That's an Athlon XP 2600+, not a 2.6GHz Athlon XP.
Look it up. On 11/10/05, Fredrik Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, hadn't seen that. Then I really should redo the benchmark and doit properly to see if there is any difference. However, "(e.g. a 1.6 GHz Pentium M can typically attain the pe
Oh, hadn't seen that. Then I really should redo the benchmark and do
it properly to see if there is any difference. However,
"(e.g. a 1.6 GHz Pentium M can typically attain the performance of a
2.4 GHz Northwood Pentium 4 (400 MHz FSB, 100 MHz quad-pumped)"
Shouldn't the AMD XP 2.6GHz be snappie
On 11/10/05, Fredrik Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However...
>
> I used the test script found here
> http://www.xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/sultra_skami.html
>
> on the Mobile Pentium 4 1600 MHz with Gentoo installed. THe script
> completed in 17 seconds , with some apps running. Comparing
However...
I used the test script found here
http://www.xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/sultra_skami.html
on the Mobile Pentium 4 1600 MHz with Gentoo installed. THe script
completed in 17 seconds , with some apps running. Comparing this to
other reports, my 1600 MHz with Gentoo on it is as good as a
On 11/5/05, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The performance "improvement" is pretty much a myth (no pun intended).
> The beauty of gentoo is in it's package management and flexibility. The
> conventional wisdom at present seem to be that you might notice a
> performance improvement on very
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 11:38:05 -0500
Myth Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I exagerated the amount of time a bit :) But even over night is
> unacceptable to me given the 'little' performance improvement you get.
The performance "improvement" is pretty much a myth (no pun intended).
The beau
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:26:17 -0500
Myth Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A little bit of time? Don't you mean alot of time compiling? I have
> tried Gentoo and the compiling of *everything* takes forever. I have
> yet to find a pre-compiled install that at least gets me going with the
> ba
On 11/3/05, Myth Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> >I'm a Gentoo user...
> >
> >I have Gentoo running two backend server, 4 frontend only boxes, and a
> >couple more PCs where I occasionally watch TV. I run Celeron, P4-HT,
> >Athlon and AMD64 systems. They all work great.
>
On Thursday 03 November 2005 05:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:07:24PM +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> > There seems to be a lot of gentoo users here!
>
> And maybe one of them can help me. I have a Xebian/Debian mix on my
> xbox right now and effectively can't use
I've had Gentoo (several flavors) completely refuse to operate
on my generic system. I'm no newb either. Redhat 5.2 was my
first distro. I run a mix of Knoppmyth, slackware, and Mandrake
right now. I just couldn't get Gentoo running...
___
mythtv-
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:07:24PM +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> There seems to be a lot of gentoo users here!
And maybe one of them can help me. I have a Xebian/Debian mix on my
xbox right now and effectively can't use it for anything until the Xorg
driver issue is resolved and/or MythTV is
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Yes, you must have missed something. It took me not longer than one night to
compile the whole gentoo system from stage 2, including
X-Serve
Myth Lists wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm a Gentoo user...
I have Gentoo running two backend server, 4 frontend only boxes, and a
couple more PCs where I occasionally watch TV. I run Celeron, P4-HT,
Athlon and AMD64 systems. They all work great.
I've been using Gentoo for a couple of years no
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Myth Lists
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. November 2005 16:26
An: Discussion about mythtv
Betreff: Re: [mythtv-users] Is gentoo the way to go?
Mark Knecht wrote:
>I'm a Gentoo user...
>
>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:26:17AM -0500, Myth Lists wrote:
>
> A little bit of time? Don't you mean alot of time compiling? I have
> tried Gentoo and the compiling of *everything* takes forever. I have
> yet to find a pre-compiled install that at least gets me going with the
> basic xwindows
Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm a Gentoo user...
I have Gentoo running two backend server, 4 frontend only boxes, and a
couple more PCs where I occasionally watch TV. I run Celeron, P4-HT,
Athlon and AMD64 systems. They all work great.
I've been using Gentoo for a couple of years now. It's great never
On 11/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am thinking gentoo may be the answer but how stable is it and how
> > difficult to set up (I have compiled a few kernels).
>
> After having not used linux in 5 years or so, I got back into it by
> embarking on a Myth/Gentoo project. If
> I am thinking gentoo may be the answer but how stable is it and how
> difficult to set up (I have compiled a few kernels).
After having not used linux in 5 years or so, I got back into it by
embarking on a Myth/Gentoo project. If you're not afraid of compiling a
kernel, Gentoo is a snap to set
Gentoo is good to learn about linux on it. I personally use it
exclusively, although I've spent a lot of time waiting for stuff to
compile at times. Of course it is possible to split compilation among
several pc's or compile your own binary versions for later use, but I
typically find it easiest
There seems to be a lot of gentoo users here! I have found gentoo easy
enough to set up for a pure myth only box (twice, was running only one
week and HW failure!) but I have built many gentoo systems previously.
There are howtos for myth, lists, docs and user forums are excellent
(best of any dis
I have been having various problems installing MythTV. My
prefered option is Ubuntu Breezy but I cant get that woring (c other
email). I have also had some luck with KnoppixMyth whitch is
great at getting a basic system running. However getting
everything working properly is a nightmare as there
21 matches
Mail list logo
