On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:51 PM, wrote:
> Quoting Jangita :
>
>
>> Simply put: I want a solution that ensures that server 2 has all the data
>> at server 1 at any point in time; say server 1 suddenly fell into a pond :)
>> . I wouldnt want to open server 2 and find the last insert/update/delete
>>
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> If server 1 and 2 are on the same local network, I would use
> a cluster.
>
As in NDB ? I've no personal experience with it - save for a sales talk by
MySQL guys some years back where we decided it was useless to us - but I
understand it has
Quoting Jangita :
Simply put: I want a solution that ensures that server 2 has all the
data at server 1 at any point in time; say server 1 suddenly fell
into a pond :) . I wouldnt want to open server 2 and find the last
insert/update/delete missing...
Ok so that rules out any asynchro
> Simply put: I want a solution that ensures that server 2 has all the
> data at server 1 at any point in time
If server 1 and 2 are on the same local network, I would use
a cluster. If they are located on physically separate networks,
I would use master-master replication.
Neil
--
Nei
On 02/09/2010 4:35 p, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Clustering is a general term, do you know which one you are comparing
with replication? Clustering most typically refers to high availability
clustering or high performance clustering, which wouldnt
necessarily/normally imply any copy of the actual
On 02/09/2010 4:32 p, Johan De Meersman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Jangita mailto:jang...@jangita.com>> wrote:
...
Growth should be linear to the growth of customers, no ? :-)
I thought so too; but one customer = 1 customer record, plus all his
transactions, and also weirdly
Clustering is a general term, do you know which one you are comparing
with replication? Clustering most typically refers to high
availability clustering or high performance clustering, which wouldnt
necessarily/normally imply any copy of the actual data.
If you want a copy of your data on a
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Jangita wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> We have a system that has been running along nicely for the past three
> months on a pc (4gb 1,8ghz,debian lenny pc). It is a telecom-financal
> system; slightly 2 hits per minute but growing exponentally as customers
> increase.
>
Grow
Hi Guys,
We have a system that has been running along nicely for the past three
months on a pc (4gb 1,8ghz,debian lenny pc). It is a telecom-financal
system; slightly 2 hits per minute but growing exponentally as customers
increase.
We have now bought two servers 12Gb RAM RAID blah blah; and
