Re: Fastmail Drafts folder not visible

2010-01-27 Thread Steve S
On Jan 27 08:56 +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote: [...] Oh, I also notice that you set imap_list_subscribed. Can you unset it and see if Drafts appears then? OK, that was it. I had set imap_check_subscribed=yes set imap_list_subscribed=yes set

Fastmail Drafts folder not visible

2010-01-26 Thread Steve S
I noticed that some people on the list are Fastmail users, so someone might have some tips. First, my muttrc part for fastmail IMAP: set imap_passive=no set my_fastmail=imaps://mail.messagingengine.com set imap_check_subscribed=yes set

Re: Fastmail Drafts folder not visible

2010-01-26 Thread Steve S
On Jan 26 17:01 +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote: * Steve S [2010-01-26 14:09]: I noticed that some people on the list are Fastmail users, so someone might have some tips. First, my muttrc part for fastmail IMAP: set imap_passive=no set

Re: Fastmail Drafts folder not visible

2010-01-26 Thread Steve S
On Jan 26 20:00 +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote: * Steve S [2010-01-26 17:50]: [...] In the folder browser, all folders are listed *except* for +Drafts: imaps://mail.messagingengine.com imaps

Re: Fastmail Drafts folder not visible

2010-01-26 Thread Steve S
On Jan 27 00:23 +0100, Steve S wrote: [...] PS: My first reply doesn't seem to have gotten through, but I used list-reply. Never mind, my bad. Everything OK. best, Steve

Re: Mutt, multiple accounts problems

2008-10-07 Thread Steve S
On Oct 06 02:45 +1100, Jaime Tarrant wrote: I am also interested to know how others solve the multiple account issue for sending mail. In my case, I use mutt with exim. I use msmtp. It's very very easy to configure. You set up different accounts and you can name them. Then, use `msmtp -a

Re: auto-move mails

2008-07-25 Thread Steve S
On Jul 24 14:16, Ravi Uday wrote: Hi, In mutt 1.5.17 is there a way we can setup a rule where if the number of emails touches 150 move the first 50 to a specified folder ? We can then map this rule witha key too ? If you are also satisfied with using the message age as criterion, you

use script output as regex pattern in folder-fook

2008-07-25 Thread Steve S
Hi I have a folder-hook acting on different folders: folder-hook folder1|folder2|folder3 ... I replaced this with folder-hook script.sh| ... and script.sh : echo 'folder1|folder2|folder3' Now, the pattern matches every folder, i.e. the hook acts on all folders, not just

Re: use script output as regex pattern in folder-fook

2008-07-25 Thread Steve S
On Jul 25 12:44, Michael Kjorling wrote: On 25 Jul 2008 14:06 +0200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve S): I replaced this with folder-hook script.sh| ... and script.sh : echo 'folder1|folder2|folder3' Maybe what you want is more along the lines of folder-hook `script.sh

Re: use script output as regex pattern in folder-fook

2008-07-25 Thread Steve S
On Jul 25 08:15, David Champion wrote: folder-hook folder1|folder2|folder3 ... I replaced this with folder-hook script.sh| ... This approach won't work. Here's why, and a possible alternative. The script.sh| notation for incorporating a script's output into your muttrc

Re: use script output as regex pattern in folder-fook

2008-07-25 Thread Steve S
On Jul 25 17:32, Rocco Rutte wrote: Hi, * Steve S wrote: I have tried set my_muttdir=$HOME/.mutt folder-hook `$my_muttdir/script.sh` ... Here, Mutt doesn't seem to expand $my_muttdir before handing the command over to the shell. Is there a trick to do that? It doesn't seem so

Re: use script output as regex pattern in folder-fook

2008-07-25 Thread Steve S
On Jul 25 10:36, David Champion wrote: set my_muttdir=$HOME/.mutt folder-hook `$my_muttdir/script.sh` ... Here, Mutt doesn't seem to expand $my_muttdir before handing the command over to the shell. Is there a trick to do that? It doesn't seem so. At least for interactive

Re: use script output as regex pattern in folder-fook

2008-07-25 Thread Steve S
On Jul 25 11:46, David Champion wrote: A more elegant solution could be a config var $configdir or $scriptdir for people who - have more then one script laying around in ~/.mutt (or wherever) - don't want to put Mutt-specific scripts in a location on $PATH You also can do

Re: latin1: german umlauts not displayed correctly

2008-06-17 Thread Steve S
On Jun 11 02:07, Chris Bannister wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:53:16PM +0200, Steve S wrote: My locale settings are -- LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=en_US.UTF-8 LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 Consider setting

latin1: german umlauts not displayed correctly

2008-06-10 Thread Steve S
Hi all I got a mail with german umlauts: äöüß which are displayed as \374 and such in the pager. The message has no Content-Type header. In w3m and with less, I see placeholders where the umlauts should be. I believe the message is latin1-encoded, b/c opening it in vim, it says:

Re: latin1: german umlauts not displayed correctly

2008-06-10 Thread Steve S
On Jun 10 15:15, Christian Ebert wrote: * Steve S on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 at 13:53:16 +0200 I got a mail with german umlauts: äöüß which are displayed as \374 and such in the pager. The message has no Content-Type header. Try: set assumed_charset=windows-1252 That's it! Thank you

pipe-split + macro with tag-prefix: applies to only one message

2008-05-31 Thread Steve S
Hi I have a macro with this signature: set pipe_split=yes macro index ,k 'tag-prefixpipe-messagecat $(tempfile) echo doing stuff...enter' If I tag some messages and hit `;,k`, the macro is applied to only one message. What am I missing? Thanks. steve

Re: pipe-split + macro with tag-prefix: applies to only one message

2008-05-31 Thread Steve S
On May 31 15:32, Rado S wrote: =- Steve S wrote on Sat 31.May'08 at 14:51:57 +0200 -= I should have been more specific. Yes, that works if and only if one or more messages are tagged. However, as I understand [1], the above macro should operate - on one or more tagged messages

Re: pipe-split + macro with tag-prefix: applies to only one message

2008-05-31 Thread Steve S
On May 31 17:15, Rado S wrote: =- Steve S wrote on Sat 31.May'08 at 16:59:22 +0200 -= On May 31 15:32, Rado S wrote: =- Steve S wrote on Sat 31.May'08 at 14:51:57 +0200 -= I should have been more specific. Yes, that works if and only if one or more messages are tagged. However

Re: no New Mail in notification when in pager

2008-05-22 Thread Steve S
On May 21 19:48, Rado S wrote: =- Steve S wrote on Wed 21.May'08 at 10:32:38 +0200 -= Automatic notification about new mail and buffy-list showing an up-to-date folder list works *only* in the index. Yes, this is known. Ah good. Is this documented in the manual or wiki

Re: no New Mail in notification when in pager

2008-05-22 Thread Steve S
On May 22 11:37, Rocco Rutte wrote: Hi, * Steve S wrote: Ah good. Is this documented in the manual or wiki? I've now added some lines to the manual: http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#handling-folders Uh, you've been faster than me. Thank's very much. steve

Re: no New Mail in notification when in pager

2008-05-21 Thread Steve S
On May 21 09:17, Rocco Rutte wrote: Hi, * Steve S wrote: Automatic notification about new mail and buffy-list showing an up-to-date folder list works *only* in the index. Yes, this is known. Ah good. Is this documented in the manual or wiki? If not, I (or whoever) could add this to e.g

Re: no New Mail in notification when in pager

2008-05-20 Thread Steve S
On May 19 19:07, Steve S wrote: Hi I noticed that when one is in the pager viewing a message and new mail arrives (Maildir), no New mail in ... notification is displayed. Also, buffy-list does only show the status before the new mail. However, in the browser and index, it works as expected

no New Mail in notification when in pager

2008-05-19 Thread Steve S
Hi I noticed that when one is in the pager viewing a message and new mail arrives (Maildir), no New mail in ... notification is displayed. Also, buffy-list does only show the status before the new mail. However, in the browser and index, it works as expected: Automatic notification after at most

Re: pass single-quoted arguments to external script

2008-05-13 Thread Steve S
On May 10 17:31, David Champion wrote: So how do I properly escape the single quotes in the vim args Personally, as soon as I start having trouble figuring out how to quote things withing multiple layers of parser, I ditch the headache and put the command into an external script that

pass single-quoted arguments to external script

2008-05-10 Thread Steve S
Hi all. I have some trouble with Mutt's quoting conventions in hooks etc. At first, what I already have and what works is (a) or (b), which does the same: a) send-hook ... set editor=\vim '+/^--[ ]*$' -c 'read some_file' \ b) send-hook ... 'set editor=vim '\''+/^--[ ]*$'\'' -c '\''read

Re: Return-Path problem

2008-04-17 Thread Steve S
Ok, now another newbie question, I am just trying to understand what I just did. The manual says: 3.291. use_envelope_from Type: boolean Default: no When set, mutt will set the envelope sender of the message. If ``$envelope_from_address'' is set, it will be used as the sender

searching in base64-encoded messages

2008-04-14 Thread Steve S
Hi all Occasionally, I get mail where the content is base64 encoded [...headers...] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 [...more headers...] SGkgR2HDq2wsCgpBY3R1YWxseSB3aGVuIHdvcmtpbmcgd2l0aCBncmFwaHMgSSBwcmVmZXJyZWQg

Re: searching in base64-encoded messages

2008-04-14 Thread Steve S
On Apr 14 14:24, Angel Olivera wrote: On Mon 14.Apr.08 14:11, Steve S wrote: Occasionally, I get mail where the content is base64 encoded [...] The problem is that I can search the message body for some text only when I view it in the pager since Mutt correctly decodes the content

Re: problems with Maildir, procmail, getmail

2008-03-09 Thread Steve S
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:34:23PM +, Jamie Griffin wrote: I've been struggling for ages trying to set up mutt on my linux machine. I've specified the Maildir mailboxes in muttrc set up procmail set up getmail to pop my email but when i open mutt it wants to use /var/mail/user i

Re: problems with Maildir, procmail, getmail

2008-03-09 Thread Steve S
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:53:55PM +, Jamie Griffin wrote: I think i might have some problems with Maildir: Did you check the Wiki http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttFaq/Maildir? That helped me to set up everything. I've got the Maildir directory, with the require cur.tmp,new sub directories. You

Re: message index: new mail, mutt doesn't open right folder

2008-02-19 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:33:07AM +0100, Steve S wrote: Suppose I have three mailboxes mailboxes +foo +bar +stuff and mutt is open all the time. The last mailbox I visited is foo/. Now mail arrives for all three boxes. I'm in the message index and navigate to bar/, press Return

folder browser, check-new and all that

2008-02-19 Thread Steve S
Hi all In connection to my earlier postings, I did some more testing and I'm pretty sure that I tracked down a kind of pathological test case to reproduce the issue. I also found that the source of the problem I'm seeing is actually connected to my first post about the check-new function. Here

message index: new mail, mutt doesn't open right folder

2008-02-18 Thread Steve S
Hi Me again. I start liking mutt more and more as I use it every day. However, I discovered one issue which I just can't understand. Suppose I have three mailboxes mailboxes +foo +bar +stuff and mutt is open all the time. The last mailbox I visited is foo/. Now mail arrives for all three

Re: message index: new mail, mutt doesn't open right folder

2008-02-18 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:18:12PM +0100, Vladimir Marek wrote: mailboxes +foo +bar +stuff and mutt is open all the time. The last mailbox I visited is foo/. Now mail arrives for all three boxes. I'm in the message index and navigate to bar/, press Return to enter the mailbox. But

Re: message index: new mail, mutt doesn't open right folder

2008-02-18 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:39:13PM +, Michael Kjorling wrote: On 18 Feb 2008 11:33 +0100, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve S): and mutt is open all the time. The last mailbox I visited is foo/. Now mail arrives for all three boxes. I'm in the message index and navigate to bar/, press Return

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-30 Thread Steve S
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Steve S wrote: I'm doing that too, with getmail and a cronjob. The problem is not that mail doesn't download to my machine, but that mutt, if * it is open all the time * showing the file browser (when invoked with `mutt -y`) * no key is pressed

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-29 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:22:49PM -0300, Leonardo Caldas wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:33:17PM +0100, Steve S wrote: Hi I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc.). In my muttrc I have bind browser n check-new

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-29 Thread Steve S
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:29:55PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: Steve S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is not that mail doesn't download to my machine, but that mutt, if * it is open all the time * showing the file browser (when invoked with `mutt -y`) * no key is pressed

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:19:59PM +, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: On Mon 28.Jan'08 at 18:33:17 +0100, Steve S wrote: I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc.). In my muttrc I have bind browser n check-new which works ok

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:50:11PM +0100, Steve S wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:19:59PM +, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: On Mon 28.Jan'08 at 18:33:17 +0100, Steve S wrote: I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc

automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Steve S
Hi I'm new to mutt, so this question my have been asked before (I found nothing on the web/in the wiki etc.). In my muttrc I have bind browser n check-new which works ok. I hit `n` manually from time to time to see if there is new mail. Is it possible to do that automatically in the

Re: automatically check for new mail

2008-01-28 Thread Steve S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:03:40PM +, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote: On Mon 28.Jan'08 at 19:50:11 +0100, Steve S wrote: My MRA is gets mail controled by a cronjob, but in mutt's folder browser, I see folders makred with 'N' only when I (a) hit `n` or (b) close mutt and restart it. What