On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 06:36:02 -0400 (EDT), "Robert P. J. Day"
wrote:
> no, i don't want to start a flame war, i just want some feedback on
> a current list of mysql "drawbacks" WRT postgresql.
>
> in the context of a fully open-source, java based ECM product, there
> is a FAQ entry that summarize
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:49:38 +0900
ninjajs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think about MySQL vs PostgreSQL ?
Both are great products and have their ups and downs. On a MySQL list
you will not get an un-biases answer to this question.
If you really want to know what people on the MySQL
Perhaps a quick search at a list archive will give you the answers you
are looking for. This was discussed at length about 6 months ago and the
messages are still at gmane. Just page through and you will find many
messages with just this subject.
http://search.gmane.org/search.php?group=gmane.comp
Hello.
You should search in archives for such questions. For example see
threads at:
http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/160972
http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/170673
"shabanip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> just want to know the main benefits of mysql over postgresql.
> thanks,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:43:50PM +0100, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Don't you think it is childish to link to documentation from 2003?
I've never seen a child do anything like you describe.
-Rich
--
Rich Lafferty --+
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:21:26 -0600, mos wrote:
>
> http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.mysql.com/doc/en/MySQL-PostgreSQL_features.html
There is a reason this page was removed from the MySQL site: some of
it was never correct in the first place, and the rest was severly
outdated.
Don't you thi
At 05:45 PM 2/24/2005, you wrote:
hi,
just want to know the main benefits of mysql over postgresql.
thanks,
Payam Shabanian
Payam,
The differences between the products are narrowing, especially
with MySQL 5.0 which is still in beta. If I could sum it up in 1 sentence
then MySQL is typical
MySQL has posted a very interesting comparison on their website. It appears
to be a reasonably fair evaluation. PostgreSQL was faster than MySQL in some
areas and MySQL was faster than PostgreSQL in most areas.
For speed with all of that functionality, I'd be more inclined to look at DB2
rat
Hi!
First of all, if I decide to benchmark MySQL vs. PostgreSQL with my
application, PostgreSQL will probably be faster. That does not mean that
MySQL is "generally" slower or that I *want* it to look slower. That
just means
1) I have no experience in tuning MySQL
2) My application was built wi
> As a minor side issue, we did some _very limited_ testing with MS SQLServer
> 2000 using unicode v ascii queries. Using unicode, queries tended to run at
> about half the speed compare to using ascii.
> This was client server, so it is likely that the increased network traffic
> is to blame, but
> > If maximum speed is critical.
> >
> > It's easy to lose sight of the fact that speed is not the
> > only criterion
> > in choosing a DBMS. Features, stability, security, and so on can be
> > just as important or more so. No single DBMS is going to win all the
> > prizes; the trick is to
same environment and network conditions, mainly, using IPv6
network protocol.
Robson
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Eastham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mysql List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: MySQL vs. PostgreSql -- speed
When I benchmarked PostgreSql against MySql for my application, MySql was 15
times faster, so 18% wouldn't make much difference for me!
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Robson Oliveira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 July 2003 15:35
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
>> >I agree with your opinion in 100%, but in my case I need DBMS with
>> >features like subselectes/utf-8/stored procedures but the
>> speed is also
>> >very important issue.
>>
>> You might have to spend money!
>>
>>
>You are saying that there is DBMS with all this features and it is as
>fast as
>> >I agree with your opinion in 100%, but in my case I need DBMS with
>> >features like subselectes/utf-8/stored procedures but the
>> speed is also
>> >very important issue.
>>
>> You might have to spend money!
>>
>>
>You are saying that there is DBMS with all this features and it is as
>fast as
> >I agree with your opinion in 100%, but in my case I need DBMS with
> >features like subselectes/utf-8/stored procedures but the
> speed is also
> >very important issue.
>
> You might have to spend money!
>
>
You are saying that there is DBMS with all this features and it is as
fast as MySQL
>> If maximum speed is critical.
>>
>> It's easy to lose sight of the fact that speed is not the
>> only criterion
>> in choosing a DBMS. Features, stability, security, and so on can be
>> just as important or more so. No single DBMS is going to win all the
>> prizes; the trick is to find th
Very smart your opinion, I agree at all with you.
-Mensaje original-
De: Bruce Feist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:37 AM
Para: MySQL List
Asunto: Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL -- speed test
Marek Lewczuk wrote:
>For everyone who thinks about moving from My
>
> which PostgreSQL version have you testet? If you want compare
> MySQL and
> PostgreSQL, than you have to use InnoDB tables. Tests with
> MyISAM make no
> sense. Out J2EE Application is working woth PostgreSQL 7.3.3
> and MySQL
> 4.0.13 with InnoDB tables (we need transactions and
> refe
> If maximum speed is critical.
>
> It's easy to lose sight of the fact that speed is not the
> only criterion
> in choosing a DBMS. Features, stability, security, and so on can be
> just as important or more so. No single DBMS is going to win all the
> prizes; the trick is to find the one
Marek Lewczuk wrote:
For everyone who thinks about moving from MySQL to PostgreSQL I have a
realy bad news - It's not worth.
That's a bit of an overstatement!
Why, You may ask... A few days ago I
have installed and tested PostgreSQL, becouse I realy need UTF-8 support
and subselects. I thought
21 matches
Mail list logo
