On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 02:31:40 +1000
Stephen Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Save the attachment to your drive; un-tar/un-gzip it; cd into the virus
directory; type sudo ./configure make make install; then run sudo
/usr/bin/virus - sit back and watch your system fry.
pedant viruses should
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 04:35, David E. Fox wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 02:31:40 +1000
Stephen Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Save the attachment to your drive; un-tar/un-gzip it; cd into the virus
directory; type sudo ./configure make make install; then run sudo
/usr/bin/virus - sit
On Sunday 22 Aug 2004 23:45, Vincent Voois wrote:
Huge Snip
Hmmz, i had a collegue with MCSE certificate that considered servers on a
hardware technical base were the same as desktop pc's. The guy was fired
after he excuted the system erase utility on a Compaq system, taken by the
hand by
Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Saturday 21 August 2004 01:21 pm, Vincent Voois wrote:
And, since this is a Mandrake Linux mailing list, you should be aware that a
Firewall wizard is built-in that is fairly complete and very good for setting
up a standard default firewall. So again, I would say that
On Sunday 22 August 2004 02:14 pm, Vincent Voois wrote:
Or by leaving it as it is.
I believe Mandrake Linux is delivered with default firewall settings in a
similar way XP's firewall is set by default. (turned off)
Ah, so you don't remember selecting a security level when you installed Linux,
Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Sunday 22 August 2004 02:14 pm, Vincent Voois wrote:
Or by leaving it as it is.
I believe Mandrake Linux is delivered with default firewall settings in a
similar way XP's firewall is set by default. (turned off)
Ah, so you don't remember selecting a security level when
On Sunday 22 August 2004 06:45 pm, Vincent Voois wrote:
In this way you have a dedicated virus that does not depend upon a fixed IP
address but wether it's host offers access to the plain internet. But it
does require the virusmaker knowledge of networking and how the OS
structure looks like
Stephen Khn wrote:
On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 05:01, Bryan Phinney wrote:
I just got a virus mail that came to my system addressed to my email address
that I use for this list. I suspect that someone has a windows machine for
the list and that machine is compromised and is trying
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:25:04 -0400
Bryan Phinney disseminated the following:
Ahhh, right. I mean, why would a hacker bother to try to hit Linux when all
he would manage to do is compromise thousands of machines that make up the
entire Internet backbone. I mean, what would be the good in,
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 00:45, JoeHill wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:25:04 -0400
Bryan Phinney disseminated the following:
Ahhh, right. I mean, why would a hacker bother to try to hit Linux when all
he would manage to do is compromise thousands of machines that make up the
entire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 August 2004 08:45:08, JoeHill wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:25:04 -0400
Bryan Phinney disseminated the following:
Ahhh, right. I mean, why would a hacker bother to try to hit Linux when
all he would manage to do is compromise
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 02:03, Charlie Mahan wrote:
On the third hand (Moties anyone? g); A question, does anyone know why the
list is suddenly being astro-turfed with html messages?
Charlie
...because we're being inundated by MS Outlook, MS Outlook Express and
web-based email clients as
Ahh... we're gonna have a ball now
Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Saturday 21 August 2004 06:33 am, Vincent Voois wrote:
Well maybe netsky doesn't work in Linux. But it's still quite simple to
scan linux deamons and send it spoofed ip packages (as if the packages
came from
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:03:44 -0600
Charlie Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the third hand (Moties anyone? g);
Ah yes, Larry Niven
Cheers
John Montgomery
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
Stephen Khn wrote:
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 00:45, JoeHill wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:25:04 -0400
Bryan Phinney disseminated the following:
Ahhh, right. I mean, why would a hacker bother to try to hit Linux when all
he would manage to do is compromise
Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 02:03, Charlie Mahan wrote:
On the third hand (Moties anyone? g); A question, does anyone know why the
list is suddenly being astro-turfed with html messages?
Charlie
...because we're being inundated by MS Outlook, MS Outlook Express and
web-based
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 03:30, Vincent Voois wrote:
Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 02:03, Charlie Mahan wrote:
On the third hand (Moties anyone? g); A question, does anyone know why the
list is suddenly being astro-turfed with html messages?
Charlie
...because we're
On Saturday 21 August 2004 12:30, Vincent Voois wrote:
Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 02:03, Charlie Mahan wrote:
On the third hand (Moties anyone? g); A question, does anyone
know why the list is suddenly being astro-turfed with html
messages?
Charlie
...because we're
Hello Hoyt,
Saturday, August 21, 2004, 10:52:59 AM, Hoyt wrote:
Okay okay, got the message... Netscape supports html too (if the
moron me does not deactivate it, that is), forgot most Linux boxers
here probably are still sticked to pine (sorry guys :P)
HB I don't think you know what you are
rikona wrote:
Hello Hoyt,
Saturday, August 21, 2004, 10:52:59 AM, Hoyt wrote:
Okay okay, got the message... Netscape supports html too (if the
moron me does not deactivate it, that is), forgot most Linux boxers
here probably are still sticked to pine (sorry guys :P)
HB I don't think you know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 August 2004 11:30:11, Vincent Voois wrote:
Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 02:03, Charlie Mahan wrote:
On the third hand (Moties anyone? g); A question, does anyone know why
the list is suddenly being astro-turfed with
On Saturday 21 August 2004 13:10, rikona wrote:
Hello Hoyt,
Saturday, August 21, 2004, 10:52:59 AM, Hoyt wrote:
Okay okay, got the message... Netscape supports html too (if the
moron me does not deactivate it, that is), forgot most Linux
boxers here probably are still sticked to pine
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:03:31 -0600
Charlie Mahan disseminated the following:
...because we're being inundated by MS Outlook, MS Outlook Express and
web-based email clients as opposed to the normal RFC standard text based
email clients properly configured?
...or maybe no one reads
On Saturday 21 August 2004 19:21, Vincent Voois wrote:
snip
For AFAIK, it always has been plain simple to hack a windows platform
using *NIX techniques and this is what i often do on occasion when
SID tables of NT servers got that corrupted that local admin isn't
able to log anymore with the
On Saturday 21 August 2004 01:21 pm, Vincent Voois wrote:
Of course, this assumes there is no firewall between the net and Linux that
wouldn't catch the packet coming in.
This i explained in the end.
No, I understand the technique of spoofing, my point was that sending out the
packets to a
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 01:43:26 +0200
Frans Ketelaars disseminated the following:
From your posts it seems to me you are not a hacker but a cracker...
...or maybe just 'cracked' ;-)
--
JoeHill RLU #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
20:31:02 up 17 days, 20:14, 8 users, load average: 1.67, 1.87,
On Saturday 21 August 2004 18:58, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Saturday 21 August 2004 01:21 pm, Vincent Voois wrote:
But the old line about Linux being just as bad as Windows and we just
don't know it because Linux isn't an active or worthy target is
simply MS FUD. Plain and simple. If you
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:37:54 -0500
Hoyt Bailey disseminated the following:
But the old line about Linux being just as bad as Windows and we just
don't know it because Linux isn't an active or worthy target is
simply MS FUD. Plain and simple. If you bought into the FUD, you
really should
28 matches
Mail list logo
