Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-06-03 Thread michael
t and I'm glad of that. Alan Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 8:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. :~It will still be confusi

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-06-02 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Denisagreed. Alan Denis HAVLIK wrote: On 31 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :~ :~It will still be confusing to many folks if, like they did :~ :~with 6.1, MacMillan decides to market 7.1 as 7.5!! Their :~ :~excuse was that more people will purchase an upgrade sequenced :~ :~by

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-06-02 Thread Alan Shoemaker
TED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 8:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. :~It will still be confusing to many folks if, like they did :~with 6.1, MacMillan decides to

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-06-01 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Denisnot allowing them to fiddle around with release numbers would be a good thing, I hope you're correct. Alan Denis HAVLIK wrote: :~It will still be confusing to many folks if, like they did :~with 6.1, MacMillan decides to market 7.1 as 7.5!! Their :~excuse was that more people

RE: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-06-01 Thread Denis HAVLIK
On 31 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :~ :~It will still be confusing to many folks if, like they did :~ :~with 6.1, MacMillan decides to market 7.1 as 7.5!! Their :~ :~excuse was that more people will purchase an upgrade sequenced :~ :~by .5 than would have bought it sequenced if sequenced

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-06-01 Thread Mark Potochnik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If anyone has questions regarding the Macmillan side of things, please let me know. Thanks, Bill Gardner Approximate date??? I saw somewhere in June?.?.?.?.? Thanks!!! MarkP

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-06-01 Thread Mark Potochnik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...and this was a decision that was met with ease by both parties. I sense some definite hostility towards Macmillan on this thread. I'd like to publicly say it is a very successful and positive partnership between the two companies. Thanks, BG I like the way

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-06-01 Thread Alan Shoemaker
30, 2000 7:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Denissure it means something! It means that as soon as the iso is available then you're on a list of customers with a vendor that will get a copy out to you asap. That means something to me

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-05-31 Thread michael
On Tue, 30 May 2000, you wrote: MichaelI've forwarded your message to them, let's see what happens. Alan Thank you. -- -michael-

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-05-31 Thread Denis HAVLIK
:~It will still be confusing to many folks if, like they did :~with 6.1, MacMillan decides to market 7.1 as 7.5!! Their :~excuse was that more people will purchase an upgrade sequenced :~by .5 than would have bought it sequenced if sequenced by only :~.1. Sheesh!! AFAIK this is not allowed by

RE: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-05-31 Thread Bill . Gardner
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 8:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. :~It will still be confusing to many folks if, like they did :~with 6.1, MacMillan decides to market 7.1 as 7.5

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-05-30 Thread Denis HAVLIK
Pre-ordering does not mean much, does it? Soon you will be able to buy 7.1 all over the place. BTW, McMillan now has exclusive rights on all english-speaking countries, so there will be no separate "Mandrake" and McMillan" products to confuse you anymore AFAIK. cu Denis :~What do the

Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.

2000-05-30 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Denissure it means something! It means that as soon as the iso is available then you're on a list of customers with a vendor that will get a copy out to you asap. That means something to me! It will still be confusing to many folks if, like they did with 6.1, MacMillan decides to market