On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 19:50, Brian Parish wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 08:54, Josenildo Marques wrote:
> > Hello !
> >
> > I installed 9.2 for a friend of mine and everything went smoothly. I
> > even updated it completely. His computer had a Windows partition and I
> > decided to turn it into a
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Urwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 07:12
Subject: Re: [newbie] Bad superblock
> On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 5:52 pm, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > Disk hda
> > #1 Windows X
On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 5:52 pm, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> Disk hda
> #1 Windows XP(NTFS 46.57GB)
> #2 Boot (for 9.2 63MB)
> #3 Root(9.2 64.65GB)
> #4 Swap(518MB)
> Disk hdb
> #1 Music(formatted as fat32 27.96GB)
I would:
1) copy anything you don't want to lose (like the contents of /home) to
Music
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Urwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 04:42
Subject: Re: [newbie] Bad superblock
> On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 4:36 pm, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > I wish I had a program to redu
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Urwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 04:39
Subject: Re: [newbie] Bad Superblock
> On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 6:35 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > From: "Richard Urwin"
On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 4:36 pm, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> I wish I had a program to reduce the windows part
> to half its size but I'll have to live with it.
The standard method is:
Defragment Windows, do not select "optimise layout" (or similar)
diskdrake now allows you to shrink the windows partitio
On Saturday 28 Feb 2004 6:35 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> From: "Richard Urwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Howabout this for a theory:
> > You installed 10.0 on the second disk while it was the only disk in
> > the machine, and therefore was hda. Your mount table, which
> > specifies which disk partitions
- Original Message -
From: "David E. Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 21:00
Subject: Re: [newbie] Bad superblock
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:06:14 -0600
> "Hoyt Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:06:14 -0600
"Hoyt Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lilo. This worked but when I booted into 10.0 there was an error which
> I couldnt clear or get around so master reset was pushed to get out of
> the system. On rebooting to 9.2 several times I noticed scroll past
> on
- Original Message -
From: "Raffaele Belardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 08:44
Subject: Re: [newbie] Bad superblock
> Hoyt,
>
> Let me recap to see if I understand correctly:
>
> - the grub menu pre
x27;s the same as fsck
if you are using ext2 or ext3 (the default installation).
It's not much, I hope others have better ideas.
raffaele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Raffaele Belardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: F
- Original Message -
From: "Raffaele Belardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 01:42
Subject: Re: [newbie] Bad superblock
> Assuming you are using ext2 or ext3, superblock backup copies are stored
> in several plac
Could someone please tell me in detail how to repair a superblock with a
rescue disk in Mandrake 9.2. I tried to run fsck with the rescue disk but
that didnt work (command not found).
Regards;
Hoyt
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
