* Dale Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010403 00:54]:
Could someone post a procmail recipe for vim? I've been dabbling with
the following, but they don't seem to work..
:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vim
:0:
* ^From:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vim-help
:0:
* ^X-Mailing-List:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vim
* Dale Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Could someone post a procmail recipe for vim? I've been dabbling with
the following, but they don't seem to work..
:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vim
try:
:0:
* ^TOvim@vim\.org
vim
or (untested, just came across it in the manpage):
:0:
*
* Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010403 09:24]:
try:
:0:
* ^TOvim@vim\.org
vim
or (untested, just came across it in the manpage):
:0:
* ^TO_vim@vim\.org
vim
$ man procmailrc
The only problem I have with the above rule is that if someone mails the
list and cc's you, both
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:36:12AM +, Matt Dunford wrote:
* Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010403 09:24]:
try:
:0:
* ^TOvim@vim\.org
vim
or (untested, just came across it in the manpage):
:0:
* ^TO_vim@vim\.org
vim
$ man procmailrc
The only problem I
Here is how I deal with mailing lists in my .procmailrc:
# eliminate duplicate messages
:0Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 16384 archive/msgid.cache
This is *bad*. If procmail fails somewhere after dupes checking and the
message is requeued, the next delivery attempt will
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:50:57AM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
Here is how I deal with mailing lists in my .procmailrc:
# eliminate duplicate messages
:0Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 16384 archive/msgid.cache
This is *bad*. If procmail fails somewhere after dupes
I'm fwd'ing this for someone who is not reading the list. Any ideas?
The problem is that every time he hits a signed message (during the
same mutt session), the status line at the bottom gets corrupted
more and more. It happens under xterms, gnome-terms, and the linux
console.
All
Argh, I hate following up myself ...
Lars Hecking writes:
I'm fwd'ing this for someone who is not reading the list. Any ideas?
The problem is that every time he hits a signed message (during the
same mutt session), the status line at the bottom gets corrupted
more and more. It
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010403 15:29]:
The problem is that every time he hits a signed message (during the
same mutt session), the status line at the bottom gets corrupted more
and more. It happens under xterms, gnome-terms, and the linux console.
|Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28)
|
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010403 15:40]:
The "screen corruption" was due to the output of this command.
Workaround:
set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys %r /dev/null 21"
Redirection is a standard feature, so I'd call this a "solution". :-)
Is that something mutt should
Is that something mutt should take care of automatically
(unexpected output of some commands, that is)?
How does a program catch "unexpected things"?
Besides, if it expected anything they would
not be unexpected, now, would they? ;-)
I kind of expected a reply like this ;-)
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:05:22AM -0700, Justin Burke wrote:
I would like Mutt be alert me when I'm replying to a message where the
address in the To: header is different than my default address, but
still within my domain name. My default address is [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but sometimes I like
Is there any way to tell Mutt to only download recent headers or
something similiar? I've got a few IMAP mailboxes that contain over
1000 messages and it takes quite a while to open them.
Thanks,
A.
--
Adam Sherman
President Technology Architect
Tritus CGI
+1 (613) 255-5164
* Thomas Duterme [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010402 22:29]:
Hi everyone,
I'm pretty new to mutt, but I love it so far.
What's not to love?
My one problem: I'd like to eliminate, or reduce headers at least in my mailboxes.
Actually, I'ld like to if possible just keep the basic headers like Subject
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 06:05:05PM +1000, Tony Collins wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:52:44AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
You were not able to find this one out yourself? Time to start a little
reading, isn't it? ;)
I thought I'd looked in quite a few places before I asked. What a
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:41:07PM -0400, Wade A. Mosely wrote:
The only problem I have with this is that the nice little message
telling me I have new mail in any newly created mailboxes isn't active
until the next time I startup Mutt (or :source .muttrc).
If you are usng bash, you can
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 02:12:15AM -0700, Joshua Haberman wrote:
The only problem I have with [the rule] is that if someone mails the
list and cc's you, both mails end up in the list's folder. If anyone
knows of a good, simple way to prevent this, please let me know.
How about:
:0 Whc:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:03:14PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:58:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
The original message was received at Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:50:52 +0800
from hgf3@localhost
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:14:08AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Now I get it. And I thought this was a mutt or mail system config
problem. This thing also happened to me at the redhat-install-list.
Believe it or not, even
Hi,
I just recognized that
# bla \
mailboxes \
=bla \
=more \
!
will disable all the lines! So the line continuation
seems to be also valid at the end of comment lines.
Is this a bug or a feature? -- Is this documented
somewhere?
--
Johannes
I'm running Mutt 2.51i on Cygwin. I've noticed that *some* of Mutt's
temporary files in /tmp never get deleted by Mutt. Any clues?
--
-duke
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Hi,
Is there a way to select a pop server like
pop://mail.myisp.com
somehow by completion (like I can select regular mailboxes by '=' and tab)
--
Johannes
Rod Pike wrote:
Greetings,
I'm using version 1.2.5i of Mutt.
Why do I get an error when I try to "set pgp_encryptself" in my muttrc?
Cheers,
Rod
--
Rod Pike
rodneyp @ utanet.at
Your subject line says it all.
--
Linux: The Choice of the GNU Generation
Hi,
Is it possible to have a 'permanent' history like in
most shells by writing the command history to a file
and loading it on later startup ?
--
Johannes
* Matt Dunford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The only problem I have with the above rule is that if someone mails the
list and cc's you, both mails end up in the list's folder. If anyone
knows of a good, simple way to prevent this, please let me know.
Maybe something like this.
:0:
*
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:01:19PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III typed:
Below is a copy of a mail that I sent to a fellow mutt-user that was
returned because the mail supposedly was sent by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This also happened to me with
set envelope_from ... nobody in his right mind accepts
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:04:02PM -0500, David Rock wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:41:07PM -0400, Wade A. Mosely wrote:
The only problem I have with this is that the nice little message
telling me I have new mail in any newly created mailboxes isn't active
until the next time I
27 matches
Mail list logo
