On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 00:17, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Oy - dunno if I ever threw this one out - can't quite remember if I
asked if any of y'all visited sites like this in yer travels...either
which, if you don't - then do; and if you do - then do it again! (g)
http://www.rootprompt.org/
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 August 2001 15:08
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] just wondering
File: message.txt
Francis J Keller wrote:
I thought this was a technical support list for people trying to learn
the mandrake systems not worrying
I thought this was a technical support list for people trying to learn
the mandrake systems not worrying about where they post thier replies
s wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:32 pm, Charles Punch wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribió:
This list is doing
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 05:47, Tim Holmes wrote:
Those links are all find and dandy, but not for a MAILING list. Those
are unwritten and accepted ruls for NEWSGROUPS, which this is not.
The reason why those are so accepted and enforced on news groups, is
because 100% of all newsreaders I've
Yeah, somebody else mentioned this to me, and also said that Pine did as
well. I guess it was the version I used at the time. I only used KMail
and Pine long enough to know I hated them. Been using Mutt for some
time now.
But this topic seems to have gotten well out of hand. I even had a few
Yes, I'm curious to. I suspect it was Code Red or some other
Windoze email worm embedded in the HTML that couldn't have caused any
Code Red is *NOT* an email worm, and has *NOTHING* to do with HTML.
It is an MS *SPECIFIC* infector, altho web servers on other OSes may
have problems, due to
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001 01:57, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Saturday 25 August 2001 10:03 am, Michael Leone escribió:
Kmail. Then again I'm no security expert. I don't have to be. I
quit using M$ products to connect to the Net, mail or news years
ago.
EVERYBODY needs to be a bit of a security
]
Subject:Re: [newbie] just wondering
Actually I find it quite annoying if following a thread to have to
scroll to
the bottom of each and every post. I like top posting, but I
usually follow
suit with what the thread is doing. If I'm the first replier
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] just wondering
File: message.txt
s wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:32 pm, Charles Punch wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribió:
This list is doing a good job cracking down on html, now if only we
could do the same
]'
Subject: RE: [newbie] just wondering
File: message.txt
okay, seeing as we are abusing each other, can i just say that this
argument is completely stupid?
Okay, i can userstand why the use of HTML is annoying, but does it
_really_ matter weather the message is posted at the top or bottom
On Friday 24 August 2001 05:05, steve wrote:
Tom, sorrry I disagree strongly. Top posting is never appropriate.
Would somebody please tell Novell that? Their Groupwise yech, yech, yech
that i'm being made to use at work *insists* on it.
Giving context
helps everyone. But do not include
On Friday 24 August 2001 07:48 am, Charles Punch wrote:
What do you do if it is important that the whole thread be understood in
context?
I don't know, maybe read from the beginning of the thread and take them one
at a time. But maybe that's too logical for ya'.
I hope it is understood
s wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 10:45 pm, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
(I've been married for 43 years -- to the same woman)
My God, I'm impressed! I've broken my record with my current, little over 4
years. :-)
it occurred to me that I had been inflicted with my first email
worm!
:24 August 2001 15:11
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [newbie] just wondering
File: message.txt
okay, seeing as we are abusing each other, can i just say that this
argument is completely stupid?
Okay, i can userstand why the use of HTML is annoying, but does it
_really_
Those links are all find and dandy, but not for a MAILING list. Those
are unwritten and accepted ruls for NEWSGROUPS, which this is not.
The reason why those are so accepted and enforced on news groups, is
because 100% of all newsreaders I've used, show the original post and
responses right
PROTECTED]]
Reply To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:24 August 2001 13:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] just wondering
File: message.txt
s wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:32 pm, Charles Punch wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribió
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribió:
This list is doing a good job cracking down on html, now if only we
could do the same for top posters.
'top posting' is appropriate sometimes. I use it sometimes when I
need to leave the whole post I'm responding to intact, unlike
Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribi:
This list is doing a good job cracking down on html, now if only we
could do the same for top posters.
What is the problem with top posting. It seems to me that usually it is
the only way to keep the message in
- Original Message -
From: Tim Barnard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] just wondering
If I might make a suggestion, you're sending HTML formatted email. A large
number of the people
Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribió:
This list is doing a good job cracking down on html, now if only we
could do the same for top posters.
'top posting' is appropriate sometimes. I use it sometimes when I
need to leave the whole post I'm
On Thursday 23 August 2001 08:40 pm, Carroll Grigsby escribió:
OK - I won't do it anymore. I didn't realize that top posting was a
sin; I don't recall seeing a post about it before.
Carroll
Don't get me wrong now : It's not a sin. A few people don't like
it. Like I said, sometimes I
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 08:20:42PM -0500, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribió:
This list is doing a good job cracking down on html, now if only we
could do the same for top posters.
'top posting' is appropriate sometimes. I use it sometimes
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 08:20:42PM -0500, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribió:
This list is doing a good job cracking down on html, now if only we
could do the same for top posters.
'top posting' is appropriate sometimes.
snip
The
Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 08:40 pm, Carroll Grigsby escribió:
OK - I won't do it anymore. I didn't realize that top posting was a
sin; I don't recall seeing a post about it before.
Carroll
Don't get me wrong now : It's not a sin. A few people don't like
it.
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:32 pm, Charles Punch wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:49 pm, Matt Greer escribió:
This list is doing a good job cracking down on html, now if only we
could do the same for top posters.
What is the problem with top posting. It seems to me that usually
The issue with top posting is that a few people don't like it, and
some over use it.
Or it's the default quoting format for mailers which shall remain nameless
:) and a sign that the user doesn't know how to edit their posts.
Especially when there is a mountain of quoted text appended
On Thursday 23 August 2001 10:45 pm, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
(I've been married for 43 years -- to the same woman)
My God, I'm impressed! I've broken my record with my current, little over 4
years. :-)
it occurred to me that I had been inflicted with my first email
worm! And, for all that
damn, I thought he was talking about being able to identify those whom
provide the most correct answers as the ^top^ posters.
html
body
boldflashingblink SHoOt MeeEEee!!/bold/flashing/blink
/body
/html
On Thursday 23 August 2001 21:53, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2001 08:40
Walter Luffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC Yahoo! mail is a web-based mail application, which means you must use a
web browser to read your mail. The sort of e-mail programs you mentioned are
intended for use with mail that is actually downloaded to your computer; with
Yahoo! mail
Derek,
Subject #2
1. Log in as root
2. Navigate to www.real.com and download the Unix .bin version of
Realplayer8
3. After downloading it, open a console and type in: chmod 777
rp8_xxx_xxx_cs1.bin
Press the [enter] key
4. Type in: ./rp8_xxx_xxx_cs1.bin
Press the [enter] key
5. I usually let it
Why don't you sign up for Yahoo pop service it is free and works good, a
little slow but you can use any mail client that can use POP. I used
the RP8.bin file. Follow the directions to install it on the real site.
The RPM one won't work with Mandrake 8 only Redhat
The scanner, I don't have one
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 10:56 am, Derek Rayne wrote:
Can any of the e-mail programs (like K-Mail, Evolution, etc...) that
are on here be configured to read and send messages via Yahoo e-mail
(the free one)? I don't want to keep on using Netscape to load up the
Yahoo e-mail page to read my
Goldenpi wrote:
it didn't detect my 2nd floppy drive. I fitted two, just because I had one
spare.
[snip]
Goldenpidid you perhaps neglect adding the second floppy
in your system bios?
Alan
It was Sep 29, 2000, 11:03, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] keyboarded:
While reading a UNIX book I was wondering (chapter mounting), how does a
device (for example a CDROM player or a disk drive) appear in the /dev
directory ? The book told me that when you for example mount a floppy
drive it should
it didn't detect my 2nd floppy drive. I fitted two, just because I had one
spare.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Just wondering...
It was Sep 29, 2000, 11:03, w
If I remember right (which means I could be wrong : ) /dev contains the
files for every possible hardware device you could ever attach to your
system. That's why it's so big (my /dev has 2234 files, "ls /dev | wc -l"). I
remember reading an article on how the 2.2.4 kernel changes that so that the
It's a temp file that's written there and evaporates when the device is
unmounted. (umount)
--
Mark
** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299
** _||_ in the making of this |
** =\/= message...
If I remember right (which means I could be wrong : ) /dev contains the
files for every possible hardware device you could ever attach to your
system. That's why it's so big (my /dev has 2234 files, "ls /dev | wc -l"). I
"Big" is an wonderful word. /dev is only a shade over 100k.
I wish I knew where the story is located, but Linus was bitten by one, so
he chose to use it as a mascot. Kinda, I think thats rite {:o)
John
Russ Westbrook wrote:
Hi All,
I am really new to this Linux thing. I actually only became aware of
it a couple of months ago and didn't really
From: jowilker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wish I knew where the story is located, but Linus was bitten by one,
so
he chose to use it as a mascot. Kinda, I think thats rite {:o)
www.penguinpower.com
http://www.penguinpower.com for the real story
Michael Scottaline wrote:
Why the penguin?
It's cute and I actually like it, I was just wondering how a penguin
got hooked up being associated with Linux. Just curious.
Thanks
Russ
Linus' choice actually. There are a bunch of apocryphal
41 matches
Mail list logo
