On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:50:11 -0500
Mr. Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
et wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
OpenGroupware server running successfully.
Lee
let us know how it goes...
Lee; I went a
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:50:11 -0500
Mr. Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
et wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
OpenGroupware server running successfully.
Lee
let us know how it goes...
Lee; I went a
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:06:08 -0500
Mr. Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:50:11 -0500
Mr. Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
et wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:06:08 -0500
Mr. Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:50:11 -0500
Mr. Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
et wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:39:23 -0500
Mr. Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I'm looking at them. OpenCRX deserves a shot too. I think
it is closer to ogo and appears to be open source, although not gpl.
Lee
Let me know how it goes Lee.
Will do.
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
OpenGroupware server running successfully.
Lee
let us know how it goes...
--
linux counter #167806 (http://counter.li.org/)
website=http://ed-tharp.kicks-ass.org;
et wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:51 am, Lee Wiggers wrote:
I would sure like to talk or chat with someone who has an
OpenGroupware server running successfully.
Lee
let us know how it goes...
Lee; I went a few rounds with OpenGroupware and couldn't get it to work.
I switched over to Egroupware
On Sunday 27 February 2005 10:02 pm, jdow wrote:
Did I say too much and get knocked off the list or did it REALLY go
silent all of a sudden.
{O.O}
it's your bad breath (smells like chewing tobacco) everyone just moved back a
foot or two in case you spit...
just kidding, we all still here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 Feb 2005 03:02, jdow wrote:
Did I say too much and get knocked off the list or did it REALLY go
silent all of a sudden.
{O.O}
10:45GMT this arrived, Joanne.
Anne
- --
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)
Have
Anne Wilson wrote:
I've been asked to help specify a box for a gamer, and he is wondering whether
an LCD monitor is capable these days of keeping up with games. Can anyone
tell me whether they use one?
Anne
I play many games on my Dell Inspiron 5150 with its 1600x1200 LCD and I
must say I've
I use a 17 one and it does wonderful. I had absolutely no issues
running Doom3 on it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Ping gamers
I've been
On Tuesday 09 Nov 2004 19:17, Manaxus wrote:
I use a 17 one and it does wonderful. I had absolutely no issues
running Doom3 on it.
Thanks, Manaxus and Frankie. I know the early ones didn't have a very good
refresh rate, but I was pretty sure that it would be better now. The
cheapest still
You won't likely find a 19 LCD panel that has a refresh rate of less
than 20ms that's affordable. For some reason panel manufacturers
haven't gotten their sh** together with the 19 panels yet, so shoot
for a 17 panel (can be had for $200-$300) or go all out for the Dell
FP2001 which can be had
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:53:51 -0400
Bryan Phinney wrote:
Charles, is your repository setup for rsync by any chance.
No, it is not, but I may look into the feasibility on making it so; just
have not gotten around to it yet.
Charles
--
The reason why worry kills more people than work is
- Original Message -
From: zamri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [newbie] ping Steven Kuhn: Gnome 2.6
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's nice actually to have a distro that is lean and mean targeted for
older computers. Can u imagine if we run
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:20:36 -0400
Todd Slater disseminated the following:
or better yet pekwm (that was just to see if Joe is paying attention ;)
Oh yeah, I'm here. Always watching...alwaaays watching
--
JoeHill RLU #282046 / www.orderinchaos.org
19:25:10 up 1 day, 21:55, 4
It's nice actually to have a distro that is lean and mean targeted for older computers. Can u imagine if we run it on newer computers ? but it is optimized for newer CPUs. That's where Mandrake excels .Todd Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an FYI-I downloaded Slackware 10 to try since it comes
On Friday 09 January 2004 15:13, Anne Wilson wrote:
Jason, why do all your messages arrive with a 'signature is bad'
warning?
Anne
Correction, Jason. Only some of your messages have bad signatures.
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 08:13, Anne Wilson wrote:
Jason, why do all your messages arrive with a 'signature is bad'
warning?
Anne
hmmm i dont know ill have to check into that i know i have it uploaded
to alotta keyservers. but that doesnt have to do with it... maybe my key
is corrupted in the
On Friday 09 January 2004 19:47, jpearl24 wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 08:13, Anne Wilson wrote:
Jason, why do all your messages arrive with a 'signature is bad'
warning?
Anne
hmmm i dont know ill have to check into that i know i have it
uploaded to alotta keyservers. but that doesnt
On Sunday 19 Oct 2003 11:51 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
Anne,
it's in ~/.kde/share/config/kopeterc
Just change AutoConnect=true to =false
Hope that's what you're lookin' for :-)
Jerry
Bingo. Yup - now I can use it for icq and forget msn until I actually
need it. Thanks, Jerry
Anne
--
Anne; MSN upgraded their system to prevent people like us
connecting to their service. It seems that they were unable
to strip usable info from us (just a guess)!
Kopete is working on a new version to fix the problem.
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 10/19/2003 at 7:12 PM Anne
On Sunday 19 Oct 2003 8:07 pm, Lanman wrote:
Anne; MSN upgraded their system to prevent people like us
connecting to their service. It seems that they were unable
to strip usable info from us (just a guess)!
Kopete is working on a new version to fix the problem.
Lanman
Hi, Lanman. Yes, I
Anne, try using texstar kopete rpm.. before I installed it I could not
connect but after the install... no problem. do you know PLF? if so go there
and addmedia for textstar.. here's the url
http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/
just follow the directions.. its quite simple
HTH.
Grasshopper
On
part again, or to use gaim or licq until it's sorted. Personally I
wouldn't bother with msn anyway, but it's the only way to get a word
in edgewise when I need to get a message to the grandchildren g
Gaim 0.71 works well and is a lot less bug prone IMHO. Don't have any trouble
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 09:00 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
ping
64 bytes from www.fastmail.fm (66.111.4.62): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=124 ms
64 bytes from www.fastmail.fm (66.111.4.62): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=49.8 ms
64 bytes from www.fastmail.fm (66.111.4.62): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=50.8 ms
64
Todd Slater wrote:
The last script I sent was garbage. This is much cleaner and more
efficient.
As it currently stands, calling the script with -n yourname names
pictures yourname-001.jpg, yourname-002.jpg etc.
Calling it with -d names pictures -MM-DD-001.jpg etc.
Calling it with -n yourname
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:36:10AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
Todd Slater wrote:
As it currently stands, calling the script with -n yourname names
pictures yourname-001.jpg, yourname-002.jpg etc.
Calling it with -d names pictures -MM-DD-001.jpg etc.
Calling it with -n yourname
Todd Slater wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:36:10AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
Todd Slater wrote:
As it currently stands, calling the script with -n yourname names
pictures yourname-001.jpg, yourname-002.jpg etc.
Calling it with -d names pictures -MM-DD-001.jpg etc.
Calling
Todd Slater wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:36:10AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
You do not have to add anything after the -d as it calls exif to read
the date imprint left by the camera (exif header). IOW, when you take a
picture the camera includes metadata about it (date and time
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:02:19PM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
I guess my camera doesn't give the correct info to achieve the end result,
ah well, never mind , at least now I can change the prefix at will
without having to manually do it all. thanks.
You don't have exif installed. I
Todd Slater wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:02:19PM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
I guess my camera doesn't give the correct info to achieve the end result,
ah well, never mind , at least now I can change the prefix at will
without having to manually do it all. thanks.
You don't
Hi John,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:20:26AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
Todd Slater wrote:
The last script I sent was garbage. This is much cleaner and more
efficient.
As it currently stands, calling the script with -n yourname names
pictures yourname-001.jpg, yourname-002.jpg etc.
Todd Slater wrote:
Hi John,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:20:26AM +, John Richard Smith wrote:
Todd Slater wrote:
The last script I sent was garbage. This is much cleaner and more
efficient.
As it currently stands, calling the script with -n yourname names
pictures yourname-001.jpg,
If your machine is reasonably current (300Mhz or faster, 128MB+ RAM),
then I would have to suspect a distributed attack via a virus or worm.
Maybe. There were a large number of different, seemingly random, hosts
all trying port 4156. Portsentry seems to be the way to get rid of these,
and all
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 21:09, dfox wrote:
Gretts *
I came home today to my box noticing that a large number of httpd
processes being spawned (this isn't a server, at least not really),
and for the last hours or so my box is real slow when it comes to
using the net.
I'm on a DSL line and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dfox wrote:
| Gretts *
|
| I came home today to my box noticing that a large number of httpd
| processes being spawned (this isn't a server, at least not really),
| and for the last hours or so my box is real slow when it comes to
| using the net.
|
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lyvim Xaphir
Sent: Sunday, 22 September 2002 10:58 AM
To: NewbieMandrake-List
Subject: Re: [newbie] ping flood?
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 21:09, dfox wrote:
Gretts *
I came home today to my box noticing that a large number of httpd
processes being
Marcia,
If you can't ping, then samba is certainly going to have problems. Are
you able to post some details of the IP addresses, subnet mask etc. i.e.
Give us a feel for how you have things set up?
Brian
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 03:32, Marcia wrote:
Dear All,
I cannot ping my vmware
Dear Brian,
Thank you for your answer. I will gather the info you asked for within the
next few days and send in. I know Samba cannot work right if I cannot even
Ping. Of course the networking works fine on the vmware Win95 side. Thank
you for your attention on this matter.
Sincerely,
Hello all
I'm trying to take my first steps with either MySQL or PostgreSQL, and the
documentation at those websites, while great, is hard to follow from a
Mandrake perspective (it seems the files are in different places from what
those websites say is customary, and there must be some small
Hello Edmund,
I have a fresh installation of LM 8.0 running on my laptop. I poked
around a bit to see if I could use MySQL, as it was installed with the OS.
You should be able to see the two default databases with the following
command:
[me@mySystem /]$ mysqlshow
This should produce output
I think this would block pings, but I'm sure there are other ways, much
better, to block ping request. A firewall should handle that for you.
As far as it preventing you from pinging other machines, it won't affect
you. If you block the port, it will not accept packets at that level,
it has
a couple of possibilities, might be you got ping no running?? might be a
firewall issue? and hey, what are you doing wrong anyway/
On Saturday 28 July 2001 10:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I got my netwqork set up all good, and when I ping the Linux server
from the windows box it wont go,
Sounds like a firewall issue. Do you have something like Norton's
Internet Security running? It will not all echo requests so you won't
get a response from the host whe pinging that machine.
Try to telnet to the Linux box. If you can get through, then it's most
likely an issue like that.
Your firewall is preventing access to the Ping command to get to the
internet. I don't know allot about PMFirewall so, you will have to wait for
others to respond for that info.
Moose
-Original Message-
From: g [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL
do you mean you CAN ping your win95 box from your linux box using the IP
address of the win95 box, but you *CAN'T* ping your win95 box from your
linux box using the name of the win95 box?
If this is what you mean, the problem is probably because you don't have a
DNS to resolve the local names.
Sorry I guess i wasn't completely clear. If i am in win95 i can ping win95
(and if connected to thenet, i can png other IP addresses in the net) but if
I ping linux i get a time out request. I tried pinging the IP address, the
name of the linux box but i still don;t get a response back. it is
/ / _
---/ / (_)__ __ __
--/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
-//_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Gshop Network Payment Solutions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 3 April 2001 2:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] ping doesn't
You got me on that one Dan ! Er,..Sorry Dr. D. !
Dan LaBine
Registered Linux User #190712
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Belkie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:38 PM
Subject: [newbie] ping IP
Hey Guys!
ok I have set up a Mandrake
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] ping IP
You got me on that one Dan ! Er,..Sorry Dr. D. !
Dan LaBine
Registered Linux User #190712
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Belkie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EM
congrats man.
s wrote:
Hey dude. Guess what?!
I got them NVidia drivers loaded!!! I can't believe it. I can play Chromiun
and Gltron now. I need to adjust my fonts now. They are all a little
smaller, but success on a day that I was becoming so frustrated. I wasn't
getting sh*t
You'd better try explaining it better if you expect any help that might
help. Let's dissect it:
-Original Message-
From: SoloCDM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 12:00 PM
To: Linux-Mandrake Newbie
Subject: [newbie] Ping Error
Something is seriously wrong with
Pong ;)
Testing. One ping only.
Bob
--
,
(o o)
+--oOOO--(_)---+
| |
|H E L L M U T |
| |
| www.fegefeuer-webzine.de |
| |
+-0OOO-+
|
54 matches
Mail list logo