this, I found that we had too
many sleeping processes. I was not even able to login to the mysql server
from a command line. Is there a way to set a timeout for sleeping
processes?
This is a small example of what I am seeing when I run a 'show processlist&#
Jason Williard wrote:
Hello,
Today, I started experiencing some issues on our website with max
connections exceeded errors. In looking into this, I found that we had too
many sleeping processes. I was not even able to login to the mysql server
from a command line. Is there a way to set a
Hello,
Today, I started experiencing some issues on our website with max
connections exceeded errors. In looking into this, I found that we had too
many sleeping processes. I was not even able to login to the mysql server
from a command line. Is there a way to set a timeout for sleeping
On Monday 06 June 2005 10:58, Gleb Paharenko wrote:
> Does this weird behavior remain if you're connecting trough UNIX socket
> to local instance of MySQL?
it does.
At the moment, I try to approach the problem Carl proposed and starting from
scratch. It works fine - hence the problem is not mysql
n the mysql processlist reports max_connections+1 pids (including the
> terminal I use to get the processlist) whereas a '$ netstat | grep mysql | wc
> -l' does never return due to an ever increasing number of open connections.
> Each of them is in state TIME_WAIT.
>
e 06, 2005 3:58 AM
Subject: Re: Re: sleeping processes
>
> Hi Carl,
>
> thank you for your reply.
> did you have a look at my original posting where I included the code?
>
> your code (omitting the error routines) is essentially like this:
> sock=mysql_init(0))
> mysql_re
Hi Carl,
thank you for your reply.
did you have a look at my original posting where I included the code?
your code (omitting the error routines) is essentially like this:
sock=mysql_init(0))
mysql_real_connect(sock,ipNumber,userName,password,gvDatabase,3306,NULL,0)
mysql_select_db(sock,g
d for some things, not good for other ones.) But, for the
appropriate applications, it is very fast.
2. You have to free the result set after every select.
By the way, this code came right out of Googling.
Thanks and good luck,
Carl
- Original Message -
From: "Ronny Mel
.
Each of them is in state TIME_WAIT.
> Do you see some sleeping processes
> with ps utility or 'mysqladmin processlist' command?
AFAIK, 'mysqladmin processlist' prints the same as a 'mysql> show full
processlist', right? It's max_connections sleeping p
Hello.
Is it possible that your application doesn't close connection properly?
Check with netstat the states of connections between your application
and server. Run netstat on the server. Do you see some sleeping processes
with ps utility or 'mysqladmin processlist' comman
Dear all,
I have a problem with the mysql interface for c, which after a couple of
hours thinking about bad or faulty programming are eliminated with
probability almost 100%.
within a loop, I do a mysql_query(), which is executed and I poll the result
and everything is fine. Up to when
> --
>>> +
>>> | 680849 | tienda | localhost | tienda | Sleep | 22 |
>>> |
>>> NULL
>>>|
>>> | 680859 | tienda | localhost | tienda | Sleep | 15
ios where the
> normal connection closure may be skipped...
>
> My $0.02...
>
> Dan Greene
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:15 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
erios where the normal connection closure may be
skipped...
My $0.02...
Dan Greene
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sleeping Processes
>
>
> I have a m
|
| 680942 | tienda | localhost | tienda | Sleep | 96 | |
NULL |
But upwards of as I said, 50 - 60 of them at any given time.
I do not have a slow day comparison to offer, but I have done many a sight
and never seen sle
Wouter de Jong writes:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:16:27PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> We are running 2.4.5-ac4 currently on the server. Could you tell me why your binary
>should run better ? Cause I tried it, and it dind't make a lot of difference.
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet/With
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:16:27PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
>
> To solve SMP problems with Linux, you should use latest kernel 2.4.*
> and our binary.
We are running 2.4.5-ac4 currently on the server. Could you tell me why your binary
should run better ? Cause I tried it, and it dind't
To solve SMP problems with Linux, you should use latest kernel 2.4.*
and our binary.
--
Regards,
__ ___ ___ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Mr. Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB, FullTime Developer
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Larn
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 01:15:38PM +0300, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm a database administrator for a hosting provider, and we have currently 2 SMP
>MySQL-database servers. The one that is causing me problems, has at least 900
>databases running on it. That's an dual PIII-55
Wouter de Jong writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a database administrator for a hosting provider, and we have currently 2 SMP
>MySQL-database servers. The one that is causing me problems, has at least 900
>databases running on it. That's an dual PIII-550, with 1024MB memory, running RedHat
>6.2, with L
Hello,
I'm a database administrator for a hosting provider, and we have currently 2 SMP
MySQL-database servers. The one that is causing me problems, has at least 900
databases running on it. That's an dual PIII-550, with 1024MB memory, running RedHat
6.2, with Linux 2.4.5-ac4.
During working
21 matches
Mail list logo
