Hi Bryan,
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 19:15, Bryan Phinney wrote:
snip
...
Just because a
company pursues goals that are not in my best interests and seeks to limit my
choices to those that make them money does not make them evil, that is simply
reality. Every human will try to
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 07:44, Douglas Bainbridge wrote:
Hi Bryan,
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 19:15, Bryan Phinney wrote:
snip
...
Just because a
company pursues goals that are not in my best interests and seeks to limit my
choices to those that make them money does not make
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:44 am, Douglas Bainbridge wrote:
Just because a
company pursues goals that are not in my best interests and seeks to
limit my choices to those that make them money does not make them evil,
that is simply reality. Every human will try to make things work out
Hi Franki and Mac,
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 11:30, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 15:48:23 +0800
Franki [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
If we all tell ten people, and make them feel as strongly about it as
we do, they will spread the word also.
Are you kidding me? I gotta try to
On Sunday 12 October 2003 01:38 am, Barry Premeaux wrote:
On Saturday 11 October 2003 06:54 pm, HaywireMac wrote:
Palladium requires computers to have a special chip, which both Intel
and AMD have already agreed to incorporate.
http://aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html#mspath
My eyes must
Further to my last post
..
Do you have a Consumers Association or similar body in the US that
could
get fired up about this?
http://aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html#mspath
I'm going to try to agitate the UK one.
DougB
I've written to the Consumers' Association in the
On Sunday 12 October 2003 10:52 am, Douglas Bainbridge wrote:
Further to my last post
One of the things that I would ask everyone who accesses the IT 2003 and
Beyond article is that some of the interpretations of the author are just
that, interpretations. Without being privy to MS's actual
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 11:47, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Sunday 12 October 2003 10:52 am, Douglas Bainbridge wrote:
Further to my last post
One of the things that I would ask everyone who accesses the IT 2003 and
Beyond article is that some of the interpretations of the author are just
that,
Hello Franki,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 12:48:23 AM, you wrote:
F Just be sure as many people know that we are not gonna stand for
F it.. even die hard windows users should not stand for it.
I have had some success with win users. Few have converted to Linux,
but all have stopped using M$
Hello Douglas,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 7:52:19 AM, you wrote:
DB Here's a copy of the letter - we'll see what happens.
Nice letter. I hope you would not mind if I use it as a basis for
letters here in the US.
--
rikonamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to buy your
Hello Bryan,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 8:47:49 AM, you wrote:
BP The technical plans have already been published, but as with all
BP things, those can be perceived in a favorable light or
BP unfavorable light.
Given the past history, it might be a good idea to assume the worst,
at least as a
On Sunday 12 October 2003 01:53 pm, rikona wrote:
Given the past history, it might be a good idea to assume the worst,
at least as a start.
As long as you keep in mind that making such assumptions automatically colors
any opinions that you form. We always need to differentiate our opinions
Hello Bryan,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 11:15:57 AM, you wrote:
BP On Sunday 12 October 2003 01:53 pm, rikona wrote:
Given the past history, it might be a good idea to assume the worst,
at least as a start.
BP As long as you keep in mind that making such assumptions automatically colors
BP
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:06:21 -0700
Barry Premeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I wonder if business will pick up for AMD?
I believe AMD has agreed to incorporate Palladium as well.
--
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 08:26, HaywireMac wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:06:21 -0700
Barry Premeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I wonder if business will pick up for AMD?
I believe AMD has agreed to incorporate Palladium as well.
On 11 Oct 2003 09:02:21 -0400
ed tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I wonder if business will pick up for AMD?
I believe AMD has agreed to incorporate Palladium as well.
http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/03/05/19/226213.shtml?tid=126
Sorry, does it mention AMD in there
On Saturday 11 October 2003 08:26 am, HaywireMac wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:06:21 -0700
Barry Premeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I wonder if business will pick up for AMD?
I believe AMD has agreed to incorporate Palladium as well.
Palladium or Trusted Computing is not going to be all
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 09:50:33 -0400
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Personally, I suspect that Palladium will be a boon for Linux and
Open-source, not a threat.
In the sense that it will make people see once and for all what these
goons are up to? If so, I believe you are correct.
--
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 09:27, HaywireMac wrote:
On 11 Oct 2003 09:02:21 -0400
ed tharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I wonder if business will pick up for AMD?
I believe AMD has agreed to incorporate Palladium as well.
On Saturday 11 October 2003 05:26 am, HaywireMac wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:06:21 -0700
Barry Premeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I wonder if business will pick up for AMD?
I believe AMD has agreed to incorporate Palladium as well.
I didn't spot a reference to AMD. I sure hope not.
It is the business world that has the deep pockets. They ought to know
about this.
Z.S.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:30:29 -0700
Barry Premeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I didn't spot a reference to AMD. I sure hope not. It would be nice
to have some alternatives out there.
Palladium requires computers to have a special chip, which both Intel
and AMD have already agreed to
I don't think so...
http://www.canoe.ca/CalgaryBusiness/cs.cs-10-10-0051.html
Steve Mazil
--
___
Mandrake Linux 9.1 (Bamboo)
Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:09:42 -0600
Steve Mazil [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I don't think so...
http://www.canoe.ca/CalgaryBusiness/cs.cs-10-10-0051.html
Riggghhht.
Word, BP just gave me the most killer link I ever did see on how MS
plans to deal with security, check it:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:05:49 -0400
HaywireMac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:09:42 -0600
Steve Mazil [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I don't think so...
http://www.canoe.ca/CalgaryBusiness/cs.cs-10-10-0051.html
Riggghhht.
Word, BP just gave me the most killer link
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:48:30 -0600
Steve Mazil [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I've only read thru about 30% of it so far and my blood is already
boiling.
Join the club. Fsck gun control, I'm buying a Benelli and going to
Redmond...
--
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage:
http://aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html#mspath
This is why my site is no longer accessible to MSIE, and why I will be
doing everything in my power to make the internet Windows-free.
Wow! that is one killer link, it's one that I'll be sending to everyone in
my address book. Hopefully
27 matches
Mail list logo
