a fix for the --tag issue, but I can't commit it because > aclocal, autoconf, automake return a whole pile of errors. Seems like > the whole build system has gotten screwed up. runs fine on my system make distclean r...@box1:~/

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Bill Hart
wbh...@sage:~/mpir-0.9.0$ aclocal configure.in:3022: warning: AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC is m4_require'd but not m4_defun'd acinclude.m4:2299: GMP_ASM_X86_GOT_UNDERSCORE is expanded from... configure.in:3022: the top level configure.in:3025: warning: AC_ENABLE_SHARED is m4_require'd but not m4_d

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Bill Hart
I've got a fix for the --tag issue, but I can't commit it because aclocal, autoconf, automake return a whole pile of errors. Seems like the whole build system has gotten screwed up. I'll commit the fix for the --tag issue, but it won't take effect until someone can successfully run aclocal, autoc

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread jason
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 01:15:08 Bill Hart wrote: > Are you sure it is not in there? It is in the version I checked out. > Yeah , sorry it is there , just not right permissions so on a color term I miss it > Bill. > > 2008/12/24 : > > On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:51:20 ja...@njkfrudi

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Bill Hart
Are you sure it is not in there? It is in the version I checked out. Bill. 2008/12/24 : > > On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:51:20 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: >> On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:31:50 Bill Hart wrote: >> > On sage.math: >> > >> > cd tune >> > make tune >> > >> > ./.libs/li

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread jason
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:51:20 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: > On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:31:50 Bill Hart wrote: > > On sage.math: > > > > cd tune > > make tune > > > > ./.libs/libspeed.a(gcd_bin.o): In function `__gmpn_ngcd_matrix_init': > > gcd_bin.c:(.text+0x0): multiple defini

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Bill Hart
Great! Torbjorn's patch is clearly licensed v3+, so we cannot use it as eMPIRe is LGPL v2+. Bill. 2008/12/24 : > > On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:44:22 Bill Hart wrote: >> Times seem great for GCD. Just some build issues to fix and we're done! >> >> Oh and I need to fix the perfect power bug.

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Bill Hart
Likewise for me make try is running fine. I will leave it running overnight. Bill. 2008/12/24 : > > On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:31:50 Bill Hart wrote: >> On sage.math: >> >> cd tune >> make tune >> >> ./.libs/libspeed.a(gcd_bin.o): In function `__gmpn_ngcd_matrix_init': >> gcd_bin.c:(.text

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread jason
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:44:22 Bill Hart wrote: > Times seem great for GCD. Just some build issues to fix and we're done! > > Oh and I need to fix the perfect power bug. > I've got a fix , but I would like to check it some more tomorrow. Jason > Bill. > > 2008/12/24 Bill Hart : > > On

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread jason
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 00:31:50 Bill Hart wrote: > On sage.math: > > cd tune > make tune > > ./.libs/libspeed.a(gcd_bin.o): In function `__gmpn_ngcd_matrix_init': > gcd_bin.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `__gmpn_ngcd_matrix_init' > gcd.o:gcd.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here > ./.lib

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Bill Hart
Times seem great for GCD. Just some build issues to fix and we're done! Oh and I need to fix the perfect power bug. Bill. 2008/12/24 Bill Hart : > On sage.math: > > cd tune > make tune > > ./.libs/libspeed.a(gcd_bin.o): In function `__gmpn_ngcd_matrix_init': > gcd_bin.c:(.text+0x0): multiple de

[mpir-devel] Re: Need some review with these files

2008-12-23 Thread Bill Hart
On sage.math: cd tune make tune ./.libs/libspeed.a(gcd_bin.o): In function `__gmpn_ngcd_matrix_init': gcd_bin.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `__gmpn_ngcd_matrix_init' gcd.o:gcd.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here ./.libs/libspeed.a(gcd_bin.o): In function `__gmpn_nhgcd_itch': gcd_bin.c:(.te