* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010616 18:15]:
Ville Uski muttered:
I venture to repeat the other question about whether mutt can show the
position in the current thread when in pager. I mean a similar thing as
in some newsreaders, like tin and trn.
set pager_index_lines=X #
Hi all,
How can multiple attachments be saved to a particular directory in a
single shot?
When the attachments are all tagged and I give ';'-'s' , it gives
filename to save as for each file individually and so I have to type
/path/to/directory/ before each filename. How can I specify the save
Hello
how can I save mails sent by myself to folders without the
attachment(s)?
Is there a way to see the number of remaining/unread messages in the
current thread when in the pager, i.e., without going to index?
Sorry if asking trivial things.
Thanks,
Ville
--
Ville Uski
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: 20010612115414.B298@BOEKHOFF_M; from malcolm.boekhoff on Tue, Jun 12,
2001 at 11:54:14AM
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:54:14AM +0100, malcolm.boekhoff wrote:
On 2001-05-07
Hi!
I have just noticed, that default character coding for attachments is
iso-8859-1 or similar, since latin2 characters are not displayed. Is there a
way to make some other charset the default?
this is how the attachment was displayed in my case..
[-- Attachment #2: zap.txt --]
[-- Type: text
Hi all,
How can multiple attachments be saved to a particular directory in a
single shot?
When the attachments are all tagged and I give ';'-'s' , it gives
filename to save as for each file individually and so I have to type
/path/to/directory/ before each filename. How can I specify the save
It does work. You may select more than one file by pressing t with
the cursor standing on each file. After that Press ; followed by
ENTER and all the selected files will be attached to your
OK, got it right now. In fact I was looking for an asterisk or an T to
show me that the file is
This behaviour should be controlled by the folder_format variable.
Perhaps you shlud reset it to its standard value (which I use!)
*That* was it! Changed the setting and all is well.
Thanks for your help
Tommy
Hi,
I want to attach several pictures to a mail. Is there any tagging
mechanism in the file selection display (-a)? Pressing t doesn't work.
The manual talks about tagging, but wont't tell me how. (Or maybe
I can't find it)
b.t.w. I am using mutt 1.3.12i
Thanks
Tommy
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 05:08:22PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:54:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:19:56PM +0200, Laurent Mirguet wrote:
Eudora removes the attachments from the mailboxes, which is nice to
keep
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Laurent Mirguet wrote:
And are you sure the the size of the mailbox has no impact on the
performances. For example, does mutt take the same time for reading a
mailbox of 1 mails and 2Mo, and a mailbox of 1 mails and 200Mo
?
Are you using
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:19:56PM +0200, Laurent Mirguet wrote:
Eudora removes the attachments from the mailboxes, which is nice to
keep small mailboxes. Is it possible to do the same with mutt ?
Oh, and where are the attachments kept? Mutt doesn't really suffer from the
size
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:54:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 08:19:56PM +0200, Laurent Mirguet wrote:
Eudora removes the attachments from the mailboxes, which is nice to
keep small mailboxes. Is it possible to do the same with mutt ?
Yes
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 07:46:03PM -0700 or thereabouts, Dr. Christian Seberino wrote:
I successfully got html attachments read automagically and
thought I would be more ambitious and get StarOffice to read
M$-Word attachments too...
What is the analog of auto_view text/html in .muttrc
the
sucker grunged at the other end. I experimented with changing the
encoding even -- to 7bit instead of base64. I'd like to have *no*
encoding but can't see how that's done. Anybody else having trouble
sending zip attachments?
Not me, but a fried of mine was having this trouble just last week
of base64. I'd like to have *no*
encoding but can't see how that's done. Anybody else having trouble
sending zip attachments?
Not me, but a fried of mine was having this trouble just last week
trying to send a tar file. His mailer (not mutt) base64-encoded the tar
file but gave it a Content
Quoting Mark Sheppard [EMAIL PROTECTED], who wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 07:49:40AM +0100, Viktor Lakics wrote:
Using staroffice is a horror idea - at least to me...:-)). What do
you want to see in those emails? Mutt is an email client, very fast,
staroffice is *BIGGG* and *SLW*. I
:
application/msword doc dot
application/rtf rtf
Hope this helps... -- Viktor
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 07:46:03PM -0700, Dr. Christian Seberino wrote:
I successfully got html attachments read automagically and
thought I would be more
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 07:49:40AM +0100, Viktor Lakics wrote:
Using staroffice is a horror idea - at least to me...:-)). What do
you want to see in those emails? Mutt is an email client, very fast,
staroffice is *BIGGG* and *SLW*. I can imagine myself waiting
30-40 sec for some stupid
I can't seem to send a message with a zipfile attached properly. It is
received at the other end as 'text/plain' or something. Anybody have an
idea of what I'm doing wrong? TIA...
--
-duke
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
I successfully got html attachments read automagically and
thought I would be more ambitious and get StarOffice to read
M$-Word attachments too...
What is the analog of auto_view text/html in .muttrc
and text/html; lynx -dump %s ; copiousoutput in .mailcap?
(I tried auto_view text/doc
According to David Champion on Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:25:17PM -0500:
| On 2001.04.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
| Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| like this:
| colour index brightred black ~?
|
| Check this thread:
|
|
I get lots of email with large attachments. Some are important and some I don't need.
What I would like to do is have a macro that will delete larger (bigger than x)
attahcments. Procmail isn't an option sine I will need some of the attachments. Is
this possible with mutt and where would I
like this:
colour index brightred black ~?
--
Eric Smith
On 2001.04.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like this:
colour index brightred black ~?
Check this thread:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/16502
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
I use this:
macro attach s save-entrybol~/WINDOWS/eol
Shawn
Previously, Benny Chee wrote:
% hi,
%
% I would like to default save all my attachments to a folder. ie
% when pressed 's', it will be saved to the default folder as
% specified by user. I hate mixing my files
* Rich Lafferty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010416 09:50]:
Mutt saves things by default to the current directory
That's true and that's really, really bothering me. I wonder
why there is a browser available for saving messages, but
not for saving attachments.
There is, and you get
hi,
I would like to default save all my attachments to a folder. ie when pressed
's', it will be saved to the default folder as specified by user. I hate mixing my
files on my root directory with my attachments.
--
Benny
PGP signature
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 09:51:39PM +0800, Benny Chee typed:
I would like to default save all my attachments to a folder.
ie when pressed 's', it will be saved to the default folder
as specified by user. I hate mixing my files on my root
directory with my attachments
You might also want to do something about this:
-- snip --
gpg: BAD signature from "Benny Chee (Singapore Telecommunications Ltd)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-- snip --
On Sun 15 Apr 2001, Benny Chee wrote:
hi,
I would like to default save all my attachments to a folde
* Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010415 17:51]:
Mutt saves things by default to the current directory
That's true and that's really, really bothering me. I wonder
why there is a browser available for saving messages, but
not for saving attachments.
Regards - Juergen.
for saving messages, but
not for saving attachments.
There is, and you get to it the same way, by hitting TAB.
-Rich
--
-- Rich Lafferty ---
Sysadmin/Programmer, Instructional and Information Technology Services
Concordia University
Encapsulation Format." The product I QA for can read these, but there
isn't any publicly available code that I'm aware of to decompose TNEF
files.
There are plenty. Off my head, I can think of Convert-TNEF on CPAN,
and a standalone conversion program called tnef on
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
There are plenty. Off my head, I can think of Convert-TNEF on CPAN,
and a standalone conversion program called tnef on
http://world.std.com/~damned/software.html.
Amavis uses (or rather, requires) this damned program afaict.
-s (well,
, the
attachment always comes up looking like:
Mutt seems to know about attachments from non-Outlook 2000 mail
programs, but dies whenever I get anything from Outlook 2K.
What can I do to fix (or get around) this problem?
I must use Outlook/NT at work. This morning I looked at the header
There are plenty. Off my head, I can think of Convert-TNEF on CPAN,
and a standalone conversion program called tnef on
http://world.std.com/~damned/software.html.
Amavis uses (or rather, requires) this damned program afaict.
I find it extremely funny that you should mention amavis
Drew Fisher wrote on mutt-users:
I have a (hopefully) quick question to ask.
I am running Mutt v1.3.14i and whenever I receive an email with
an attachment from someone using Microsoft Outlook 2000, the
attachment always comes up looking like:
As an experiment, I made a word-doc.zip and
: application/msword, Encoding: base64, Size: 31K --]
[-- application/msword is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
Mutt seems to know about attachments from non-Outlook 2000 mail
programs, but dies whenever I get anything from Outlook 2K.
What can I do to fix (or get around) this problem?
Thanks
[-- Type: application/msword, Encoding: base64, Size: 31K --]
[-- application/msword is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
Mutt seems to know about attachments from non-Outlook 2000 mail
programs, but dies whenever I get anything from Outlook 2K.
What can I do to fix (or get a
Drew Fisher wrote on mutt-users:
I have a (hopefully) quick question to ask.
I am running Mutt v1.3.14i and whenever I receive an email with
an attachment from someone using Microsoft Outlook 2000, the
attachment always comes up looking like:
Mutt seems to know about attachments from
Hi-
I'm having problems sending attachments to non mutt users. It appears
to be stemming from their not being able to recognize the boundaries
between attachments (I've noticed that other mailers use a "boundary"
variable, and my mutt is adding an asterisk to this.)
I'd really appr
On Thu 08-Mar-2001 at 04:23:35PM +0100, Mullen A.J. wrote:
I'm having problems sending attachments to non mutt users. It appears
to be stemming from their not being able to recognize the boundaries
between attachments (I've noticed that other mailers use a "boundary"
variable, a
On Thu 08-Mar-2001 at 05:42:11PM +0100, Mullen A.J. wrote:
Here's an example of the full header and boundaries I'm sending
which is not being properly decoded by other mailers (although it
is by other mutt users).
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 8 15:20:13 2001
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001
To elaborate on my earlier question about including attachments,
the following is what I'm sending out. This is the raw text of the
mail. When Mutt receives this, it's able to parse it without a problem
and treat the attachments and text appropriately. When other mailers
(so far tried
Mullen A.J. writes:
To elaborate on my earlier question about including attachments,
the following is what I'm sending out. This is the raw text of the
mail. When Mutt receives this, it's able to parse it without a problem
and treat the attachments and text appropriately. When other
That is the plain text message of the email text. I find it helpful when
that is there. I am not aware of a way to exclude that in the listing.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 09:04:52AM -0700, Duke Normandin muttered:
| A typical mailing list attachments index looks like this on my setup:
|
| 1. RE
A typical mailing list attachments index looks like this on my setup:
1. RE: [PHP] File Upload [message/rfc822, 7bit, 1.6k]
2. `-no description [text/plain, 7bit, Windows-1252, 1.2k]
My question is: is there any way to exclude the 2. line above from
showing up in the attachments' index
in the message
header. Now i already use procmail to find attachments by looking at
the header for 'Content-Type:.*multipart/mixed' which eliminates PGP
and alternative attachments. So just let Mutt match a pattern in the
header for Content-Type:? set for some attachment to score
Quoting Brian Galbraith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web10807
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 23:28:56 +
From: Brian Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Forwarding a message with attachments
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Folks
I am
mike polniak wrote:
David Champion wrote:
On 2001.01.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Duncan Watson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to show messages that attachments in the index. I took a look
at index_format but no luck at first reading. Does anyone ha
At 23:07 -0500 30 Jan 2001, mike polniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now i already use procmail to find attachments by looking at
the header for 'Content-Type:.*multipart/mixed' which eliminates PGP and
alternative attachments.
That's not really a good test for whether a message has
ould not have gotten carried away
with this idea of identifying attachments, which is not that necessary anyway.
--
~~~
Hello,
I am trying to show messages that attachments in the index. I took a look
at index_format but no luck at first reading. Does anyone have an idea on
how to accomplish this?
Thanks in advance,
/Duncan
--
Duncan Watson Application Engineer
On 2001.01.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Duncan Watson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to show messages that attachments in the index. I took a look
at index_format but no luck at first reading. Does anyone have an idea on
how to accomplish this?
Can't be d
David Champion wrote:
On 2001.01.30, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Duncan Watson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to show messages that attachments in the index. I took a look
at index_format but no luck at first reading. Does anyone have an idea on
how to
of Mutt so please be patient.I am on a steep learning
curve. I may have missed this in the list of options..but I have a question.
How can I forward a message with attachments, without saving and
reattaching?
TIA
Brian
--
Brian Galbraith [ Mutt 1.3.13i]| GnuPG 1.0.4d | SuSE Linux
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 05:08:34PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
This is a problem of Eudora, right?
As it happens, yes you're right. :) At the time I didn't know who was at
fault, I merely found out how to solve the incompatibility with a bit of a
hack. :)
Tell the Eudora developers!
I'm
MM --
...and then msquared said...
% On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% encrypt and sign a message to Eudora users. As far as I can tell, you
% can only send with pgp_create_traditional, and I haven't even seen
% attachments working with encryption.
%
% Yes! I
right; you cannot
encrypt and sign a message to Eudora users. As far as I can tell, you
can only send with pgp_create_traditional, and I haven't even seen
attachments working with encryption.
Yes! I figured it out!
In order to send encrypted attachments and such to Eudora, the MIME
content
* msquared [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010119 15:53]:
Yes! I figured it out! In order to send encrypted attachments and
such to Eudora, the MIME content that is encrypted MUST have the
following as its FIRST header:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Anyone know the correct procedure for notifying
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:57:18PM + or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Conor Daly thought:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:07:57PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Axel Bichler thought:
Hi Conor!
* Conor Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010118 09:37]:
OTOH, I did a little script that
msquared proclaimed on mutt-users that:
In order to send encrypted attachments and such to Eudora, the MIME
content that is encrypted MUST have the following as its FIRST header:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mutt definitely generates it - and specifying content type without
mime-version is broken
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 08:27:27AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
In order to send encrypted attachments and such to Eudora, the MIME
content that is encrypted MUST have the following as its FIRST header:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mutt definitely generates it - and specifying content
help at all in working around this, so that I can use
mutt to send encrypted attachments that Eudora (and other mail
applications) recognise...
Note that I didn't even bother testing with Outlook and Outlook Express,
because they have bugger all support for receiving and correctly
processing encrypted
help at all in working around this, so that I can use
mutt to send encrypted attachments that Eudora (and other mail
applications) recognise...
Note that I didn't even bother testing with Outlook and Outlook Express,
because they have bugger all support for receiving and correctly
processing encrypted
and sign a message to Eudora users. As far as I can tell, you
can only send with pgp_create_traditional, and I haven't even seen
attachments working with encryption.
Now, that doesn't mean that the data didn't make it there, and the
recipient can find the attachments in whatever directory Eudora uses
not been modified. If I try showing headers and
edit-message, this field is off limits. Any ideas how to fix this?
Deletion of attachments marked for deletion will first take place
when you close or sync (by typing $ with default key bindings) the
current mailbox. But then the line count
Hi, I have a little problem with mutt colors.
For some reason my attachements are shown in black on black and I
cannot figure out which color parameter dictates that.
This is the list I get when I press 'v' to view attachements I'm
talking about.
Thanks in advance.
//Fredde
I'm using mutt 1.2.5i from Debian 2.2. It seems that, if I have a
message with message/rfc822 attachments (eg, some mailing list
digests), I can do some but not all of the operations on the
attachment that I could do on a normal message. In particular, I
want to save an attachment as a separate
read the previous thread about forwarding
mails with attachments and the final solution was
resending mail with esc e
or
set mime_forward=yes in .muttrc
we have a better solution now, with lastest stable version of mutt.
What the first solution does is, simple resending the m
Hello,
According to Mutt's manual, I've put this line in my .mailcap file to read
HTML-attachments without running X :
text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s | less
It works generally fine, but sometimes HTML-files aren't recognized by Mutt.
I didn't find (or understand...) in the mailcap
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:24:15PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Hello,
According to Mutt's manual, I've put this line in my .mailcap file to read
HTML-attachments without running X :
text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s | less
While this works, you might want to use
Hello,
I've allready read the previous thread about forwarding
mails with attachments and the final solution was
resending mail with esc e
or
set mime_forward=yes in .muttrc
What the first solution does is, simple resending the message,
but not preformating it (header, body
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Byrial Jensen wrote:
macro compose f2 "attach-file/home/mark/templates/mimeenter"
macro compose f3 "attach-file/home/mark/templates/completecomplete"
cool, they work :-)
Thank You,
Mark Weinem
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 00:01:18 +0200, Mark Weinem wrote:
Is it possible to attach a file via macro?
This doesn't work:
macro compose f2 "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime"
Try this:
macro compose f2 "attach-file/home/mark/templates/mimeenter"
Perhaps it would be more elegant
Is it possible to attach a file via macro?
This doesn't work:
macro compose f2 "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime"
Perhaps it would be more elegant if the macro just offers the
templates directory and the user chooses the attachment he wants.
Regards,
Mark Weinem
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:16:03PM +, Marcelo C . Martinelli wrote:
I get a lot of attached files in my e-mail messages. Does any one
know if there is any way to save all of them at once to disk?
Is the following sequence not adequate?
v(view attachments)
(tag all relevant files
ons.
%
% 1. How do you forward a message, including all the attachments
% that came with the message? Ideally I would include the forwarded
% main message as text and the all the attachments would be auto
% loaded as attachments to the new mail.
Will forwarding the entire message as an attachmen
A quick check of my muttrc shows
[zero] [7:03am] ~ egrep -i forw\|weed\|decode\|mime .mutt/muttrc
# default list of header fields to weed when displaying
ignore "from " received content- mime-version status x-status message-id
ignore x-priority x-ms list-id precedence x-mailman
Austin --
...and then Austin Schutz said...
%
% But what I want to do is forward all the attachments. I swear I
Right; I got that part.
% must be having some sort of brain lapse here, but I can't figure out how
% to do it, e.g.:
I have confirmed that I can forward myself a note
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:29:00AM +0100, Primus wrote:
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 08:29:00 +0100
From: Primus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Austin Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Mutt Users' List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: forwarding multiple attachments?
Mon Sep 4 08:25:17 BST 2000
Using esce (edit current message as template)
on the message you are interested in forwarding
will allow you to delete which ever attachments
that you're not interested in forwarding.
--
-primus
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:09:06PM -0700, Austin Schutz wrote
Hello!
I have to write two shell scripts. One to check a file, and send it via
Email to the other script. The second script has to get the attached
file back from the Email and install it.
The file which is attached is a PGP signed Tarball.
It is send via
mutt -a files.tar.pgp -s "Subject"
I've been on vacation, sorry for the slow response:
Austin --
...and then Austin Schutz said...
% This must be a really dumb question, but how does one forward
% multiple attachments? tagging them in the 'view attachments' menu
% doesn't seem to do it.
Do you mean "
itself all of the attachments
% will come along with it...
%
% That would be what I would expect, but that's not what happens. When
% I forward a message via 'f' only the main body of the message is selected for
% forwarding, not any attachments. I've verified that other people observe
Austin --
...and then Austin Schutz said...
% This must be a really dumb question, but how does one forward
% multiple attachments? tagging them in the 'view attachments' menu
% doesn't seem to do it.
Do you mean "some but not all attachments from a single message"? Or do
you
% Also, one of the handy features of bsd mail is the ability to
% edit messages in your box. can this be done with mutt?
Now, this one I can answer; with newer (1.2x and up) mutts you can
separately edit-message (modify the message and automatically save it
back to your mailbox) and
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 01:18:03PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
% Also, one of the handy features of bsd mail is the ability to
% edit messages in your box. can this be done with mutt?
Now, this one I can answer; with newer (1.2x and up) mutts you can
separately edit-message (modify
This must be a really dumb question, but how does one forward
multiple attachments? tagging them in the 'view attachments' menu
doesn't seem to do it.
I would think that it would be handy to have the default for
the regular forward command automagically attach all files for you
if I sent messages that showed up as attachments, these
broken mailers could decode them automatically.
Thanks!
eric
On Thursday, Luke Ravitch said something like:
I don't know if this is part of your problem, but I found it necessary
to add the "force_html" switch to lynx in my .mailcap. I.e.:
text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s ; copiousoutput
Otherwise I would just get the HTML source. (Mutt's
please tell me the two commands I put in my
.muttrc or .mailcap files that will execute electric eyes (ee) and lynx
for image and html attachments. I've tried the commands in the mutt
manual and I still keep coming up with windows of text.
here's what I've tried:
text/html; lynx -dump %s
I have just installed and configured debian 2.2 and I am using mutt for
a mailreader. Would someone please tell me the two commands I put in my
.muttrc or .mailcap files that will execute electric eyes (ee) and lynx
for image and html attachments. I've tried the commands in the mutt
manual and I
extensions, so lynx was assuming it was just a
plain text file.) I also added:
auto_view text/html
to my .muttrc so that HTML attachments are displayed automatically (I
think that's what it does). Hope this helps.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 09:55:59PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
I have just
My god, a flurry of self-replies. Sorry about the noise. Won't happen
again.
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 09:25:32AM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 08:41:12AM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
Aaah, I see. So here's the thing:
1. I want folder={maggie.automagic.org}INBOX when I do a
I have folder and spooldir set to an IMAP-type path, since I don't keep
any mail locally. This works very nicely (mmm, 1.2.4i good) except that
if I try to add a local attachment to a message I'm composing, mutt
looks for the file on the IMAP server rather than looking on the local
filesystem.
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 01:27:21AM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
I have folder and spooldir set to an IMAP-type path, since I don't keep
any mail locally. This works very nicely (mmm, 1.2.4i good) except that
if I try to add a local attachment to a message I'm composing, mutt
looks for the file on
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 01:27:21AM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
I have folder and spooldir set to an IMAP-type path, since I don't keep
any mail locally. This works very nicely (mmm, 1.2.4i good) except that
if I try to add a local attachment to a message I'm composing, mutt
looks for the file on
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 05:17:21PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 01:27:21AM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
I have folder and spooldir set to an IMAP-type path, since I don't keep
any mail locally. This works very nicely (mmm, 1.2.4i good) except that
if I try to add a local
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 08:41:12AM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
Aaah, I see. So here's the thing:
1. I want folder={maggie.automagic.org}INBOX when I do a "c" to change
folders;
2. I want folder=~ when I do an "a" to add an attachment to a message.
I had a brief moment of clarity and
701 - 800 of 918 matches
Mail list logo
