Re: [MSX] MSX Emulator Comparison [update]

2005-02-27 Thread Sander Zuidema
uhm... the second M.E.S.S. should of course be NLMSX. Sorry! :) Sander Zuidema wrote: The MSX Emulator Comparison is a thorough back-to-back comparison of 12 different MSX emulators for Windows. Each emulator is rated according to its accuracy, sound-quality, useability and the amount of

[MSX] MSX Emulator Comparison [update]

2005-02-27 Thread Sander Zuidema
The MSX Emulator Comparison is a thorough back-to-back comparison of 12 different MSX emulators for Windows. Each emulator is rated according to its accuracy, sound-quality, useability and the amount of features it has to offer. In this new edition of the comparison, the latest versions of

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-21 Thread Roel de Wit
Hi, > > Hmmm I've tried the standard Unix version of fMSX.. It compiled okay but > > said it couldn't open a window in X-Window... > The colour depth of fMSX is fixed at compilation time. Does the colour depth > (BPP) specified in the fMSX Makefile match the colour depth of your X server? That w

Re:[2] MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-15 Thread Francisco Alvarez
"yoyo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/06/02 15:01:44: >I can't run open MSX I wait for a windows version > >Yea I'm a bad microsoft user :-) No no, you are a good Microsoft user!!! ;-) Regards, Saeba -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-15 Thread yoyo
lnetaide @paris @france1 (www.france1.org) yoyo - Original Message - From: "David Heremans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:15 PM Subject: Re: MSX Emulator comparison > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 11:37:24PM +0200, Beno?t D

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-12 Thread Roel de Wit
Hi, Whoops... My fault Anyhow, downloading now :) > For the download: > > 1) go to http://openmsx.sf.net/ > 2) click 'project summary' > 3) click 'Download' > > If you have troubles with openMSX, don't hesitate to contact the > developers with details! > > Thanks, > > Joost > > -

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-11 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:35:25PM +0200, Roel de Wit wrote: > Hi, > > Too bad I can't download it anywhere.. I've looked at the openmsx site a few > times since Tilburg but there never was a (working) source/binary download > link. I think it depends on your definition of 'working'. It works al

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-11 Thread Roel de Wit
Hi, Too bad I can't download it anywhere.. I've looked at the openmsx site a few times since Tilburg but there never was a (working) source/binary download link. > > I don't know why NLMSX is not in your TOP 5 of the MSX emulators, but I must > > precise one thing : NLMSX, as MESS, emulates the

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-11 Thread David Heremans
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 11:37:24PM +0200, Beno?t Delvaux wrote: > I don't know why NLMSX is not in your TOP 5 of the MSX emulators, but I must > precise one thing : NLMSX, as MESS, emulates the SRAM, not only of the > Panasonic FM-PAC, but also the SRAM of some cartridge games in "ASCII" > format.

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-11 Thread Maarten ter Huurne
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 13:32, Roel de Wit wrote: > Hmmm I've tried the standard Unix version of fMSX.. It compiled okay but > said it couldn't open a window in X-Window... The colour depth of fMSX is fixed at compilation time. Does the colour depth (BPP) specified in the fMSX Makefile match th

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-11 Thread yoyo
MAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:37 PM Subject: Re: MSX Emulator comparison > I don't know why NLMSX is not in your TOP 5 of the MSX emulators, but I must > precise one thing : NLMSX, as MESS, emulates the SRAM, not only of the > Panasonic FM-PAC, but also the SR

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-11 Thread Roel de Wit
Hi, > > Hmmm what's the best emulator currently available for Linux (in source > > code) ?? I just received my Playstation 2 Linux Kit and want to do some > > recompiling :) > I know the following MSX emulators for Linux: > - fMSX from Marat > - fMSX-SDL (not sure if code is already available) >

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-10 Thread BenoƮt Delvaux
www.marsupone.com et http://www.marsupone.com/msxvalley - Original Message - From: yoyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:55 PM Subject: Re: MSX Emulator comparison > hello > > The best emulator is fmsx 2.6 for windows > 2nd is fmsx-sdl

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-10 Thread yoyo
ntact : [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq : 60793140 irc : yoyo_ sur IRC.DAL.NET DALnet network (www.dal.net) @dalnetaide @paris @france1 (www.france1.org) - Original Message - From: "Sander Zuidema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-10 Thread Sander Zuidema
> I know the following MSX emulators for Linux: > - fMSX from Marat > - fMSX-SDL (not sure if code is already available) > - MESS (MSX1 only) > - Zodiac (I don't know the status, look at SourceForge) > - openMSX (most MSX2 features implemented) > There may be more, does anyone (Sander?) know? I b

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-09 Thread Maarten ter Huurne
On Friday 07 June 2002 10:01, Roel de Wit wrote: > Hmmm what's the best emulator currently available for Linux (in source > code) ?? I just received my Playstation 2 Linux Kit and want to do some > recompiling :) I know the following MSX emulators for Linux: - fMSX from Marat - fMSX-SDL (not sur

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-08 Thread Sander Zuidema
> Hmmm what's the best emulator currently available for Linux (in source code) > ?? I just received my Playstation 2 Linux Kit and want to do some > recompiling :) I just started working on a linux-comparison, but I will take my time for that one - like I did with the Windows version. Please hav

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-08 Thread Roel de Wit
Hi, > > We're still looking for someone to port openMSX to Windows. For details, visit > http://openmsx.sourceforge.net/. If you're interested, post a message on our > mailinglist. > Hmmm what's the best emulator currently available for Linux (in source code) ?? I just received my Playstation

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-07 Thread Sander Zuidema
> It would be interesting to have some kind of MSX emulator testkit, which runs > various tests and displays how close to real a MSX the emulator is > performing. Emulator programmers can use this to make their emulator more > accurate. Apart from timing tests, feature tests and display/sound test

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-06 Thread Maarten ter Huurne
On Friday 07 June 2002 00:46, Sander Zuidema wrote: > > About the speed test programs: could you publish those? I would like to > > run them under openMSX and see how it scores. > > I'll mail them to you in private so not everyone can have a laugh at what I > call benchmarks ;) Thanks! openMSX

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-06 Thread Sander Zuidema
> That's a nice and thorough review. Compliments! *blush* > Any chance of a similar review of MSX emulators running under Linux? Yup, a Linux-emulator-comparison is on the to-do list ;) > About the speed test programs: could you publish those? I would like to run > them under openMSX and see h

Re: MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-06 Thread Maarten ter Huurne
On Thursday 06 June 2002 23:34, Sander Zuidema wrote: > The MSX Resource Center tested six popular MSX emulators for the Windows > platform and compared them to each other. Are emulators as good as the real > thing? Does all MSX software run on every emulator? Which of these > emulators is the bes

MSX Emulator comparison

2002-06-06 Thread Sander Zuidema
The MSX Resource Center tested six popular MSX emulators for the Windows platform and compared them to each other. Are emulators as good as the real thing? Does all MSX software run on every emulator? Which of these emulators is the best choice? This and more in the first MSX Resource Center Emula