On 19:15 31 Jul 2002, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 18:26:40 +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
| * Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-31 15:14]:
|the default value should *always* be documented.
| What do you mean by documented?
| the manual to muttrc
Morning.
I just wanted to ask this, because it's been on my mind for quite a bit
of time already. So, as Mutt's manual say, the old-style PGP message
format is _strongly deprecated_. I shouldn't use it, then? But is the
new-style PGP message format somehow unreadable for some mail clients,
like
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 02:43:15 +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
not quite right - sorry. so lete me repeat:
OK, perhaps I haven't understood.
i want the manual to list all possibilities of default
values and their dependencies to configure options -
I still don't understand. What do you mean by
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 16:39:57 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 19:15 31 Jul 2002, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 18:26:40 +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
| * Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-31 15:14]:
|the default value should *always* be
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
Is this too ambitious a wish?
unfortunately, yes.
Ricardo SIGNES is a man of vision, I think. If it is practical to link
in a preferred regex suite, as described in his post on this thread, to
allow the ERE-proficient amongst
Jussi Ekholm wrote:
I just wanted to ask this, because it's been on my mind for quite a
bit of time already. So, as Mutt's manual say, the old-style PGP
message format is _strongly deprecated_. I shouldn't use it, then?
But is the new-style PGP message format somehow unreadable for some
* Patrik Modesto [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 12:09 +0200]:
Maybe this is stupid question but I searched man-page to muttrc and find
nothing about it. So, I need to forward message that contains some
attachments. But I need to edit/update the text part of the forwarded
message. What I've
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 18:55:42 +1000
From: Erik Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: most commonly used regex lib for awk/frep/mutt/sed?
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
Is this too ambitious a wish?
unfortunately, yes.
Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I Cc'd this message to mutt-users, too - I think this belongs there
instead of mutt-dev]
I think the documentation about scoring is quite lacking.
I could somewhat agree; I've never been able to fully understand how
mails could be sorted first by threads
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 11:35]:
if mutt could be ./configure'd --with-pcre (nondefault, of course),
there'd be virtually no problems with confusion between
regexps found in various published .muttrc's and
the syntax mutt linked with pcre actually expected.
assuming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm wrote:
[$pgp_create_traditional]
well - strongly deprecated, perhaps, but since there are only a few
MUAs which have good PGP/MIME support (none of them very commonly used
in most circles) it's
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:07:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Do you have any idea why clearsigning an email with signature brakes the
signature delimiter? It always changes from -- to - -- and that's
not fun at all.
That is the way it's supposed to be, it's being escaped. If you verify
the
Patrik Modesto sez:
} Hi!
} Maybe this is stupid question but I searched man-page to muttrc and find
} nothing about it. So, I need to forward message that contains some
} attachments. But I need to edit/update the text part of the forwarded
} message. What I've found is forward only text part or
I received on a list an email from someone using Outlook Express 6 and
it came out as all '?'s. Anyone know why this would be? I didn't see
any information at all about the ercoding or what-not.
Thanks.
-Ken
* Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [2002-08-02 13:57 +0200]:
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 11:35]:
if mutt could be ./configure'd --with-pcre (nondefault, of course),
there'd be virtually no problems with confusion between regexps
found in various published .muttrc's and
* Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 12:52]:
To forward a message with attachments as you would naturally
want to you need to go to the attachments view of the message,
tag everything you want to forward (including the body if you
want to forward that), and then tag-forward (i.e.
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 13:04]:
I received on a list an email from someone using Outlook Express 6
and it came out as all '?'s. Anyone know why this would be?
Outlook Express?
Sven
--
Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outcast/Outage Excess | Doubtlook Distress |
On Fri, Aug 2, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 13:04]:
I received on a list an email from someone using Outlook Express 6
and it came out as all '?'s. Anyone know why this would be?
Outlook Express?
Yes. Turns out it is from Korea, and when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joakim Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:07:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Do you have any idea why clearsigning an email with signature brakes the
signature delimiter? It always changes from -- to - -- and that's
From: Calum Selkirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:03:20 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mutt + pcre
i somehow missed the Sven's message, so i'm replying to this one
* Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [2002-08-02 13:57 +0200]:
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jussi --
...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
%
% Morning.
Hiya!
The short form:
1) mutt 1.4 and earlier required a patch (Aaron(?) wrote an early one and
then Dale wrote the one that replaced it) to tweak $pgp_create_traditional
so that it would twist and bend to suit Outhouse, but 1.5 and up
Sven Guckes sez:
} * Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 12:52]:
} To forward a message with attachments as you would naturally
} want to you need to go to the attachments view of the message,
} tag everything you want to forward (including the body if you
} want to forward that),
Vincent Lefevre writes:
The installed manual should be preprocessed during the build to have
the correct defaults.
But how can it have the correct defaults since there is only one
manual for several binaries?
What several binaries? My system has only one /usr/local/bin/mutt.
Cameron
* On 2002.08.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Calum Selkirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if mutt could be ./configure'd --with-pcre (nondefault, of course),
there'd be virtually no problems with confusion between regexps
found in various published .muttrc's and the syntax mutt linked with
* On 2002.08.02, in 20020802115532.GC12347@erpland,
* Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I Cc'd this message to mutt-users, too - I think this belongs there
instead of mutt-dev]
Maybe, but it's also a request for someone to further develop the
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:14:27 -0700, Chris Palmer wrote:
What several binaries? My system has only one /usr/local/bin/mutt.
There are systems with multiple binaries. Please read the thread.
--
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100%
validated (X)HTML - Acorn
Vincent Lefevre writes:
There are systems with multiple binaries.
It's up to the sysadmin to keep the man pages in the same directory
prefix as the binaries. /usr/foo/man/man1 should correspond to
/usr/foo/bin, et c.
--
Chris music is what numbers feel like San Francisco, CA
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:01:18 -0700, Chris Palmer wrote:
Vincent Lefevre writes:
There are systems with multiple binaries.
It's up to the sysadmin to keep the man pages in the same directory
prefix as the binaries. /usr/foo/man/man1 should correspond to
/usr/foo/bin, et c.
We agreed
* On 2002.08.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 12:52]:
To forward a message with attachments as you would naturally
want to you need to go to the attachments view of the message,
tag everything you want to
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:51:52AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
This one of the less intuitive parts of mutt. To forward a message with
attachments as you would naturally want to you need to go to the
attachments view of the message, tag eveerything you want to forward
(including the body
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 13:15]:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 13:04]:
I received on a list an email from someone using Outlook Express 6
and it came out as all '?'s. Anyone know why this would be?
Outlook
On Fri, Aug 2, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
Yes. Turns out it is from Korea, and when I
bounced it to Outlook at work it came out as text.
you found a Korean garbage to text converter!
congratulations!! finally - some use for OE! :-)
Gee, thanks, Sven. You've been a huge help. ;-)
-Ken
At 10:22 PM +0200 2002/08/02, Sven Guckes wrote:
you found a Korean garbage to text converter!
congratulations!! finally - some use for OE! :-)
I think it started out life as a Korean text to garbage
converter. So it makes sense that only OE would be able to convert
the
* Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 21:43]:
At 10:22 PM +0200 2002/08/02, Sven Guckes wrote:
you found a Korean garbage to text converter!
congratulations!! finally - some use for OE! :-)
I think it started out life as a Korean text to garbage converter.
So it makes sense that
David Champion sez:
} * On 2002.08.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
} * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
} * Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 12:52]:
} To forward a message with attachments as you would naturally
} want to you need to go to the attachments view of the message,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:22 PM +0200 2002/08/02, Sven Guckes wrote:
you found a Korean garbage to text converter!
congratulations!! finally - some use for OE! :-)
I think it started out life as a Korean text to garbage
converter. So it makes sense that
Greg, et al --
...and then Gregory Seidman said...
%
...
% } * Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 12:52]:
% } To forward a message with attachments as you would naturally
Well, as *you* would want, anyway...
...
% Not bad, but mime_forward does the wrong thing also. It's great
37 matches
Mail list logo
