from NAnt (just did a new update from cvs too).
Is there a way I can detect if mono did include ICU
support?
--- Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: D-Fuse [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Bug Report
Date: Tue, 28
- Original Message -
From: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NAntDev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:48 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] userdocs
Hi all,
I am in the process of making more changes to the userdocs. In the past we
had referred to the userdocs (at least in
Patch committed.
Thanks a lot
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Tharen D. Debold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:40 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] patch for read-only config file during build
If you use cvs to fetch read-only files, nant.exe.config ends
Hi Scott,
I just finished rewriting part of the C++ support starting from the changes
you made ...
However, too be honest I know almost nothing about C+, and I also wasn't
always sure when to read config setting from baseConfig and when from
fileConfig (in VcProject.BuildCPPFiles) ... I
We currently only support two diffferent platforms, namely win32 and unix.
For win32, we support .NET 1.0, .NET 1.1, .NET CF 1.0, SSCLI 1.0 and Mono
1.0, while for unix we only support the Mono framework (and Mac OsX is
considered to be unix).
For Mono on unix we've configured the runtime engine
PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: NAnt-Devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Exec Task OS Specific
Apparently its just not documented, but the attribute itself works.
Thanks a lot. And that shouldn't break anything between OS's right
WOW ! I hope they can bring some of the magic of IDEA to .NET !!!
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:24 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] jetbrains and new c# IDE
I already had this issue fixed on my local system, but I'm testing some
other changes before committing the fix ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Dmitriy Bezugliy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:50 PM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks
Gert,
OK, I was using a three weeks old version...
three weeks old ??? A lot can happen
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Licensing
Thanks for the info Stefan,
I tend to agree with you re FSF and associated philosophy.
There
Lalit,
Can you submit this bug report as a formal bug using the bug tracker (at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nant/) ?
Clayton, can you have a look at this ?
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Lalit Parashar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07,
- Original Message -
From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gert Driesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:23 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] RE: filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle
next release]
Hi
- Original Message -
From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
in Ant 1.5, that is. With Ant 1.6beta things have changed
dramatically.
Ivan,
I haven't had time to read through your length email yet, but I still want
to share some information with you ...
NAnt already has support for executing a specific target when the build
fails by creating a property named nant.onfailure with a value
corresponding with the name of the target
There's still a bug in the patch, so I wouldn't commit it for now ...
Your patch will make the delete task a lot more chatty, as it will now
output the filename of every file in the fileset even when the task is not
in verbose mode ...
The reason why there was a verbose argument in the
- Original Message -
From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)
In my opinion
- Original Message -
From: Ivan Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:24 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [nant-dev] onFail patch
Hello Gert,
the problem is, that I don't want to get all the log (I want to track
the subproject, which
consistent. If you don't take it, you should take the rest because its
a lot more consistent. I'll make the fix if you'd like, else I'll leave
it alone.
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 13:27, Gert Driesen wrote:
There's still a bug in the patch, so I wouldn't commit it for now ...
Your patch
Should we have something similar to the -bugreport switch of the .NET
compiler ?
If no build is executed, it would just prompt the user for information
regarding the problem. If a build is executed, it would log all build output
to the specified file and then ask for additional information ...
I was busy with lots of things and didn't read your message thoroughly ...
Sorry about that
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: James C. Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 8:46 AM
Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported,
ofcourse.
in Ant 1.5, that is. With Ant 1.6beta things have changed
dramatically.
http://ant.apache.org/manual-1.6beta/CoreTypes/custom-programming.html
for the short version
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 4:52 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next
release]
I think I need
for solution task (described below) is good idea?
I
want to ensure that if I do it, it will be accepted (alot of work)
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Mastracci
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle
next release]
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I need to read up
Before posting patches, first make sure there's interest in your patch. We
wouldn't want you wasting efforts on a patch that will never be committed
...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Met @ Uber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: NAnt-Devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
+1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our
No we're working on the main branch, but I noticed that, at times, anoncvs
is more than 5 days behind ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ian MacLean
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1
n="@"
endtoken="@"
filter token="TEST" value="123" /
/filterset
filterset begintoken="#" endtoken="#"
filter token="DUNNO" value="WHAT"
/
/filterset
/filtersets/move
I haven't really tested it thoroughly,
I would advise you to have a look at the patch that was submitted as part of
bug report #805307
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=805307group_id=31
650atid=402868) and at the remarks I made to the author (included in the
log of the bug report) ...
I really think we can use
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text
something like that yes :-)
but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain support
would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ian MacLean
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could ofcourse
create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't necessary need one
... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL
I'm not sure about this, but I think this change was committed after a
branch was made for the 0.8.3 release ...
I'll look into this later ...
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Eric Fetzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003
I verified this, and it is indeed only available in the 0.8.4 nightly builds
...
- Original Message -
From: Eric Fetzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 5:29 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] nant.onfailure
What happened to nant.failure
I think this error message was removed from NAnt (in cvs), as a task nested
it a task container (eg. if/ifnot task) will now cause the task to fail (and
the build if failonerror is set to true for the task container), but thanks
for the report anyway ...
keep'em coming ...
Gert
- Original
Hi Jay,
I updated the SqlTask yesterday to be less verbose, let me know if that
works for you (you'll need to rebuild both NAnt and NAntContrib from cvs, or
wait for the next nighlty build)
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Turpin, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi Richard,
You might have to manually update the path to your mono installation in the
following attributes of the mono-1.0-linux framework node in nant
root\src\NAnt.Console\NAnt.Console.exe.config.linux :
sdkdirectory (default is /usr/local/bin)
frameworkdirectory (default is
don't worry, enjoy your trip !
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:48 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] NAntSchemaTask under construction
I have updated things a little bit, but handling of arrays and
Hi,
As you may have noticed, we've finally got the nightly build process running
again for both NAnt and NAntContrib.
For NAnt, the nightly builds are available at
http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds, while the task doc for the
nightly build is available online at
Hi,
I've committed the following (possible breaking) change to cvs (which should
also be available in today's nightly build) :
The call task will now always execute both the specified target, and all
its dependencies. In previous versions of NAnt, you could force the
execution of a target by
Look very good, but I have some remarks
:
use
BuildElementCollection("compilerargument"or "compilerargs") instead of
[BuildElementArray("arg")]
that will :
- make it clear that those are argument that will
be passed to the compiler
- allow us to use a more structured build layout
/
/compilerargs
/solution
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ! nant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task addin
use BuildElementCollection
Good catch again, martin.
It would be even better if you could also creates
unit tests for the fixes you post :-)
Gert
- Original Message -
From:
Martin
Aliger
To: ! nant
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:01
PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: foreach
Here is
Your patch was submitted to cvs.
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Jemerov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:51 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] [patch] support dynamic assemblies in TaskBuilder.cs
Hello nant-developers,
I'm now
problems ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Erv Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-Mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] servicecontroller task
Great Idea. I'd love to get a few more exec
Yeah, I agree we should use an existing (open-source) library.
I'm pretty sure ftp will be available in some future revision of the .NET
Framework, but that will leave users of other frameworks in the cold, and we
wouldn't want that ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Clayton Harbour
Just my personal opinion, but I'm not sure I like this ...
It is just a personal preference, I do know Ant supports it (but I don't
think it's used much) ...
I prefer using multiple includes elements, that way it's easier to add xml
comments to each elements.
I would rather fix this in the docs
to reach a certain status ... ... otherwise performing two actions in a row
(in case of a restart, this means stop and start) will cause problems ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Erv Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-Mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Mastracci
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jaroslaw Kowalski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset
Hi,
I'm thinking about adding a task for stopping/starting/pausing/continueing a
service, and at the same time waiting for it to reach a certain status.
It would look something like this :
servicecontroller service=iisadmin action=Start | Stop | Continue |
Pause waitforstatus=Paused | Running |
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 9:04 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] 0.8.3 final
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Is there any updated roadmap
I actually implemented this task and added it to cvs, but remarks and
suggestions are still welcome (as always) ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 10:50 AM
Subject: [nant-dev
) ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset option fromframework
Firstly I
That is the intention yes, we could ofcourse skip the 0.8.3 release and
start the 0.8.4 beta cycle ...
I agree that having a 0.8.3 release with serious known issues might now be a
good idea after all.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Philippe Lavoie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian MacLean
I don't have any problems with us releasing a 0.8.3 soon, it has indeed been
in beta for way too long. But we should consider documenting the known
issues in the solution task.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Erv Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Philippe
Martin,
Your patches were committed to cvs.
Thanks for the contribution,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ! nant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task
I did some tests and found no negative effects of doing this, so I submitted
this change this cvs.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 6:10 AM
Subject:
: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: brian.nantz [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Subversion Tasks
Really,
What is the benefit of nesting everything under a cvs tag ? apart from
having common
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] IIS Task
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you should actually create a servicecontroller task that
allows
any service to be started, paused, continued
I'd rather move to the following task layout for the cvs tasks, but I
haven't yet looked at implementing it :
cvs cvsroot=... password=...
update destination=... /
checkout /
/cvs
if you get my point ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: brian.nantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: Brian Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:16 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] IIS Task
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:00 AM
Any reason why you used WMI and not the ServiceController class
This is now fixed in cvs.
Thanks !
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ! nant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:15 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] solution task
Hi,
recent outputdir addon is missing this (second constructor)
---
sourceforge has been experiencing problems lately (actually its already
quite a while), so anonymous cvs is running against the backup server.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ! nant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:40 PM
Subject:
Hi Tom,
This has actually already been committed to cvs, but thanks for the patch
anyway ...
Gert
PS. Would it be possible to include patches as attachments instead of
having them inline ?
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cabanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I can't recall why I changed it ... I've reverted my changes for now.
Sorry for the hassle it caused.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Erv Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gert Driesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
These should be fixed in cvs now.
Thanks !
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ! nant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:46 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] Fw: two more problems in Solution task (path related)
Hi again,
I found two more
Hi Eddie,
I've committed your patches to cvs.
Thanks !
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Eddie Tse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 3:58 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] solution task fixes
Hi All,
I've been experimenting with the solution task from CVS
I submitted your patch to cvs.
Keep'em coming :-)
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cabanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:04 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Patch for Solution Task
Solution task sometimes puts two dots in resource names where there
: [nant-dev] NUnit Config
Thx... is this attribute documented... i may have overlooked it...
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yogesh Shetty
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NUnit Config
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:05:20 +0200
Hi Yogesh,
The test
Hi Jasper,
I'm not sure if this is the correct fix for this issue ...
I'd rather remove the default formatter altogether, but that would break
backward compatibility. But if we can correct wrong behaviour, we should do
it as soon as possible ...
Ian, what do you think ?
Gert
- Original
] NUnit Config
Thx... is this attribute documented... i may have overlooked it...
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yogesh Shetty
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NUnit Config
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:05:20 +0200
Hi Yogesh,
The test element has
Patch was applied.
Thanks !
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cabanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gert Driesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:37 PM
Subject: Patch for Solution task
Gert, thanks for applying my first patch. After examining your
Hi Yogesh,
The test element has a appconfig attribute that can be used to set the
application configuration file that should be used.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Yogesh Shetty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:33 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] NUnit
Ian,
Is it ok to commit my local changes, then ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Anthony LoveFrancisco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Ian MacLean' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Gert Driesen'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Jaroslaw Kowalski' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'NAnt Developers'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
Hi Ian,
What's the general practice for attribute names regarding case ?
Should new properties always be lowercase or should we also use mixed-case
properties ?
If we can also use mixed-case properties, then I assume the first letter
should be lower-case (camel case), right ?
for example, I
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: general practice for attribute names
I'm fairly sure that we had agreed on lower case
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:18 PM
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail)
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: general practice for attribute names
I'm fairly sure that we had agreed on lower case for the build file.
useRuntimeEngine is more readable
but now you have to work out
Hi Jaroslaw,
I've added this attribute now. That was my intention anyway, so thanks for
reporting this.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 11:38 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] PATCH: New
Hi Tom,
I'll look into committing your patch later today.
I'll probable change your WebMap class to be a strongly typed collection,
and remove your WebMapAttribute class as I don't see any added value in
that.
Keep the patches coming !!
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cabanski
Hi Brant,
The IncludeTask already supports failonerror, as support for failonerror is
implemented in the Task base class. I did make some minor modifications
just now that will make it more clear as to what is causing the include task
to fail.
Ian, should we allow a file to be included twice
Hi Arjen,
Good to see someone finally took the time to implement these tasks, great
work
However, I'm not sure the FxCop task is very useful as you've implemented
it, but I could be wrong ofcourse ... I think we could actually start from
an existing FxCop project file as it doesn't make sense to
Hi,
This issue is now fixed in cvs.
Thanks for reporting this.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Horn, Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] P.S. to last message
Julian,
I
of these rules are just
guidelines that could and in some cases actually should be ignored.
Gert
Best,
Arjen
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:42 PM
To: Arjen Poutsma; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] FxCop
Name=$(FxCopDir)\Rules\PerformanceRules.dll Enabled=True
AllRulesEnabled=True /
/RuleFiles
as you can see, you can't just use a fileset for the targets unless you
always want all types to be analyzed ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Arjen Poutsma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen
Hi Jarek,
Normally the daily builds are produced using an automated build server
(using Draco.NET), however we've been having issues for some time now but we
hope to have these resolved as soon as possible (Scott, please ???).
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslaw Kowalski
Thanks Arjen, I'll commit it later (today?) with some minor adjustments.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Arjen Poutsma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] RegSvcs Task
Hi,
Attached to this file is the RevSvcs task. This
The lib directory changes are not in the 0.8.3 branch, these will become
available in the 0.8.4 version.
I suggest building NAnt from cvs on Linux, which is quite easy : just
execute make clean make all in the NAnt root directory. However you
should make sure that you've built Mono from cvs
Hi,
I don't think I really like adding a message attribute to the Task class,
and having two ways of outputting messages to the build log.
The echo task is more powerful as it allows messages to be output only when
a condition is met (separate from the task conditions), and it allows you to
set
I did make some changes to the build process on the main branch in order to
better support third party libraries (for multiple framework versions).
Apparently you've committed the NAnt.VSNet.build from the main branch to the
0.8.3 branch.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Matthew
as the libpath is a semi-colon delimited list of directories, you should
perhaps consider using a FileSet instead of a string property.
Just to make sure we do it right from the start.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: David Keber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
- Original Message -
From: John Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Gert Driesen' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:50 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] RE: NAnt version number
Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure
John,
I'm not sure about this, but wasn't it the intention to using the following
version numbering scheme :
major.minor.revision.YMMDD
eg. 0.8.3.30710 (if a release would be built today) ?
Or do you have another proposal ?
Are we currently keeping track of the version numbers (the revision
Clayton,
Can you look into the issues with the unit tests for the cvs tasks ?
We've been having lots of problems with these unit tests, should we perhaps
set the HaltOnError to false for now for these tests ? That we can at least
get the nightly build up and running again ...
GErt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:10 PM
Subject: RE: CvsTask unit tests
Hi Gert,
I am not sure what you mean. I did some work about 2 weeks ago to get
these running, which involved pointing
I haven't really tried NUNit on mono yet.
Perhaps you should ask both the NUnit team and the Mono team if there are
known issues with NUnit on Mono, and if these will be resolves in NUNit 2.1
(which has been postponed several times). I assume there was a good reason
for the Mono developers to
Hi,
Is it ok to rename the properties that designates a target to execute when
the build fails from nant.failure to nant.onfailure, to have it in sync
with nant.onsuccess ?
I know this is a breaking change, so we should document it as such in the
release notes.
In my opinion, changes like these
Hi John,
I've created a branch and named it BRANCH-083, as a tag has to start
with a letter and cannot contain dots.
Gert
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 03:46, John Barstow wrote:
Now that we have a cleanly building code base, can someone with CVS write
access create a branch for the 0.8.3 release?
I forgot : I'll increment the version number later today ...
what version number do you recommend, 0.8.4. ?
what was actually decided after the discussion on this subject ?
John, will you assign a fixed (0.8.3.x) version number to the 0.8.3
branch before building the release ?
will
It will output a warning if it's still used, and will continue to actually
use it for now.
- Original Message -
From: Bernard Vander Beken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-Mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 8:45 AM
Subject: RE
601 - 700 of 753 matches
Mail list logo
