On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:42:28AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-03 22:23]:
Is there a list charter anywhere for mutt-users? The
majordomo info was less than helpful (see mutt.org for info)
try http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/mail.php3
Is there a list charter anywhere for mutt-users? The majordomo info was
less than helpful (see mutt.org for info)
It seems like the focus for this list is decidedly more narrow than is the
norm for most other lists...
--kurt
* Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-10-2002 00:27]:
Is there a list charter anywhere for mutt-users? The majordomo info was
less than helpful (see mutt.org for info)
It seems like the focus for this list is decidedly more narrow than is the
norm for most other lists...
What does this have
* Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-03 22:23]:
Is there a list charter anywhere for mutt-users? The
majordomo info was less than helpful (see mutt.org for info)
try http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/mail.php3#etiquette
i have put together a bit of info about these topic
It'z back.
* On Wed, 02 Oct 2002, PeterKorman wrote:
It'z back.
Not for me. Things seem fine.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:23:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And there is an error message at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says
I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And there is an error message at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says:
Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64 MB
by 0.0 MB. If you don't remove
* D. J. Bolderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [30-09-2002 10:08]:
yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...
Yes i sent a message to mutt.org last Friday and i never seen it
on the list..
I also sent a reply to Sven's mail of last night about these problems.
He sent
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ren?? Clerc wrote:
yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...
Yes i sent a message to mutt.org last Friday and i never seen it
on the list..
I also sent a reply to Sven's mail of last night about these
problems. He sent
Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org
server?
Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space,
or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything?
Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
since thats the only thing that works?
[JPK]
--
[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by
I'm wondering how the servers that manage the list
are set up. Is there 1 server that receives all
messages and many that send the messages to the
subscribers?
--
[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by all her children
the only thing that works?
I host the list ... I believe a colleague may have done some
mail reconfiguration on Friday, I'll check nothing's changed, and
put things back to normal if they have !!!
Sorry if things have broken ... unfortunately I've been away from
access since Thurs ...
Steve
* D. J. Bolderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-29 23:24]:
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And there is an error message at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says:
Warning
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:42:54AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* D. J. Bolderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-29 23:24]:
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And there is an error message at
http
to the gbnet.net addresses?
I normally always use the mutt.org address and subscribed with
it. I only used gbnet that time because I wanted it to make it
to the list.
I don't expect to get my copy of this message either, until the
problem is fixed.
--
John
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday...
Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [69/47071] [NEW=40058] [~d 26/9/2002-]
so - 69 messages since 26th September...
perhaps the problem is only with addresses
who subscribed
I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. And there is an error message at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages
that says:
Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64
MB by 0.0 MB. If you don't remove messages
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote:
I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And there is an error message at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says:
Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64 MB
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:11:27PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
* Alex Polite [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-17 08:22]:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
usually do now is push L for list-reply the remove the body and
appropriate headers.
I have
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:05:26PM -0600, Rob Park wrote:
That's awfully restrictive. What if you were in another mbox and you
wanted to mail mutt-users?
I just use an alias, and send mail normally.
Good for you!
--
Alex Polite
http://plusseven.com/gpg/
* Rob Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-17 22:49]:
Alas! darren chamberlain spake thus:
* Alex Polite [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-17 08:22]:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
usually do now is push L for list-reply the remove the body and
appropriate
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-17 22:25]:
Presumably if you use the patch which has RFC 2369 support, there might
be a 'list-post' option, which would be nice In fact, mutt could
probably add a 'list-post' option (which would post a new message to
list(s) existing
darren chamberlain wrote:
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-17 22:25]:
Presumably if you use the patch which has RFC 2369 support, there might
be a 'list-post' option, which would be nice In fact, mutt could
probably add a 'list-post' option (which would post a new message
* Alex Polite [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 14:24]:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
usually do now is push L for list-reply the remove the body and
appropriate headers.
Just send a new message to the list address,
e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
René Clerc
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
the list address, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] You may want to
cut-and-paste the list address
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:02:26PM +0100, Dave Smith wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
the list address, e.g. [EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:05:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
the list address, e.g
* Alex Polite [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-17 08:22]:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
usually do now is push L for list-reply the remove the body and
appropriate headers.
I have this in my config:
subscribe mutt-users@
mailboxes =lists/mutt-users
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:11:27PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
I have this in my config:
subscribe mutt-users@
mailboxes =lists/mutt-users
folder-hook =lists/mutt-users macro index m \mail[EMAIL PROTECTED]\
subscribe mutt-dev@
subscribe @bugs.guug.de
Dave Smith wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
the list address, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] You may want to
cut-and-paste
Alas! darren chamberlain spake thus:
* Alex Polite [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-17 08:22]:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
usually do now is push L for list-reply the remove the body and
appropriate headers.
I have this in my config:
subscribe
Sven, et al -
...and then Sven Guckes said...
%
% * David Thorburn-Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06]:
% Can you verify that a test message that meets these requirements ..
% Once you have such a message in hand, please gzip it and forward it
% to the list along with screen clips
* David Thorburn-Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06]:
Can you verify that a test message that meets these requirements ..
Once you have such a message in hand, please gzip it and forward it
to the list along with screen clips ...
argh! NO! do *not* attach screen clips to your message
Dear all,
I am subscribed to several mailing lists which I sort to different
folders by procmail. So, when I changed to a folder I exactly know
which mailing list's emails I am reading.
For this reason, I would like to have the following feature:
- I am subscribed to a mailing list
and
- I
* Lukas Ruf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020905 16:00]:
Does anyone know any smart solution to this request? I would
appreciate any hints...
Look in the mutt manual, section 6.3.83
(Hint: use %F instead of %L)
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-05 16:00:37 +0200:
I would like to have the following feature:
- I am subscribed to a mailing list
and
- I would like to see the sender of the email as it is the case for
emails that do not belong to a mailing lists.
see index_format, s/%L/%F/
--
begin
* Steve Wollkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mutt and I'm trying to get mailing list support to work. I put the
'subscribe mutt-users' in my .muttrc and these messages are flagged L
correctly, but for some reason when I try to save them it prompts me to save
them by the author's address
In message 3 of the current thread, Paul Gabriel wrote:
* Steve Wollkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mutt and I'm trying to get mailing list support to work. I put the
'subscribe mutt-users' in my .muttrc and these messages are flagged L
correctly, but for some reason when I try to save them
* Sven Guckes:
it'll be for newbies. and for newbies only.
it's unmoderated and open for all to post -
including spammers. automatic posts will tell them to rtfm and
google - once a week. like i said - this list is for newbies.
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You remind me
In message 1 of the current thread, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Sven Guckes:
it'll be for newbies. and for newbies only.
Sounds like a list for me. I have a newbie question, and yes, I've looked
on google and the manual (though I probably missed something). I'm new to
mutt and I'm trying to get
* On 2002.08.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like i said - this
list is for newbies.
You remind me a lot of Dogbert.
I love mutt. I set an alias to remind me of this insightful remark, and
right after a ^L redraw, all messages from Sven show
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:23:02PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
the distinction between bloat and feature
are usually subjective to one's preferences.
i doubt that many users will use such a menu.
besides - what shall this menu offer?
Vikram - can you answer these questions for me?
having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
--
Patrick Shanahan
Registered Linux User #207535
http://counter.li.org
Please DO NOT carbon me on replies to list, unless you are requesting
duplicate responces.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
Seems to be working fine here... anyone else?
- --
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ | 0x1410081E
-BEGIN PGP
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:32:03PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
Seems to be working fine here... anyone else?
No problem here
* Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-19 15:05]:
having seen NO traffic for 3 days,
have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
nope - looks fine. there are 31
mails within the last two days.
Sven
=== --verbose:
Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [31/45741] [NEW=39643] [~d 2d]
45368 N L 020818 Jussi
be reading this here on the list.)
but like i said: i don't mind such a menu.
my creation hooks and color setups would
probably have benefitted from such a menu.
i had to restart mutt a *lot* of times
just trying out a new hook for something.
you probably know the feeling install
a new program and reboot
, moving, editing them... except
if you could save the hook-lists and load them on startup.
so all it takes is a dump of the current list to a file.
then you can look at it and rearrange it with your editor
:unhook * and :source file from within. sounds fine.
so, developers, how about a save
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
to write these to a file so he can monitor them.
a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat?
Sven
of-course not but an added functionality.
--
Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and feature
are usually subjective to one's preferences.
i doubt that many users will use such a menu.
besides - what shall this menu offer?
of course, this adds another menu
with default bindings and commands.
i suppose there you would use it to list the rules,
show sublists by pattern, add and remove
On 020816, at 18:23:02, Sven Guckes wrote
* On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
to write these to a file so he can monitor them.
a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat?
* Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-16 12:34]:
of-course not but an added
Hi Sven,
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16. Aug. 2002]:
* Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-16 12:34]:
Vikram - can you answer these questions for me?
I can -- i was the original poster.
of-course not but an added functionality.
[...]
i suppose there you would use it to list
Hi,
I can see the current value of an variable with
set ?variable
but is there a possibility to list currently active hooks?
Ciao, Gregor
--
echo '16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D3F204445524F42snlbxq'|dc
* Gregor Zattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-12 18:03]:
I can see the current value of an variable with set ?variable
but is there a possibility to list currently active hooks?
no. :-(
someone i know had added some print statements
to write these to a file so he can monitor them.
a menu would
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 11:10:42AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
| * Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:43:23PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
|
| | personally, i find that disallowing attachments on
| | mailing lists is fine.
|
| Don't forget that PGP/MIME signatures are
figured out how to solve from the documentation:
1. How do I get a list of folders with new messages in them? What
I'd like is to press a button and get a numbered list of folders
with the number of new messages in them. Then to change folder I
could just type in the number
Ben Escoto wrote:
1. How do I get a list of folders with new messages in them? What
I'd like is to press a button and get a numbered list of folders
with the number of new messages in them. Then to change folder I
could just type in the number.
well you have to define
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:04:29AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
well you have to define which mailboxes you want to receive incoming
mail; ie:
mailboxes ! +labels +admin +cron
or something like that (they can be all on one line or split over
multiple lines, i believe).
to see the list
* Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-18 03:52]:
I'm on the same list as Dee and am having the same problem.
My best guess is that the mailing list software
is chocking on the mime headers.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
looks
* W. D. McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 05:43]:
Is list maintainer Jim on-line tonight?
If, please reply off line.
CC'd to the mutt-users list.
man irc!
Sven
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:44:39AM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote:
This mail sure looks ok and contains no attachments. You may want to
check yourself for the mails you send to the other mailing list: Just
press v to view the attachments. If you want to check the raw mail,
use the following
Hi Derrick,
Problem :
Sometimes a message received via a mailing list, but doesn't
mention the list in any of the recipient headers. (eg a member
bounced an off-list reply back to the list) Mutt's list-reply
function doesn't recognize any lists in that case.
Solution (my
Hi,
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 03:11:36 +0200] wrote:
Problem :
Sometimes a message received via a mailing list, but doesn't
mention the list in any of the recipient headers. (eg a member
bounced an off-list reply back to the list) Mutt's list-reply
function
I am subscriped to a mail list that will net let me post using my config
of Mutt 1.4i, which I suspect being a new user of mutt, might be a
common problem or one easily overcome. Maybe I could tossed some ideas.
They send back a notice saying they do not allow attachments. I am
wondering how
Hi,
* W. D. McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-07-15 06:20]:
I am subscriped to a mail list that will net let me post using my config
of Mutt 1.4i, which I suspect being a new user of mutt, might be a
common problem or one easily overcome. Maybe I could tossed some ideas.
They send back a notice
Is list maintainer Jim on-line tonight ?
If, please reply off line.
CC'd to the mutt-users list.
/Dee
Problem :
Sometimes a message received via a mailing list, but doesn't
mention the list in any of the recipient headers. (eg a member
bounced an off-list reply back to the list) Mutt's list-reply
function doesn't recognize any lists in that case.
Solution (my idea
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
email where I
address... ;-)
So, this could be the reason, huh? Was I stupid to subscribe with a
redirect address? Should I unsubscribe with goa-head.org and subscribe
again with that real one? Then again, I wouldn't be able to send mail to
this list from goa-head.org, which is my public address in Usenet
ekhowl@***.fi... User unknown
More information off-list if you need some.
--
Cedric
I would like to bind 'r' to 'list-reply' when the message is from a
mailing list I'm subscribed to. A catch-all one command would be nice.
~l message is addressed to a known mailing list
Should I use message-hook, folder-hook or what?
# Hmm, don't think so... ~l
Hi,
* Kurt Hindenburg [02-06-08 17:15:07 +0200] wrote:
I would like to bind 'r' to 'list-reply' when the message
is from a mailing list I'm subscribed to. A catch-all
one command would be nice.
# Hmm, don't think so... ~l is not a folder
folder-hook ~l bind index r list-reply
Hi all,
I sent a message to this list. 10:28:55 +0200,i.e. 3.5h ago and it still
doesn't show up. What's wrong? It's nether my account not working nor my
relay that has trouble.
Michael
--
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% Hi all,
Hello!
%
% I sent a message to this list. 10:28:55 +0200,i.e. 3.5h ago and it still
That's odd. I've sent a few messages in the past few minutes and they've
already shown up. Have you seen new stuff from me?
% doesn't show up
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% I sent a message to this list. 10:28:55 +0200,i.e. 3.5h ago and it still
That's odd. I've sent a few messages in the past few minutes and they've
already shown up. Have you seen new stuff from me?
Yeah and you obviously received my List slow
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% % I sent a message to this list. 10:28:55 +0200,i.e. 3.5h ago and it still
%
% That's odd. I've sent a few messages in the past few minutes and they've
% already shown up. Have you seen new stuff
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% I seems that it's only my own messages that get lost. Strage!
Finally my messages (on this subject) arrived. So all is well. I wonder
what happend to the message I was talking about, though. I'll just
bounce it and see if it get's through now.
I
how mutt-users is set up, but could you have turned off metoo
(in the list config, not muttrc) when you weren't looking?
Of course $metoo is unset in your muttrc, and that's a fine setting, but
I specifically pointed to the mailing list software rather than your
local mutt configuration.
The point
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-06 16:15:42 CEST] wrote:
I forget how mutt-users is set up, but could you have
turned off metoo (in the list config, not muttrc) when you
weren't looking?
Hmm, I thought this list is run by majordomo. I've only
recognized the 'metoo' feature by Mailman (which
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:43:59PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* David T-G [2002-06-06 16:15:42 CEST] wrote:
I forget how mutt-users is set up, but could you have
turned off metoo (in the list config, not muttrc) when you
weren't looking?
Hmm, I thought this list is run by majordomo. I've
Hi,
* Steve Kennedy [2002-06-06 16:47:10 CEST] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:43:59PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
But anyways, what's the problem if messages take 2 hours
to be delivered? 2 or 3 days are really a bit long, but
this ain't chat, imho.
Could be many problems, using
this may be a little off topic but you are all such a friendly bunch
and i used mutt to send the email, i thought i'd give it a try...
i have tried to subscribe to a couple mailing lists by sending a
subscribe message (using mutt!) to the list subscribe address but i
never get a response of any
So sprach Will Yardley am 2002-05-21 um 15:10:19 -0700 :
i'm pretty sure i've used symlinks in both directions and never had a
problem either way.
I'm now using symlinks from ML-MUTT-USERS - .ML-MUTT-USERS and
everybody is happy.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote
This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
email where I was told, that I wasn't subscribed to mutt-users. Here's
the email I got
Jussi --
...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
%
% This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
% to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
% occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
% email where I was told, that I
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:17:57PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
% to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
% occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
% email where I
I haven't recieved a single mail from the list since the last week or so.
Is it the list or is it just me ?
Sharukh.
--
Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri
Mumbai, India.
On Tue 21-May-2002 at 01:47:38PM +0530, Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri. wrote:
I haven't recieved a single mail from the list since the last week or
so. Is it the list or is it just me ?
It stopped working sometime on Thursday - Seems to be ok now, though
no messages posted over the weekend
On Wed 22-May-2002 at 10:23:07AM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Tue 21-May-2002 at 01:47:38PM +0530, Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri. wrote:
I haven't recieved a single mail from the list since the last week or
so. Is it the list or is it just me ?
It stopped working sometime on Thursday
Sharukh --
...and then Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri. said...
%
% I haven't recieved a single mail from the list since the last week or so.
% Is it the list or is it just me ?
It's you.
%
% Sharukh.
% --
% Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri
% Mumbai, India.
HTH HAND
:-D
--
David T-G
Alexander Skwar wrote:
It was courier. However I don't think that's a good idea, because,
hm, dunno... Hm, no, it's not good - if I create a new folder via
IMAP with Courier, it will be named .foo. I've setup a cron script to
create the symlinks. Hm, either way I can get it to work, if
Hello!
Since I'm unable to make mutt 1.3.99 list mailboxes in hidden
directories (see previous mail), I now tried to use normally named
mailboxes which are symlinks.
To do this, I've created a symlink from ML-MUTT-USERS to
ML-MUTT-USERS (in the case of this mailinglist). My mailboxes line
now
Hi,
* Alexander Skwar [05/19/02 10:34:23 CEST] wrote:
So I've set my mailboxes line to be:
mailboxes ! +.ML-MUTT-USERS
However, this doesn't work, because mutt doesn't seem to take mailboxes
which begin with a Dot (.) (and are hidden because of this).
If mutt didn't accept it, it would
So sprach Rocco Rutte am 2002-05-19 um 12:55:56 +0200 :
I guess you didn't touch the $mask variable. Maybe mutt does
what you'd want it to do but just doesn't display anything
because of your $mask.
Oh, yes, you're right! I would have thought that the $mask only
controls what's displayed in
On 07:35 19 May 2002, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| So sprach Rocco Rutte am 2002-05-19 um 12:55:56 +0200 :
| I guess you didn't touch the $mask variable. Maybe mutt does
| what you'd want it to do but just doesn't display anything
| because of your $mask.
|
| Oh, yes, you're
On 04:38 19 May 2002, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Since I'm unable to make mutt 1.3.99 list mailboxes in hidden
| directories (see previous mail), I now tried to use normally named
| mailboxes which are symlinks.
This is what I get for reading email backwards.
| To do this, I've
So sprach Cameron Simpson am 2002-05-20 um 10:17:56 +1000 :
Or you would work around it with a symlink or you don't wan't
to change $mask. Cheers,
Well, the symlink trick also only works when $mask=.* - see my other
mail. In the default $mask case, mutt doesn't look at the symlink
target.
So sprach Cameron Simpson am 2002-05-20 um 10:26:48 +1000 :
This is what I get for reading email backwards.
;)
SOunds like mutt's using lstat instad of stat. Probably a mistake
in this instance.
Yes, I agree.
What if you swap the symlink around:
rm ML-MUTT-USERS
mv
Mike --
...and then Michael P. Soulier said...
%
% On 14/05/02 Christopher Swingley did speaketh:
%
% I hate Lyris. Lyris is so nonstandard that one would think it was a
...
%
% Me too. They set up Lyris in-house here, and I've ignored the project and
% put up my own GNU Mailman server
801 - 900 of 1389 matches
Mail list logo
