Hello,
I think, we have some time, since xBuild seems to be in pre-alpha stage. But
interestingly, MSBuild is using Microsoft.Build.* namespace - xBuild mimics
this as well? Seems little ugly to me.
> The difference between xBuild and MSBuild is only the platform, they both
use the same file lay
t; Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 3:52 PM> To: Martin Aliger> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond> > Hi,> > i
think, using msbuild isnt the problem on Windows machines, > but what is with Mono? MsBuild isnt present on Unix or MacOS.> > But there is a 4 solution.
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
It's now been almost 6 weeks since rc4 came out.
There are three open bugs filed since then, none of which are
showstoppers in my opinion. There are two others closed and one deleted.
There are a couple of problems reporting i
Gert Driesen wrote:
>
>> rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
>> Hello,
>>
>> agreed - 1.0 soon is a good thing. I see only one big thing
>> which we should
>> addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The
>> same thing.
>>
>> Since m
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 3:52 PM
>> To: Martin Aliger
>> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i think, using msbuild isnt the problem on Windows machines,
>> but what is with Mono? MsBuild isnt p
ct)
Martin Aliger
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Wagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 3:52 PM
> To: Martin Aliger
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
>
> Hi,
>
> i think, using msbuild isnt the problem on Windows machines,
lf Of Gary Feldman
>> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:47 AM
>> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
>>
>> It's now been almost 6 weeks since rc4 came out.
>>
>> There are three open bugs filed since then, n
>> FWIW, we just use the task to run MSBuild, using the
>> 2.0 Framework. Works just fine.
>
> Yes - but you give up many features do for you.
> Inter-project
> dependency solving is what I desperatelly need. We have ~300 .csprojs
> (under
> 1 ccnet project) with new ones appearing, and we do
Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe 2 distributions: 1.0 compatible, and 2.0, compiled for > 2.0 and with> additional features?This might create too much confusion for (some) users, no ?GertI agree with Gert. 2 Distributions will be confusing instead make sure that the Core keeps w
Mike, Brad,
> FWIW, we just use the task to run MSBuild, using the
> 2.0 Framework. Works just fine.
Yes - but you give up many features do for you. Inter-project
dependency solving is what I desperatelly need. We have ~300 .csprojs (under
1 ccnet project) with new ones appearing, and we do n
> > should addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The
> Are people really waiting for this ?
I think so. How many of 1.0 users use task? Same percentage of
2.0 users would want to use simmilar feature under 2.0. Or they have to use
something else...
> Shouldn't we focus on imp
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Gary Feldman
> > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:47 AM
> > To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
> >
> > It's now been almost 6 weeks since rc4 came out.
> >
> > Ther
> Since many developers are migrating (or already using) framework 2.0
> in
> VS2005 and we (currently) do not provide direct tools for projects it
> uses,
> they could either: use plain msbuild (deserters!) or use core
>
> As I see it, we could:
> 1/ state, that new project files used on VS2005
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: vrijdag 14 juli 2006 12:59
> To: 'Gary Feldman'; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
>
ry Feldman
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:47 AM
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
>
> It's now been almost 6 weeks since rc4 came out.
>
> There are three open bugs filed since then, none of which are
> sho
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Feldman
Sent: Friday, 14 July 2006 12:47 p.m.
To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
It's now been almost 6 weeks since rc4 came out.
There are three open b
W! Bravo!-- Jay Flowers--http://jayflowers.com-
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Ne
It's now been almost 6 weeks since rc4 came out.
There are three open bugs filed since then, none of which are
showstoppers in my opinion. There are two others closed and one deleted.
There are a couple of problems reporting in the mailing list since then,
some of which seem significant to me.
At 08:53 PM 3/26/2003 +0100, Christoph Wille wrote:
At 09:19 AM 3/26/2003 -0800, Scott Hernandez wrote:
SharpZipLib: We can grab a new stand-alone release (when it comes out), or
just use the assembly distributed with SharpDevelop. I'd lean towards just
leaving it alone until there is a new stand-a
Arjen Poutsma wrote:
I also wonder if the regex task i submitted will be added to the cvs, or whether it
needs to be improved first.
I've added it. Thanks
Ian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be T
> I think we were still discussing the best way to implement
> the features in
> the looptask . Maybe we are just waiting on the work
> do be done,
> and the changes to be committed. I would not call this a show-stopper.
I agree: this is not a show-stopper.
After reading all possible solution
helped me
tremendously in accomplishing my work.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Mastracci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Nant-Developers (E-mail)
Subject: [nant-dev] Release 0.8.2
Before 0.8.2 goes into release mode, are there any outstanding issues
At 09:19 AM 3/26/2003 -0800, Scott Hernandez wrote:
SharpZipLib: We can grab a new stand-alone release (when it comes out), or
just use the assembly distributed with SharpDevelop. I'd lean towards just
leaving it alone until there is a new stand-alone release. But at that time,
we should back out m
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:25 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] Release 0.8.2
> Before 0.8.2 goes into release mode, are there any outstanding issues
> that anyone needs addressed? Specifically:
>
> - Any showstopping bugs? There have made some significant ch
Before 0.8.2 goes into release mode, are there any outstanding issues
that anyone needs addressed? Specifically:
- Any showstopping bugs? There have made some significant changes to a
number of core classes. There's always a chance for a new bug or
regression to pop up. Is the SharpZipLib d
Brad Wilson
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:43 AM
> To: NAnt Developers
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Release
>
> Scott Hernandez wrote:
>
> > Okay, with all the changes I've made, let's push back the release to
> > Monday (last time, I promise?).
>
> I'
Scott Hernandez wrote:
> Okay, with all the changes I've made, let's push back the release to
> Monday (last time, I promise?).
I'd rather you promised it was stable, than it was out this Monday. How
about that? :) :)
Brad
--
Read my web log at http://www.quality.nu/dotnetguy/
__
Okay, with all the changes I’ve made, let’s push
back the release to Monday (last time, I promise?). That will give everyone a
little time to make sure I didn’t break anything important.
I apologize for all the delays, but I really wanted to move
some of the stuff out of NAnt into NAntC
28 matches
Mail list logo
