subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/gro
d to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhu
quot; group.
>> To post to this group, send email to nhus...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
&g
t; > the progress being made. The easiest way to implement it is iterate
> > > over the items I need to save, save each one and report the progress.
> > > But I'd like to let NH do the work.
> >
> > > The only thing I thought of was using Interceptor
tp://twitter.com/tehlike
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Minisha Sharma
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Work At Home - Earn $30,000 Per Month
>>
>>
>> http://blogrns.googlepages.com/home
>&
te
> also need to access the same db?
>
> /Oskar
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
http://www.twitter.com/sidarok
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" grou
find examples of this?
> - Can it be used with MsSQL2005?
> - When must I to use this strategy?
>
> Best regards.
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
http://www.twitter.com/sidarok
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message be
at could be tested in a unit
> test.
>
> But is it worth the effort? Look at the code and you see that it is
> obviously wrong:
>
> NativeSQLQuerySpecification.cs, Line 74:
>CollectionHelper.CollectionEquals(querySpaces, that.querySpaces) &&
>querySpace
sequent calls are
> > waiting at the same point, as if there was a lock.
> > - CPU is on 50-60% during this time. The CPU is used by our server,
> > not the DB.
> > - Normally, CPU is very low during the test.
> > - No other threads are do
t; > >> > Okay, so sofar EF wins in readability atleast but i dont intend to
> > > >> > actually look at the queries so i'm not worried.
> >
> > > >> > I noticed that NHibernate was ALOT slower then EF, the reasons
> seemed
> > >
p://twitter.com/tehlike
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Guga Oliveira >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > preffers without IoC.
> >
> > > What is the opinion of the mastere? Use or not? If it will be beter to
> > > use somo IoC. What is most indicated, Castle
y question is:
> * Should we, as a community, build up a complete documentation?
> * How should this be done? It must be managed, structures must be
> defined.
> * Where should this be done? On nhforge's wiki?
> * How do we attra
d it I would be reducing some of memory footprint.
>
> On May 4, 3:43 pm, Sidar Ok wrote:
> > Keep in mind the breaking changes from 1.2 to 2.1
> >
> > @codegoblin
> >
> > Can you expand on how you want to use config serialization to reuse
> configs
> >
a good idea to move towards NH 2.1 and use 2.1
>> trunk code in production?
>
>
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
http://www.twitter.com/sidarok
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
... One thing I see is having the
> IHaveParentId be implemented by the proxy ... then have an
> IAggregateRoot for the actual parent ... so you can just keep walking
> up the path but none fo the objects carry the ids themselves. As I go
> through this though I keep hearing "too
g Created/Modified etc on a Repository rather than using
> it
> > only as a query mechanism then the repository can do that for you,
> because
> > the only way to call Update to save the child is to go via that
> Repository.
> >
> >
> > Pete
> >
>
erstand what i mean with my bad english :)
>
> the reference to this entity doesn't exists, i will use them only as
> read-only data with query as
>
> IList GetResultInPeriod(DateTime start, DateTime end)
>
> i know that it's a value object, so my question ca
2009/4/14 Michal
> >
> >
> >
> > > fabio could you provide me a specific example which would enforce
> > > business rules ... what objects would be required, where would the
> > > validation live, etc.
> >
> > Sure I can. Consulting is my job.
>
nslate and then run sql for get more quick results ??
>
> thank U All,
>
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
http://www.twitter.com/sidarok
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers"
on for 40 different databases all of the same schema.
>
> A bit of a waste, no?
>
> On 6 Apr, 12:26, Sidar Ok wrote:
> > >>I am trying to avoid having a seperate sessionfactory for each
> >
> > client.
> >
> > Why ?
> >
> >
> >
> &
ervice receives a request
> from MSMQ.
>
> Do you think this is possible? \
>
> if not, is there another approach I can take?
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
http://www.twitter.com/sidarok
--~--~-~--~~~---~
ding NH need, so far, a Dynamic-Proxy system.Do you
> > have some advise about which one all users should use ?
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
http://www.twitter.com/sidarok
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~--
er in your opinion ?
>
> 2009/3/20 Sidar Ok
>
> Hi All,
>>
>> Nearly a week passed by, and here are the results :
>>
>> http://www.snappoll.com/view_results.php?poll_id=318184
>>
>> *Logging Abstraction Poll for Nhibenate*
>> Do you want to
, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Sidar Ok wrote:
> There has been some debates over abstracting the logging, to be able to
> plug our custom logger into NH and not having to use log4net. Here is a poll
> to measure the interest on this :
>
> http://snappoll.com/poll/318184.php
>
>
There has been some debates over abstracting the logging, to be able to plug
our custom logger into NH and not having to use log4net. Here is a poll to
measure the interest on this :
http://snappoll.com/poll/318184.php
Thanks for your time on this.
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
http
gt;>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Tuna Toksoz wrote:
>>
>>> transformation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscrib
t;answer" (or exception)
>>>
>>>
>>> NH is not magical. It's an abstraction on top of ADO.NET same old
>>>> IDbConnection, IDbCommand and IDataReader.
>>>> no DB => IDbConnection.Open() will fail => exception.
&g
may be we can "call for" them with a blog post in nh-forge ? (so we can
drive relevant people to there)
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Fabio Maulo wrote:
> 2009/2/3 Sidar Ok
>
>> wow, that's spooky
>
>
> What is important is to have some response from Ora
acle
>>>>> section in this wiki
>>>>>
>>>>> http://nhforge.org/groups/nhusers/wiki/know-issues-for-specific-rdbms.aspx
>>>>> would be useful for us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>>
>>
> only
> >>> >>> non-default .ctor and required value type dependencies a bad idea?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Krzysztof
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Fabio Maulo <
>
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >>>> > > class="X.Entities.User, X, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
>>>> > > PublicKeyToken=null" />
>>>> > >
>>>> > > >>> > >
sons - plus always having domain objects in valid state -
> > there is no way around for me to bind domain objects to the ui or
> > services. In your described UI-szenario, there seem to be no wcf
> > services aground. So coming back to the initial question, going
> > distribute
t;
>
>
> --
> Tuna Toksöz
>
> Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
>
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" g
hat's why now we will always use DTOs for sending info back to
> the client. Generally, they're more stable than our domain objects and
> this means less coupling and less worries with clients updates...
>
> --
> Regards,
> Luis Abreu
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
el: 84 8824-0558
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Tuna Toksöz
>>>>
>>>> Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
roperties that needs to be attached to the
> > entity in order to make serialization with WCF happen, and that
> > serializing to XML
> > is one solution
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > >
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
--~--~-~-
> tables or?
>
> Cheers,
> Miika
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to nhusers@g
rify: it means that
>>> practically for commercial applications
>>> they can link the DLL and remain propietary (what does the note about
>>> reverse engineering the commercial app mean?) ?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
code.google.com or codeplex
>>
>> On Oct 15, 10:35 pm, "Sidar Ok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I think moving to google code should be something to consider seriously.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:28 P
t;>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ken Egozi.
>>> http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
>>> http://www.musicglue.com
>>> http://www.castleproject.org
>>> http://www.gotfriends.co.il
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
; Foo-bar-blog and so on are good because far of any opinion about app
>> design...
>> --
>> Fabio Maulo
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Tuna Toksöz
>
> Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
--~--~--
Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/12 Sidar Ok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Most issues are revolving around nh being open source and backed by
>> redhat, to my experience.
>>
>
> I'm sorry...
> NH was backe
that illusion has similar roots on why we have LGPL license today. (and GPL
v3 even)
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "backed by" well, lets say "the illusion of being backed by redhat!"
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at
m show up when you do a search.
>>>>
>>>> In short, we need success stories to collect, if you have one, please
>>>> don't hesitate to send it here.
>>>>
>>>> Your contributions are all welc
it here.
>
> Your contributions are all welcome.
>
> --
> Tuna Toksöz
>
> Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
r sessions etc...)
>>>>
>>>> What else would you guys like to see posts about? Or what would you like
>>>> to write posts about?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tuna Toksöz
>>>
>>&g
>
> Oguz BAYRAM / Istanbul
> blog : http://www.oguzbayram.com
>
> >
>
--
Sidar Ok
http://www.sidarok.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group
that project will
> work only with MSSQL. They choose NH.
> >
> > I don't want to talk for Ayende but... when some big OSS developer say
> you
> > "write your own" or "patch it" it is because the day have only 24hours
> and
> > who write
ced to 2 or 3 lines of code in these cases. This means
> >> that you'll end up writting less code vy using the codebehind file
> >> than if you write the aspz code necessary for setting up the
> >> objectdatasource control...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
arched around and only
> > found scattered materials for this topic.
> >
> > Wonder if there is any best practice out there?
> >
> > I also saw that LINQ to NHibernate might be an answer because in .NET
> > 3.5 there is a L
;>
>>> BTW you can try some other tool as:
>>> - Use LINQ2SQL designer (before look the generated code is better to go
>>> to the church)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ken Egozi.
> http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
> http
51 matches
Mail list logo
