Re: mutt and qmail

2000-08-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 08:11:51AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: The hostname on this machine is devel.danen.net, but I don't understand where this "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" stuff is coming from. Any ideas? I'm calling qmail like this:

Re: mutt and qmail

2000-08-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 12:27:45AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: | The hostname on this machine is devel.danen.net, but I don't understand | where this "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" | stuff is coming from. Any ideas? /var/qmail/control files Nothing

Re: mutt and qmail

2000-08-30 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed Aug 30, 2000 at 07:32:35AM +, Jim Breton wrote: I'm calling qmail like this: set sendmail="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject" Hmm.. I'm not sure where all that stuff is coming from... but (someone correct me if I'm wrong) I don't believe you can use the typical sendmail command

mutt and qmail

2000-08-29 Thread Vincent Danen
I've finally taken the plunge and put qmail on my personal system after having used it on my server forever. I've got a rather strange mix here and some odd errors... This is what my log looks like when I send out a message: @400039ac8fb70cda2b34 new msg 190666 @400039ac8fb70cdaa834

Re: undelete messages

2000-06-27 Thread Vincent Danen
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 11:52:49PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Thanks. Now, is there any way to bind the arrow keys to use the J/K action instead of the j/k action? That would be really nice... Sure. bind index up previous-entry bind index down next-entry You may possibly

undelete messages

2000-06-25 Thread Vincent Danen
How do I undelete messages? When I try to go back to a deleted message, mutt won't let me... I can't move the arrow onto it. I see on the menu bar at the bottom there is an undelete command, but it looks to work only on the highlighted message (which is never a deleted message because I can

Re: undelete messages

2000-06-25 Thread Vincent Danen
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 02:00:46AM -0500, David Champion wrote: How do I undelete messages? When I try to go back to a deleted message, mutt won't let me... I can't move the arrow onto it. I see Type in the message number to jump to any message, or use the next-entry and previous-entry

Re: undelete messages

2000-06-25 Thread Vincent Danen
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 12:10:02AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: How do I undelete messages? When I try to go back to a deleted message, mutt won't let me... I can't move the arrow onto it. I see on the menu bar at the bottom there is an undelete command, but it looks to work only on the

Re: 1.2.2i problems

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 07:43:23PM -0700, AG wrote: Anyone know why there's such a discrepancy? I think the RPM might be stripping the binaries but I don't know if that would make such a big difference... Doing a mutt -v on both the RPM and manual binaries produces the same output:

procmail recipe for backup

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I'm sure I got this little code snippet from a mutt-related website... I've got this in my .procmailrc file: ## Nuke duplicate messages :0 Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache ## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages :0 c

Re: procmail recipe for backup

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:00:28PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: ## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages :0 c backup :0 ic | cd $PMDIR rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e 1,100d` But it doesn't seem to be working properly (the backup part). I've got something like

wOOp!

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
Well, after two frustrating days I got it all working! Colors work now that I'm using ncurses (5.0 for those interested), and the readonly inbox problem is also gone due to this small problem with the RPM specfile: %files %defattr(-,root,root) That's what was messing up the permissions on

Re: procmail recipe for backup

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:56:38AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: ## Nuke duplicate messages :0 Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache ## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages :0 c backup :0 ic | cd $PMDIR rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e 1,100d` That

Re: procmail recipe for backup

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:29:43PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: No, I'm using the mbox format. Does this mean I can't do this then? Is there something similar to this for the mbox format? Hack together something out of grep, awk and sed :) Or look for 'grepmail' on freshmeat and

Re: procmail recipe for backup

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:24:35PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Hmmm... ok... backup was actually a mailbox file, so I deleted it and made a directory named backup and changed $PMDIR to $PMDIR/backup. As long as the first and second recipe both have the same expression, and it points

Re: 1.2.2i problems

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:58:03AM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote: Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally different

Re: procmail recipe for backup

2000-06-22 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 06:16:07AM -0400, David T-G wrote: % Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I'm sure I got % this little code snippet from a mutt-related website... % % I've got this in my .procmailrc file: % % ## Nuke duplicate messages ... % ## Create backup

1.2.2i problems

2000-06-21 Thread Vincent Danen
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally different outputs. The first is from the manual install and the second is from the RPM install

Re: 1.2.2i problems

2000-06-21 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 03:35:42PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote: Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally different outputs. The first

Re: 1.2.2i problems

2000-06-21 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 09:45:22PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1262377 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt* -rwxr-sr-x1 root mail36607 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/muttbug*

Re: 1.2.2i problems

2000-06-21 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:11:05PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally different outputs. The

Re: Fwd: failure notice

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 07:49:49AM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: I insert a my_hdr Return-Path:... statement into the .muttrc for [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when it bounced back for the second time it showed the Return-Path as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where devel.danen.net is the hostname for

colors all whacked out?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
I just upgraded to 1.2i and the colors are all whacked out. Has this happened to anyone else? I compiled with slang support instead of ncurses and the colors worked ok in the 1.0.1 RPMs from Mandrake, but the colors in this one are just horrible and nothing is coming out right... any ideas?

readonly mailbox in 1.2i?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
Now that I've upgraded, mutt tells me my /var/spool/mail/vdanen mailbox is readonly but with 1.0.1 it didn't. Did I mess something up on the compile? Any ideas would be appreciated. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net Freezer Burn BBS:

Re: Fwd: failure notice

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: Hi there. I can't seem to figure this one out. It's like sendmail is re-writing the Return-Path header and it's making my posts to some mailing lists bounce for some reason. [...] Sounds like you need to fix your

Re: failure notice

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:04:02PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000: I just upgraded and have run into a few problems (see other messages). How would I use the envelope thing? set envelope_from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I meant setgid nor setuid in other message)? I changed it to 755 and I still get read-only permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has -rw-rw permissions and is owned by vdanen.mail. I can't delete any messages in my inbox with the new

read-only mailbox, more details

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
FYI, this may help track down the problems. I think it has something to do with mutt_dotlock or else how I compiled it. This is how I compiled mutt... maybe I need to add more stuff (like the locking stuff?) to configure? ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-sharedir=/etc --sysconfdir=/etc

Re: read-only mailbox, more details

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:46:06PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: FYI, this may help track down the problems. I think it has something to do with mutt_dotlock or else how I compiled it. This is how I compiled mutt... maybe I need to add more stuff (like the locking stuff?) to configure?

Re: setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:43:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: Dotlocking will create a file /var/spool/mail/vdanen.lock. In order to do this, mutt_dotlock needs write access to that directory, which is normally enabled by making mutt_dotlock setgid mail. To illustrate things,

Re: setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:08:14PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I meant setgid Yes, it needs to be setgid to the group that owns the mail spool directory. That's the whole point of it. Dotlocking in some configurations needs to be

Re: setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:41:51PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: I changed it to 755 and I still get read-only permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has -rw-rw permissions and is owned by vdanen.mail. The important thing are the permissions of the /var/spool/mail _directory_,

Fwd: failure notice

2000-06-19 Thread Vincent Danen
:41 - Received: (from vdanen@localhost) by devel.danen.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) id e5J5m3a09047 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:48:03 -0600 Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:48:03 -0600 From: Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ELUG Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: Re

Re: failure notice

2000-06-19 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 10:27:05PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: I insert a my_hdr Return-Path:... statement into the .muttrc for [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when it bounced back for the second time it showed the Return-Path as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where devel.danen.net is the hostname for this

Re: failure notice

2000-06-19 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 11:34:45PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 19 Jun 2000: Hmmm... I use Qmail as my SMTP server on my server, but not on this machine. Maybe I should use Qmail on this machine also... Maybe, no arguments from me. :-) (I

Macro to change role

2000-06-17 Thread Vincent Danen
Hi there, I'm new to mutt being a long-time Pine fanatic. Just because I was bored today I switched to mutt (don't ask why, I'm not sure myself) and so far I'm somewhat impressed. I search the archive and couldn't find a satisfactory answer to this question... I used the Pine roles somewhat