On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 02:55:17PM +1200, Quentin Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To be fair to the anonymous writer, the main reason for introducing
> 3.23.25 was
>
> Changes in release 3.23.35
> --
>
>* Fixed newly introduce bug in `ORDER BY'.
>
> Nothing there about 'i
grade or not upgrade' decision.
JM2c
Quentin
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy D. Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 19 March 2001 11:47 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Greg Cope
Subject: Re: MySQL 3.23.35 is released
On Sun, Mar 18,
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 03:31:47PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 17-Mar-2001 Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
>
> >> Er. Is there any way you guys can actually form a stable branch,
> >> and a development branch? It would be nice to get a stable
> >> version of mysql with replication, and that
On 17-Mar-2001 Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:56:34AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> On 17-Mar-2001 Greg Cope wrote:
>> > Michael Widenius wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x
>> >> releas
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:51:39AM +, Peter Skipworth wrote:
> I'd love to see some benchmarks soonish if anyone has/is about to
> compare each of the table handlers for speed and
> stability. Personally I'd love to have row-level locking, but don't
> want to do it if it means lower stability
I'd love to see some benchmarks soonish if anyone has/is about to
compare each of the table handlers for speed and stability. Personally I'd
love to have row-level locking, but don't want to do it if it means
lower stability and/or slower basic select/insert queries.
regards,
P
On Sat, 17 Mar
2
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:53:50PM -0800, Patrick Calkins wrote:
> Hello all;
>
> Sorry to sound a little naive, but what is this new GEMINI thing I
> have been reading about? Is there any FAQ/Docs on it or what is so
> neet about it??
It is a new table handler which is being developed by the fol
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: MySQL 3.23.35 is released
> Michael Widenius wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x
release
> > Greg> may be and when we
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:56:34AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 17-Mar-2001 Greg Cope wrote:
> > Michael Widenius wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>
> >> Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x
> >> release
> >> Greg> may be and when we might see a public 4
On 17-Mar-2001 Greg Cope wrote:
> Michael Widenius wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x
>> release
>> Greg> may be and when we might see a public 4.x alpha. I know the answer
>> will
>> Greg> probably be "When its ready" but a small
Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x release
> Greg> may be and when we might see a public 4.x alpha. I know the answer will
> Greg> probably be "When its ready" but a small clue would be nice :-)
>
> Lets guess a bit :)
Hi!
> "Greg" == Greg Cope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greg> Michael Widenius wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The 3.23.35 mainly fixes a critical bug in 3.23.34 with ORDER BY. We
>> don't know how the ORDER BY bug slipped through our testing suite or
>> how fatal it's really is, but as we have got
Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The 3.23.35 mainly fixes a critical bug in 3.23.34 with ORDER BY. We
> don't know how the ORDER BY bug slipped through our testing suite or
> how fatal it's really is, but as we have got a couple of reports about
> core dumps regarding this, we recommend 3.23
13 matches
Mail list logo
