On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:22:38 -0700
Eric Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Hah! I've seen titlebars in your screen shots...
those are never on terms, me smarmy bastage!
And c'mon, admit it: When it's dark, and no one's lookin, you fire up
fbpanel... You sick B*stard!
no way! I never minimize
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 22:21, HaywireMac wrote:
no way! I never minimize anythin', seein' as I got 8 desktops I flip
through with me mousewheel, LOL! I will admit that I've begun using
idesk, just so's I kin use those loverly Mac icons I went through so
much trouble to convert way back when on
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:52:42 +1000
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Only 8. I VNC into the server and have 10 desktops, then have another
10 locally here, and a new PIII-500 running RH that I VNC into with
another 6 desktops. You're lagging, mate...badly so...
Well, I do VNC into my
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:03:37 -0700
Eric Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
What does it do better? I'm not trying to bait, i really want to
know.
It has more eye candy and you don't have to configure it using
inscrutable text files. That would be the way I would look at it coming
from the
this gives me a blue prompt :
PS1=\[\033[34m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
this gives me a lighter blue prompt :
PS1=\[\033[36m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
HaywireMac wrote:
I want to make my bash prompt blue.
According to the LDP, IIUIC, it should look like this:
just a wild guess from looking at what you have listed, it
appears that the part
\w$[\0[0m\]
may have mismatched or misaligned \ since they don't follow the
exact same escape sequences as what comes before.
man bash should cover this pretty good, if i remember correctly.
hth.
joe
---
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 07:54:16 -0500
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
this gives me a blue prompt :
PS1=\[\033[34m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
this gives me a lighter blue prompt :
PS1=\[\033[36m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
ah, I see now, if you use one [], then
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 07:54:16 -0500
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
this gives me a blue prompt :
PS1=\[\033[34m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
this gives me a lighter blue prompt :
PS1=\[\033[36m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
and if you want the prompt to be
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 07:54:16 -0500
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS1=\[\033[36m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
second gives me a cyan prompt...but ty.
:D
Femurs
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Tuesday September 9 2003 04:56 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 07:54:16 -0500
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS1=\[\033[36m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
second gives me a cyan prompt...but ty.
:D
Femurs
PS1= \W \\$just gives ya a good 'ol
tom $ (as
Here is another cool thing: you can have the prompt set the title of the
xterm for you.
This way, in the taskbar i see the path 1st, so when there's a bunch of
them open, i know which is which.
#PS1=\[\033]0;\w: \u\007\] -- sets title sets prompt --
#\[\033[33m\]\w \$
if test
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:50:16 -0700
Eric Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Here is another cool thing: you can have the prompt set the title of
the xterm for you.
This way, in the taskbar i see the path 1st, so when there's a bunch
of them open, i know which is which.
#PS1=\[\033]0;\w:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:00:13 -0400
HaywireMac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:56:37 -0600
Heather/Femme [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
second gives me a cyan prompt...but ty.
too bad you couldn't do like in Q3, eh?
^3H^2a^1y^5w^2i^4r^6e^1M^2a^3c, LOL!
Then we'd have
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:00:56 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday September 9 2003 04:56 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 07:54:16 -0500
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS1=\[\033[36m\][\$(date +%H%M)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w]$
second gives me a cyan
assuming you use a taskbar, or even titlebar, you Pekwm traitor! ;-)
Hah! I've seen titlebars in your screen shots...
And c'mon, admit it: When it's dark, and no one's lookin, you fire up
fbpanel... You sick B*stard!
You know, pekwm has been so smooth for so long! I love it. I don't
even
On Wednesday 02 Apr 2003 10:33 am, Ken Rhodes wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have been using Mandrake since version 6.0 and have continually upgraded
with no real problems.
However, after recently upgrading to 9.1, when I use the bash command
shutdown I get a command not found error message!
Same here, had to copy /sbin/shutdown to /bin to make it visible to all
users, then chmod a+s /bin/shutdown to suid it. I'm using standard
security level, I wonder if in lower security level it's different.
raffaele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have been using Mandrake since
Ken Rhodes wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have been using Mandrake since version 6.0 and have continually upgraded with no real problems.
However, after recently upgrading to 9.1, when I use the bash command shutdown I get a command not found error message!
Can anyone tell me what happened and why?
Thanks to all who responded...
logging in as superuser allows me to use shutdown. I haven't tried the other
suggestions yet.
Maybe I changed my security level/permissions or something when I upgraded this time.
Regards,
Kenneth Rhodes
--
On Wednesday 02 Apr 2003 12:01 pm, Ken Rhodes wrote:
Thanks to all who responded...
logging in as superuser allows me to use shutdown. I haven't tried the
other suggestions yet.
Maybe I changed my security level/permissions or something when I upgraded
this time.
I know that (under 9.0)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yours it not the only one. I found the same problem on my install. It appears
that it isn't limited to the console. I do have a extra question. If you have
the X starting when it boots instead of logging into an account click reboot
and see if
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 19:33, Ken Rhodes wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have been using Mandrake since version 6.0 and have continually upgraded with no
real problems.
However, after recently upgrading to 9.1, when I use the bash command shutdown I
get a command not found error message!
Can
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 20:08, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
Same here, had to copy /sbin/shutdown to /bin to make it visible to all
users, then chmod a+s /bin/shutdown to suid it. I'm using standard
security level, I wonder if in lower security level it's different.
raffaele
It would be better
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:53:07 -0400
Todd Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can generate a playlist using: find /tunes -type f -follow -name
'*.ogg'-o -name '*.mp3' -o -name '*.MP3' | sort myplaylist.m3u. This
includes all the files in all the folders in /tunes.
But what if I want to
... il messaggio di errore ti dice che non c'è uno script che si chiama
configure nella directory da dove lanci il comando ... quindi ... parto
dall'inizio e provo ad immaginare:
Credo tu ti riferisca ad un programma sorgente con estensione tar.gz (o
tar.bz2)..
Se è così il primo passo è quello
u'r right jay.
what might be helpful is if someone could mail me a fairly standard
/etc/bashrc , bashprofile and /home/.bashrc, to see what it looks like and
does.
On Sunday 09 September 2001 11:55, you wrote:
The later version of bash does not mess up your bashrc, but it won't
restore
I can't find the original email sent on this topic, but it says that the
hostname was replaced with the bash-2.05$. Are you simply referring to
the prompt? Or is the hostname actually saying it's bash-2.05$?
As for the request for a standard /etc/skel/.bashrc and
/etc/skel/.bash_profile,
The later version of bash does not mess up your bashrc, but it won't restore
your lost one either, if I understand you correctly.
Jay
On Friday 07 September 2001 11:17, I was honored with this communique:
right, some more interesting facts i have just discovered:
i have lost the pretty
Does the user that you were loged in have permissons on his assigned home
directory?
The same happened to my a couple of days before, and I see in LunxConf that
the home directory of the user I was logging in was created by the root and
the user ddidn't have permissons . . .
Maybe it's just a
On Thursday 06 September 2001 13:38, you wrote:
Does the user that you were loged in have permissons on his assigned home
directory?
The same happened to my a couple of days before, and I see in LunxConf that
the home directory of the user I was logging in was created by the root and
the
On Saturday 14 April 2001 18:28, you wrote:
I tried ./scriptname and bash reports "No such file or
directory". I can ls and it shows scriptname* which should
indicate that it is executable and in the current directory.
Careful here. Scripts can be confused in the sense that it'll report
'no
Hi Dean,
Likely your system is set up (properly so) without the current
directory in the path.
To invoke a shell script named, say, foo.sh, type this:
./foo.sh (Notice the leading dot-slash) and it should run. This
indicates that the script is in the current directory: dot represents
the
I tried ./scriptname and bash reports "No such file or
directory". I can ls and it shows scriptname* which should
indicate that it is executable and in the current directory.
btw:
I bought the book "LINUX Shells by Example" by Ellie Quigley
and have been trying to run some of the scripts from
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
Ciao a tutti,
improvvisamente la bash non fa pi il prompt come al solito con il mio
nome (localhost etc. etc.) ma si presenta solo come "bash-2.04".
Il problema che non riconosce pi alcuni comandi nemmeno con il login
come root, l'unico modo per eseguire lo
34 matches
Mail list logo
