Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Philip Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NAnt may be bound to the gpl because of things like the sharpcvslib. Yes, that may be an important issue. Please also note that the LGPL is rather difficult to understand in the context of late binding languages like Java (and I assu

RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

I am no lawyer. - Mitch Denny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.monash.net - +61 (414) 610141 - > -Original Message- > From: Scott Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 4:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt

RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

Nelson Sent: Wed 10/8/2003 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release) > Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're still > stuck with the GPL license :-) I am pretty su

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

10:50 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release) > > > Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're still > > stuck with the GPL license :-) > > I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do whatever they wan

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

> Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're still > stuck with the GPL license :-) I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do whatever they want, so long as they aren't bound to the gpl by other source code or libraries in the application. NAnt may be bound to the g

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

> - Original Message - > From: "Clayton Harbour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:53 PM > Su

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant

Thanks a lot Stefan. So it looks like The bootstrap version of NAnt built fine but it looks like mint didn't like the resultant exe for some reason. I get the impression from posts on the mono list that MacOsX support needs a bit of work. thatns fo the patch as well. Ian On Wed, 08 Oct 2003, Ia

RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

>In my opinion, the .NET community really lacks coordination right now .. >Which is something Apache does a terrific job at for the Java open-source >community . > >Gert I agree with you Gert, there is a lot going on at Apache but you can tell that there is one entity behind it all. I think the

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant

On Wed, 08 Oct 2003, Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sure - just get the latest source from cvs, "latest" means whatever you get when using anoncvs at sf.net 8-) > run make patched the Makefile to avoid the mono JIT. Patch is appended. > in the basedir and let us know if it works :)

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant

Stefan Bodewig wrote: If you want me to run any specific tests on my iBook, I'll be happy to help out - but I'll probably need detailed explanations ;-) sure - just get the latest source from cvs, run make in the basedir and let us know if it works :) Ian Stefan ---

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant

On Wed, 08 Oct 2003, Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We also have nant running fairly well with mono on linux. nice. > As far as I'm aware no one has tested on Mac OSX though. The hardest part is getting Mono for Macs. There is a fink package for Mono 0.23 that I wouldn't recommend to

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant

Hi Stefan, I'd think that Ian and Gerry would remember that. I've never unsubscribed since then, but must admit that much of the things you discuss are simply beyond my knowledge of .NET (close to zero ;-). To me you a

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant

Stefan Bodewig wrote: We're planning on moving to an Apache or BSD style license, Really? so that should make you feel a little more comfortable :-) More than just "a little" to say the truth. Cool - becuase this has basically been agreed upon - its been more of an inertia thing

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Too bad there was no follow-up after that ... a missed opportunity > if you ask me ... This is not quite true. Both Gerry and Ian followed up, the cooperation just didn't work out somehow. Not enough time and all that. > We're plan

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

> - Original Message - > From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:32 AM > Subject: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release) > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Drie

[nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > great to see that one of the driving forces thanks > behind Ant is also interested in NAnt :) More and longer than you think. ;-) I'd think that Ian and Ge