Am 22.03.2016 um 02:05 schrieb Jan Steinman:
please refrain from answering when you have no clue how DNS blacklists are
working and what about others are talking
Well, excuse me! Someone put on their bossy pants this morning!
A simple “That’s not what’s going on here” would have been
> please refrain from answering when you have no clue how DNS blacklists are
> working and what about others are talking
Well, excuse me! Someone put on their bossy pants this morning!
A simple “That’s not what’s going on here” would have been much nicer.
J
--
MySQL General Mailing List
Am 20.03.2016 um 20:22 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 20.03.2016 um 20:16 schrieb Jan Steinman:
From: Reindl Harald
Date: 17 March 2016 at 06:27:22 PDT
Am 17.03.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
i still can't send my question to the ML. Our outgoing Mailer has a
new
Am 20.03.2016 um 20:16 schrieb Jan Steinman:
From: Reindl Harald
Date: 17 March 2016 at 06:27:22 PDT
Am 17.03.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
i still can't send my question to the ML. Our outgoing Mailer has a new IP
which is not listed
> From: Reindl Harald
> Date: 17 March 2016 at 06:27:22 PDT
>
> Am 17.03.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
>> i still can't send my question to the ML. Our outgoing Mailer has a new IP
>> which is not listed
>>
Hi,
i still can't send my question to the ML. Our outgoing Mailer has a new IP
which is not listed
(http://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3a146.107.103.20=toolpage#),
our domain is not listed
Am 17.03.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
i still can't send my question to the ML. Our outgoing Mailer has a new IP
which is not listed
(http://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3a146.107.103.20=toolpage#),
our domain is not listed
Am 09.03.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
i tried yesterday several times to send an e-Mail to this list. E-Mail is
formatted as plain-text, has no links included and no attachment but is
declined as spam. This is what is bounced:
: host
Bernd,
> : host lists-mx.mysql.com[137.254.60.71] said: 552 spam
> score exceeded threshold (#5.6.1) (in reply to end of DATA command)
>
> Any ideas ?
Whatever provider you are using to send mail has been blacklisted?
It happens with some ISP who are not diligent
Hi,
i tried yesterday several times to send an e-Mail to this list. E-Mail is
formatted as plain-text, has no links included and no attachment but is
declined as spam. This is what is bounced:
: host lists-mx.mysql.com[137.254.60.71] said: 552 spam
score exceeded
Hi,
We
are running on opensuse that defaults to a mariadb instead of mysql
install, so we were running icinga 1.9.2 / idoutils 1.9.2 on a opensuse
ppc system, with mariadb 5.5.33. This generated a lot of errors in de
database (with restarts):
InnoDB: Assertion failure in thread
[mailto:vegiv...@tuxera.be]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 2:16 PM
To: Brad Heller
Cc: Johnny Withers; MySQL General List
Subject: Re: Concurrent read performance problems
Good to hear. A word of warning, though: make sure you don't have more
connections allocating those buffers than your machine can
On my phone now, but it smells of file-based sorting, making disk access the
bottleneck. Can you provide the explain?
Brad Heller b...@cloudability.com wrote:
Hey list, first time posting here so apologies if this is the wrong
forum
for this but I'm really out of options on how to solve this
Yes sorry, here's the explain. It was taken from MariaDB 5.5.32. Looks like
there is a lot of filesort goin' on here. Also note that I'm only using the
first two fields of the covering index (intentionally).
Just because it says filrsort doesn't mean it'll create a file on disk.
Table schema and full query would be helpful here too
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/05/what-does-using-filesort-mean-in-mysql/
On Aug 11, 2013 1:28 PM, Brad Heller b...@cloudability.com wrote:
Yes sorry,
True, which is why I said I suspected file-based sort :-) At one million rows,
that seems to be an accurate guess, too. Still on the phone, though, and in
bed. I'll read the thread better tomorrow, but you might get some benefit from
cutting out the subselect if that's possible.
If you have
Johan, your suggestion to tweak max_heap_table_size and tmp_table_size
fixed the issue. Bumping them both to 512MB got our performance back
on-par. I came up with a way to avoid the contention using a complex set of
temp tables, but performance was abysmal.
By reverting to the more
Good to hear. A word of warning, though: make sure you don't have more
connections allocating those buffers than your machine can handle memory-wise,
or you'll start swapping and performance will REALLY go down the drain.
A query/index based solution would still be preferred. Could you for
Hey list, first time posting here so apologies if this is the wrong forum
for this but I'm really out of options on how to solve this problem!
*Short version:*
1. High concurrent reads, performing the same well-indexed query type to
the same two tables.
2. No additional traffic at all--just
oops..sorryproblem seems to be with base...so i meant to post it in
base mailing list
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:37 AM, rounak jain rounak.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I have connected MySql to Base. I created some relationships in MySql.
They are properly visible in the Relationships chart in
I'm using CygWIN to compile MySQL 5.6.10 for Windows. Using the source code
(Generic Linux (Architecture Independent), Compressed TAR Archive) Version
5.6.10.
I have no problems compiling (Generic Linux (Architecture Independent),
Compressed TAR Archive) Version 5.5.29 source code
During a recent system software upgrade (CentOS) on the front-end of our
computing cluster, the mysql area was upgraded without our realizing that it
was going to be. Now, php and mysql do not communicate well with one another.
The version of mysql on the system after the upgrade is 5.1.61.
: problems with INNODB tables
Thanks for your answer. I read http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/memory
where it tells you to do one thing if using MYIASM tables and another
if using INNODB tables. We are using both. Any suggestions?
Thanks for any help.
Malki Cymbalista
Webmaster, Weizmann Institute
...@weizmann.ac.il
08-9343036
-Original Message-
From: Rick James [mailto:rja...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:42 PM
To: Andrés Tello; Malka Cymbalista
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com; Shlomit Afgin; Ronen Hayun
Subject: RE: problems with INNODB tables
Check your memory usage
Cymbalista
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com; Shlomit Afgin; Ronen Hayun
Subject: RE: problems with INNODB tables
Check your memory usage according to
http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/memory
-Original Message-
From: Andrés Tello [mailto:mr.crip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:00
fine. Each time
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Malka Cymbalista
malki.cymbali...@weizmann.ac.il wrote:
We are running MySQL version 5.0.45 on a Linux machine. Over the past few
months we have been having several problems:
1. Our mysql processes have increased the memory used from about
Check your memory usage according to
http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/memory
-Original Message-
From: Andrés Tello [mailto:mr.crip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:00 AM
To: Malka Cymbalista
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com; Shlomit Afgin; Ronen Hayun
Subject: Re: problems
of which are
generally accessible from remote clients over SSL.
However, one of my FreeBSD mySQL clients is having problems connecting to any
of the servers. Running mySQL under truss reports the following:
Looking at this output tells something went terribly wrong:
file descriptor 2
Sorry, but I have to start with a negative remark:
Why, oh why, don't you mention the version number you
are using? I hope it is some roughly current 5.1, but
I'd rather like you to tell it.
Doh! Right you are! Sorry, that was totally my bad.
mysql select version();
++
|
Interesting that you can request advice from finland vs
calling from redwood shores CA for technical advice
first take a look at:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/secure-basics.html
once you've determined the algorithm you will want to implement
take a look at SSL 1,2,3 and TLS
perhaps a misconfiguration on the failing client ..
can you go to successful client, enable DEBUG level
debugging and log the connection and then go to the
failing client..enable DEBUG level debugging and log
the connection to the failing client this would determine
deltas between the
Hi!
Martin Gainty wrote:
[[...]]
joerg ..any thoughts on this matter??
Sorry - none.
I never dealt with the inner workings of the SSL library.
Just seeing file descriptor 2 (standard error) used for socket
operations makes me assume *very* strongly that something went wrong
well before
I have three mySQL server, all of which are SSL-enable and all of which are
generally accessible from remote clients over SSL.
However, one of my FreeBSD mySQL clients is having problems connecting to any
of the servers. Running mySQL under truss reports the following
Debian squeeze, mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.1.49, for debian-linux-gnu
(i486) using readline 6.1, PHP 5.3.3-2 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built:
Oct 21 2010 18:58:27).
I'm not sure if this group or the php one is more appropriate but
thought I would try here first as it is perhaps a mysql setting I
Hi,
We're chaning it to INT(9). Apparently someone remembered to change the type
of data in this field from an alphanumeric value to an INT(9).
I'm going to change this asap.
Thanks
BR
AJ
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:17 AM, mos mo...@fastmail.fm wrote:
At 04:44 AM 9/3/2010, Alexandre Vieira
Hi List,
In a 20m interval in our max load I have:
OS WAIT ARRAY INFO: reservation count 637, signal count 625
Mutex spin waits 0, rounds 19457, OS waits 428
RW-shared spins 238, OS waits 119; RW-excl spins 13, OS waits 8
(The values are the difference between the start and end of this 20m
On 9/3/2010 3:15 PM, Johnny Withers wrote:
It seems that when your index is PRIMARY on InnoDB tables, it's magic and is
part of the data thereby it is not included in the index_length field.
I have never noticed this. I don't think adding a new index will make a
difference.
You could try
At 04:44 AM 9/3/2010, Alexandre Vieira wrote:
Hi Johnny,
mysql EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM clientinfo WHERE userid='911930694';
++-++---+---+-+-+---+--+---+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key |
Hi Johnny,
mysql EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM clientinfo WHERE userid='911930694';
++-++---+---+-+-+---+--+---+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len
| ref | rows | Extra |
On 02/09/2010 6:05 p, Alexandre Vieira wrote:
Hi Jangita,
I'm 15779 innodb_buffer_pool_pages_free from a total of 22400. That's
246MB of 350MB free.
| Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_data | 6020 |
| Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_dirty| 1837 |
| Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_flushed |
Ok, so I'm stumped?
What kind of hardware is behind this thing?
-JW
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Alexandre Vieira nul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Johnny,
mysql EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM clientinfo WHERE userid='911930694';
, doesn't follow any
specific pattern. All working concurrently.
A big bottleneck is:
8 queries inside InnoDB, 28 queries in queue
1 read views open inside InnoDB
Increasing innodb_thread_concurrency might help without causing any problems
to the overall performance.
Makes total sense if you read
1 read views open inside InnoDB
Increasing innodb_thread_concurrency might help without causing any
problems to the overall performance.
Makes total sense if you read:
http://peter-zaitsev.livejournal.com/9138.html
Thanks in advance.
BR
AJ
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johnny Withers
in queue
1 read views open inside InnoDB
Increasing innodb_thread_concurrency might help without causing any
problems to the overall performance.
Makes total sense if you read:
http://peter-zaitsev.livejournal.com/9138.html
Thanks in advance.
BR
AJ
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:31 PM
of
inserts and deletes. Data manipulation is random, doesn't follow any
specific pattern. All working concurrently.
A big bottleneck is:
8 queries inside InnoDB, 28 queries in queue
1 read views open inside InnoDB
Increasing innodb_thread_concurrency might help without causing any
problems
manipulation is random, doesn't follow any
specific pattern. All working concurrently.
A big bottleneck is:
8 queries inside InnoDB, 28 queries in queue
1 read views open inside InnoDB
Increasing innodb_thread_concurrency might help without causing any
problems to the overall performance
causing any
problems to the overall performance.
Makes total sense if you read:
http://peter-zaitsev.livejournal.com/9138.html
Thanks in advance.
BR
AJ
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johnny Withers
joh...@pixelated.netwrote:
Ok, so I'm stumped?
What kind of hardware is behind
causing any
problems to the overall performance.
Makes total sense if you read:
http://peter-zaitsev.livejournal.com/9138.html
Thanks in advance.
BR
AJ
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johnny Withers
joh...@pixelated.netwrote:
Ok, so I'm stumped?
What kind of hardware is behind
It seems that when your index is PRIMARY on InnoDB tables, it's magic and is
part of the data thereby it is not included in the index_length field.
I have never noticed this. I don't think adding a new index will make a
difference.
You could try moving your log files to a different disk array
Hi list,
I'm having some performance problems on my 5.0.45-log DB running on Solaris
8 (V240).
We only have one table and two apps selecting, updating, inserting and
deleting massively and randomly from this table.
The table is very simple. All SELECTs,INSERTs,UPDATEs and DELETEs have only
one
Can you show us the table structure and sample queries?
On Thursday, September 2, 2010, Alexandre Vieira nul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I'm having some performance problems on my 5.0.45-log DB running on Solaris
8 (V240).
We only have one table and two apps selecting, updating, inserting
What is the hardware spec? Anything else running on the box?
Why are you replicating but not making use of the slave?
Can you post the output of SHOW CREATE TABLE?
Regards
John
On 2 September 2010 12:50, Alexandre Vieira nul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I'm having some performance problems
John, Johnny,
Thanks for the prompt answer.
mysql SHOW CREATE TABLE clientinfo;
On 02/09/2010 4:46 p, Alexandre Vieira wrote:
John, Johnny,
Thanks for the prompt answer.
...
We also run some other applications in the server, but nothing that consumes
all the CPU/Memory. The machine has almost 1GB of free memory and 50% of
idle CPU time at any time.
TIA
BR
Alex
Hi Jangita,
I'm 15779 innodb_buffer_pool_pages_free from a total of 22400. That's 246MB
of 350MB free.
| Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_data | 6020 |
| Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_dirty| 1837 |
| Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_flushed | 673837 |
| Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_free |
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Performance problems on MySQL
John, Johnny,
Thanks for the prompt answer.
mysql SHOW CREATE TABLE clientinfo
for your
delete queries?
DELETE FROM clientinfo WHERE units='155618918';
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Vieira [mailto:nul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:46 AM
To: John Daisley; joh...@pixelated.net
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Performance problems on MySQL
Hi listers
mysql server here is
mysql-server-5.1.48-2.fc13.x86_64
this morning i created a message with a literal string in chinese in it.
the messages in the application i used are stored in a mysql database,
when you submit them, like in a sent folder.
With this chinese literal in it, i,
can u please list out the table structure...as collation can also be set at
column level
regards
anandkl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:00 PM, mysql my...@ayni.com wrote:
Hi listers
mysql server here is
mysql-server-5.1.48-2.fc13.x86_64
this morning i created a message with a literal string in
Hi Ananda
table structure is:
mysql show full columns from suomi_contacts2;
+--+--+---+--+-+---+-+-+-+
| Field| Type | Collation
can u please give the output of
desc suomi_contacts2;
2010/8/31 mysql my...@ayni.com
Hi Ananda
table structure is:
mysql show full columns from suomi_contacts2;
On 2010-08-31 15:17, Ananda Kumar wrote:
desc suomi_contacts2;
mysql desc suomi_contacts2;
+--+--+--+-+---+-+
| Field| Type | Null | Key | Default |
Extra |
did u try changing the collation for history column to UTF8
and try the update.
2010/8/31 mysql my...@ayni.com
On 2010-08-31 15:17, Ananda Kumar wrote:
desc suomi_contacts2;
mysql desc suomi_contacts2;
Hi Ananda
not sofar. But if you recommend it, i will give it a try.
thanks so much.
suomi
On 2010-08-31 15:41, Ananda Kumar wrote:
did u try changing the collation for history column to UTF8
and try the update.
2010/8/31 mysql my...@ayni.com mailto:my...@ayni.com
On 2010-08-31 15:17,
Hi Ananda
that worked fine:
mysql alter table suomi_contacts2 modify history longtext character set
utf8 collate utf8_bin;
Query OK, 6327 rows affected (0.34 sec)
Records: 6327 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
mysql
mysql update suomi_contacts2 set history = concat(now(), ' ', ''
,'concerne:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Norman Khine nor...@khine.net wrote:
hello,
i have a working master-slave replication, the problem i find is that
if i restart the MASTER there is a difference in the MASTER_LOG_FILE
and MASTER_LOG_POS on the SLAVE.
what is the correct way to keep the two
hello,
i have a working master-slave replication, the problem i find is that
if i restart the MASTER there is a difference in the MASTER_LOG_FILE
and MASTER_LOG_POS on the SLAVE.
what is the correct way to keep the two slaves in sync even after i
restart the server. the way i do it now is to:
since u r starting slave by postion beyond master, and if some of the
changes are already present on slave, it would error out with duplicate.
You need
show slave status\G;
slave stop;
show slave status\G;..wait for few min..than again
show slave status\G;just to make sure...slave is in
That is really bad, you will loose changes.
You shouldnt have to do anything when rebooting either the master or
slave. If the master is down, then the slave recieves no updates. If
the slave is down, when it comes back up it checks the master log pos
and plays thro any changes that are
True,
But some times, this does not work and u need to know the master bin-log
file and position to start, so that there is no loss of data.
regards
anandkl
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:39 PM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
That is really bad, you will loose changes.
You shouldnt have to do anything
i see, so the best is to just stop slave and then check the master
status, and when the master status syncs then i start the slave?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:09 PM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
That is really bad, you will loose changes.
You shouldnt have to do anything when rebooting either
Yes,
You need to note down the master bin-log file name and position on the
slave, this is a must.
regards
anandkl
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Norman Khine nor...@khine.net wrote:
i see, so the best is to just stop slave and then check the master
status, and when the master status
Quoting Norman Khine nor...@khine.net:
i see, so the best is to just stop slave and then check the master
status, and when the master status syncs then i start the slave?
Well Im willing to hear from others experiences, but if you really
shouldnt have to do anything. If you want you can
Smith,
I never said, this wont work.Some times, there are chances of lossing data.
regards
anandkl
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:48 PM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Quoting Norman Khine nor...@khine.net:
i see, so the best is to just stop slave and then check the master
status, and when the
-slave replication sync problems.
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Date: Thursday, 26 August, 2010, 6:34 PM
hello,
i have a working master-slave replication, the problem i find is that
if i restart the MASTER there is a difference in the MASTER_LOG_FILE
and MASTER_LOG_POS on the SLAVE.
what is the correct
Quoting Ananda Kumar anan...@gmail.com:
Smith,
I never said, this wont work.Some times, there are chances of lossing data.
regards
anandkl
If you have experience of this fair enough. Theres no reason it should
make any difference, as everything is based upon the binlog file and
Quoting jitendra ranjan jitendra_ran...@yahoo.com:
Hi,
The best way to use sync the master and slave is using mk-checksum
tools. just google it and use the the tools for online sync of
master and slave.
Jeetendra Ranjan
MySQL DBA
Yes, data integrity isnt guaranteed with MySQL
Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
-Original Message-
From: Norman Khine [mailto:nor...@khine.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:05 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: master-slave replication sync problems.
hello,
i have a working master-slave replication, the problem i find
***
Slave_IO_Running: Yes
Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
-Original Message-
From: Norman Khine [mailto:nor...@khine.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:05 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: master-slave replication sync problems.
hello,
i have a working
Hello,
I tried to response to a posting on the list named in the subject. But
it is rejected with the following message:
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host lists.mysql.com [213.136.52.31]: 552 spam score exceeded
threshold (#5.6.1)
Neither this emailaddress is
At 10:51 AM 2/15/2010, Frank Becker wrote:
Hello,
I tried to response to a posting on the list named in the subject. But it
is rejected with the following message:
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host lists.mysql.com [213.136.52.31]: 552 spam score exceeded
Is the MySQL mailing list admin subscribed to the list? I have also sent a
message or more telling about this issue, with no response.
--
Octavian
mos mo...@fastmail.fm wrote in message
news:6.0.0.22.2.20100215120015.02cd4...@mail.messagingengine.com...
At 10:51 AM 2/15/2010, Frank Becker
Hi friends,
Last weekend I made an environment that use a MySQL Server version 4.1 that
was defined to be the MASTER and other one version 5.1 defined as SLAVE.
Because the application that was concept working over exception, often the
SLAVE server got new error and replication stops.
Well, I
Hi Wagner,
You have to start the server with the option as below for skipping the
error.
--slave-skip-errorr= 1062 or all
1062 - will skip the your error as the error number is 1062 and all will
skip all the errors.
You have to mention specific error numbers to skip the same.
--
Thanks
Ok, Suresh. . .I started MySQL with slave_skip_errors = all and It solve the
problem!
Thanks.
WB
2010/1/25 Suresh Kuna sureshkumar...@gmail.com
Hi Wagner,
You have to start the server with the option as below for skipping the
error.
--slave-skip-errorr= 1062 or all
1062 - will skip the
I tried to look at the binary logs by using phpMyAdmin, but got an error:
SQL error:
SHOW BINLOG EVENTS LIMIT 0, 30;
MySQL said:
#1220 - Error when executing command SHOW BINLOG EVENTS: Wrong offset or I/O
error.
From the error-file:
100111 16:15:40 [ERROR] Error in
Hey folks. I'm getting some weird behaviour out of Auto_increment.
If I enter a attempt to INSERT a row into a table with a UNIQUE index,
where the insert would violate uniqueness of existing data, I'm seeing
the auto_increment increase even though the insert fails.
The server in question is
It will also update the auto_increment column when you ROLLBACK a failed
insert:
mysql USE test;
Database changed
mysql SELECT * FROM t1\G
Empty set (0.00 sec)
mysql DROP TABLE t1;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)
mysql
mysql CREATE TABLE t1(
- id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
Hmm, that makes sense. I should have thought of that. Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Johnny Withersjoh...@pixelated.net wrote:
It will also update the auto_increment column when you ROLLBACK a failed
insert:
mysql USE test;
Database changed
mysql SELECT * FROM t1\G
Empty set
in the log file. SHOW SLAVE
STATUS states no problems.
I have attempted changing binlog_format, and have received the same
results on all three settings. The Master has no settings to ignore
any particular schema.
Using the query browser, and running the same exact query with the
same user
Subject: RE: Problems After MySql 5.1.34
Gary wrote:
Welcome to the hell that is php + apache + mysql. If you upgrade your
MySql (especially major versions 5.0 = 5.1) you will also need to
recompile php against the new MySql client libs. We've had very
limited success trying to get it to work
as it would make my compiling life easier every time I update MySql on all of
my boxes.
Gary
From: Johnny Stork [li...@openenterprise.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 1:03 PM
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Problems After MySql 5.1.34
Typo
Hi Johnny, all!
Johnny Stork wrote:
Typo, moved from 5.0.67 to 5.1.34
Ok, that helps - I checked the contents.
Johnny Stork wrote:
I recently upgraded an asterisk/trixbox server to mysql 5.1.34 from
5.64. Access to the db seesm fine from the shell, phpmyadmin or even
the Trixbox/FreePBX
older version(s).
If you found any problems with this, please tell us!
We are considering to change the contents of shared-compat RPMs, so
that they would not replace shared any more but just complement it
(bring just the old libs, not the current one).
The advantage would be that you then can
Gary wrote:
Welcome to the hell that is php + apache + mysql. If you upgrade your
MySql (especially major versions 5.0 = 5.1) you will also need to
recompile php against the new MySql client libs. We've had very
limited success trying to get it to work otherwise.
Well, you don't actually
: donderdag 7 mei 2009 15:15
To: ad...@asarian-host.net; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Problems After MySql 5.1.34
Gary
this isnt mysql's fault that php has such abysmal build tools..try
requesting a web developer to simply download php and run the proprietary
binary tools
after a week of sleepless
Typically we see the problems with RH/Cent when you upgrade through those
channels and then do an install of the 5.1.x series on top of that. I tried it
about 9 months ago, so the details are fuzzy. I do know that in attempts to
recover we extracted the RPM contents and tried to copy them
You are right. I misspoke regarding mysql - php - apache hell. It happens
anytime an interface changes.
From: Mark [ad...@asarian-host.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 5:57 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Problems After MySql 5.1.34
Gary
I recently upgraded an asterisk/trixbox server to mysql 5.1.34 from
5.64. Access to the db seesm fine from the shell, phpmyadmin or even the
Trixbox/FreePBX tool, but trying to apply Trixbox changes, or running a
pear update produces the errors below. I created a couple of sl but
this did not
Typo, moved from 5.0.67 to 5.1.34
Johnny Stork wrote:
I recently upgraded an asterisk/trixbox server to mysql 5.1.34 from
5.64. Access to the db seesm fine from the shell, phpmyadmin or even
the Trixbox/FreePBX tool, but trying to apply Trixbox changes, or
running a pear update produces the
1 - 100 of 2763 matches
Mail list logo