are permanent.
Rolling it back may still be possible, but it will be complicated and extremely
expensive, computationally speaking. I strongly recommend you to review your
design choices.
I hope this helps.
Kind regards,
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie, and Photographer
--
MySQL General Mailing
, benchmark, benchmark,
benchmark.
My 0.02€.
Kind regards,
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie, and Photographer
On 9 Apr 2012, at 20:47, Karen Abgarian wrote:
I vote 1) yes 2) no
It could be result of the app developer's convenience to just wrap anything
they submit to the database
have at hand.
I hope this helps with getting started.
Good luck, and kind regards.
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie, and Photographer
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
- restore the data.)
You can use SELECT...INTO DUMPFILE and LOAD DATA INFILE... to achieve what I
believe you're asking here, save the eventual misunderstanding. ;-)
Cheers
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie, and Photographer
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http
.
Cheers!
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie, and Photographer
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie, and Photographer
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org
indexes than the master; or with locked tables because of
long-running-queries), this will be as precise as seconds-behind-master, no
more than a lousy estimate.
Cheers.
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie, and Photographer
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com
The data size is about 200 GB. I would have noticed increase on writes. No
backup activity is running (actually I don't do conventional backups).
Any theories?
Thank you for your interest.
Kind regards,
--
Luis Motta Campos
On 23 Oct 2011, at 14:06, Tyler Poland tpol...@engineyard.com wrote
ideas.
Kind regards,
--
Luis Motta Campos
On 23 Oct 2011, at 23:27, Claudio Nanni claudio.na...@gmail.com wrote:
Luis,
Very hard to tackle.
In my experience, excluding external(to mysql) bottlenecks, like hardware,
o.s. etc, 'suspects' are the shared resources 'guarded' by unique mutexes
in the future.
Kind regards,
--
Luis Motta Campos
(apart from the usual replication load). I am
sure no changes were applied to the server or to the cluster.
I'm looking forward for suggestions and theories on the issue - all ideas are
welcome.
Thank you for your time and attention,
Kind regards,
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie
I
need to write a function?
Hi,
You'll have to write your own function for that.
Cheers
--
Luis Motta Campos
is a DBA, Foodie, and Photographer
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch
available for CentOS 64
bits).
Please feel free to address me if you need more information about that,
either here or at the FreeNode's #mysql IRC channel (my nick there is
LuisMottaCampos).
Cheers
--
Luis Motta Campos is a software engineer,
Perl Programmer, foodie and photographer.
--
MySQL
Restore Database Using the Restore Procedure
Test Database in Production Environment
Start Database in Production Environment
Database Monitoring
Follow Up Database Behavior and Performance
- END TASK LIST -
--
Luis Motta Campos (a.k.a. Monsieur Champs
will start reading right away.
I would like to read more comments from the members of this list.
Thank you all for your patience and help.
Cheers!
--
Luis Motta Campos (a.k.a. Monsieur Champs) is a software engineer,
Perl fanatic evangelist, and amateur {cook, photographer}
--
MySQL General
Baron Schwartz wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 10:04 AM, Luis Motta Campos wrote:
Baron Schwartz wrote:
What are the biggest changes you anticipate? I'd say they will be
the version upgrade, converting to InnoDB, and using
replication. It looks like you have planned well for all but
using
15 matches
Mail list logo