On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 04:49:38PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Scott Weeks wrote:
> > It's all phunny money. Real economics are not even considered.
> > At all.
>
> And what makes your think the Data Center Optimization Initiative is any
> different, when they are counting
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 01:27:32PM +, Nicholas Warren wrote:
> http://nabcop.org/index.php
>
> For me the logo is a flower and it says "Set $wgLogo to the URL path to your
> own logo image."
> Am I the only one?
Same here. I suspect that the page has not been fully customized.
--
Mike Andr
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:51:07AM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
>
> > On Sep 23, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
> >
> > Passive cooling typically translates to lower performance but also can
> > be more expensive.
>
> $DAYJOB uses an immersion cooling system so it’s higher performance and much
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:42:49AM -0400, Dovid Bender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a
> trace should not look like? Anyone have IP's that I can trace from the US
> or UK that will show
> 1) jitter
> 2) packet loss
> 3) very far away (perhaps
This post includes the word Damn.
damn
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:06:14PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
> It's either Mike, Comcast or the NANOG list, so it's probably a safe bet.
Bilingual English/French may indicate a Canadian mailserver.
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:59:41AM -0700, James Downs wrote:
>
> > On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote:
>
> > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain.
>
> Nad Cog?
North American Data Center Operations Group, perhaps?
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:52:17PM -0700, alvin nanog wrote:
>
> hi ethan
>
> On 08/03/15 at 10:58am, Ethan wrote:
> >
> > Getting bandwidth into the events is a pain. Huge venues are meant for large
> > corporate events not lower budget cons and festivals. Venue pricing I
> > believe is 750-150
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:50:44PM +0100, Colin Johnston wrote:
> blocking to mitigate risk is a better trade off gaining better percentage
> legit traffic against a indventant minor valid good network range.
That may be your call, or your management's call, but that doesn't make it
*my* call or
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:27:08PM +0300, John Kinsella wrote:
> On 7/15/15 1:28 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> >You can't be a "dummy" and a service provider...
>
> oh? :)
Counterexample: Cox. They refuse to even admit to me that they are even
considering IPV6.
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mike
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 05:34:03AM +, Mel Beckman wrote:
> Owen,
>
> I never said it was a greenfield deployment. Someone else tagged it with
> that term.
>
> My understanding of the term "greenfield" WRT wifi is that there are no
> interfering signals to contend with. I don't know of any U.S.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:01:38PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why
> would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is
> no residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much less
> 10,00
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:30:05PM -0400, A MEKKAOUI wrote:
> Your right. Actually, Bell knows that home does not need that much
> BW, Bell size their network for much less than that. However, from a
> marketing perspective, when Bell says to a client I am offering you
> 1G at $100 and competition
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:06:26PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > On Jun 26, 2015, at 13:02 , Karl Auer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
> >> How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
> >> it is overkill.
> >
> > This se
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 04:34:46PM +, Cryptographrix wrote:
> Have to agree with Shawn on this.
> If you watch her testimony in front of Congress, it is clear that she was
> completely flustered at the inability to hire competent people, and the
> lack of her superiors to prioritize the moderni
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:21:12PM +0300, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> Tell me how do you plan find printer in /64 subnet, scan it?
>
> On 02.06.2015 18:08, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> >
> > I can't run my laser printer without a firewall in front of it, and I
> > can't even guess how secure the controll
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:06:18PM -0500, Chris Brookes wrote:
> Anyone else seeing a lot of latency to google via qwest?
>
> ..
>
> 11 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms min-edge-12.inet.qwest.net [207.225.128.1]
> 1215 ms13 ms12 ms chx-edge-03.inet.qwest.net [67.14.38.5]
> 1312 ms
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:10:29PM -0400, hass...@hushmail.com wrote:
> No one replied with any useful information. I guess no one wants
> competition on this list? Pretty poor tactic.
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:55:01 -0400 hass...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >I want to begin making my own ISP, mainly
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:17:07AM -0700, Jeff Johnstone wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Mark Keymer wrote:
>
> > I am wondering what some of you guys do when your home ISP is down. At
> > least those of you that don't give yourself internet.
> >
> > I know we have a wide range of peo
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:09:03PM -0400, Eric Wieling wrote:
> Obligatory xkcd http://xkcd.com/806/
Damn, that's _fine_!
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:21:57AM -0700, Mark Keymer wrote:
> I am wondering what some of you guys do when your home ISP is down. At
> least those of you that don't give yourself internet.
>
> I myself have a cable provider at home that I use. And I find it quite
> frustrating to call and report
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:49:03PM -0430, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> > What standards? The RFID tag on the milk carton will, essentially, replace
> > the bar code once RFID tags become cheap enough. It'll be like an
> > uber-barcode with a bunch more information.
> >
> > For keeping track of how much
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:39:59AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 07:33:53PM -0400, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> > Is there an acronym for RTFM when there are a volume of manuals that need
> > to be read?
>
> FOAD, perhaps?
Well, there's ADD: Attention Deficit Disorder.
Then t
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:47:18PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 6/22/2011 14:33, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> >> I agree, the whole use of the terms 'need' and 'want' in this conversation
> >> are
> >> ridiculous. It's the Internet. The entire thing isn't a 'need'. It's
> >> not like life
> >
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:04:25PM -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Aw, Jeezus.
>
> No. Just, no.
>
> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/06/17/202245/
Yeah. Maybe ICANN needs its own special TLD: .idiots?
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:21:35AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:31 AM, Daniel Seagraves wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:41 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> >
> >> Nice try, but the human right you just made a case for is "the right to rid
> >> yourself of crimina
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:43:24PM -0400, Christopher Pilkington wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Michael Dillon
> wrote:
> > So we should CONDONE such borrowing and recommend a couple of /8s to
> > use in North America. Perhaps one could be DOD for those operators
> > that do not carry a
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:34:59AM -1000, Paul Graydon wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 08:53 AM, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
> >On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:46:45PM +, Eu-Ming Lee wrote:
> >>To do this, you only need 2 numbers: the nth digit of pi and the number of
> >>digits.
> >>
> >>Simply convert your
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:53:47AM -0500, Chad Dailey wrote:
> +1. I'd go to six months, having been the night shift bitch. Flipping
> shifts around damn near killed me.
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Mark Green wrote:
> > Suggestion; once on the 'night shift' stay put for at least three
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:41:18PM +, Mike Walter wrote:
> I find it amusing that the article says - "The deal will combine two
> unprofitable companies...".
>
> So I guess the thinking is that two negatives make a positive?
They may lose on every subscriber, but now they'll make it up i
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:34:13AM -0400, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2011, at 10:27 58AM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
>
> > That's a good question. Maybe they can't qualify under Arin rules.
> > Another question will be: how is Arin going to handle it?
> >
> > Im pretty sure that the RSA s
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:34:13AM -0400, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2011, at 10:27 58AM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
>
> > That's a good question. Maybe they can't qualify under Arin rules.
> > Another question will be: how is Arin going to handle it?
> >
> > Im pretty sure that the RSA s
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:14:54AM -0600, mikea wrote:
> I rise to expose my ignorance.
>
> 208.0.0.0/8 is an ARIN block, and ARIN has allocation data for the
> blocks immediately adjoining 208.64.200.0/22, but no allocation data for
> 208.64.200.0/22 itself, either in WHOIS or
I rise to expose my ignorance.
208.0.0.0/8 is an ARIN block, and ARIN has allocation data for the
blocks immediately adjoining 208.64.200.0/22, but no allocation data for
208.64.200.0/22 itself, either in WHOIS or in the website. Nor does
208.64.200.0/22 appear to be "special" in any way.
Is t
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:08:39AM -0800, JC Dill wrote:
> On 22/02/11 10:38 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> >The other CERT: Community Emergency Response Team.
>
> >https://www.citizencorps.gov/cert/about.shtm
>
> +1 for CERT. I also think that taking a CERT class is a great way to
> re-evaluate yo
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:14:04AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> > From: Jeff Wheeler
> > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 8:13 AM
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an
> > IPv6naysayer...)
> >
> >
> > I suspect Google, Microsoft, and others ha
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 05:01:12PM -0500, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Any confirmation of internet blocking?
>
> http://bikyamasr.com/wordpress/?p=26849
>
> As massive street demonstrations are met with widespread violence in
> Algeria, the country is reporting that many Facebook accounts have been
> de
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:59:15PM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 1/27/2011 6:25 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
> >
> >Anyone for peering cake?
> >
>
> Yeah, Google, HE, Cogent, Sprint, Qwest, and Level3 all need peering
> cakes (as I'm pretty sure there is no participant in that list which is
>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:20:54PM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:53 22PM, mikea wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:26:58PM -0800, Mark Keymer wrote:
> >> What I don't understand is I can only guess they must have a IT team.
> >>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:26:58PM -0800, Mark Keymer wrote:
> What I don't understand is I can only guess they must have a IT team.
> And Maybe even 1 or more people that view this list. Why don't they just
> talk to there own staff about the issues? Maybe one of the IT guess saw
> the issues talk
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 04:33:30PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
>
> > > Why the hostility, Valdis?
> >
> > As I said several times - it's not hard to be 98% or 99% sure you can make
> > all your commitments. However, since predicting the
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 02:52:56PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, January 07, 2011 09:25:59 am David Sparro wrote:
> > I find that the security "Layers" advocates tend not to look at the
> > differing value of each of those layers.
>
> Different layers very much have different values, and,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 06:36:25AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>
> TR Shaw writes:
>
> > There is a federal directive that has been in place for a number of
> > years that requires IPV6 support for all new IT contracts/systems
> > and also a directive to all federal agencies to support IPV6
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Graham Wooden wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I encountered an interesting issue today and I found it so bizarre ? so I
> thought I would share it.
>
> I brought online a spare server to help offload some of the recent VMs that
> I have been deploying. Around the
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 06:41:09PM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Contrary to popular belief the average person tend to severely dislike
> all forms of road construction or having their yard repeatedly torn up.
>
> I know it's all happy fun times to say "let's have 10 water/electrical
> providers
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:13:21PM -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> You may find that simply fewer content providers decide it's worth it to play
> in that space, under those conditions, which results in fewer choices for the
> consumer, and something closer to a monopoly on the available content
>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:00:56PM -0500, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mikea [mailto:mi...@mikea.ath.cx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:28 AM
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: Alleged backdoor in
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:51:24PM -0800, Michael J Wise wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:56 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:39:02PM -0800, Chaim Rieger said:
> >> Does anyone remember the last time a law enforcement agency had
> >> someone sign a 10 year NDA on a backdoor?
> >>
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:59:07AM -0800, andrew.wallace wrote:
> I was reading about this- yeah really "anonymous".
>
> http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/12/anonymous-releases-very-unanonymous-press-release/
>
> Also:
>
> http://www.boingboing.net/2010/12/11/anonymous-isnt-loic.html
A
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 06:26:30PM +, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Michael Smith wrote:
> > "front lines of this "cyberwar"?
> Warfare isn't the correct metaphor.
> Espionage/covert action is the correct metaphor.
"Low intensity conflict" may be more correct.
--
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:49:47AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
> >>> We do remember, don't we, that the domain that started this discussion
> >>> were shut down by Verisign, the registry, not a registrar?
> >> interesting that in THI
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 06:29:54PM -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>
> >Old skool.
> >
> >Twitter is much faster:
> >
> >http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/home/government-disaster-advisors-twitter-ha
> >cked-used-to-send-tsunami-warning/408447
>
> But morse
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:17:37PM -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Ricky Beam wrote:
>
> >I think they are now a violation of the NEC. And they were delisted by UL
> >years ago. They pose a hazard as they will not react fast enough to
> >prevent a fatal shock. (and the onl
53 matches
Mail list logo
