simply saw table_open_cache
using the full value of 3000 and once again the same behaviour.
When running "Show open tables" though, we find that the amount of open
tables is only 283 and a count of all tables returned that there is only 381 tables on
the server.
However when
Hi all
I am hoping this mail finds all well.
I have a question about mysql open tables and open_table_cache which I do
not seem to be finding the answer to on the internet.
We are busy investigating an issue on a server where we have erattic
behaviour.
During the times
Hello Mogens,
On 8/18/2018 2:32 PM, Mogens Melander wrote:
Guys,
I think I remember this from way back.
You could ask for a lock, and get an OK if it is safe.
Something like, if there is pending transactions, on your target tables,
you would get a NO.
But then again. I could be wrong
Guys,
I think I remember this from way back.
You could ask for a lock, and get an OK if it is safe.
Something like, if there is pending transactions, on your target tables,
you would get a NO.
But then again. I could be wrong, and Shawn is the authority on this.
On 2018-08-18 23:59, shawn
Hello Jeff,
On 8/13/2018 12:05 PM, j...@lxvi.net wrote:
Hello, I have read through several pages of the reference manual, and
I've seen several instances where it is stated that LOCK TABLES (and
UNLOCK TABLES) is not allowed in a stored procedure, but so far, I
haven't found an explanation
Hello, I have read through several pages of the reference manual, and
I've seen several instances where it is stated that LOCK TABLES (and
UNLOCK TABLES) is not allowed in a stored procedure, but so far, I
haven't found an explanation as to *why* that is. Could someone please
enlighten me?
Thanks
Hi Martin,
On 4/12/2016 07:23, Martin Mueller wrote:
I abandoned a MySQL 5.22 database that quite suddenly andthat I wasn’t able to
start up again. The data directory consists of a mix of ISAM and Inno tables.
I was able to copy the ISAM tables into a new 5.6 version, and they work
Hi Martin
On 4/12/2016 07:23, Martin Mueller wrote:
I abandoned a MySQL 5.22 database that quite suddenly andthat I wasn’t able to
start up again. The data directory consists of a mix of ISAM and Inno tables.
I was able to copy the ISAM tables into a new 5.6 version, and they work.
I
On 12/3/2016 14:23, Martin Mueller wrote:
I abandoned a MySQL 5.22 database
There's been 5.0m 5,1, 5,4 (briefly), 5.5, 5.6 and now 5.7. No 5,.2.
that quite suddenly andthat I wasn’t able to start up again. The data
directory consists of a mix of ISAM and Inno tables.
You mean MyISAM
Am 03.12.2016 um 21:23 schrieb Martin Mueller:
In my case, I can reproduce Time machine backups of data directories at varying
times. At one point I was able to replace the non-working installation with an
earlier installation, but then it failed unpredictably.
Are the Inno tables on Time
I abandoned a MySQL 5.22 database that quite suddenly andthat I wasn’t able to
start up again. The data directory consists of a mix of ISAM and Inno tables.
I was able to copy the ISAM tables into a new 5.6 version, and they work.
I understand that INNO tables are different because different
I am regularly using indices on medium-big tables (1000 to > 5
entries), and even on temporary tables (which I use a lot) in joins
(EXPLAIN SELECT is your friend).
But I'd never thought indices were needed for small tables (100-200
entries). I recently found they are useful too, and
ata
in the file is encrypted), then any technique for doing
safe file-level backups will preserve the encryption.
Examples:
cold backups (copying off the files after stopping the
daemon)
FTWRL + wait for background threads to complete their
queues + file system snapshot
MySQL Enterpris
any technique for doing safe file-level backups will
preserve the encryption.
Examples:
cold backups (copying off the files after stopping the daemon)
FTWRL + wait for background threads to complete their queues + file
system snapshot
MySQL Enterprise Backup (coming soon for TDE tables; w
Am 03.03.2016 um 16:40 schrieb lejeczek:
how to backup in a way that this in-database-encryption will be taken
advantage of?
does any of present backup solutions can do it?
many thanks
think once again what "transparent encryption" means
the most effective backup is anyways running slave
On 02/03/16 00:51, shawn l.green wrote:
On 3/1/2016 6:26 PM, lejeczek wrote:
On 29/02/16 21:35, shawn l.green wrote:
On 2/29/2016 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:54 schrieb Gary Smith:
On 29/02/2016 19:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
cryptsetup/luks can achieve that way
On 3/1/2016 6:26 PM, lejeczek wrote:
On 29/02/16 21:35, shawn l.green wrote:
On 2/29/2016 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:54 schrieb Gary Smith:
On 29/02/2016 19:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
cryptsetup/luks can achieve that way better
Only to a degree.
no - not
On 29/02/16 21:35, shawn l.green wrote:
On 2/29/2016 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:54 schrieb Gary Smith:
On 29/02/2016 19:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
cryptsetup/luks can achieve that way better
Only to a degree.
no - not only to a degree - when the question is
On 2/29/2016 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:54 schrieb Gary Smith:
On 29/02/2016 19:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
cryptsetup/luks can achieve that way better
Only to a degree.
no - not only to a degree - when the question is "not store anything
unencrypted on the disk"
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:54 schrieb Gary Smith:
On 29/02/2016 19:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
cryptsetup/luks can achieve that way better
Only to a degree.
no - not only to a degree - when the question is "not store anything
unencrypted on the disk" the is no degree, but or if
Once the disk
On 29/02/2016 19:54, Gary Smith wrote:
However, if TDE is employed, then you've got another significant
obstacle to overcome: The data is only encrypted (aiui) once it's in
memory.
Apologies, that should read "unencrypted (aiui) once it's in memory"
Gary
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For
On 29/02/2016 19:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
cryptsetup/luks can achieve that way better
Only to a degree. Once the disk is unencrypted, you've got access to the
filesystem. If you've got physical access to the machine, then anything
which gives you console access gives you (potentially) access
(internally in mysql) tables and php will be fine?
If not, would it be easy to re-code php to work with this new,
internal encryption?
Starting with MysQL 5.7.11, there is transparent data encryption (TDE)
for InnoDB tables. If you use that, it is as the name suggest
transparent for PHP. See also
Hi Reindl,
On 2/29/2016 2:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:07 schrieb Jesper Wisborg Krogh:
Hi Lejeczek,
On 1/03/2016 00:31, lejeczek wrote:
hi everybody
a novice type of question - having a php + mysql, can one just encrypt
(internally in mysql) tables and php will be fine
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:07 schrieb Jesper Wisborg Krogh:
Hi Lejeczek,
On 1/03/2016 00:31, lejeczek wrote:
hi everybody
a novice type of question - having a php + mysql, can one just encrypt
(internally in mysql) tables and php will be fine?
If not, would it be easy to re-code php to work
Hi Lejeczek,
On 1/03/2016 00:31, lejeczek wrote:
hi everybody
a novice type of question - having a php + mysql, can one just encrypt
(internally in mysql) tables and php will be fine?
If not, would it be easy to re-code php to work with this new,
internal encryption?
Starting with MysQL
On 29/02/16 14:38, Steven Siebert wrote:
Simple answer is no. What are you trying to accomplish?
I was hoping that with this new feature (google's) where
mysql itself, internally uses keys to encrypt/decrypt tables
or tablespaces I could just secure data, simply.
Chance is I don't quite get
Simple answer is no. What are you trying to accomplish?
S
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:31 AM, lejeczek <pelj...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> hi everybody
>
> a novice type of question - having a php + mysql, can one just encrypt
> (internally in mysql) tables and php will be fin
hi everybody
a novice type of question - having a php + mysql, can one
just encrypt (internally in mysql) tables and php will be fine?
If not, would it be easy to re-code php to work with this
new, internal encryption?
thanks.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http
From: Martin Mueller martinmuel...@northwestern.edu
I moved the data directory of a MySQL installation from one computer to
another. This works for MyISAM tables. Unfortunately I inadvertently
created some INNO tables, and it doesn't seem to work.
Oh dear. Hope you have a backup.
I fought
Am 20.08.2015 um 23:06 schrieb Martin Mueller:
I moved the data directory of a MySQL installation from one computer to
another. This works for MyISAM tables. Unfortunately I inadvertently
created some INNO tables, and it doesn't seem to work.
The show tables command accurately lists
I moved the data directory of a MySQL installation from one computer to
another. This works for MyISAM tables. Unfortunately I inadvertently
created some INNO tables, and it doesn't seem to work.
The show tables command accurately lists the following the tables from a
longer list
pospairs
with it, does it exist any method
to delete tables quicly?
i know that drop and delete are not equivalent but i want to get rid of
all
information inside
thanks
Pau Marc Muñoz Torres
skype: pau_marc
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paumarc
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pau_Marc_Torres3
in my sql server and i want to delete it, it also
have
some indexes. I tried to drop table and delete commands but i
eventually get a time out. Wath can i do with it, does it exist any
method
to delete tables quicly?
i know that drop and delete are not equivalent but i want to get rid of
all
it exist any
method
to delete tables quicly?
i know that drop and delete are not equivalent but i want to get rid of
all
information inside
thanks
Pau Marc Muñoz Torres
skype: pau_marc
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paumarc
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pau_Marc_Torres3/info/
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 02:01:57PM +0530, Pothanaboyina Trimurthy wrote:
Guys, can I implore you to post to a mailing list using its address in To:
field and not CC:ing it? You are constantly breaking out of my filters.
--
vag·a·bond adjective \ˈva-gə-ˌbänd\
a : of, relating to, or
tables in use 1, locked 1
ROLLING BACK 297751 lock struct(s), heap size 35387832, 74438247 row
lock(s), undo log entries 66688203
MySQL thread id 37, OS thread handle 0x7f11bc4b9700, query id 110
localhost pau query end
delete from ensemblmotive
FILE I/O
I/O thread 0
The problem was here:
---TRANSACTION 154B1E00, ACTIVE 265942 sec rollback
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
ROLLING BACK 297751 lock struct(s), heap size 35387832, 74438247 row
lock(s), undo log entries 66688203
MySQL thread id 37, OS thread handle 0x7f11bc4b9700, query id 110 localhost
pau query
rollback
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
ROLLING BACK 297751 lock struct(s), heap size 35387832, 74438247 row
lock(s), undo log entries 66688203
MySQL thread id 37, OS thread handle 0x7f11bc4b9700, query id 110
localhost pau query end
delete from ensemblmotive
FILE I/O
I/O
for trx's n:o 154B1E0A undo n:o 0
History list length 1136
LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION:
---TRANSACTION 0, not started
MySQL thread id 67, OS thread handle 0x7f11bc426700, query id 244 localhost
pau
SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS
---TRANSACTION 154B1E00, ACTIVE 265942 sec rollback
mysql tables
sql server and i want to delete it, it also have
some indexes. I tried to drop table and delete commands but i
eventually get a time out. Wath can i do with it, does it exist any method
to delete tables quicly?
i know that drop and delete are not equivalent but i want to get rid of all
Hello every body
i have a big table in my sql server and i want to delete it, it also have
some indexes. I tried to drop table and delete commands but i
eventually get a time out. Wath can i do with it, does it exist any method
to delete tables quicly?
i know that drop and delete
every body
i have a big table in my sql server and i want to delete it, it also have
some indexes. I tried to drop table and delete commands but i
eventually get a time out. Wath can i do with it, does it exist any method
to delete tables quicly?
i know that drop and delete are not equivalent
I just upgraded a server from 5.1 to 5.5. Our tables are all MyISAM. I
have a python script that inserts rows to a table, in 5.1 it worked
fine. In 5.5 it's failing with 'Lock wait timeout exceeded'. I google
this, and it seems that all the cases of people getting that were with
InnoDB tables
Hi,
i've been already reading the documentation the whole day, but still confused
and unsure what to do.
We have two databases which are important for our work. So both are stored
hourly. Now I recognized that each database has a mixture of MyISAM- and
InnoDB-tables. A backup of this mix does
- and
InnoDB-tables. A backup of this mix does not seem to be easy. Until now it
was dumped using mysqldump --opt -u root --databases mausdb What I
understand until now is that --opt is not necessary because it is default. It
includes, among others, --lock-tables which is senseful
XTrabackup can handle both InnoDB and MyISAM in
a consistent way while minimizing lock time on
MyISAM tables ...
http://www.percona.com/doc/percona-xtrabackup/2.1/
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe, Principal Support Engineer (EMEA)
SkySQL - The MariaDB Company | http://www.skysql.com/
--
MySQL General
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your reply. Theorically the fragmented tables not offer the best
performance to the InnoDB engine, that's correct or not?
I don't know if is a problem or not, is a doubt/question for me. I'm not
sure if is an atypical behaviour.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Antonio.
*please* don't use reply-all on mailing-lists
the list by definition distributes your message
Am 30.06.2014 13:14, schrieb Antonio Fernández Pérez:
Thanks for your reply. Theorically the fragmented tables not offer the best
performance to the InnoDB engine,
that's correct or not?
practically
Hi Andre,
Thanks for your reply. I have checked the link and my configuration.
Innodb_file_per_table is enabled and in data directory appears a set of
files by each table.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Antonio.
Am 27.06.2014 09:48, schrieb Antonio Fernández Pérez:
Thanks for your reply. I have checked the link and my configuration.
Innodb_file_per_table is enabled and in data directory appears a set of
files by each table.
Any ideas?
ideas for what?
* which files don't get shrinked (ls -lha)
*
Hi Reindl,
Thanks for your attention.
Following the previous mail, I have checked my MySQL's configuration and
innodb_file_per_table is enabled so, I think that this parameter not
affects directly to fragmented tables in InnoDB (In this case).
I would like to know, if is possible, why after
Hello Antonio,
On 6/27/2014 9:31 AM, Antonio Fernández Pérez wrote:
Hi Reindl,
Thanks for your attention.
Following the previous mail, I have checked my MySQL's configuration and
innodb_file_per_table is enabled so, I think that this parameter not
affects directly to fragmented tables
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com
Subject: Re: Optimizing InnoDB tables
I would like to know, if is possible, why after execute an analyze table
command on some fragmented table, after that, appears fragmented again.
Simple question
Hi again,
I have enabled innodb_file_per_table (Its value is on).
I don't have clear what I should to do ...
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Antonio.
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergames.com
Subject: Re: Optimizing InnoDB tables
I have enabled innodb_file_per_table (Its value is on).
I don't have clear what I should to do ...
Then all new tables will be created in their own tablespace now
Have a look at this:
https://rtcamp.com/tutorials/mysql/enable-innodb-file-per-table/
--
Andre Matos
andrema...@mineirinho.org
On Jun 25, 2014, at 2:22 AM, Antonio Fernández Pérez
antoniofernan...@fabergames.com wrote:
Hi again,
I have enabled innodb_file_per_table (Its value is on).
I
Hi list,
I was trying to optimize the InnoDB tables. I have executed the next query
to detect what are the fragmented tables.
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA,TABLE_NAME
FROM TABLES WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA NOT IN (information_schema,mysql) AND
Data_free 0
After that, I have seen that there are 49 fragmented
Hi Antonio, como esta?
What's the mysql version you're running? Have you tried to ALTER TABLE x
ENGINE=InnoDB?
-- WB, MySQL Oracle ACE
Em 24/06/2014, às 08:03, Antonio Fernández Pérez
antoniofernan...@fabergroup.es escreveu:
Hi list,
I was trying to optimize the InnoDB tables. I have
Hi Wagner,
I'm running
MySQL Percona Server 5.5.30 64Bits. No, I don't have tried to execute
ALTER TABLE (Analyze with InnoDB tables do that, or not?).
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Antonio.
Hello Antonio,
On 6/24/2014 7:03 AM, Antonio Fernández Pérez wrote:
Hi list,
I was trying to optimize the InnoDB tables. I have executed the next query
to detect what are the fragmented tables.
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA,TABLE_NAME
FROM TABLES WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA NOT IN (information_schema,mysql
Am 24.06.2014 21:07, schrieb shawn l.green:
It makes a huge difference if the tables you are trying to optimize have
their own tablespace files or if they live
inside the common tablespace.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/innodb-parameters.html#sysvar_innodb_file_per_table
which
Hello Reindl,
On 6/24/2014 3:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.06.2014 21:07, schrieb shawn l.green:
It makes a huge difference if the tables you are trying to optimize have their
own tablespace files or if they live
inside the common tablespace.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en
2014-05-15 14:26 GMT+02:00 Antonio Fernández Pérez
antoniofernan...@fabergroup.es:
Hi,
I have in my server database some tables that are too much big and produce
some slow query, even with correct indexes created.
For my application, it's necessary to have all the data because we
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Arostegui man...@tuenti.com
Subject: Re: Big innodb tables, how can I work with them?
noSQL/table sharding/partitioning/archiving.
I keep wondering how people believe that NoSQL solutions magically don't need
RAM to work. Nearly all of them slow
2014-05-19 11:49 GMT+02:00 Johan De Meersman vegiv...@tuxera.be:
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Arostegui man...@tuenti.com
Subject: Re: Big innodb tables, how can I work with them?
noSQL/table sharding/partitioning/archiving.
I keep wondering how people believe that NoSQL
What kind of queries is this table serving? 8GB is not a huge amount of
data at all and IMO it's not enough to warrant sharding.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Antonio Fernández Pérez
antoniofernan...@fabergroup.es wrote:
Hi,
I have in my server database some tables that are too
support this amount but in this case and thinking in the
future, I have this problem with my architecture; how can I grow in
database servers without delete rows in the tables.
I have checked slow queries and now there aren't.
These tables are serving queries from FreeRADIUS service. For example
Hi,
I write to the list because I need your advices.
I'm working with a database with some tables that have a lot of rows, for
example I have a table with 8GB of data.
How can I do to have a fluid job with this table?
My server works with disk cabin and I think that sharding and partitioning
Am 16.05.2014 15:49, schrieb Antonio Fernández Pérez:
I write to the list because I need your advices.
I'm working with a database with some tables that have a lot of rows, for
example I have a table with 8GB of data.
How can I do to have a fluid job with this table?
My server works
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Fernández Pérez antoniofernan...@fabergroup.es
Subject: Advices for work with big tables
Hi,
I write to the list because I need your advices.
I'm working with a database with some tables that have a lot of rows, for
example I have a table
Hello Antonio,
On 5/16/2014 9:49 AM, Antonio Fernández Pérez wrote:
Hi,
I write to the list because I need your advices.
I'm working with a database with some tables that have a lot of rows, for
example I have a table with 8GB of data.
How you design your tables can have a huge impact
Hi,
I have in my server database some tables that are too much big and produce
some slow query, even with correct indexes created.
For my application, it's necessary to have all the data because we make an
authentication process with RADIUS users (AAA protocol) to determine if one
user can
Am 15.05.2014 14:26, schrieb Antonio Fernández Pérez:
I have in my server database some tables that are too much big and produce
some slow query, even with correct indexes created.
For my application, it's necessary to have all the data because we make an
authentication process with RADIUS
2014/04/07 08:02 -0800, Tim Johnson
2)mysqldump forces all database names to lower case in the CREATE
DATABASE statement. I know, one shouldn't use upper case in
database names, but :) tell that to my clients.
Why not? That is not mentioned in the section devoted to mapping such names to
* h...@tbbs.net h...@tbbs.net [140407 23:09]:
2014/04/07 08:02 -0800, Tim Johnson
2)mysqldump forces all database names to lower case in the CREATE
DATABASE statement. I know, one shouldn't use upper case in
database names, but :) tell that to my clients.
Why not? That is not
have used mysqldump with just the --all-databases
option to transfer data across different linux partitions.
I'm wondering if I should explicitly exclude some of the tables from
the mysql database. If so, which? perhaps mysql.user?
thoughts? Opinions?
thanks
I should add the following:
1
already set up a mysql user on the ubuntu OS.
In the past I have used mysqldump with just the --all-databases
option to transfer data across different linux partitions.
I'm wondering if I should explicitly exclude some of the tables from
the mysql database. If so, which? perhaps mysql.user
partitions.
I'm wondering if I should explicitly exclude some of the tables from
the mysql database. If so, which? perhaps mysql.user?
thoughts? Opinions?
thanks
--
Tim
tim at tee jay forty nine dot com or akwebsoft dot com
http://www.akwebsoft.com, http://www.tj49.com
--
MySQL General Mailing List
option to transfer data across different linux partitions.
I'm wondering if I should explicitly exclude some of the tables from
the mysql database. If so, which? perhaps mysql.user?
thoughts? Opinions?
thanks
I should add the following:
1)the only user added to the new partition
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Locking a Database (not tables) x
Hi David.
On 3/21/2014 1:42 PM, David Lerer wrote:
Frequently, we import a production dump that contains only 1 or 2 databases
into one of our QA instances that contains many more databases. (i.e.
database being a schema
...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 3:34 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Locking a Database (not tables) x
Hi David.
On 3/21/2014 1:42 PM, David Lerer wrote:
Frequently, we import a production dump that contains only 1 or 2 databases into one of our QA instances
that contains many more
2014-03-21 18:42 GMT+01:00 David Lerer dle...@univision.net:
Frequently, we import a production dump that contains only 1 or 2
databases into one of our QA instances that contains many more databases.
(i.e. database being a schema or a catalogue).
At the beginning of the import script, we
Perhaps enabling read only, followed by import with super user will do what you
want.
On Mar 22, 2014, at 12:26 AM, Manuel Arostegui man...@tuenti.com wrote:
2014-03-21 18:42 GMT+01:00 David Lerer dle...@univision.net:
Frequently, we import a production dump that contains only 1 or 2
Frequently, we import a production dump that contains only 1 or 2 databases
into one of our QA instances that contains many more databases. (i.e.
database being a schema or a catalogue).
At the beginning of the import script, we first drop all objects in the QA
database so that it will be a
Frequently, we import a production dump that contains only 1 or 2 databases
into one of our QA instances that contains many more databases. (i.e.
database being a schema or a catalogue).
At the beginning of the import script, we first drop all objects in the QA
database so that it will be a
: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:12 PM
To: David Lerer
Subject: Re: Locking a Database (not tables) x
You could set max_connections = 0; then kill off any remaining connections. Do
your data load and then set you max_connections back to what it was prior.
show variables like ‘max_connections’; (note
there is a
better approach.
If you start with a DROP DATABASE that will pretty much ensure
that nobody gets back into it.
Then re-create your tables in a new DB (yyy)
As a last set of steps do
CREATE DATABASE
RENAME TABLE yyy.table1 to .table1, yyy.table2 to .table2
Parallel Universe* now features Parallel Network Query (Distributed Query)
which joins tables from multiple servers in the network with unprecedented
speed.
Parallel Network Query may also be used to speed up slow server by
distributing tables of the query to multiple servers for processing which
I got an interesting problem with creation of indexes on MyISAM
tables in MySQL 5.6.15 and MySQL 5.6.14 running on FreeBSD 8.4 for float
columns - I am not able to create indexes on these columns
Indexes on all other columns work just fine
The problem occur while I was loading data from MySQL
--databases, methinks.
- Original Message -
From: Daevid Vincent dae...@daevid.com
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Sent: Thursday, 21 November, 2013 10:44:39 PM
Subject: How do I mysqldump different database tables to the same .sql file?
I'm working on some code where I am trying
on some code where I am trying to merge two customer accounts
(we get people signing up under different usernames, emails, or just create
a new account sometimes). I want to test it, and so I need a way to restore
the data in the particular tables. Taking a dump of all the DBs and tables
do I mysqldump different database tables to the same .sql
file?
There is a good reason that the USE database is not output in those
dumps..
it would make the tool very difficult to use for moving data around.
If I might suggest, a simple workaround is to create a shell script along
I'm working on some code where I am trying to merge two customer accounts
(we get people signing up under different usernames, emails, or just create
a new account sometimes). I want to test it, and so I need a way to restore
the data in the particular tables. Taking a dump of all the DBs
2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64
I have created checksum table and tried to use --ignore-tables-regex to
remove some tables from checking.
pt-table-checksum --chunk-size-limit= --nocheck-plan --replicate-check
--ignore-tables-regex=^test.s_.*_tmp$
--ignore-tables=test.catalogsearch_fulltext
Hello Neil,
On 8/24/2013 5:21 AM, Neil Tompkins wrote:
I have the following four MySQL tables
Region
RegionId
City
CityId
RegionId
Hotel
HotelId
CityId
HotelRegion
HotelId
RegionId
I'm struggling to write a UPDATE statement to update the City table's
RegionId field from data
I have the following four MySQL tables
Region
RegionId
City
CityId
RegionId
Hotel
HotelId
CityId
HotelRegion
HotelId
RegionId
I'm struggling to write a UPDATE statement to update the City table's
RegionId field from data in the HotelRegion table.
Basically how can I update the City table
-
From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:dae...@daevid.com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:57 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Need query to determine different column definitions across
tables
-Original Message-
From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:dae...@daevid.com]
Sent: Monday, July
I'm noticing that across our several databases and hundreds of tables that
column definitions are not consistent. I'm wondering if there is a tool or
query (using INFORMATION_SCHEMA perhaps) that will show me all databases,
tables and columns where they don't match (by column name).
For example
...@daevid.com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 2:11 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Need query to determine different column definitions across
tables
I'm noticing that across our several databases and hundreds of tables that
column definitions are not consistent. I'm wondering
1 - 100 of 4735 matches
Mail list logo
