Brian Schweitzer wrote:
I did them all by hand however,
not via bot - the batch indication in the notes was simply an
indication of the edit processing batch, using the tool I wrote a long
time back for batch edit submissions. The edits themselves, however,
were all manually identified.
So
Lauri Watts wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Leiv Hellebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not that big a stretch to extend this to bypass the orchestra
altogether and write something concerto-like in structure for a single
instrument such as the piano. (But I'm out of my wits here as to
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
(For the Work-view of the CSGS pages, Lauri has a very good point in
that we should look to what the composer wanted himself. For KV 447, I
guess this is simply Konzert in Es . See
http://dme.mozarteum.at/DME/nma/scan.php?vsep=141l=2p1=29#29)
I would suggest that
2008/2/23, Lauri Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Leiv Hellebo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's not that big a stretch to extend this to bypass the orchestra
altogether and write something concerto-like in structure for a single
instrument such as the piano. (But I'm
On 23/02/2008, Brian Schweitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest that the NMA (and other such resources) be taken as it
is, rather than what some might want it to be. It is a urText, but
the titles are not. The titles, if you actually look at pictures of
the original scores
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Aaron Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20-Feb-08, at 10:35 PM, Andrew Conkling wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/album/a3523d3e-
b172-4164-8406-5dda5eea7a28.html (tracks 5-8)
Is this really a track-level detail? I know there are (more or less)
two camps on
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Conkling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/album/3883f2fd-44b1-4174-82a0-c1fb8dc1c8db.html(tracks
1-2)
Tracks 1 and 2 are performed together, but the track list doesn't show
that. Does it turn out that they're from different works of Mozart's?
Andrew Conkling wrote:
At this point, I don't even care about any sort of CTTS; I'd really just
like to see some consistency (at least across a release!).
I understand that, and I don't think it's too much to ask :)
But the EditNotes for these changes say they were done as batch edits,
so I
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Leiv Hellebo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Aaron Cooper wrote:
Pardon my late response, but I believe that by definition concertos
feature an orchestra, however I wouldn't mind seeing Concerto for
Piano and Orchestra.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Leiv Hellebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Cooper wrote:
Pardon my late response, but I believe that by definition concertos
feature an orchestra, however I wouldn't mind seeing Concerto for
Piano and Orchestra.
2008/2/22, Aaron Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Leiv Hellebo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Aaron Cooper wrote:
Pardon my late response, but I believe that by definition concertos
feature an orchestra, however I wouldn't mind seeing Concerto for
Piano and
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Conkling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/album/3883f2fd-44b1-4174-82a0-c1fb8dc1c8db.html(tracks
1-2)
Tracks 1 and 2 are performed together, but the track list doesn't show
that. Does it turn out that they're from different works
Andrew Conkling wrote:
At this point, I don't even care about any sort of CTTS; I'd really just
like to see some consistency (at least across a release!).
I understand that, and I don't think it's too much to ask :)
But the EditNotes for these changes say they were done as batch
Aaron's statement still seems fine. Maybe we could refine it a bit: By
/implication/, concertos feature an orchestra, unless otherwise stated.
We don't need an MB-glossary for classical music terms, I think. Let's
leave that to others. (For one, we're music enthusiasts, not
On 20-Feb-08, at 10:35 PM, Andrew Conkling wrote:
So I started poking around to see how all these CSGS edits would
impact my collection and found a lot that seem to be worse than they
were before.
Some examples (limited to Mozart's œuvre):
Andrew Conkling wrote:
So I started poking around to see how all these CSGS edits would impact
my collection and found a lot that seem to be worse than they were before.
Personally, I've done just a few changes, and so far only on my stuff,
to return things back to how they were (or
16 matches
Mail list logo
