On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:00:17PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
> * Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Fri-01 19:56 -0700]:
> >
> >On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:45:37PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
>[ ..snip.. ]
> >have you checked the "set mark_old" in y
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:20:30AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:46:49PM -0400 or thereabouts, Federico Grau wrote:
> >
> > hi Pumbaa,
> >
> > set pgp_create_traditional=yes
> >
> > from the man page:
> >pgp_create_traditional
> > Type: quadoption
>
* Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Fri-01 19:56 -0700]:
>
>On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:45:37PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
[ ..snip.. ]
>have you checked the "set mark_old" in your ~/.muttrc ?
>
>i have 1.3.22i and don't experience the problem you're having.
yeah, i
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:46:49PM -0400 or thereabouts, Federico Grau wrote:
>
> hi Pumbaa,
>
> set pgp_create_traditional=yes
>
> from the man page:
>pgp_create_traditional
> Type: quadoption
> Default: no
>
> This option controls whether
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:45:37PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
> dont really like replying to my own posts, but just more
> info, in case someone cares.
>
> it looks like the problem is still there in 1.3.22i
>
> also, it looks like it works fine, until i quit mutt. if i
> qu
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:46:49PM -0400, Federico Grau wrote:
>
> some other pgp questions,
> mutt (1.2.5i) does a wonderful job of automatically verifying MIME/pgp signed
> messages. However it does not automatically verify inline pgp messages,
> unless i pipe them to "gpg --verify". is there
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:24:51AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
> hi. i noticed that on going out my gpg signed emails are sent as
> another mime attachments which could be annoying to users who have
> gui mua's. how can i setup mutt so that gpg signs all appear together
> with the body of the messa
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 12:33:51AM +0200, Björn Lindström wrote:
> I am using Mutt 1.3.20i and GnuPG 1.0.6.
>
> My problem is that when i view a message, like this;
>
> ---
>
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 12 00:26:53 2001) --]
> gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG-E key, ID 6CAD
dont really like replying to my own posts, but just more
info, in case someone cares.
it looks like the problem is still there in 1.3.22i
also, it looks like it works fine, until i quit mutt. if i
quit mutt, and then come back, i dont get the 'new mail'
indicator. this could, i suppose, be expec
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:02:58PM -0500, Drew Raines wrote:
> I press ! to execute a shell command, and if I press enter at the prompt
> instead of a command, it kicks me out of mutt without saving.
>
> If this is the desirable behavior, will someone explain why?
It is the logical behaviour!
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:02:58PM -0500, Drew Raines wrote:
> I press ! to execute a shell command, and if I press enter at the prompt
> instead of a command, it kicks me out of mutt without saving.
>
> If this is the desirable behavior, will someone explain why?
it doesn't actually kick you ou
* Danny O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> You don't get kicked out - mutt forks a new shell. Type 'exit' or ctrl-D
> to return to your previous mutt enjoyment.
Ah. That would explain why one day when I was confirming this behavior,
there were many, many mutt processes running :)
Thanks.
--
Dre
hi. i noticed that on going out my gpg signed emails are sent as
another mime attachments which could be annoying to users who have
gui mua's. how can i setup mutt so that gpg signs all appear together
with the body of the message?
thanks.
--
"In is out and out is in. But out is out and in i
Drew Raines wrote:
> I press ! to execute a shell command, and if I press enter at the prompt
> instead of a command, it kicks me out of mutt without saving.
Not really: Type "exit" and you get back to mutt. It's just a sub shell.
> If this is the desirable behavior, will someone explain why?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:02:58PM -0500, Drew Raines wrote:
> I press ! to execute a shell command, and if I press enter at the prompt
> instead of a command, it kicks me out of mutt without saving.
>
> If this is the desirable behavior, will someone explain why?
You don't get kicked out - mutt
I press ! to execute a shell command, and if I press enter at the prompt
instead of a command, it kicks me out of mutt without saving.
If this is the desirable behavior, will someone explain why?
--
Drew
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:25:18PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> > Various hooks are handled differently; send-hooks, IIRC, stop at the
> > first match. Are you sure you've tried
> >
> > default
> > duivel
> > nl
> >
> > in that order (sorry, but...)? Nothing else looks out of the ord
Gord --
...and then Gord Mc.Pherson said...
% Hi,
%
%Is there a way to have mutt automatically bounce a message from a
% specific email address. The only reference to bouncing email is
% 'bounce_delivered' and I don't think it's the option I'm looking for.
The only thing of which I can thin
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:44:38PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% > ...
% > %
% > % This does not work, whatever order I put them in.
% > % It still sends the .signature.nl
% >
% > Various hooks are handled d
El Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 01:27:13AM +, Daniel Biddle va escriure:
> Your message said:
>
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; de [EMAIL PROTECTED] sobre Sun,
> +Sep 09, % Y a les 06:48
>
>+-0400~? ¡¢£ñ¥ª§¿ª«¬¡«»°±²µ¶·º»11¿ÄÅÆÇ+ÉÑÖÜßàáâäåæçèéêëìíîïñòóôö÷°ùúûü²ÿ
>
Hi,
Is there a way to have mutt automatically bounce a message from a
specific email address. The only reference to bouncing email is
'bounce_delivered' and I don't think it's the option I'm looking for.
Any suggestions are welcome?
--
Thus spake David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> concerned about my messages being accidentally munged in transmission
> (found on this list only a month or two ago and bought to my attention
> by a guy -- whose name I have now forgotten but whose attention is
> still appreciated -- who wondered why m
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:44:38PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Cliff --
>
> ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
> % Hello
> % I am using send-hooks for different signatures.
> ...
> %
> % This does not work, whatever order I put them in.
> % It still sends the .signature.nl
>
> Various hooks are
Ailbhe, et al --
...and then Ailbhe Leamy said...
% On (14/09/01 09:41), David T-G wrote:
%
% > ...and then Ailbhe Leamy said... %
%
% > % Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?
% >
% > Why not? You put your home page in your signature, for instance; you
% > have a mailing addres
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% Hello
% I am using send-hooks for different signatures.
...
%
% This does not work, whatever order I put them in.
% It still sends the .signature.nl
Various hooks are handled differently; send-hooks, IIRC, stop at the
first match. Are you sure you
Hello
I am using send-hooks for different signatures.
For example
# Default signature
#
send-hook . 'set signature="~/.signature"'
# Dutch signature
#
send-hook ".*\.nl" 'set signature="~/.signature.nl"'
The second one signs my mail with a dutch signature if sending
to a Dutch address.
However
Thus spake Andy Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Because someone can send an email to a mailing list purpoting to be
> from you that can cause a lot of damage, e.g. some form of hoax. A
> signed email can only be from you (assuming web of trust works as
> intended).
And I would add that although ma
Matthias LOITSCH muttered:
> just another question :)
>
> i want to send a mail to many persons, but they shouldnt see that they mail is
> not sent only to them.
> with the Bcc i have to specify a To Adress...
No, you don't. Well, sort off. :)
alias bcc undisclosed-recipients: ;
And enter bcc a
Peter Lavender muttered:
> I thought I had this working, but seems that I have broken something,
> and I'm not sure I'm using send and folder-hook correctly.
>
> What I need to have happen is that my .sig changes, my From address is
> correct (which it is) and the reply-to: header is correct, and
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:04:55PM +0100, Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
> In what way is it useful to pgp-sign or encrypt a mail that is for
> distribution to a mailing list? You are aware of the fact that there are
> archives?
Because someone can send an email to a mailing list purpoting to be
from you t
On (14/09/01 09:41), David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Ailbhe Leamy said... %
> % Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?
>
> Why not? You put your home page in your signature, for instance; you
> have a mailing address that you list that is suitable for replies.
Having a valid From:
Ailbhe, et al --
...and then Ailbhe Leamy said...
%
...
% Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?
Why not? You put your home page in your signature, for instance; you
have a mailing address that you list that is suitable for replies.
It is my not-so-humble opinion that everyone e
Olaf, et al --
...and then Olaf Schulz said...
% On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:08:46AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > I'd think that it's because you'd want to tag a whole thread only from
% > the index, since you [probably] can't get a picture of the whole thread
% > from the single-message pager
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:54:45PM +0200, Olaf Schulz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:08:46AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> > ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
> > % Hello
> > % The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index
> >
> > I'd think that it's because you'd want to tag a wh
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:05:26PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Johannes Zellner [12/09/01 12:04 +0200]:
> > how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ?
> > Actually I can already READ mail by having
> > set imap_user=""
> > set imap_pass=""
>
> > but if I try to SEND mail, it tells me
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:08:46AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
> % Hello
> % The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index
>
> I'd think that it's because you'd want to tag a whole thread only from
> the index, since you [probably] can't get a pictur
David --
...and then David said...
% Sorry for the double mail I sent it prematurely.
I wondered about that...
%
% Is there a way to repeat a command [n] times? (again, mimicing the
% vi number modifiers to most any command).
I'd say that you ought to look into tagging, or perhaps l
J-S --
...and then Jean-Sebastien Morisset said...
% I've read about the 'outlook patch' in a few messages, but haven't been
% able to find it anywhere. Can someone point me to a URL with the patch for
% mutt v1.2.5?
Surf over to
http://mutt.sector13.org/mutt-build-cocktail/Old/
and look fo
I wrote:
> But is there a solution to get the output of commands which change
> often, for example
> my_hdr X-Date: `date`
Anser to myself: Quote the backticks. \`...\`
(Thanks to Peter due to his "send-hook . my_hdr X-Uptime: \`uptime\`"!)
-volker
--
http://die-Moells.de/ * http://S
Volker --
...and then Volker Moell said...
% Hi, there!
Hello!
%
% The output of UNIX commands traditionally will be substituted before
% the line is parsed. For the example
% my_hdr X-Operating-System: `uname -a`
% this is ok.
Yep.
%
% But is there a solution to get the output of comma
Justin --
...and then Justin R. Miller said...
...
% Mutt problem, but I'd like to learn what the deal is either way and this
% list has the kind of people who tend to know this stuff :->
*grin*
%
% I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG. That results
Good for you!
% in
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% Hello
% The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index
Er, toggle-thread? I have that as 'tag-thread' in my keybindings...
% is displayed, not if you have the index above and a message
% below in the screen.
Right; it's bound in the
Jean-Sebastien --
...and then Jean-Sebastien Morisset said...
% I don't know about you guys, but I got tired of PGP's (version 6.5.8)
% copyright message. Here's a little script I wrote called
% 'pgp-no-copyright':
Cool; thanks. Sec Zehl had written a patch back in the 0.95 days which
condensed
Peter --
...and then Peter Lavender said...
% Hi everyone,
Hello again!
%
% I thought I had this working, but seems that I have broken something,
% and I'm not sure I'm using send and folder-hook correctly.
Did my hook examples and muttrc.* files help you? I was going to go back
to a note I
Hi,
trying to get off-line IMAP up and running (on RedHat 7.0/i386). Tried
isync, but it unfortunately use maildir format for mailboxes (I prefer
standard mbox). So, I found a mailsync (on
http://mailsync.sourceforge.net). However, I have no success with its
compilation. First, I tried to compile
Hi,
trying to get off-line IMAP up and running (on RedHat 7.0/i386). Tried
isync, but it unfortunately use maildir format for mailboxes (I prefer
standard mbox). So, I found a mailsync (on
http://mailsync.sourceforge.net). However, I have no success with its
compilation. First, I tried to compile
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> Johannes Zellner wrote:
> > when I use a cygwin terminal to log in to my linux box from windows,
> > the terminal is set to cygwin. As there are no termcap entries for
> > cygwin on my linux machine, I set the $TERM to 'ansi' which wo
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:58:05AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I use a cygwin terminal to log in to my linux box from windows,
> the terminal is set to cygwin. As there are no termcap entries for
> cygwin on my linux machine, I set the $TERM to 'ansi' which works
> nicely and gi
Paul, et al --
...and then Paul de Weerd said...
% Hi list,
%
% I recently switched to using Mutt for all my mail. Sure
% do like it ! But I do miss some tools I had back when
Good for you!
% using ELM, namely frm and nfrm. frm listed all mails
Yeah. I happen to like elm's alias file format
Steve --
Sorry for the delay in responding...
...and then Steve said...
% On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:44:01AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > ...and then Steve said...
% > % I'm having a problem finding the relevant entry or `how to' in the
% > % manual on doing the following:
% > %
% > % mappi
With Mutt 1.3.22.1, when I type 's' to save a message to a mailbox:
The up arrow (history-up) seems to behave correctly, going backward
through the history. But when I use the down arrow (history-down),
instead of going forward, it still goes backward.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - W
Am Fre, 14 Sep 2001, schrieb Eric Smith:
> I am trying to do something like this:
> macro index y "!vim /home/eric/.muttrc\nexec source /home/eric/.muttrc"
>
> The first part I have been using for years - very useful by the way
> especially when you have the following autocommand
> autocmd BufR
I am trying to do something like this:
macro index y "!vim /home/eric/.muttrc\nexec source /home/eric/.muttrc"
The first part I have been using for years - very useful by the way
especially when you have the following autocommand
autocmd BufRead * normal `"
(returns you to where you were in the
Johannes Zellner wrote:
> when I use a cygwin terminal to log in to my linux box from windows,
> the terminal is set to cygwin. As there are no termcap entries for
> cygwin on my linux machine, I set the $TERM to 'ansi' which works
> nicely and gives correct output for 'ls', 'vim', 'slrn' for exam
Johannes Zellner wrote:
> when I use a cygwin terminal to log in to my linux box from windows,
> the terminal is set to cygwin. As there are no termcap entries for
> cygwin on my linux machine, I set the $TERM to 'ansi' which works
> nicely and gives correct output for 'ls', 'vim', 'slrn' for exam
* Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Fri-01 00:53 -0700]:
>Is it possible to associate a particular message signature
>to a particular mail-folder and/or recipient ?
yeah. i just did it today :)
the example for recepient is in the userguide ('sept they
set the 'from' header there, and
Hi,
when I use a cygwin terminal to log in to my linux box from windows,
the terminal is set to cygwin. As there are no termcap entries for
cygwin on my linux machine, I set the $TERM to 'ansi' which works
nicely and gives correct output for 'ls', 'vim', 'slrn' for example.
Unfortunately mutt doe
Hello
Is it possible to associate a particular message signature to a particular mail-folder
and/or recipient ?
..apart from editing it that is !
--
Regards
Cliff
58 matches
Mail list logo
