On Wednesday 20 August 2003 01:13 am, HaywireMac wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 00:56:44 -0400
Brant Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Doesn't Mozilla support 128 bit encryption?
I was almost sure it did by default.
David, what are you encountering when you try to connect to the bank's
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 07:05:19 -0400
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I though that it supported it by default also. The last time I logged
onto the bank (a week or so ago) everything was alright. Last night I
got:
Unsupported Browser
I'll bet you dollars to donuts it has nothing
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 07:05:19 -0400, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I though that it supported it by default also. The last time I logged onto the
bank (a week or so ago) everything was alright. Last night I got:
Unsupported Browser
To provide maximum security and
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:25, Miark wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 07:05:19 -0400, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I though that it supported it by default also. The last time I logged onto the
bank (a week or so ago) everything was alright. Last night I got:
Unsupported Browser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 07:05:19 -0400, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about
Re: [newbie] Browsers:
I though that it supported it by default also. The last time I logged onto
the bank (a week or so ago) everything was alright. Last night I
got
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 09:52 am, Dick Gevers wrote:
If you use Konqueror web browser you can set (per site) your Browser
identification as being any version of MSIE 4.1 and up. Moreover Konqueror
supports upto 256 bit encryption.
I visit microsoft.com to get windows updates for my
David wrote:
All of a sudden, I am getting a requirement from my bank that I use a browser
that supports 128 bit encryption. I am using Mozilla 1.4. Is there something
in a user.js or a pref.js file that I can force the issue?
David
Doesn't Mozilla support 128 bit encryption?
--
Brant
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 00:56:44 -0400
Brant Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Doesn't Mozilla support 128 bit encryption?
I was almost sure it did by default.
David, what are you encountering when you try to connect to the bank's
website?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
In a message dated 10/18/2000 7:27:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey! Wadda u mean, Larry? You get to BUY betas to test with
Micro$oft!
And then buy it again (it's now "the product") and do it again! Why buy
the
same product only once? Capitalism to the
In a message dated 10/18/2000 12:25:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the things I see regularly is people's unfamiliarity with
beta-test software, both in terms of expectations and interpretations. I
guess it is pretty unique for most people working in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/18/2000 12:25:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the things I see regularly is people's unfamiliarity with
beta-test software, both in terms of expectations and interpretations. I
guess it is pretty
Dennis Myers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/18/2000 12:25:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
much better than the Netscape fonts (which I can not get to change) that
I think I will use Mozilla to browse and Netscape for mail, until I can
figure out how to get Kmail to
Title: RE: [newbie] Browsers
I had tried the tar file on Opera and got a dump due to unexpected EOF. So that didn't work for me. And I do understand that beta may load slower but what I am seeing is after it loads and is running, if I change screens to go to say mail it takes about 5 times
I had tried the tar file on Opera and got a dump due to unexpected EOF. So
that didn't work for me. And I do understand that beta may load slower but
what I am seeing is after it loads and is running, if I change screens to go
to say "mail" it takes about 5 times longer to bring up the mail
In a message dated 10/18/2000 12:13:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the things I see regularly is people's unfamiliarity with
beta-test software, both in terms of expectations and interpretations. I
guess it is pretty unique for most people working in Windows
Dennis Myers wrote:
I have d/l'd Opera, Netscape 6, and Mozilla and find that I can not
install Opera due to wrong architecture, and the other two flow like
molasses in January. They are so slow to load anything that I feel like
I have timewarped back to the good old dos days and booting
One of the things I see regularly is people's unfamiliarity with
beta-test software, both in terms of expectations and interpretations. I
guess it is pretty unique for most people working in Windows to see true
beta-apps with all their trace code, dead code, etc. still hanging inside
or downloading softwareThe lynx and its later version links(which I use
with a great deal of comfort) are real great browsers.it would be great
it some peeps started using it and stayed away from browsers - each of whom
"create" "new" "standards".
I'm a commandline junkie,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Dennis Myers wrote:
I have d/l'd Opera, Netscape 6, and Mozilla and find that I can not
install Opera due to wrong architecture, and the other two flow like
molasses in January. They are so slow to load anything that I feel like
I have timewarped back to the good old dos
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Dennis Myers wrote:
I have d/l'd Opera, Netscape 6, and Mozilla and find that I can not
install Opera due to wrong architecture, and the other two flow like
molasses in January. They are so slow to load anything that I feel like
I have timewarped back to the good old
"D.M. Mattix (Mike)" wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Dennis Myers wrote:
I have d/l'd Opera, Netscape 6, and Mozilla and find that I can not
install Opera due to wrong architecture, and the other two flow like
molasses in January. They are so slow to load anything that I feel like
I have
I have d/l'd Opera, Netscape 6, and Mozilla and find that I can not
install Opera due to wrong architecture, and the other two flow like
If you want to try this, download the tar file instead. I dont know
what's going on with their rpms but you've bumped into what's a common
problem there.
Dennis Myers escribió:
I have d/l'd Opera, Netscape 6, and Mozilla and find that I can not
install Opera due to wrong architecture
Download the tarball. It's got an executable in it.
, and the other two flow like
molasses in January.
I've just downloaded Mozilla M17 and it's a bit
23 matches
Mail list logo
