s answer. It might work for this case but will
> > try
> > to decrypt many types of attachments which are in fact not pgp encrypted.
> > The attachment should have type
> > application/pgp-encrypted
> >
> > otherwise it needs to be fixed.
> >
>
None of the possibilities is actually working.
But at least I have clues enough to go deeper with .mailcap options,
which I clearly ned to learn,
Thanks again.
>
> actually, forget my previous answer. It might work for this case but will try
> to decrypt many types of attachments whi
ase but will try
to decrypt many types of attachments which are in fact not pgp encrypted.
The attachment should have type
application/pgp-encrypted
otherwise it needs to be fixed.
Richard
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:15:10PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
>
> application/octet-stream; gpg %s
>
> Now, If i try to open the file from mutt I am asked for my gpg
> passphrase, and the file is decrypted in /tmp, which is not that bad.
> Sorry for being unable to go further, but: how could the
PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
>
>
>> What I am trying to do now is sending encrypted attachments instead of
>> encrypted e-mails. I installed Cryptophane in the Windows boxes and
>> all is ok, except my mutt is not recognizing .gpg attachments, and a
>> message of &qu
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:44:27PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
> What I am trying to do now is sending encrypted attachments instead of
> encrypted e-mails. I installed Cryptophane in the Windows boxes and
> all is ok, except my mutt is not recognizing .gpg attachments, and a
> messag
What I am trying to do now is sending encrypted attachments instead of
encrypted e-mails. I installed Cryptophane in the Windows boxes and
all is ok, except my mutt is not recognizing .gpg attachments, and a
message of "octet-stream/aplication is not supported" is shown in
every me
Solved! Thank you!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Jose M Vidal on Wednesday, 08 December 2010:
>> Hi,
>> I had to come back, because the kind solution provided by Syerling ( &
>> sleep n) was apparently working, but while viewing pdf documents, when
>> I was browsing t
Quoth Jose M Vidal on Wednesday, 08 December 2010:
> Hi,
> I had to come back, because the kind solution provided by Syerling ( &
> sleep n) was apparently working, but while viewing pdf documents, when
> I was browsing to previous pages they turned blank.
> So I decided to use the mutt_bgrun scrip
> I had to come back, because the kind solution provided by Syerling ( &
> sleep n) was apparently working, but while viewing pdf documents, when
> I was browsing to previous pages they turned blank.
> So I decided to use the mutt_bgrun script, till I realize I ignore
> where to save it and how to
Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:42:05PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > While opening and viewing mutt attachments, mutt is not available
>> > until I close the attachment app (evince, chrome, etc)
>> > Is there any way to open attachments while keeping the mut
Quoth Marco Giusti on Sunday, 28 November 2010:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:42:05PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
> > Hi,
> > While opening and viewing mutt attachments, mutt is not available
> > until I close the attachment app (evince, chrome, etc)
> > Is there any wa
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:42:05PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
> Hi,
> While opening and viewing mutt attachments, mutt is not available
> until I close the attachment app (evince, chrome, etc)
> Is there any way to open attachments while keeping the mutt terminal
> available?
>
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:42:05PM +0100, Jose M Vidal wrote:
> Hi,
> While opening and viewing mutt attachments, mutt is not available
> until I close the attachment app (evince, chrome, etc)
> Is there any way to open attachments while keeping the mutt terminal
> available?
Worked like a charm.
Thank you very much!
jm
Quoth Jose M Vidal on Sunday, 28 November 2010:
> Hi,
> While opening and viewing mutt attachments, mutt is not available
> until I close the attachment app (evince, chrome, etc)
> Is there any way to open attachments while keeping the mutt terminal
> available?
> Thanks a lot!
Hi,
While opening and viewing mutt attachments, mutt is not available
until I close the attachment app (evince, chrome, etc)
Is there any way to open attachments while keeping the mutt terminal available?
Thanks a lot!
--
jm
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:59:50AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> * On 20 Nov 2010, Chris G wrote:
> > By default mutt saves attachments in the current directory (i.e. in the
> > directory in which it was started). In my case this is often somewhere
> > completely rando
* On 20 Nov 2010, Chris G wrote:
> By default mutt saves attachments in the current directory (i.e. in the
> directory in which it was started). In my case this is often somewhere
> completely random and most definitely isn't where I want to save
> attachments.
>
> A
Chris,
You could always alias mutt to be the following:
cd ~/tmp ; mutt
I know that's a hackish work around but it's a quick fix.
-Troy
* Chris G :
> By default mutt saves attachments in the current directory (i.e. in the
> directory in which it was started). In my ca
By default mutt saves attachments in the current directory (i.e. in the
directory in which it was started). In my case this is often somewhere
completely random and most definitely isn't where I want to save
attachments.
Apart from being careful about the dreictory from which I start mu
On 10.11.10, 00:33, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
> Hi, I'm using this for showing me the number of attachments:
>
> set index_format="%4C %Z %2M %{%d %b %y} %-28.28a (%4l) %?X?[%X]& ? %s"
>
> And it's mainly the part "%?X?[%X]&" ...
>
y} %-25.25n %?X?[%X]& ? %s"
>
> and it works fine, excepted that the counter does not show
> application/octet-stream attachments (in most cases PDF or -- ugly -- .doc or
> .odt) . Reading the online man, I've
> added
>
> attachments application/octet-stre
* On 09 Nov 2010, Francesco de Virgilio wrote:
> Hi all,
> show at least if the mail has any attachment in the index? I don't
> want the exact number of attachments, but only I want to know if there
> is any.
>
> Yes, I know there's a patch for this, here [1] but
s any attachment in the index? I don't
> want the exact number of attachments, but only I want to know if there
> is any.
>
> Yes, I know there's a patch for this, here [1] but really don't want
> to recompile Mutt every time. A workaround based on a software
> external
Hi all,
I use Mutt since 3 moths and with a rockin' muttrc it's simply the
best MUA I've ever used.
But, I've searched around the net without success: is there a way to
show at least if the mail has any attachment in the index? I don't
want the exact number of attachments
* On 25 Oct 2010, Eric Smith wrote:
> Is this possible?
Not out of the box, but I wrote a patch that allows it.
Original:
Message-ID: <20030311223336.gf6...@dust.uchicago.edu>
http://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev&m=104742220831941&w=2
Current version of this patch:
http://paste.org/pastebin
Is this possible?
--
- Eric Smith
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:43:10AM +0300, Cristopher Thomas wrote:
> On 14Oct 1017, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:00:34AM +0300, Cristopher Thomas wrote:
> > > I'm not sure I understand you're point.
> >
> > What's not to understand?
[...]
> You know, I think I misread Ed'
On 14Oct 1017, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:00:34AM +0300, Cristopher Thomas wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 18:30, Ed Blackman wrote:
> > > I'm wondering whether it's now appropriate to change this to default to
> > > 'yes'.
>
> > I'm not sure I understand you're point.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:00:34AM +0300, Cristopher Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 18:30, Ed Blackman wrote:
> > I'm wondering whether it's now appropriate to change this to default to
> > 'yes'.
> I'm not sure I understand you're point.
What's not to understand? Ed is suggesting t
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 18:30, Ed Blackman wrote:
>
> I'm wondering whether it's now appropriate to change this to default to
> 'yes'. I understand the reason it isn't yes by default: RFC 2047 says
> explicitly not to use RFC 2047 decoding on filename parameters. That is
> because it would cause
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:35:15AM +0900, Dan Drake wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 at 10:41AM +0900, Dan Drake wrote:
I'm wondering if there's any way to get Mutt to decode the filenames of
attachments. Here's a bit from an attachment I received today:
Whoops...I just looked in t
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 at 10:41AM +0900, Dan Drake wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's any way to get Mutt to decode the filenames of
> attachments. Here's a bit from an attachment I received today:
Whoops...I just looked in the archives for this list, and noticed that just
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's any way to get Mutt to decode the filenames of
attachments. Here's a bit from an attachment I received today:
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name="=?EUC-KR?B?MjAxMbq9ILCzvLOxs7D6uPEoRSkueGxz?="
Content-
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 07:45:50PM +0800, lilydjwg wrote:
Hi, there. I sent a C program as an attachment in GBK encoding, but
mutt took it as UTF-8. But there was nothing seems wrong until some
time later when I need the C program file. I opened the mail in mutt,
and the file is displayed with il
Hi, there. I sent a C program as an attachment in GBK encoding, but
mutt took it as UTF-8. But there was nothing seems wrong until some
time later when I need the C program file. I opened the mail in mutt,
and the file is displayed with illegal characters replaced by `?'.
And, what surprises me is
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:45:20PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-06-14, Steve Brown wrote:
> > It has come to pass that I need to save some of these emails as a text
> > file, pretty much as it is in Mutt's pager. That is, the email body,
> > then the text of the
On 2010-06-14, Steve Brown wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> I'm struggling to get my head around a small problem that I have, and I
> wonder if one of you would be kind enough to give me a pointer or two.
>
> I receive a number of emails with word attachments.
>
> I can h
On 14-06-2010, at 15h 49'44", Steve Brown wrote about "How to save email plus
word attachments as one text file"
> Hi List.
>
> I'm struggling to get my head around a small problem that I have,
> and I wonder if one of you would be kind enough to give me
On Jun 14 2010 15:49, Steve Brown wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> I'm struggling to get my head around a small problem that I have, and I
> wonder if one of you would be kind enough to give me a pointer or two.
>
> I receive a number of emails with word attachments.
>
> I
Hi List.
I'm struggling to get my head around a small problem that I have, and I
wonder if one of you would be kind enough to give me a pointer or two.
I receive a number of emails with word attachments.
I can happily read them inline using antiword and things are fine.
It has come to
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:19:58PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> Can you say why this behavior has been implemented? Is this considered
> a bug?
It looks like the behavior was changed as a result of this bug:
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3246
> As for me I found that behavior quite annoyin
On date Sunday 2010-03-14 08:21:05 -0700, Michael Elkins muttered:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > I recently upgraded my Debian to Squeezy from Lenny, since then mutt
> > fails to view attachment of type text/x-diff using the corresponding
> > mailcap entry.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> I recently upgraded my Debian to Squeezy from Lenny, since then mutt
> fails to view attachment of type text/x-diff using the corresponding
> mailcap entry.
The Debian package for Mutt includes a patch which forces text/x-diff to
ghting features).
If I try to view an attachment with extension of type text/x-patch it
is viewed with vim, the same if I change the content type of a
text/x-diff file to text/x-patch file.
So this problem only seems to occurr with text/x-diff attachments,
mutt insists on using the internal page
* Daniel Dalton on Thursday, February 25, 2010 at 17:24:49 +1100
> How can I make mutt forward all attachments as well as the original
> email when using 'f' the forward command? I would also like the original
> text from the email to be included in the body of the message as i
0n Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:35:53AM +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
>* Daniel Dalton [2010-02-25 07:27]:
>
>> How can I make mutt forward all attachments as well as the original
>> email when using 'f' the forward command? I would also like the o
* Daniel Dalton [2010-02-25 07:27]:
> How can I make mutt forward all attachments as well as the original
> email when using 'f' the forward command? I would also like the original
> text from the email to be included in the body of the message as it is
> now.
Press
Hi,
How can I make mutt forward all attachments as well as the original
email when using 'f' the forward command? I would also like the original
text from the email to be included in the body of the message as it is
now.
So all I want to do is make mutt attach all original attachme
ry much appreciate this feature being added to mutt. Sometimes
> people send megabytes of attachments that I don't want to see, but I
> need to read the message before I can decide wether I want to see the
> attachment or not. Since I have a bandwidth limit, it would be helpful
> if I
(get them,
> > view them, store them, leave them...)?
>
> A user of Debian mailing list pointed me to this (9 years) "wishlist" bug:
>
> ***
> IMAP should only download (large) attachments when they are viewed
> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/663
> ***
>
>
ted me to this (9 years) "wishlist" bug:
***
IMAP should only download (large) attachments when they are viewed
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/663
***
Is it really still opened, that is, not implemented? :-)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Hello,
I usually use Mutt in Debian Lenny with my Gmail account directly via
IMAP.
It works nice but when people send me some big attachments (images or
media content) those files are also auto-downloaded in pager and it can
take some time to get the whole message open.
Is there any way I
ousoutput text/html viewer. I
> also have implicit_autoview on.
No idea on this one.
> What's worse is that hitting on such attachments just places
> the raw HTML into the internal pager. If I use ('m'),
> then a browser is spawned.
That's easy: mutt's def
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:19:02PM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Brian!
>
> On Mo, 02 Nov 2009, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks. It would be good if that was explained in the docs.
>
> Thanks, I updated the installation instructions on the webpage.
Thanks. That is better.
Ho
Hi Brian!
On Mo, 02 Nov 2009, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> Thanks. It would be good if that was explained in the docs.
Thanks, I updated the installation instructions on the webpage.
regards,
Christian
--
:wq
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 07:46:44AM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > However, in the install instructions, what do you mean by:-
> >
> > simple load CheckAttach.vba and source it using :so %.vba?
> >
> > I have no idea what this means. Load it where and ho
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> However, in the install instructions, what do you mean by:-
>
> simple load CheckAttach.vba and source it using :so %.vba?
>
> I have no idea what this means. Load it where and how? Source is where
> and how?
>
try
vim CheckAttach.vba
:so %
:q
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 02:59:04PM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi,
> some time ago, someone posted on this list a question on how to have
> some kind of attachment check, so he would not forget to attach his
> files to the mail. I replied with
> http://marc.info/?i=20090116091203.GB3197%
Hi,
some time ago, someone posted on this list a question on how to have
some kind of attachment check, so he would not forget to attach his
files to the mail. I replied with
http://marc.info/?i=20090116091203.GB3197%20()%20256bit%20!%20org in
which I posted a little vim script, that performed
My apologies for replying to you personally.
T-Bird does not have a reply-to-list function and I forgot to change
the To: header accordingly.
Gen-Paul.
--- Begin Message ---
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Patrick Gen-Paul [10-17-09 16:49]:
I ran into the :attachments command by accident while
* Patrick Gen-Paul [10-17-09 16:49]:
> I ran into the :attachments command by accident while tabbing at the
> ":" mutt command line prompt.
>
> I checked the muttrc man page as well as the mutt manual and I was
> unable to find it documented anywhere.
>
> Un
I ran into the :attachments command by accident while tabbing at the ":"
mutt command line prompt.
I checked the muttrc man page as well as the mutt manual and I was
unable to find it documented anywhere.
Unless I missed it, it's not even listed under "6.2 Configurati
Am 2009-10-12 14:12:54, schrieb Christian Ebert:
> What are your mailcap entries for pdf? Mine are:
>
> application/pdf; xpdf /dev/stdin
Why not: application/pdf; xpdf %s
> application/pdf; pdftotext -layout -nopgbrk /dev/stdin -; copiousoutput
and: application/pdf; pdftotext -layout -nopgb
* Michelle Konzack on Monday, October 12, 2009 at 14:28:05 +0200
> I get many business messages with attached PDF files and I use pdftotext
> to show them inline which works nicely.
>
> But if I am in the attachment view, I like to use xpdf but this does not
> work currently.
>
> Is there a possi
Hello,
I get many business messages with attached PDF files and I use pdftotext
to show them inline which works nicely.
But if I am in the attachment view, I like to use xpdf but this does not
work currently.
Is there a possibility to make this different?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:43:41AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> note in his attachment, he has:
>
> text/html; view %s; edit=emacs22 %s; compose=emacs22 ... %s; needsterminal
Thanks, I got this working now.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Friday, July 17 at 04:38 PM, quoth Noah Slater:
> When I create a new message, mutt creates a file like:
>
> /tmp/mutt-tumbolia-1000-2303-0
>
> Is there no way to hook into the same thing?
Not that I'm aware of... but very creative people have p
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 02:35:50PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> For reference, since people can and do rebind their keys, it's
> probably better to refer to things by their function names. In this
> case (as you can see from the help menu), it's .
Okay, thanks.
> You *can* automate the process, b
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 07:12:17PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I would like to add new inline text attachments with ease.
> Editing the
> message correctly launches emacs.
Assuming that you want to insert files which already exist: How about
ESC-x insert-file wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, July 14 at 07:12 PM, quoth Noah Slater:
>I would like to add new inline text attachments with ease.
Hm. Let's get back to that in a minute.
>At the moment, I am doing:
>
> nfoo.txttext/plain
>
>This brings up
Hey,
I would like to add new inline text attachments with ease.
At the moment, I am doing:
nfoo.txttext/plain
This brings up vi to edit my text file.
Once this has been edited, I do:
^d
This seems to work, but I have a few questions:
* Can I automate this whole process so that I can
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:58:41PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:52:31PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > Is it possible to save a lot of attachments in one go?
> >
> > E.g. like tag-save but for attachments. Obviously the detination
> > would have to
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:52:31PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> Is it possible to save a lot of attachments in one go?
>
> E.g. like tag-save but for attachments. Obviously the detination
> would have to be a directory and all the attachments would get their
> default name but I don&
Is it possible to save a lot of attachments in one go?
E.g. like tag-save but for attachments. Obviously the detination
would have to be a directory and all the attachments would get their
default name but I don't see this as a big issue.
--
Chris Green
On 2009-03-20, Hein Zelle wrote:
> Dear Mutt users,
>
> when viewing attachments in external programs (notably openoffice), I
> often have a terminal sit "unused" for a while as I'm reading the
> attachment. What happens often is that I hit a key or enter in tha
Dear Mutt users,
when viewing attachments in external programs (notably openoffice), I
often have a terminal sit "unused" for a while as I'm reading the
attachment. What happens often is that I hit a key or enter in that
terminal (which is showing just the last "$ mutt&quo
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:07:18AM +, J??rg Sommer wrote:
| Why not use a macro that opens the attachment viewer and marks all
| attachments for deletion and leaves the attachment viewer.
True, this would be pretty easy. I'm looking more toward implementing
a 'search for all atta
Hallo Ryan,
Ryan Corder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:58:29AM -0400, Jorge Luis wrote:
>| Is there a way to interactively delete attachments to an arbitrary mutt mbox
>| folder?
>|
>| In other words, is it possible to list my folders, sort them by size, and
>then
&
Hi Jorge,
Jorge Luis wrote:
> Is there a way to interactively delete attachments to an arbitrary mutt mbox
> folder?
In short: on the mail hit v (view-attachments) and delete the attachments
with d (delete-entry).
Bye, Jörg.
--
Fazit: „Schießen Sie nicht mit dem Geiger!“
<news:46778c
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:58:29AM -0400, Jorge Luis wrote:
| Is there a way to interactively delete attachments to an arbitrary mutt mbox
| folder?
|
| In other words, is it possible to list my folders, sort them by size, and then
| claw through the directory, deleting attachments that I no
Is there a way to interactively delete attachments to an arbitrary mutt mbox
folder?
In other words, is it possible to list my folders, sort them by size, and then
claw through the directory, deleting attachments that I no longer need.
I'd prefer to answer a prompt: (delete-attachment [ye
t; removed in the copy. The attachment should stay.
>
> The design is: Auto_viewed attachments stay. Or rather their text
> representation stays. Other attachments are removed, because they are
> not renderable as text, or just not rendered in current settings
> (auto_view/unauto_v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 23 at 04:43 PM, quoth Martin:
> Is there a way to execute a script on attachments after saving them?
>
> For example: I receive 5 documents, tag them and save them in a
> directory, and now I would like to run a scr
Hello,
Is there a way to execute a script on attachments after saving them?
For example: I receive 5 documents, tag them and save them in a
directory, and now I would like to run a script on these files without
having to open a shell/file manager and cd into the directory.
Thanks, best regards
t; work.
|
| Not directly, to my knowledge, but should be do-able via macro.
| create a $temp directory
| extract the attachments to $temp
| initiate viewer
| either delete interactive after viewing via viewer
| or by macro after viewing
| remove $temp
As a step towards part 2, the "
ld be do-able via macro.
create a $temp directory
extract the attachments to $temp
initiate viewer
either delete interactive after viewing via viewer
or by macro after viewing
remove $temp
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no
Hi,
I have mails with multiple pictures attached. Is it possible to view them
all, i.e. call the viewer with “pic1 pic2 pic3.” My viewer is able to
show more than one picture. doesn't work.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Ein Narr, er sieht die Weisheit nicht,
selbst wenn sie närrisch zu ihm spricht.
++ 25/12/08 12:10 -0600 - Kyle Wheeler:
>>> of the message. Now, one last question, is it possible to have mutt
>>> show all attachments in the pager, regardless of alternatives?
>
>No. Mutt follows the MIME decoding guidelines pretty strictly, and the
>messag
> 8 ├─>multipart appledoubl
>>> 9 │ ├─> application applefile
>>> 10 │ └─> application msword
>>> 11 └─>texthtml
>>
>> That seems to work reliable. Setting multipart/alternative as the first
&g
=- Dustin Cannon wrote on Tue 23.Dec'08 at 15:49:59 -0500 -=
> I am using mutt to connect to an imap server. When I try to add an
> attachment mutt wants to search the imap server. I can't seem to
> find any way to make mutt search locally for files to attach. Can
> someone enlighten me?
Wiki ->
ve as the first
| possibility to alternative_order makes it show the other part of the
| message. Now, one last question, is it possible to have mutt show all
| attachments in the pager, regardless of alternatives?
|
| I don't need all of them to be rendered, but to know other parts
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Dustin Cannon wrote:
> I am using mutt to connect to an imap server. When I try to add an
> attachment mutt wants to search the imap server. I can't seem to find
> any way to make mutt search locally for files to attach. Can someone
> enlighten me?
It should not related to
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 03:49:59PM -0500, Dustin Cannon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using mutt to connect to an imap server. When I try to add an
> attachment mutt wants to search the imap server. I can't seem to find
> any way to make mutt search locally for files to attach. Can someone
> enlighten
Hi,
I am using mutt to connect to an imap server. When I try to add an
attachment mutt wants to search the imap server. I can't seem to find
any way to make mutt search locally for files to attach. Can someone
enlighten me?
I've done some searching on the interweb and I haven't been able to
fi
vel 6 as level 5 is text/plain.
That seems to work reliable. Setting multipart/alternative as the first
possibility to alternative_order makes it show the other part of the
message. Now, one last question, is it possible to have mutt show all
attachments in the pager, regardless of alternatives?
++ 18/12/08 10:20 +0800 - bill lam:
>On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Rejo Zenger wrote:
>> |I 1 [multipa/alternativ,
>> 7bit, 178K]
>> |I 2 AA> [text/plain, 7bit,
>> us-ascii, 1.8K]
>> |I 3 AA>[multipa/mixed,
>> 7bit,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> |I 1 [multipa/alternativ,
> 7bit, 178K]
> |I 2 AA> [text/plain, 7bit,
> us-ascii, 1.8K]
> |I 3 AA>[multipa/mixed,
> 7bit, 176K]
> |I 4 AA> [t
he Word document.
The User-Agent header was:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
The question is, of course, why didn't list mutt the Word attachment in
the pager view?
I have had a similar problem a while ago. The pager showed the
text/plain part only and didn't mention any ot
301 - 400 of 987 matches
Mail list logo
