On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:23, Pae Choi wrote:
> Look!
>
> I already unsubscribed this. Do you understand what that mean?
> I have no interest to dealing with MySQL and have no time for
> this.
>
> You must understand that this thread was started from someone
> who were interested to sell his/her p
- Original Message -
From: "David Axmark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Darney Lampert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "mysql" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] LEGAL information about MySQL.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Axmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> In this case there is not distribution so no fee is needed. We would
> like to be paid in this case also but there is legal requirement for a
> license if you do not distribute.
Missing 'no'?
- rick cronan
-
Look!
I already unsubscribed this. Do you understand what that mean?
I have no interest to dealing with MySQL and have no time for
this.
You must understand that this thread was started from someone
who were interested to sell his/her product that utilize MySQL. And
I was trying to help both side
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 14:45, Darney Lampert wrote:
> Sorry continue this subject ... I´m the author original question, "LEGAL
> information about MySQL".
> But I Think that my question is simple and the other answers do not make
> sense to me.
> I never said that I change original MySQL source co
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 12:43, Pae Choi wrote:
> Didn't you the previous posting that contains two paragraphs
> from GPL?
He probably did but since you misread the GPL. I have talked to Richard
Stallman and Eben Moglen who wrote the GPL about these issues. And you
misread the GPL.
/David
> And if
> -Original Message-
> From: Pae Choi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Seems like all against I see are coming from MySQL team.
> I know MySQL is stealing a lot of code from the public
> domain, inclduing the SSL part. How funny!
By definition you can't "steal" anything from the public doma
Sorry continue this subject ... I´m the author original question, "LEGAL
information about MySQL".
But I Think that my question is simple and the other answers do not make
sense to me.
I never said that I change original MySQL source code, and I just want know
if I can use MySQL database on
my
Hello.
I do not intent to follow-up on the issue, as you are either trolling
or clueless (and not willing to inform yourself) or both.
On Sat 2002-11-30 at 08:30:52 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Seems like all against I see are coming from MySQL team.
But I want to prevent a misconception: I
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pae Choi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] LEGAL information about MySQL.
> Hi.
>
> On Sat 2002-11-30 at 06:43:11 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Didn't you
Hi.
On Sat 2002-11-30 at 06:43:11 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Didn't you the previous posting that contains two paragraphs
> from GPL?
I saw these paragraphs. How do they relate to anything of this
discussion? They are taken out of context from the Preamble of the
license and only state som
warning!
Pae
- Original Message -
From: "Tonu Samuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] LEGAL information about MySQL.
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 14:46, Pae Choi wrote:
> If MySQL plays so dirty,
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 14:46, Pae Choi wrote:
> If MySQL plays so dirty, go with PostgreSQL. It's been known
> to be better and more acceptable in all platforms. Ex, they
> have triggers, etc that MySQL does not have.
FUD. I pointed to information of FSF and people not related to MySQL.
Seems l
One final thouhgt for the people who wish to sell your
own products.
You can distribute your own products, but let your customers
download the GPL packages. In that way, you are not
distributing that.
And you can include your license saying that something
like any utilziation of third-party packa
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] LEGAL information about MySQL.
> All who haven't read GPL FAQ, go and read it:
> http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
>
> Current discussion is covered beginning from:
>
> http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-
All who haven't read GPL FAQ, go and read it:
http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
Current discussion is covered beginning from:
http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifiedJustBinary
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
Also, discussion here reminded me MySQL vs Progress case wh
Didn't you the previous posting that contains two paragraphs
from GPL?
And if someone wants to sell the software that use the MySQL,
then simply let them downlaod it. Then you will be out of this
crap.
Also, PostgreSQL will be your alternative option as well.
Pae
P.S.: There are many commercia
Hello.
This is quickly heading towards off-topic. If you are interested in a
discussion of what the GPL means, a different forum would be more
adequate, I think.
I do not necessarily completely agree with MySQL AB's interpretation
of the GPL, but since it's their product, I am fine with it.
But
18 matches
Mail list logo
