Hello,
mutt 1.5.21 under Centos 7
gpg 2.0.22 under Centos 7
I have been trying to send encrypted messages via mutt in command line.
The email arrives at destination but is never encrypted.
If I send the same thing using mutt interactively, the message arrives
encrypted.
Any idea where I could
On 30/06 16:47, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:11:53PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote:
On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to
for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one
On 01Jul2015 20:12, Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org wrote:
On 2015-07-02 12:20 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
I keep a little maildb which assigns group names to addresses, and
autogenerate mutt aliases formed like the above from it. Why the
maildb? Because my mail filing also uses these groups in
On 2015-07-02 12:20 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
I keep a little maildb which assigns group names to addresses, and
autogenerate mutt aliases formed like the above from it. Why the
maildb? Because my mail filing also uses these groups in its rules.
Excuse my ignorance, but what is a maildb?
On 30Jun2015 16:47, Jon LaBadie mut...@jgcomp.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:11:53PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote:
On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to
for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with
On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to
for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account
S/Mime. But I want to use my main account with both and would like to
choose on a per user
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:11:53PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote:
On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to
for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account
S/Mime. But I want to use
Hi,
is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to
for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account
S/Mime. But I want to use my main account with both and would like to
choose on a per user basis whether I encrypt via PGP or S/Mime. I know
people
* Jon LaBadie mut...@jgcomp.com [2015-06-30 16:53]:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:11:53PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote:
On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to
for using S/Mime or using mutt with one
Dear colleagues,
I would be grateful if someone could confirm if I've done everything right:
a). I'm using Mutt 1.5.18 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 with gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9
b). Here is a fragment from my .muttrc:
---
set pgp_decode_command=/opt/local/bin/gpg %?p?--passphrase-fd 0?
--no-verbose --quiet
Sorry :)
As I see, I was quite stupid, unfortunately.
My email should be encrypted not with my public key, of course, but
with public keys received from addressees. That's why I was suggested
to select keys (question No. 1) , and that's why I gpg has told me
that the key was already present
hello,
now i have spent some additional hours on this problem which might
turn out to be some idiot fault of the person behind the keyboard.
unfortunately this was the case. i was stuck up on pressing s instead of p
when i wanted to use gpg. it is *very* embarrassing and i apologize sincerely
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:58:21PM +0100, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
hello,
now i have spent some additional hours on this problem which might
turn out to be some idiot fault of the person behind the keyboard.
unfortunately this was the case. i was stuck up on pressing s instead of p
when
Hello Niels,
Niels den Otter wrote on 17.03.10:
any hints are much needed...
Just to be sure. You are opening an e-mail that is signed/encrypted
with PGP and not with S/MIME?
I am able to decrypt stored gpg encrypted messages. And replying to one of
these messages also works fine. (I
Hello Chuck,
thanks for taking the time.
Chuck Smith wrote on 17.03.10:
I was looking around for a fix for you and found something interesting.
Look at the Mutt User Manual in the section on PGP:
http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttGuide/UseGPG
Look carefully at the this command:
set
dear mutt-users,
Probably my question was too imprecise.
Jan-Herbert Damm wrote on 16.03.10:
hello all,
gpg and mutt used to work fine. now mutt won't find any public keys anymore. I
have run the following tests:
[...]
now i have spent some additional hours on this problem which might
turn
I'm not an expert, but shouldn't mutt call /home/jan/.gnupg?
--
Nothing is ever so bad that it couldn't be worse, and if it could be
worse than it is, then maybe its not so bad!
Hello,
Dale Raby wrote on 17.03.10:
I'm not an expert, but shouldn't mutt call /home/jan/.gnupg?
Indeed! Unfortunately I have no idea how mutt generates the commands for
encryption.
In muttrc i can't find any hint to s/mime. The variable pgp_sign_command is
set to a sensible gpg command. It
Dear Jan,
On Wednesday, 17 March 2010, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
gpg and mutt used to work fine. now mutt won't find any public
keys anymore. I have run the following tests:
[...]
now i have spent some additional hours on this problem which might
turn out to be some idiot fault
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:11:53PM +0100, Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
Hello,
Dale Raby wrote on 17.03.10:
I'm not an expert, but shouldn't mutt call /home/jan/.gnupg?
Indeed! Unfortunately I have no idea how mutt generates the commands for
encryption.
In muttrc i can't find any hint to
hello all,
gpg and mutt used to work fine. now mutt won't find any public keys anymore. I
have run the following tests:
beginn gpg-test---
j...@herb:~$ cat test.txt
this is the content of test.txt
j...@herb:~$ gpg -se -r Markus test.txt
[prompted to enter my passphase]
pub 2048g
Hi,
* Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
GPG asks my passphrase but doesn't accept it.
What gpg setup did you use? contrib/gpg.rc? It's not gpg that's asking
but mutt. So maybe mutt doesn't call gpg at all or in a wrong way...
Ok, it works fine now. The problem was in the direction pointed
Hello,
Testing Mutt 1.20.
GPG asks my passphrase but doesn't accept it.
I don't really know where to start looking for figuring this out.
from config.log:
---
$ ./configure -C --prefix=/opt/mutt --enable-pop --enable-imap\
--enable-smtp --enable-debug --with-gss --with-gnutls --with-sasl
Hi,
* Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
GPG asks my passphrase but doesn't accept it.
What gpg setup did you use? contrib/gpg.rc? It's not gpg that's asking
but mutt. So maybe mutt doesn't call gpg at all or in a wrong way...
Rocco
pgp7cJuKZz5L7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Rocco Rutte wrote on 02.07.09:
Hi,
* Jan-Herbert Damm wrote:
GPG asks my passphrase but doesn't accept it.
What gpg setup did you use? contrib/gpg.rc? It's not gpg that's asking
but mutt. So maybe mutt doesn't call gpg at all or in a wrong way...
I guess I'm running into the same
Hello list, I'm trying to have mutt encrypt to multiple gpg keyids at once
when I send to a single email address.
The people behind the address (it's an email reflector) all have their own
gpg and pgp keys [1]. I've not yet found a way to make encryption to all
their keys happen with mutt 1.5.18
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Johnson wrote:
The people behind the address (it's an email reflector) all have their own
gpg and pgp keys [1].
The best way to handle this is to have the e-mail reflector do it.
The e-mail reflector should provide a public key to which you
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:42:22PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Johnson wrote:
The people behind the address (it's an email reflector) all have their own
gpg and pgp keys [1].
The best way to handle this is to have the e-mail reflector do
Hello,
encrypting, signing, checking signatures: all works. Sort of.
Two hassles:
1. I can't access encrypted mail that I send. When I try to read
it, I get Could not copy message.
2. when I receive an encrypted mail, I see a text block of gibberish that
I have to manually pipe through
* Dan H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-28 14:28 +0100]:
Content-Description: kjlkj
???
1. I can't access encrypted mail that I send. When I try to read
it, I get Could not copy message.
See the thread starting with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, January 28 at 02:28 PM, quoth Dan H.:
1. I can't access encrypted mail that I send. When I try to read
it, I get Could not copy message.
That's by design (but it's a rather uninformative error message).
Encrypted email can only be read
Hello Stefano,
On Monday, April 16, 2007 at 12:01:57 +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
the body of the mail (which is supposedly the part which is signed).
There's more signed: The MIME part mini-header, the empty head/body
separator line, and of course the body. Everything between the MIME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 15 at 01:45 AM, quoth Stefano Sabatini:
Hi to all mutters, and sorry for the likely dumb question I'm posting.
No prob; this may be a dumb answer.
I'm testing mutt and gnupg, I can verify with no problem messages
signatures, but
On date Monday 2007-04-16 01:09:40 -0600, Kyle Wheeler muttered:
On Sunday, April 15 at 01:45 AM, quoth Stefano Sabatini:
[...]
I'm testing mutt and gnupg, I can verify with no problem messages
signatures, but it fails when I do it manually, saving in distinct
files the message and the
Hi to all mutters, and sorry for the likely dumb question I'm posting.
I'm testing mutt and gnupg, I can verify with no problem messages
signatures, but it fails when I do it manually, saving in distinct
files the message and the signature.
For example if I save the (clear) message in message,
I'm using mutt with mixmaster and gnupg all fine apart from mixmaster .If i
send a mail not forwarded by any mix
chai the mail get delivered right with content , pgp signature and everithing
.If i send it through a mix chai it
gets delivered reporting only the pgp signature and no content,i'm
I fear that code has gone untested and unmaintained for a long time.
On 2007-02-05 17:49:55 +0100, gab bag wrote:
From: gab bag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:49:55 +0100
Subject: Mutt mixmaster gpg pgp
X-Spam-Level:
I'm using mutt with mixmaster
a
key, I get a mutt notification that seems to indicate it can't find gpg/pgp.
Anything else pgp/gpg in mutt ( in regards to sending a msg) results in a beep.
A check of docs and the list archives doesn't reveal anything significant.
I don't find any config vars that would I would use to point
Just FYI ... this is pretty good as far as I can see.
- Forwarded message from USM Bish [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: USM Bish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:31:19 +0530
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIH] mutt and gpg
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:19
I've used a send-hook along with auto-encrypt before, and that works
fine. As for getting the info from your keyring, the only way that
comes to mind is running some kind of script on a regular basis (perhaps
a cron job) that lists your keyring, extracts the email addresses from
the key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:59:08PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
gpg --list-keys | perl -n -e '/(.*?)/; print send-hook $1 \set
pgp_autoencrypt\\n' ~/.muttrc.autoenc
gpg --list-keys|perl -ne '/^.*(.*).*$/; print send-hook $1 \set
pgp_autoencrypt\\n
Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have been using mutt with pgp for some time now, but I've now got
enough people that I want to send encrypted mail to on a regular basis
that I'd like to have mutt automatically encrypt mail to everyone for
whom I have public keys, and
* Derek D. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [24-09-2001 23:43]:
| I think it's a nice feature you describe. I don't have the answer, but
| if someone has, I'll benefit from it too!
|
| Since you said so, I CC:'d the list so they'll know I'm not the only
| one who's paranoid... =8^) I mean, so the
Thus spake René Clerc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[... some marvelous Xemacs trick ...]
Does anybody know if it's possible with vim? I mostly use mutt over
ssh...
Here's one way:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/20095
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/21602
--
|
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:55:26PM -0400, Derek D. Martin wrote:
I have been using mutt with pgp for some time now, but I've now got
enough people that I want to send encrypted mail to on a regular basis
that I'd like to have mutt automatically encrypt mail to everyone for
whom I have
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 at 18:07:15 -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Thus spake Ren=E9 Clerc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
=20
[... some marvelous Xemacs trick ...]
=20
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:59:08PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:55:26PM -0400, Derek D. Martin wrote:
I have been using mutt with pgp for some time now, but I've now got
enough people that I want to send encrypted mail to on a regular basis
that I'd like to have
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 11:50:52PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
| The reason why I'm mailing you is the following question:
|
| Your email body is justified. How do you do this? With vim somehow?
| Could you explain this to me?
Does anybody know if it's possible with vim? I mostly use
David Rock mutt [24/09/01 22:31 -0500]:
This would suggest that full justification is also not possible within
vim natively. I don't have par installed, so I can't test to see if it
would do it.
set editor=vim +':set tw=77' +':set wrap' +\`awk '/^$/ {print i+2; exit} {i++}' %s\`
%s
| Hi all..
|
| ich have a small problem (I think) with mutt and gpg.
| I'v got mutt-1.3.19 with gnupg-1.0.6 and all went fine, but when I want to
| encrypt a mail, I got this:
|
| usage: gpg [options] --encrypt [filename]
|
| I seems something wrong, but i do not find this error.
|
| In my
Hi all..
ich have a small problem (I think) with mutt and gpg.
I'v got mutt-1.3.19 with gnupg-1.0.6 and all went fine, but when I want to
encrypt a mail, I got this:
usage: gpg [options] --encrypt [filename]
I seems something wrong, but i do not find this error.
In my .muttrc I have this vor
Hi all..
ich have a small problem (I think) with mutt and gpg.
I'v got mutt-1.3.19 with gnupg-1.0.6 and all went fine, but when I want to
encrypt a mail, I got this:
usage: gpg [options] --encrypt [filename]
I seems something wrong, but i do not find this error.
In my .muttrc I have this vor
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:43:53PM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
In my .muttrc I have this vor gpg- encryptions:
set pgp_encrypt_only_command=gpg -v --batch --output - --encrypt --textmode
--armor --always-trust -- -r %r -- %f
set pgp_encrypt_sign_command=gpg --passphrase-fd 0 -v
Hi!
Does anyone have the .muttrc commands off hand for the operation of GNUPG
under Mutt?
Thanks in advance!
---
S c o t t A. D a v i s ! Si vis pacem para bellum
sdavis at Austin-Texas.net ! http://www.austin-texas.net/~sdavis
Packet Wrangler For Hire...! Unemployed victim of bad dot com
Scott Davis proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Does anyone have the .muttrc commands off hand for the operation of GNUPG
under Mutt?
/usr/doc/mutt-1.2.5i/samples/gpg.rc
-s (or wherever your mutt docs are located)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @
Hello mutt-users...
I recently have set up GPG, and have mutt using it to sign mail... a
few questions:
I have pgp_autosign and pgp_sign_as set, but when I go to send a
message, mutt choses MD5 as the MIC algorithm. If i manually do a sign
as, then select my key, it detects it as SHA1
Hi i have just switched over to mutt from pine and I have started using GPG
with mutt as well, I think I have everything working correctly apart from
one lillte thing.
When someone send me a email using pine signed with gpg (using pgp4pine)
when I open the email I can read what is contains
Graham Lillico (Tue 16.0500-08:46):
[deleted]
email sent from mutt using gpg to sign it then I get the above message and
then shortly followed by "PGP signature successfully verified." why don't I
get this from messages sent and signed using pine? Does this mean it can't
veri
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 10:17:42AM +0530, Abhay Ghaisas said:
Is there any way I can directly add a key that has been sent by
somebody to me by email into the key-ring directly from mutt?
You must have the following settings:
set pgp_gpg=/usr/bin/gpg#where your GnuPG binary
On Wed, 06 Oct 1999, Abhay Ghaisas wrote:
Also, is there any way I can get keys from key-servers from
behind a fire-wall?
GPG doesn't support getting keys via a http proxy, but I wrote a patch
for it; it is attached.
Apply the patch tp gpg-1.0.0 and set http_proxy, eg.
export
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 11:09:06AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 08:43:47AM +0100, Georg Josef Uphoff wrote:
Well, this might be a simple question, but how do I use
mutt with GnuPG ?
I'd recommend against this currently: gpg gives validity information
which is
Well, this might be a simple question, but how do I use
mutt with GnuPG ?
Thanks.
--
-
Georg Josef Uphoff
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.uphoff-ib.com/guphoff
, assuming that your copy of Mutt supports gpg.)
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal | is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
Net
Georg Josef Uphoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this might be a simple question, but how do I use
mutt with GnuPG ?
You need to set the configuration variables so, and then you can use
gnugp instead of pgp:
set pgp_v2=/usr/bin/pgp # pgp 2.* binary
set
64 matches
Mail list logo
